World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking National Ranking Publications Citations
Environmental Sciences 39 8388 519 91 5660

Thomas Gnauk publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Thomas Gnauk between 1970 and 2014, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Thomas Gnauk published across 45 years, from 1970 to 2014, averaging 2.3 papers a year. Output peaked at 11 publications in 2009. 3 of the 102 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
2 4 6 8 10
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1970 to 2014. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 11. Peak 11 publications in 2009. 1970: 1 publication 1971: 0 publications 1972: 0 publications 1973: 0 publications 1974: 0 publications 1975: 0 publications 1976: 3 publications 1977: 0 publications 1978: 0 publications 1979: 0 publications 1980: 0 publications 1981: 0 publications 1982: 0 publications 1983: 0 publications 1984: 0 publications 1985: 0 publications 1986: 0 publications 1987: 0 publications 1988: 0 publications 1989: 0 publications 1990: 0 publications 1991: 1 publication 1992: 0 publications 1993: 0 publications 1994: 1 publication 1995: 1 publication 1996: 0 publications 1997: 1 publication 1998: 3 publications 1999: 1 publication 2000: 2 publications 2001: 8 publications 2002: 10 publications 2003: 3 publications 2004: 8 publications 2005: 5 publications 2006: 5 publications 2007: 4 publications 2008: 7 publications 2009: 11 publications 2010: 10 publications 2011: 9 publications 2012: 5 publications 2013: 2 publications 2014: 1 publication
1970 2014

102 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Thomas Gnauk: publications per year, 1970 to 2014
Year Publications
1970 1
1971 0
1972 0
1973 0
1974 0
1975 0
1976 3
1977 0
1978 0
1979 0
1980 0
1981 0
1982 0
1983 0
1984 0
1985 0
1986 0
1987 0
1988 0
1989 0
1990 0
1991 1
1992 0
1993 0
1994 1
1995 1
1996 0
1997 1
1998 3
1999 1
2000 2
2001 8
2002 10
2003 3
2004 8
2005 5
2006 5
2007 4
2008 7
2009 11
2010 10
2011 9
2012 5
2013 2
2014 1
Total 102
Download as CSV

Thomas Gnauk publication distribution in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Environmental Sciences in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Thomas Gnauk sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 66 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 41–50 to 690+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 617. Most scientists, 617, have 121–130 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 690 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 91–100 publications, is where this scientist sits. 41–50 publications: 21 scientists 51–60 publications: 62 scientists 61–70 publications: 133 scientists 71–80 publications: 257 scientists 81–90 publications: 361 scientists 91–100 publications: 440 scientists 101–110 publications: 492 scientists 111–120 publications: 541 scientists 121–130 publications: 617 scientists 131–140 publications: 544 scientists 141–150 publications: 541 scientists 151–160 publications: 539 scientists 161–170 publications: 444 scientists 171–180 publications: 444 scientists 181–190 publications: 400 scientists 191–200 publications: 377 scientists 201–210 publications: 318 scientists 211–220 publications: 282 scientists 221–230 publications: 263 scientists 231–240 publications: 220 scientists 241–250 publications: 217 scientists 251–260 publications: 180 scientists 261–270 publications: 181 scientists 271–280 publications: 155 scientists 281–290 publications: 130 scientists 291–300 publications: 127 scientists 301–310 publications: 130 scientists 311–320 publications: 85 scientists 321–330 publications: 106 scientists 331–340 publications: 80 scientists 341–350 publications: 83 scientists 351–360 publications: 75 scientists 361–370 publications: 69 scientists 371–380 publications: 52 scientists 381–390 publications: 54 scientists 391–400 publications: 56 scientists 401–410 publications: 44 scientists 411–420 publications: 40 scientists 421–430 publications: 36 scientists 431–440 publications: 25 scientists 441–450 publications: 25 scientists 451–460 publications: 32 scientists 461–470 publications: 29 scientists 471–480 publications: 21 scientists 481–490 publications: 26 scientists 491–500 publications: 26 scientists 501–510 publications: 17 scientists 511–520 publications: 19 scientists 521–530 publications: 15 scientists 531–540 publications: 22 scientists 541–550 publications: 12 scientists 551–560 publications: 15 scientists 561–570 publications: 11 scientists 571–580 publications: 19 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 9 scientists 601–610 publications: 7 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 5 scientists 631–640 publications: 5 scientists 641–650 publications: 6 scientists 651–660 publications: 3 scientists 661–670 publications: 3 scientists 671–680 publications: 4 scientists 681–689 publications: 4 scientists 690+ publications: 100 scientists
41–50 publications 690+

This scientist: 91 publications — 9th percentile

9% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 690 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Environmental Sciences scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,676 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
41–50 21
51–60 62
61–70 133
71–80 257
81–90 361
91–100 440 91
101–110 492
111–120 541
121–130 617
131–140 544
141–150 541
151–160 539
161–170 444
171–180 444
181–190 400
191–200 377
201–210 318
211–220 282
221–230 263
231–240 220
241–250 217
251–260 180
261–270 181
271–280 155
281–290 130
291–300 127
301–310 130
311–320 85
321–330 106
331–340 80
341–350 83
351–360 75
361–370 69
371–380 52
381–390 54
391–400 56
401–410 44
411–420 40
421–430 36
431–440 25
441–450 25
451–460 32
461–470 29
471–480 21
481–490 26
491–500 26
501–510 17
511–520 19
521–530 15
531–540 22
541–550 12
551–560 15
561–570 11
571–580 19
581–590 9
591–600 9
601–610 7
611–620 11
621–630 5
631–640 5
641–650 6
651–660 3
661–670 3
671–680 4
681–689 4
690+ 100
Download as CSV

Thomas Gnauk D-index placement in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Environmental Sciences scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Thomas Gnauk sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300
Bar chart with 97 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 126+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 348. Most scientists, 348, have 45 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 126 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 39 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 12 scientists 31 D-Index: 26 scientists 32 D-Index: 51 scientists 33 D-Index: 88 scientists 34 D-Index: 123 scientists 35 D-Index: 163 scientists 36 D-Index: 206 scientists 37 D-Index: 267 scientists 38 D-Index: 265 scientists 39 D-Index: 275 scientists 40 D-Index: 321 scientists 41 D-Index: 343 scientists 42 D-Index: 305 scientists 43 D-Index: 336 scientists 44 D-Index: 330 scientists 45 D-Index: 348 scientists 46 D-Index: 291 scientists 47 D-Index: 275 scientists 48 D-Index: 272 scientists 49 D-Index: 273 scientists 50 D-Index: 263 scientists 51 D-Index: 232 scientists 52 D-Index: 266 scientists 53 D-Index: 217 scientists 54 D-Index: 198 scientists 55 D-Index: 177 scientists 56 D-Index: 202 scientists 57 D-Index: 204 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 177 scientists 60 D-Index: 166 scientists 61 D-Index: 152 scientists 62 D-Index: 143 scientists 63 D-Index: 150 scientists 64 D-Index: 124 scientists 65 D-Index: 119 scientists 66 D-Index: 120 scientists 67 D-Index: 118 scientists 68 D-Index: 82 scientists 69 D-Index: 98 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 105 scientists 72 D-Index: 74 scientists 73 D-Index: 84 scientists 74 D-Index: 70 scientists 75 D-Index: 67 scientists 76 D-Index: 78 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 59 scientists 79 D-Index: 52 scientists 80 D-Index: 47 scientists 81 D-Index: 38 scientists 82 D-Index: 48 scientists 83 D-Index: 42 scientists 84 D-Index: 42 scientists 85 D-Index: 43 scientists 86 D-Index: 29 scientists 87 D-Index: 37 scientists 88 D-Index: 29 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 34 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 22 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 19 scientists 95 D-Index: 24 scientists 96 D-Index: 21 scientists 97 D-Index: 20 scientists 98 D-Index: 24 scientists 99 D-Index: 17 scientists 100 D-Index: 17 scientists 101 D-Index: 21 scientists 102 D-Index: 25 scientists 103 D-Index: 18 scientists 104 D-Index: 26 scientists 105 D-Index: 20 scientists 106 D-Index: 15 scientists 107 D-Index: 10 scientists 108 D-Index: 13 scientists 109 D-Index: 15 scientists 110 D-Index: 12 scientists 111 D-Index: 8 scientists 112 D-Index: 7 scientists 113 D-Index: 9 scientists 114 D-Index: 6 scientists 115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116 D-Index: 7 scientists 117 D-Index: 8 scientists 118 D-Index: 3 scientists 119 D-Index: 5 scientists 120 D-Index: 7 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 4 scientists 123 D-Index: 8 scientists 124 D-Index: 7 scientists 125 D-Index: 9 scientists 126+ D-Index: 92 scientists
30 D-Index 126+

This scientist: 39 D-Index — 15th percentile

15% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 126 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Environmental Sciences scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,676 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 12
31 26
32 51
33 88
34 123
35 163
36 206
37 267
38 265
39 275 39
40 321
41 343
42 305
43 336
44 330
45 348
46 291
47 275
48 272
49 273
50 263
51 232
52 266
53 217
54 198
55 177
56 202
57 204
58 166
59 177
60 166
61 152
62 143
63 150
64 124
65 119
66 120
67 118
68 82
69 98
70 94
71 105
72 74
73 84
74 70
75 67
76 78
77 60
78 59
79 52
80 47
81 38
82 48
83 42
84 42
85 43
86 29
87 37
88 29
89 30
90 34
91 20
92 22
93 17
94 19
95 24
96 21
97 20
98 24
99 17
100 17
101 21
102 25
103 18
104 26
105 20
106 15
107 10
108 13
109 15
110 12
111 8
112 7
113 9
114 6
115 12
116 7
117 8
118 3
119 5
120 7
121 2
122 4
123 8
124 7
125 9
126+ 92
Download as CSV

Overview

Thomas Gnauk is affiliated with the Leibniz Association in Germany. Their academic profile does not currently list recent papers, co-authors, or specific publication venues.

Information regarding main fields of study, subfields, and topics of research is not available for this scientist. Additionally, there are no recorded book publications or awards linked to their profile at this time.

This profile summarizes publicly available data related to Thomas Gnauk's scientific affiliations and research output as currently documented.

Best Publications

  • Results of the "Carbon Conference" International Aerosol Carbon Round Robin Test Stage I

    Heidrun Schmid;Lothar Laskus;Hans Jürgen Abraham;Urs Baltensperger

  • Aerosol-chamber study of the α-pinene/O3 reaction: influence of particle acidity on aerosol yields and products

    Yoshiteru Iinuma;Olaf Böge;Thomas Gnauk;Hartmut Herrmann

  • Source characterization of biomass burning particles: The combustion of selected European conifers, African hardwood, savanna grass, and German and Indonesian peat

    Y. Iinuma;E. Brüggemann;T. Gnauk;K. Müller

  • Enhanced role of transition metal ion catalysis during in-cloud oxidation of SO2.

    Eliza Harris;Bärbel Sinha;Bärbel Sinha;Dominik van Pinxteren;Andreas Tilgner

  • Particle number size distributions in a street canyon and their transformation into the urban-air background: measurements and a simple model study

    Birgit Wehner;Wolfram Birmili;Thomas Gnauk;Alfred Wiedensohler

  • Relative humidity dependence of aerosol optical properties and direct radiative forcing in the surface boundary layer at Xinken in Pearl River Delta of China : An observation based numerical study

    Y. F. Cheng;Y. F. Cheng;A. Wiedensohler;H. Eichler;J. Heintzenberg

  • Aerosol optical properties and related chemical apportionment at Xinken in Pearl River Delta of China

    Y.F. Cheng;A. Wiedensohler;H. Eichler;H. Su

  • The formation of organic sulfate esters in the limonene ozonolysis secondary organic aerosol (SOA) under acidic conditions

    Yoshiteru Iinuma;Conny Müller;Olaf Böge;Thomas Gnauk

  • Seasonal variation of aliphatic amines in marine sub-micrometer particles at the Cape Verde islands

    C. Müller;Y. Iinuma;Johannes Karstensen;D. van Pinxteren

  • INTERCOMP2000: the comparability of methods in use in Europe for measuring the carbon content of aerosol

    Harry ten Brink;Willy Maenhaut;Regina Hitzenberger;Thomas Gnauk

  • Mixing state of elemental carbon and non‐light‐absorbing aerosol components derived from in situ particle optical properties at Xinken in Pearl River Delta of China

    Ya Fang Cheng;Ya Fang Cheng;Heike Eichler;Alfred Wiedensohler;Jost Heintzenberg

  • A four-year size-segregated characterization study of particles PM10, PM2.5 and PM1 depending on air mass origin at Melpitz

    G. Spindler;E. Brüggemann;T. Gnauk;A. Grüner

  • Size distribution and source analysis of ionic compositions of aerosols in polluted periods at Xinken in Pearl River Delta (PRD) of China

    Shang Liu;Min Hu;Sjaak Slanina;Ling-Yan He

  • A case of extreme particulate matter concentrations over Central Europe caused by dust emitted over the southern Ukraine

    W. Birmili;Kerstin Schepanski;Kerstin Schepanski;A. Ansmann;G. Spindler

  • Long-term size-segregated characterization of PM10, PM2.5, and PM1 at the IfT research station Melpitz downwind of Leipzig (Germany) using high and low-volume filter samplers

    G. Spindler;K Müller;E. Brüggemann;T. Gnauk

  • Size segregated water uptake of the urban submicrometer aerosol in Beijing

    A. Massling;M. Stock;B. Wehner;Z.J. Wu

  • Hygroscopic properties and extinction of aerosol particles at ambient relative humidity in South-Eastern China

    H. Eichler;H. Eichler;Y. F. Cheng;Y. F. Cheng;W. Birmili;A. Nowak

  • Carbonaceous aerosol over the Indian Ocean: OC/EC fractions and selected specifications from size‐segregated onboard samples

    C. Neusüß;T. Gnauk;A. Plewka;H. Herrmann

  • A new method to determine the mixing state of light absorbing carbonaceous using the measured aerosol optical properties and number size distributions

    N. Ma;C. S. Zhao;T. Müller;Y. F. Cheng

  • Hygroscopic growth of urban aerosol particles in Beijing (China) during wintertime: a comparison of three experimental methods

    J. Meier;B. Wehner;A. Massling;W. Birmili

  • Size‐ and time‐resolved chemical particle characterization during CAREBeijing‐2006: Different pollution regimes and diurnal profiles

    D. van Pinxteren;E. Brüggemann;T. Gnauk;Y. Iinuma

Frequent Co-Authors

Hartmut Herrmann
Hartmut Herrmann Leibniz Association
Wolfram Birmili
Wolfram Birmili German Environment Agency
Alfred Wiedensohler
Alfred Wiedensohler Leibniz Institute for Tropospheric Research
Yoshiteru Iinuma
Yoshiteru Iinuma Okinawa Institute of Science and Technology
Gerald Spindler
Gerald Spindler Leibniz Association
Yafang Cheng
Yafang Cheng Max Planck Institute for Chemistry
Birgit Wehner
Birgit Wehner Leibniz Association
Regina Hitzenberger
Regina Hitzenberger University of Vienna
Willy Maenhaut
Willy Maenhaut Ghent University
Albert Ansmann
Albert Ansmann Leibniz Association

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Environmental Sciences opens doors to diverse career pathways, many of which intersect with complementary fields like sociology and social work. For those interested in understanding the societal impacts of environmental issues, exploring online sociology bachelor programs can provide valuable insights into human behavior and community dynamics.

Graduate education is also increasingly accessible through flexible online options. Students aiming for advanced expertise may consider doctorate degree online no dissertation programs, which offer rigorous coursework without the traditional dissertation barrier. This can be particularly appealing for professionals seeking to balance work and study.

For educators and researchers wanting to advance their qualifications, programs that offer an eds to edd bridge program provide a streamlined pathway from a Doctor of Education (EdD) to a Doctor of Education (EdD) degree, enhancing leadership and expertise in environmental education sectors.

Additionally, those interested in the application of social work within environmental contexts might find value in the dsw programs online, which equip graduates to address social and environmental justice challenges from a policy and community support perspective.

Best Scientists Citing Thomas Gnauk

Recently Published Articles