World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Biology and Biochemistry

D-Index
64
Citations
17392
World Ranking
9536
National Ranking
4209

Tamir Gonen publication distribution in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Biology and Biochemistry in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Tamir Gonen sits on this spectrum.

47–56 publications: 8 scientists 57–66 publications: 35 scientists 67–76 publications: 106 scientists 77–86 publications: 231 scientists 87–96 publications: 414 scientists 97–106 publications: 546 scientists 107–116 publications: 704 scientists 117–126 publications: 849 scientists 127–136 publications: 980 scientists 137–146 publications: 942 scientists 147–156 publications: 969 scientists 157–166 publications: 950 scientists 167–176 publications: 951 scientists 177–186 publications: 915 scientists 187–196 publications: 787 scientists 197–206 publications: 841 scientists 207–216 publications: 735 scientists 217–226 publications: 709 scientists 227–236 publications: 651 scientists 237–246 publications: 605 scientists 247–256 publications: 510 scientists 257–266 publications: 524 scientists 267–276 publications: 434 scientists 277–286 publications: 418 scientists 287–296 publications: 350 scientists 297–306 publications: 363 scientists 307–316 publications: 315 scientists 317–326 publications: 296 scientists 327–336 publications: 261 scientists 337–346 publications: 240 scientists 347–356 publications: 219 scientists 357–366 publications: 197 scientists 367–376 publications: 154 scientists 377–386 publications: 161 scientists 387–396 publications: 155 scientists 397–406 publications: 145 scientists 407–416 publications: 124 scientists 417–426 publications: 112 scientists 427–436 publications: 132 scientists 437–446 publications: 116 scientists 447–456 publications: 99 scientists 457–466 publications: 81 scientists 467–476 publications: 91 scientists 477–486 publications: 80 scientists 487–496 publications: 80 scientists 497–506 publications: 60 scientists 507–516 publications: 36 scientists 517–526 publications: 46 scientists 527–536 publications: 54 scientists 537–546 publications: 44 scientists 547–556 publications: 43 scientists 557–566 publications: 43 scientists 567–576 publications: 42 scientists 577–586 publications: 25 scientists 587–596 publications: 34 scientists 597–606 publications: 23 scientists 607–616 publications: 33 scientists 617–626 publications: 31 scientists 627–636 publications: 27 scientists 637–646 publications: 25 scientists 647–656 publications: 28 scientists 657–666 publications: 34 scientists 667–676 publications: 18 scientists 677–686 publications: 16 scientists 687–696 publications: 10 scientists 697–706 publications: 12 scientists 707–716 publications: 21 scientists 717–726 publications: 12 scientists 727–736 publications: 12 scientists 737–746 publications: 10 scientists 747–756 publications: 7 scientists 757–766 publications: 13 scientists 767–776 publications: 15 scientists 777–786 publications: 13 scientists 787–796 publications: 9 scientists 797–806 publications: 9 scientists 807–816 publications: 7 scientists 817–826 publications: 4 scientists 827–836 publications: 9 scientists 837–846 publications: 7 scientists 847–856 publications: 3 scientists 857–866 publications: 5 scientists 867–876 publications: 5 scientists 877–886 publications: 11 scientists 887–896 publications: 3 scientists 897–906 publications: 4 scientists 907–916 publications: 7 scientists 917–926 publications: 5 scientists 927–936 publications: 6 scientists 937–946 publications: 6 scientists 947–956 publications: 3 scientists 957–966 publications: 7 scientists 967–976 publications: 2 scientists 977–986 publications: 2 scientists 987–996 publications: 1 scientists 997–1,006 publications: 5 scientists 1,007–1,016 publications: 2 scientists 1,017–1,026 publications: 2 scientists 1,027 publications: 1 scientists 1,028+ publications: 100 scientists
47 publications 1,028+

This scientist: 276 publications — 73rd percentile

73% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,028 publications or more.

Tamir Gonen D-index placement in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Biology and Biochemistry scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Tamir Gonen sits on this spectrum.

40–41 D-Index: 80 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 183 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 317 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 504 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 718 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 900 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 1,026 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 1,150 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 1,236 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 1,253 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 1,163 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 1,131 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 1,032 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 897 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 814 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 715 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 709 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 596 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 512 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 473 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 412 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 373 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 358 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 285 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 273 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 227 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 208 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 193 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 153 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 157 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 148 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 120 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 113 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 100 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 86 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 67 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 72 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 73 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 64 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 53 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 60 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 54 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 43 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 38 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 49 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 26 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 18 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 23 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 32 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 32 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 27 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 19 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 22 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 12 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 16 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 14 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 10 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 13 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 10 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 7 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 9 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 13 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 4 scientists 166 D-Index: 4 scientists 167+ D-Index: 98 scientists
40 D-Index 167+

This scientist: 64 D-Index — 52nd percentile

52% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 167 D-Index or more.

Overview

Tamir Gonen is affiliated with the University of California, Los Angeles in the United States. Their research spans multiple disciplines, including Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology, as well as Materials Science. Within these broader fields, they have contributed extensively to the subfields of Molecular Biology, Materials Chemistry, Spectroscopy, Structural Biology, and Biomedical Engineering.

Their research addresses a variety of topics, with a strong focus on Enzyme Structure and Function, Mass Spectrometry Techniques and Applications, and Advanced Electron Microscopy Techniques and Applications. Additional areas of study include Biochemical and Molecular Research, Protein Structure and Dynamics, Crystallization and Solubility Studies, and Ion-surface interactions and analysis.

Several frequent coauthors have collaborated with Gonen across many publications. These include Michael W. Martynowycz, Johan Hattne, Max T. B. Clabbers, Emma Danelius, and Johan Unge.

Gonen's work has been published in various academic venues, most notably:

  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • Acta Crystallographica Section A Foundations and Advances
  • Structural Dynamics
  • Structure
  • The Cambridge Structural Database

Recent publications by Gonen and collaborators highlight developments in electron microscopy and crystallography techniques. Notable papers include:

  • "Benchmarking the ideal sample thickness in cryo-EM," 2021, published in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
  • "Biocatalytic Carbene Transfer Using Diazirines," 2022, Journal of the American Chemical Society
  • "Ab initio phasing macromolecular structures using electron-counted MicroED data," 2022, Nature Methods
  • "MicroED structure of the human adenosine receptor determined from a single nanocrystal in LCP," 2021, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
  • "MicroED in natural product and small molecule research," 2020, Natural Product Reports

In addition to articles, Gonen has contributed to book publications, including a title on cryoEM published by Springer Science+Business Media in 2020.

Best Publications

  • Lipid-protein interactions in double-layered two-dimensional AQP0 crystals

    Tamir Gonen;Yifan Cheng;Piotr Sliz;Piotr Sliz;Yoko Hiroaki

  • Computational design of self-assembling protein nanomaterials with atomic level accuracy

    Neil P. King;William Sheffler;Michael R. Sawaya;Breanna S. Vollmar

  • Structure of the toxic core of α-synuclein from invisible crystals

    Jose A. Rodriguez;Magdalena I. Ivanova;Michael R. Sawaya;Duilio Cascio

  • Accurate design of co-assembling multi-component protein nanomaterials.

    Neil P. King;Jacob B. Bale;William Sheffler;Dan E. McNamara

  • Tension directly stabilizes reconstituted kinetochore-microtubule attachments

    Bungo Akiyoshi;Krishna K. Sarangapani;Andrew F. Powers;Christian R. Nelson

  • Accurate design of megadalton-scale two-component icosahedral protein complexes.

    Jacob B. Bale;Shane Gonen;Shane Gonen;Yuxi Liu;William Sheffler

  • Amphotericin forms an extramembranous and fungicidal sterol sponge

    Thomas M Anderson;Mary C Clay;Alexander G Cioffi;Katrina A Diaz

  • Atomic structures of low-complexity protein segments reveal kinked β sheets that assemble networks

    Michael P. Hughes;Michael R. Sawaya;David R. Boyer;Lukasz Goldschmidt

  • Aquaporin-0 membrane junctions reveal the structure of a closed water pore

    Tamir Gonen;Piotr Sliz;Piotr Sliz;Joerg Kistler;Yifan Cheng

  • Design of a hyperstable 60-subunit protein icosahedron

    Yang Hsia;Jacob B. Bale;Shane Gonen;Dan Shi

  • The CryoEM Method MicroED as a Powerful Tool for Small Molecule Structure Determination.

    Christopher G Jones;Michael W Martynowycz;Johan Hattne;Tyler J Fulton

  • The structure of aquaporins

    Tamir Gonen;Thomas Walz

  • Three-dimensional electron crystallography of protein microcrystals

    Dan Shi;Brent L Nannenga;Matthew G Iadanza;Tamir Gonen

  • High-resolution structure determination by continuous-rotation data collection in MicroED

    Brent L Nannenga;Dan Shi;Andrew G W Leslie;Tamir Gonen

  • A Type VI Secretion-Related Pathway in Bacteroidetes Mediates Interbacterial Antagonism

    Alistair B. Russell;Aaron G. Wexler;Brittany N. Harding;John C. Whitney

  • High thermodynamic stability of parametrically designed helical bundles.

    Po Ssu Huang;Gustav Oberdorfer;Gustav Oberdorfer;Chunfu Xu;Xue Y. Pei

  • Structure-based inhibitors of tau aggregation

    P.M. Seidler;D.R. Boyer;D.R. Boyer;J.A. Rodriguez;J.A. Rodriguez;M.R. Sawaya;M.R. Sawaya

  • Haemolysin Coregulated Protein Is an Exported Receptor and Chaperone of Type VI Secretion Substrates

    Julie M. Silverman;Danielle M. Agnello;Hongjin Zheng;Benjamin T. Andrews

  • Design of ordered two-dimensional arrays mediated by noncovalent protein-protein interfaces

    Shane Gonen;Frank DiMaio;Tamir Gonen;David Baker

  • Corrigendum: Lipid–protein interactions in double-layered two-dimensional AQP0 crystals

    Tamir Gonen;Yifan Cheng;Piotr Sliz;Yoko Hiroaki

Frequent Co-Authors

Michael R. Sawaya
Michael R. Sawaya University of California, Los Angeles
David Eisenberg
David Eisenberg Harvard University
Duilio Cascio
Duilio Cascio University of California, Los Angeles
David Baker
David Baker University of Washington
Thomas Walz
Thomas Walz Rockefeller University
Charles G. Glabe
Charles G. Glabe University of California, Irvine
Stephen C. Harrison
Stephen C. Harrison Harvard University
Todd O. Yeates
Todd O. Yeates University of California, Los Angeles
Trisha N. Davis
Trisha N. Davis University of Washington
Yifan Cheng
Yifan Cheng University of California, San Francisco

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring online degrees in Biology and Biochemistry opens a variety of career opportunities, both in science and healthcare industries. For those interested in mental health, you can pursue fast track mental health nursing programs to quickly gain the skills required to support psychiatric care, a field seeing growing demand.

Nutrition is another exciting area with direct ties to biology and human health. You can choose from flexible nutrition degree programs online, preparing for roles in wellness, healthcare, or research.

If you want to move into healthcare administration after your science studies, consider pursuing the cheapest online mba healthcare management programs. This path can lead to leadership roles in hospitals, biotech firms, and research organizations.

For those interested in the business and technical aspects of healthcare, earning a coding certification such as CCS boosts your career prospects. Learn more about ccs certification differences, costs, and salary outlooks to make an informed decision.

Best Scientists Citing Tamir Gonen

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles