World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 34 10204 5371 252 4988

Thomas Oakland publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Thomas Oakland between 1969 and 2022, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Thomas Oakland published across 54 years, from 1969 to 2022, averaging 4.9 papers a year. Output peaked at 16 publications in 2010. 2 of the 264 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1969 to 2022. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 16. Peak 16 publications in 2010. 1969: 2 publications 1970: 1 publication 1971: 2 publications 1972: 4 publications 1973: 4 publications 1974: 0 publications 1975: 3 publications 1976: 1 publication 1977: 4 publications 1978: 2 publications 1979: 5 publications 1980: 3 publications 1981: 0 publications 1982: 2 publications 1983: 4 publications 1984: 5 publications 1985: 4 publications 1986: 5 publications 1987: 4 publications 1988: 3 publications 1989: 7 publications 1990: 6 publications 1991: 5 publications 1992: 7 publications 1993: 3 publications 1994: 4 publications 1995: 5 publications 1996: 7 publications 1997: 8 publications 1998: 4 publications 1999: 2 publications 2000: 6 publications 2001: 6 publications 2002: 3 publications 2003: 2 publications 2004: 7 publications 2005: 7 publications 2006: 10 publications 2007: 10 publications 2008: 15 publications 2009: 11 publications 2010: 16 publications 2011: 7 publications 2012: 10 publications 2013: 8 publications 2014: 12 publications 2015: 7 publications 2016: 5 publications 2017: 0 publications 2018: 0 publications 2019: 1 publication 2020: 3 publications 2021: 1 publication 2022: 1 publication
1969 2022

264 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Thomas Oakland: publications per year, 1969 to 2022
Year Publications
1969 2
1970 1
1971 2
1972 4
1973 4
1974 0
1975 3
1976 1
1977 4
1978 2
1979 5
1980 3
1981 0
1982 2
1983 4
1984 5
1985 4
1986 5
1987 4
1988 3
1989 7
1990 6
1991 5
1992 7
1993 3
1994 4
1995 5
1996 7
1997 8
1998 4
1999 2
2000 6
2001 6
2002 3
2003 2
2004 7
2005 7
2006 10
2007 10
2008 15
2009 11
2010 16
2011 7
2012 10
2013 8
2014 12
2015 7
2016 5
2017 0
2018 0
2019 1
2020 3
2021 1
2022 1
Total 264
Download as CSV

Thomas Oakland publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Thomas Oakland sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 251–260 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 252 publications — 81st percentile

81% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201 252
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Thomas Oakland D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Thomas Oakland sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 34–35 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 34 D-Index — 13th percentile

13% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671 34
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2003 - APA Award for Distinguished Contributions to the International Advancement of Psychology

Overview

Thomas Oakland was affiliated with the University of Florida in the United States. The research work conducted by this scientist primarily focused on various domains within psychology, with a total of seven publications recorded in the field.

Their subfields of study included Developmental and Educational Psychology, Applied Psychology, Clinical Psychology, and General Psychology. These areas collectively reflect a diverse range of psychological research interests.

The main topics of their work focused on:

  • Educational and Psychological Assessments
  • Psychological Testing and Assessment
  • Resilience and Mental Health
  • Academic and Historical Perspectives in Psychology

The scientist published research in multiple venues, notably:

  • Revista Interamericana de Psicología/Interamerican Journal of Psychology
  • Psychology the Journal of the Hellenic Psychological Society

Among the recent papers authored by Thomas Oakland were:

  • "Estatus Internacional Sobre el Desarrollo y Uso de test: Posibles Implicaciones para el Perú," published in 2021 in Revista Interamericana de Psicología/Interamerican Journal of Psychology
  • "Test Development and Use Internationally," published in 2020 in Psychology the Journal of the Hellenic Psychological Society

Thomas Oakland collaborated frequently with several co-authors over the course of their career, including:

  • William E. Hanson
  • Jacqueline P. Leighton
  • Stewart I. Donaldson
  • Mark D. Terjesen
  • C. Norman Shealy

During their career, they received recognition in the form of the APA Award for Distinguished Contributions to the International Advancement of Psychology in 2003.

Best Publications

  • Anatomical risk factors for phonological dyslexia.

    Christiana M. Leonard;Mark A. Eckert;Linda J. Lombardino;Thomas Oakland

  • A critical analysis of cross-cultural research and testing practices: Implications for improved education and training in psychology

    Barbara M. Byrne;Thomas Oakland;Frederick T. L. Leong;Fons J. R. van de Vijver

  • Language, Reading, and Readability Formulas: Implications for Developing and Adapting Tests.

    Thomas Oakland;Holly B. Lane

  • An Evaluation of the Dyslexia Training Program A Multisensory Method for Promoting Reading in Students with Reading Disabilities

    Thomas Oakland;Jeffrey L. Black;George Stanford;George Stanford;Nancy L. Nussbaum

  • The handbook of international school psychology

    Shane R. Jimerson;Thomas Oakland;Peter Farrell

  • Introduction to the Handbook of International School Psychology

    Shane R. Jimerson;Thomas D. Oakland;Peter T. Farrell

  • Psychological and educational assessment of minority children

    Thomas Oakland

  • Estimated Prevalence of Attention-Deficit/ Hyperactivity Disorder Symptoms Among College Freshmen Gender, Race, and Rater Effects

    Dong Hun Lee;Thomas Oakland;Gina Jackson;Joseph Glutting

  • Factors influencing teachers' and psychologists' recommendations regarding special class placement

    Paula Matuszek;Thomas Oakland

  • A Survey of School Psychology in Developed and Developing Countries

    Thomas D. Oakland;Jacqueline L. Cunningham

  • Rehabilitation and health assessment: Applying ICF guidelines

    Elias Mpofu;Thomas Oakland

  • Factorial Invariance of Woodcock-Johnson III Scores for African Americans and Caucasian Americans:

    Oliver W. Edwards;Thomas D. Oakland

  • Adaptive behavior among adults with intellectual disabilities and its relationship to community independence.

    Unknown

  • The Course on Individual Cognitive Assessment.

    Vincent C. Alfonso;Thomas D. Oakland;Regina LaRocca;Alexandra Spanakos

  • Displaying Ethical Behaviors by Psychologists When Standards Are Unclear

    Mark M. Leach;Thomas Oakland

  • Ethics Standards Impacting Test Development and Use: A Review of 31 Ethics Codes Impacting Practices in 35 Countries.

    Mark M. Leach;Thomas Oakland

  • The Effects of Test-Wiseness Materials on Standardized Test Performance of Preschool Disadvantaged Children.

    Thomas Oakland

  • Alternative treatments for attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder: does evidence support their use?

    Alan W. Brue;Thomas D. Oakland

  • Use of Educational and Psychological Tests Internationally

    Thomas Oakland

  • Assessment of Leadership in Children, Youth and Adults:

    Thomas Oakland;Bradd A. Falkenberg;Christopher Oakland

  • Adaptive behavior assessment system-II : clinical use and interpretation

    Thomas Oakland;Patti L. Harrison

  • A Review of the Vineland Adaptive Behavior Scales, Survey Form

    Thomas Oakland;Susan Houchins

Frequent Co-Authors

Elias Mpofu
Elias Mpofu University of North Texas
Joseph J. Glutting
Joseph J. Glutting University of Delaware
Philip A. Saigh
Philip A. Saigh Columbia University
Ronald K. Hambleton
Ronald K. Hambleton University of Massachusetts Amherst
Shane R. Jimerson
Shane R. Jimerson University of California, Santa Barbara
Peter Farrell
Peter Farrell University of Manchester
Donald H. Saklofske
Donald H. Saklofske University of Western Ontario
Timothy R. Konold
Timothy R. Konold University of Virginia
Fons J. R. van de Vijver
Fons J. R. van de Vijver Tilburg University
Geoff Lindsay
Geoff Lindsay University of Warwick

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Earning a degree in psychology opens up numerous pathways, from clinical practice to counseling and therapy. Many students pursue additional credentials online to meet state-specific licensing requirements. For example, if you're interested in family therapy, it's important to understand the requirements on how to become an mft in Wichita or how to become a marriage and family therapist in Winston Salem. Each location has unique steps, coursework, and supervised experience requirements.

For those considering becoming a licensed therapist, state regulations can also affect your career path. Aspiring professionals should research Albuquerque licensed therapist requirements or the specific requirements for becoming a licensed therapist in Anaheim. Online degree programs often cater to these regional demands, offering flexible options that help graduates meet necessary licensure criteria.

Choosing the right degree and understanding regional regulations are key. Researching your desired state's process and pursuing specialized online programs can set you up for a rewarding career in counseling or therapy.

Best Scientists Citing Thomas Oakland

Recently Published Articles