World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Microbiology 58 3427 3146 1351 1205 199 11990

Tanya Parish publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Tanya Parish between 1994 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Tanya Parish published across 32 years, from 1994 to 2025, averaging 7.9 papers a year. Output peaked at 21 publications in 2019. 23 of the 252 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1994 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 21. Peak 21 publications in 2019. 1994: 1 publication 1995: 2 publications 1996: 0 publications 1997: 2 publications 1998: 5 publications 1999: 3 publications 2000: 3 publications 2001: 5 publications 2002: 3 publications 2003: 8 publications 2004: 4 publications 2005: 4 publications 2006: 3 publications 2007: 9 publications 2008: 11 publications 2009: 3 publications 2010: 7 publications 2011: 6 publications 2012: 6 publications 2013: 9 publications 2014: 14 publications 2015: 13 publications 2016: 7 publications 2017: 16 publications 2018: 16 publications 2019: 21 publications 2020: 7 publications 2021: 17 publications 2022: 17 publications 2023: 7 publications 2024: 8 publications 2025: 15 publications
1994 2025

252 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Tanya Parish: publications per year, 1994 to 2025
Year Publications
1994 1
1995 2
1996 0
1997 2
1998 5
1999 3
2000 3
2001 5
2002 3
2003 8
2004 4
2005 4
2006 3
2007 9
2008 11
2009 3
2010 7
2011 6
2012 6
2013 9
2014 14
2015 13
2016 7
2017 16
2018 16
2019 21
2020 7
2021 17
2022 17
2023 7
2024 8
2025 15
Total 252
Download as CSV

Tanya Parish publication distribution in Microbiology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Microbiology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Tanya Parish sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150 200 250
Bar chart with 64 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 55–64 to 679+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 288. Most scientists, 288, have 135–144 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 679 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 195–204 publications, is where this scientist sits. 55–64 publications: 8 scientists 65–74 publications: 29 scientists 75–84 publications: 55 scientists 85–94 publications: 112 scientists 95–104 publications: 137 scientists 105–114 publications: 190 scientists 115–124 publications: 235 scientists 125–134 publications: 234 scientists 135–144 publications: 288 scientists 145–154 publications: 265 scientists 155–164 publications: 264 scientists 165–174 publications: 253 scientists 175–184 publications: 276 scientists 185–194 publications: 190 scientists 195–204 publications: 234 scientists 205–214 publications: 208 scientists 215–224 publications: 198 scientists 225–234 publications: 155 scientists 235–244 publications: 161 scientists 245–254 publications: 160 scientists 255–264 publications: 146 scientists 265–274 publications: 139 scientists 275–284 publications: 148 scientists 285–294 publications: 115 scientists 295–304 publications: 96 scientists 305–314 publications: 88 scientists 315–324 publications: 106 scientists 325–334 publications: 65 scientists 335–344 publications: 76 scientists 345–354 publications: 64 scientists 355–364 publications: 62 scientists 365–374 publications: 65 scientists 375–384 publications: 61 scientists 385–394 publications: 34 scientists 395–404 publications: 44 scientists 405–414 publications: 36 scientists 415–424 publications: 35 scientists 425–434 publications: 29 scientists 435–444 publications: 33 scientists 445–454 publications: 34 scientists 455–464 publications: 25 scientists 465–474 publications: 26 scientists 475–484 publications: 20 scientists 485–494 publications: 19 scientists 495–504 publications: 16 scientists 505–514 publications: 17 scientists 515–524 publications: 23 scientists 525–534 publications: 14 scientists 535–544 publications: 14 scientists 545–554 publications: 18 scientists 555–564 publications: 12 scientists 565–574 publications: 7 scientists 575–584 publications: 9 scientists 585–594 publications: 9 scientists 595–604 publications: 9 scientists 605–614 publications: 7 scientists 615–624 publications: 9 scientists 625–634 publications: 7 scientists 635–644 publications: 4 scientists 645–654 publications: 5 scientists 655–664 publications: 6 scientists 665–674 publications: 7 scientists 675–678 publications: 3 scientists 679+ publications: 99 scientists
55–64 publications 679+

This scientist: 199 publications — 48th percentile

48% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 679 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Microbiology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 5,513 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
55–64 8
65–74 29
75–84 55
85–94 112
95–104 137
105–114 190
115–124 235
125–134 234
135–144 288
145–154 265
155–164 264
165–174 253
175–184 276
185–194 190
195–204 234 199
205–214 208
215–224 198
225–234 155
235–244 161
245–254 160
255–264 146
265–274 139
275–284 148
285–294 115
295–304 96
305–314 88
315–324 106
325–334 65
335–344 76
345–354 64
355–364 62
365–374 65
375–384 61
385–394 34
395–404 44
405–414 36
415–424 35
425–434 29
435–444 33
445–454 34
455–464 25
465–474 26
475–484 20
485–494 19
495–504 16
505–514 17
515–524 23
525–534 14
535–544 14
545–554 18
555–564 12
565–574 7
575–584 9
585–594 9
595–604 9
605–614 7
615–624 9
625–634 7
635–644 4
645–654 5
655–664 6
665–674 7
675–678 3
679+ 99
Download as CSV

Tanya Parish D-index placement in Microbiology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Microbiology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Tanya Parish sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150
Bar chart with 88 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 40 to 127+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 162. Most scientists, 162, have 58 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 127 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 58 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 40 D-Index: 30 scientists 41 D-Index: 86 scientists 42 D-Index: 90 scientists 43 D-Index: 117 scientists 44 D-Index: 122 scientists 45 D-Index: 123 scientists 46 D-Index: 108 scientists 47 D-Index: 110 scientists 48 D-Index: 106 scientists 49 D-Index: 109 scientists 50 D-Index: 129 scientists 51 D-Index: 111 scientists 52 D-Index: 116 scientists 53 D-Index: 127 scientists 54 D-Index: 134 scientists 55 D-Index: 134 scientists 56 D-Index: 112 scientists 57 D-Index: 136 scientists 58 D-Index: 162 scientists 59 D-Index: 151 scientists 60 D-Index: 139 scientists 61 D-Index: 123 scientists 62 D-Index: 126 scientists 63 D-Index: 144 scientists 64 D-Index: 109 scientists 65 D-Index: 103 scientists 66 D-Index: 124 scientists 67 D-Index: 112 scientists 68 D-Index: 103 scientists 69 D-Index: 131 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 93 scientists 72 D-Index: 96 scientists 73 D-Index: 92 scientists 74 D-Index: 80 scientists 75 D-Index: 66 scientists 76 D-Index: 87 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 73 scientists 79 D-Index: 59 scientists 80 D-Index: 57 scientists 81 D-Index: 55 scientists 82 D-Index: 47 scientists 83 D-Index: 77 scientists 84 D-Index: 50 scientists 85 D-Index: 45 scientists 86 D-Index: 42 scientists 87 D-Index: 41 scientists 88 D-Index: 32 scientists 89 D-Index: 38 scientists 90 D-Index: 35 scientists 91 D-Index: 34 scientists 92 D-Index: 27 scientists 93 D-Index: 26 scientists 94 D-Index: 33 scientists 95 D-Index: 22 scientists 96 D-Index: 37 scientists 97 D-Index: 22 scientists 98 D-Index: 21 scientists 99 D-Index: 22 scientists 100 D-Index: 30 scientists 101 D-Index: 16 scientists 102 D-Index: 20 scientists 103 D-Index: 17 scientists 104 D-Index: 19 scientists 105 D-Index: 16 scientists 106 D-Index: 19 scientists 107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108 D-Index: 14 scientists 109 D-Index: 10 scientists 110 D-Index: 9 scientists 111 D-Index: 7 scientists 112 D-Index: 11 scientists 113 D-Index: 6 scientists 114 D-Index: 15 scientists 115 D-Index: 10 scientists 116 D-Index: 12 scientists 117 D-Index: 7 scientists 118 D-Index: 10 scientists 119 D-Index: 10 scientists 120 D-Index: 11 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 7 scientists 123 D-Index: 12 scientists 124 D-Index: 5 scientists 125 D-Index: 9 scientists 126 D-Index: 6 scientists 127+ D-Index: 95 scientists
40 D-Index 127+

This scientist: 58 D-Index — 39th percentile

39% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 127 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Microbiology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 5,513 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
40 30
41 86
42 90
43 117
44 122
45 123
46 108
47 110
48 106
49 109
50 129
51 111
52 116
53 127
54 134
55 134
56 112
57 136
58 162 58
59 151
60 139
61 123
62 126
63 144
64 109
65 103
66 124
67 112
68 103
69 131
70 94
71 93
72 96
73 92
74 80
75 66
76 87
77 60
78 73
79 59
80 57
81 55
82 47
83 77
84 50
85 45
86 42
87 41
88 32
89 38
90 35
91 34
92 27
93 26
94 33
95 22
96 37
97 22
98 21
99 22
100 30
101 16
102 20
103 17
104 19
105 16
106 19
107 18
108 14
109 10
110 9
111 7
112 11
113 6
114 15
115 10
116 12
117 7
118 10
119 10
120 11
121 2
122 7
123 12
124 5
125 9
126 6
127+ 95
Download as CSV

Overview

Tanya Parish is affiliated with Seattle Children's Hospital in the United States and has a research focus concentrated on tuberculosis and related infectious diseases. The scientist's academic work spans multiple fields including Medicine and Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology.

The subfields of Tanya Parish's research are diverse, with significant contributions in Infectious Diseases, Molecular Biology, Epidemiology, Organic Chemistry, and Molecular Medicine. These subfields appear consistently within their publication record, emphasizing an interdisciplinary approach to disease-related biochemistry and molecular research.

Primary research topics addressed include:

  • Tuberculosis Research and Epidemiology
  • Mycobacterium research and diagnosis
  • Cancer therapeutics and mechanisms
  • Biochemical and Molecular Research
  • Synthesis and biological activity
  • Antibiotic Resistance in Bacteria
  • Pneumocystis jirovecii pneumonia detection and treatment

The scientist has published frequently in several venues, indicating a targeted dissemination strategy across relevant journals. These venues include:

  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
  • ACS Medicinal Chemistry Letters
  • ACS Infectious Diseases
  • SSRN Electronic Journal

Notable recent publications by Tanya Parish and collaborators are:

  • In vitro drug discovery models for Mycobacterium tuberculosis relevant for host infection, 2020, Expert Opinion on Drug Discovery
  • The Tuberculosis Drug Accelerator at year 10: what have we learned?, 2021, Nature Medicine
  • Kupyaphores are zinc homeostatic metallophores required for colonization of Mycobacterium tuberculosis, 2022, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
  • Multiple Mutations in Mycobacterium tuberculosis MmpL3 Increase Resistance to MmpL3 Inhibitors, 2020, mSphere
  • Spirocycle MmpL3 Inhibitors with Improved hERG and Cytotoxicity Profiles as Inhibitors of Mycobacterium tuberculosis Growth, 2021, ACS Omega

Frequent collaborators who have coauthored multiple papers with Tanya Parish include Aaron Korkegian, R. H. Allen, Matthew B. McNeil, Lindsay Flint, and Yulia Ovechkina. These collaborations underscore a network of researchers focused largely on infectious diseases and tuberculosis research.

Best Publications

  • Use of a flexible cassette method to generate a double unmarked Mycobacterium tuberculosis tlyA plcABC mutant by gene replacement.

    Tanya Parish;Neil G. Stoker

  • Deletion of Two-Component Regulatory Systems Increases the Virulence of Mycobacterium tuberculosis

    Tanya Parish;Debbie A. Smith;Sharon Kendall;Nicola Casali

  • Optimisation of bioluminescent reporters for use with mycobacteria.

    Nuria Andreu;Andrea Zelmer;Taryn Fletcher;Paul T. Elkington

  • Characterization of auxotrophic mutants of Mycobacterium tuberculosis and their potential as vaccine candidates.

    Debbie A. Smith;Tanya Parish;Neil G. Stoker;Gregory J. Bancroft

  • Identification of New Drug Targets and Resistance Mechanisms in Mycobacterium tuberculosis

    Thomas R. Ioerger;Theresa O’Malley;Reiling Liao;Kristine M. Guinn

  • Variation among Genome Sequences of H37Rv Strains of Mycobacterium tuberculosis from Multiple Laboratories

    Thomas R. Ioerger;Yicheng Feng;Krishna Ganesula;Xiaohua Chen

  • Gene expression profile of Mycobacterium tuberculosis in a non-replicating state.

    D.G.Niranjala Muttucumaru;Gretta Roberts;Jason Hinds;Richard A. Stabler

  • The common aromatic amino acid biosynthesis pathway is essential in Mycobacterium tuberculosis.

    Tanya Parish;Tanya Parish;Neil G. Stoker

  • The senX3–regX3 two-component regulatory system of Mycobacterium tuberculosis is required for virulence

    Tanya Parish;Tanya Parish;Debbie A. Smith;Gretta Roberts;Joanna Betts

  • Mycobacterium tuberculosis protocols

    Tanya Parish;Neil G. Stoker

  • Evaluation of vaccines in the EU TB vaccine cluster using a guinea pig aerosol infection model of tuberculosis

    Ann Williams;Graham J. Hatch;Simon O. Clark;Karen E. Gooch

  • Sensitive detection of gene expression in mycobacteria under replicating and non-replicating conditions using optimized far-red reporters.

    Paul Carroll;Lise J. Schreuder;Julian Muwanguzi-Karugaba;Siouxsie Wiles;Siouxsie Wiles

  • A dual read-out assay to evaluate the potency of compounds active against Mycobacterium tuberculosis.

    Juliane Ollinger;Mai Ann Bailey;Garrett C. Moraski;Allen Casey

  • An inducible expression system permitting the efficient purification of a recombinant antigen from Mycobacterium smegmatis

    James A. Triccas;Tanya Parish;Warwick J. Britton;Warwick J. Britton;Brigitte Gicquel

  • Mycobacterium tuberculosis Responds to Chloride and pH as Synergistic Cues to the Immune Status of its Host Cell

    Shumin Tan;Neelima Sukumar;Robert B. Abramovitch;Tanya Parish

  • Electroporation of Mycobacteria

    Tanya Parish;Neil G. Stoker

  • The Mycobacterium tuberculosis dosRS two-component system is induced by multiple stresses.

    S.L Kendall;F Movahedzadeh;S.C.G Rison;L Wernisch

  • The missing piece of the type II fatty acid synthase system from Mycobacterium tuberculosis

    Emmanuelle Sacco;Adrian Suarez Covarrubias;Helen M. O'Hare;Paul Carroll

  • The Arabinosyltransferase EmbC Is Inhibited by Ethambutol in Mycobacterium tuberculosis

    R. Goude;A. G. Amin;D. Chatterjee;T. Parish;T. Parish

  • Validation of the Essential ClpP Protease in Mycobacterium tuberculosis as a Novel Drug Target

    Juliane Ollinger;Theresa O'Malley;Edward A. Kesicki;Joshua Odingo

  • Regulation of the inducible acetamidase gene of Mycobacterium smegmatis

    Tanya Parish;Eshwar Mahenthiralingam;Philip Draper;Elaine O. Davis

Frequent Co-Authors

Neil G. Stoker
Neil G. Stoker Royal Veterinary College
Thomas R. Ioerger
Thomas R. Ioerger Texas A&M University
James C. Sacchettini
James C. Sacchettini Texas A&M University
Gregory J. Bancroft
Gregory J. Bancroft London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine
Naresh Kumar
Naresh Kumar University of New South Wales
Diwan S. Rawat
Diwan S. Rawat University of Delhi
Dean C. Crick
Dean C. Crick Colorado State University
Helena I. Boshoff
Helena I. Boshoff National Institutes of Health
Marvin J. Miller
Marvin J. Miller University of Notre Dame
Dirk Schnappinger
Dirk Schnappinger Cornell University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Microbiology in the USA opens doors to various career paths, often complemented by additional online degrees. For those interested in public health, considering some of the easiest online MPH programs to get into can be a practical step. These programs offer flexible study options that build on microbiology foundations to address community health challenges.

Another rewarding career trajectory is becoming a child life specialist, where understanding microbiology enhances knowledge of health and wellness in pediatric settings. This role combines science with compassionate care to support children through medical experiences.

For individuals with different backgrounds, such as those seeking online colleges that accept felons, microbiology-related degrees remain accessible. Researching online colleges that accept felons ensures opportunities for continuing education and career advancement without barriers related to past records.

Additionally, healthcare professionals aiming to elevate their careers might explore becoming a functional medicine nurse practitioner. This path blends scientific knowledge, including microbiology, with holistic treatment approaches, often reflecting in competitive salaries and specialized roles.

Best Scientists Citing Tanya Parish

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles