World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Medicine 108 5969 5610 14 12 340 46360

Thomas Lumley publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Thomas Lumley between 1995 and 2026, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Thomas Lumley published across 32 years, from 1995 to 2026, averaging 14.6 papers a year. Output peaked at 32 publications in 2010. 15 of the 468 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
10 20 30
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1995 to 2026. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 32. Peak 32 publications in 2010. 1995: 5 publications 1996: 4 publications 1997: 3 publications 1998: 5 publications 1999: 3 publications 2000: 10 publications 2001: 5 publications 2002: 13 publications 2003: 16 publications 2004: 31 publications 2005: 19 publications 2006: 22 publications 2007: 15 publications 2008: 20 publications 2009: 29 publications 2010: 32 publications 2011: 23 publications 2012: 12 publications 2013: 18 publications 2014: 25 publications 2015: 16 publications 2016: 15 publications 2017: 10 publications 2018: 10 publications 2019: 9 publications 2020: 8 publications 2021: 20 publications 2022: 17 publications 2023: 23 publications 2024: 15 publications 2025: 14 publications 2026: 1 publication
1995 2026

468 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Thomas Lumley: publications per year, 1995 to 2026
Year Publications
1995 5
1996 4
1997 3
1998 5
1999 3
2000 10
2001 5
2002 13
2003 16
2004 31
2005 19
2006 22
2007 15
2008 20
2009 29
2010 32
2011 23
2012 12
2013 18
2014 25
2015 16
2016 15
2017 10
2018 10
2019 9
2020 8
2021 20
2022 17
2023 23
2024 15
2025 14
2026 1
Total 468
Download as CSV

Thomas Lumley publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Thomas Lumley sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600 800
Bar chart with 86 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 101–120 to 1,796+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 922. Most scientists, 922, have 341–360 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 321–340 publications, is where this scientist sits. 101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 610 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101–120 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 340 publications — 25th percentile

25% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
101–120 5
121–140 26
141–160 73
161–180 155
181–200 230
201–220 363
221–240 487
241–260 545
261–280 722
281–300 768
301–320 834
321–340 895 340
341–360 922
361–380 838
381–400 861
401–420 918
421–440 806
441–460 771
461–480 751
481–500 713
501–520 617
521–540 610
541–560 537
561–580 504
581–600 509
601–620 396
621–640 386
641–660 371
661–680 340
681–700 336
701–720 307
721–740 259
741–760 230
761–780 228
781–800 217
801–820 204
821–840 186
841–860 177
861–880 155
881–900 139
901–920 145
921–940 116
941–960 133
961–980 91
981–1,000 96
1,001–1,020 77
1,021–1,040 70
1,041–1,060 63
1,061–1,080 77
1,081–1,100 49
1,101–1,120 54
1,121–1,140 49
1,141–1,160 51
1,161–1,180 35
1,181–1,200 39
1,201–1,220 26
1,221–1,240 37
1,241–1,260 36
1,261–1,280 27
1,281–1,300 32
1,301–1,320 28
1,321–1,340 17
1,341–1,360 30
1,361–1,380 28
1,381–1,400 17
1,401–1,420 21
1,421–1,440 15
1,441–1,460 12
1,461–1,480 12
1,481–1,500 18
1,501–1,520 14
1,521–1,540 17
1,541–1,560 15
1,561–1,580 6
1,581–1,600 2
1,601–1,620 12
1,621–1,640 11
1,641–1,660 8
1,661–1,680 5
1,681–1,700 5
1,701–1,720 10
1,721–1,740 12
1,741–1,760 14
1,761–1,780 6
1,781–1,795 5
1,796+ 100
Download as CSV

Thomas Lumley D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Thomas Lumley sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
250 500 750 1,000
Bar chart with 75 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 70–71 to 217+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 1,027. Most scientists, 1,027, have 82–83 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 108–109 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 399 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70–71 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 108 D-Index — 71st percentile

71% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
70–71 226
72–73 391
74–75 574
76–77 730
78–79 891
80–81 972
82–83 1,027
84–85 1,003
86–87 960
88–89 970
90–91 922
92–93 839
94–95 808
96–97 779
98–99 668
100–101 611
102–103 630
104–105 513
106–107 541
108–109 445 108
110–111 429
112–113 399
114–115 393
116–117 318
118–119 302
120–121 287
122–123 255
124–125 256
126–127 252
128–129 230
130–131 179
132–133 168
134–135 163
136–137 159
138–139 134
140–141 134
142–143 118
144–145 109
146–147 106
148–149 74
150–151 79
152–153 80
154–155 87
156–157 57
158–159 74
160–161 69
162–163 60
164–165 53
166–167 39
168–169 42
170–171 32
172–173 39
174–175 40
176–177 28
178–179 19
180–181 23
182–183 31
184–185 18
186–187 20
188–189 22
190–191 13
192–193 21
194–195 12
196–197 12
198–199 14
200–201 15
202–203 13
204–205 10
206–207 8
208–209 4
210–211 12
212–213 11
214–215 10
216 4
217+ 98
Download as CSV

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2015 - Fellow of the Royal Society of New Zealand
  • 2012 - Fellow of the American Statistical Association (ASA)

Overview

Thomas Lumley is affiliated with the University of Auckland in New Zealand. Their research bridges mathematics and medicine, with a strong focus on statistical methods and their applications in health-related fields.

The main fields of study for Lumley include:

  • Mathematics
  • Medicine

Their work further specializes in subfields such as:

  • Statistics and Probability
  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine
  • Genetics
  • Economics and Econometrics
  • Epidemiology

The primary topics covered in Lumley's research reflect a focus on advanced statistical and causal inference techniques, among others:

  • Statistical Methods and Bayesian Inference
  • Statistical Methods and Inference
  • Advanced Causal Inference Techniques
  • Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life
  • Genetic Associations and Epidemiology
  • Bayesian Methods and Mixture Models
  • Cardiac, Anesthesia and Surgical Outcomes

Lumley has published extensively in key venues, including:

  • arXiv (Cornell University)
  • Statistics in Medicine
  • BMJ Open
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • SSRN Electronic Journal

Several recent publications illustrate Lumley's engagement with statistical and clinical research challenges. Examples include:

  • "Blinding and expectancy confounds in psychedelic randomized controlled trials" (2021) in Expert Review of Clinical Pharmacology
  • "The Staphylococcus aureus Network Adaptive Platform Trial Protocol: New Tools for an Old Foe" (2022) in Clinical Infectious Diseases
  • "Multiple Imputation Through XGBoost" (2023) in Journal of Computational and Graphical Statistics
  • "A Bayesian analysis of mortality outcomes in multicentre clinical trials in critical care" (2021) in British Journal of Anaesthesia
  • "Two-Phase Sampling Designs for Data Validation in Settings with Covariate Measurement Error and Continuous Outcome" (2021) in Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A (Statistics in Society)

Lumley's frequent collaborators include:

  • Pamela A. Shaw
  • Bryan E. Shepherd
  • Anna Rolleston
  • Kyunghee Han
  • Nikki Earle

Their professional recognitions include being named a Fellow of the Royal Society of New Zealand in 2015 and a Fellow of the American Statistical Association in 2012.

Best Publications

  • Time-Dependent ROC Curves for Censored Survival Data and a Diagnostic Marker

    Patrick J. Heagerty;Thomas Lumley;Margaret S. Pepe

  • The importance of the normality assumption in large public health data sets.

    Thomas Lumley;Paula Diehr;Scott Emerson;Lu Chen

  • Systematic identification of trans eQTLs as putative drivers of known disease associations

    Harm-Jan Westra;Marjolein J Peters;Tõnu Esko;Hanieh Yaghootkar

  • Genome-wide association study of blood pressure and hypertension

    Daniel Levy;Georg B. Ehret;Georg B. Ehret;Kenneth Rice;Germaine C. Verwoert

  • Genome-wide analysis of genetic loci associated with Alzheimer disease.

    Sudha Seshadri;Annette L. Fitzpatrick;M Arfan Ikram;Anita L. DeStefano

  • Health outcomes associated with various antihypertensive therapies used as first-line agents: a network meta-analysis

    Bruce M. Psaty;Thomas Lumley;Curt D. Furberg;Gina Schellenbaum

  • Network meta-analysis for indirect treatment comparisons

    Thomas Lumley

  • New loci associated with kidney function and chronic kidney disease

    Anna Köttgen;Anna Köttgen;Cristian Pattaro;Carsten A. Böger;Christian Fuchsberger

  • Efficacy of Antiseptic-Impregnated Central Venous Catheters in Preventing Catheter-Related Bloodstream Infection: A Meta-analysis

    David L. Veenstra;Sanjay Saint;Somnath Saha;Thomas Lumley

  • Genome-Wide Association Study of Retinopathy in Individuals Without Diabetes

    Richard A. Jensen;Xueling Sim;Xiaohui Li;Mary Frances Cotch

  • Meta-analyses of genome-wide association studies identify multiple loci associated with pulmonary function

    Dana B. Hancock;Mark Eijgelsheim;Jemma B. Wilk;Sina A. Gharib

  • Multiple loci associated with indices of renal function and chronic kidney disease

    Anna Köttgen;Nicole L. Glazer;Abbas Dehghan;Shih Jen Hwang

  • Association between blood pressure level and the risk of myocardial infarction, stroke, and total mortality: the cardiovascular health study.

    Bruce M. Psaty;Curt D. Furberg;Lewis H. Kuller;Mary Cushman

  • Genomewide Association Studies of Stroke

    M. Arfan Ikram;Sudha Seshadri;Joshua C. Bis;Myriam Fornage

  • Referent selection in case-crossover analyses of acute health effects of air pollution.

    Drew Levy;Thomas Lumley;Lianne Sheppard;Joel Kaufman

  • Genetic associations at 53 loci highlight cell types and biological pathways relevant for kidney function

    Cristian Pattaro;Alexander Teumer;Mathias Gorski;Audrey Y. Chu

  • Quality control and quality assurance in genotypic data for genome-wide association studies.

    Cathy C. Laurie;Kimberly F. Doheny;Daniel B. Mirel;Elizabeth W. Pugh

  • Common variants at ten loci influence QT interval duration in the QTGEN Study.

    Christopher Newton-Cheh;Christopher Newton-Cheh;Mark Eijgelsheim;Kenneth M Rice;Paul I W de Bakker;Paul I W de Bakker

  • Genome-wide association and large-scale follow up identifies 16 new loci influencing lung function

    María Soler Artigas;Daan W. Loth;Louise V. Wain;Sina A. Gharib

  • An Introduction to Survival Analysis using Stata

    Thomas Lumley

Frequent Co-Authors

Bruce M. Psaty
Bruce M. Psaty University of Washington
Susan R. Heckbert
Susan R. Heckbert University of Washington
Nicholas L. Smith
Nicholas L. Smith University of Washington
André G. Uitterlinden
André G. Uitterlinden Erasmus University Rotterdam
Jerome I. Rotter
Jerome I. Rotter UCLA Medical Center
Albert Hofman
Albert Hofman Harvard University
Eric Boerwinkle
Eric Boerwinkle The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston
Joshua C. Bis
Joshua C. Bis University of Washington
Albert V. Smith
Albert V. Smith University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Fernando Rivadeneira
Fernando Rivadeneira Erasmus University Rotterdam

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Medicine in the USA opens a range of alternative online degrees and healthcare career pathways. For those interested in healthcare without years of medical school, consider administrative roles—such as through healthcare administration programs—which prepare students for leadership positions in hospitals and clinics.

The demand for certified specialists in health records continues to rise, and quality education is now available entirely online. The best online medical billing and coding schools train students in key administrative skills relevant to today’s healthcare settings, often with financial aid options.

Nursing remains a popular path—with flexible entry points. Some aspiring nurses are searching for an lpn school without teas test to streamline admission and get into the workforce faster. Meanwhile, current registered nurses seeking advancement may look to the rn to np bridge programs, which are designed to transition ADN-qualified nurses toward advanced practice roles.

These flexible, recognized degrees can open doors to rewarding health careers—many of which are accessible online and align with the emerging needs of the US healthcare system.

Best Scientists Citing Thomas Lumley

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles