World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
T. Prabhakar Clement

T. Prabhakar Clement

D-Index & Metrics

Environmental Sciences

D-Index
43
Citations
7594
World Ranking
7071
National Ranking
2524

T. Prabhakar Clement publication distribution in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Environmental Sciences in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where T. Prabhakar Clement sits on this spectrum.

41–50 publications: 21 scientists 51–60 publications: 62 scientists 61–70 publications: 133 scientists 71–80 publications: 257 scientists 81–90 publications: 361 scientists 91–100 publications: 440 scientists 101–110 publications: 492 scientists 111–120 publications: 541 scientists 121–130 publications: 617 scientists 131–140 publications: 544 scientists 141–150 publications: 541 scientists 151–160 publications: 539 scientists 161–170 publications: 444 scientists 171–180 publications: 444 scientists 181–190 publications: 400 scientists 191–200 publications: 377 scientists 201–210 publications: 318 scientists 211–220 publications: 283 scientists 221–230 publications: 263 scientists 231–240 publications: 220 scientists 241–250 publications: 217 scientists 251–260 publications: 180 scientists 261–270 publications: 181 scientists 271–280 publications: 155 scientists 281–290 publications: 130 scientists 291–300 publications: 127 scientists 301–310 publications: 130 scientists 311–320 publications: 85 scientists 321–330 publications: 106 scientists 331–340 publications: 80 scientists 341–350 publications: 83 scientists 351–360 publications: 75 scientists 361–370 publications: 69 scientists 371–380 publications: 52 scientists 381–390 publications: 54 scientists 391–400 publications: 56 scientists 401–410 publications: 44 scientists 411–420 publications: 40 scientists 421–430 publications: 36 scientists 431–440 publications: 25 scientists 441–450 publications: 25 scientists 451–460 publications: 32 scientists 461–470 publications: 29 scientists 471–480 publications: 21 scientists 481–490 publications: 26 scientists 491–500 publications: 25 scientists 501–510 publications: 17 scientists 511–520 publications: 18 scientists 521–530 publications: 15 scientists 531–540 publications: 22 scientists 541–550 publications: 12 scientists 551–560 publications: 15 scientists 561–570 publications: 11 scientists 571–580 publications: 19 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 9 scientists 601–610 publications: 7 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 5 scientists 631–640 publications: 5 scientists 641–650 publications: 6 scientists 651–660 publications: 3 scientists 661–670 publications: 3 scientists 671–680 publications: 4 scientists 681–686 publications: 3 scientists 687+ publications: 100 scientists
41 publications 687+

This scientist: 154 publications — 44th percentile

44% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 687 publications or more.

T. Prabhakar Clement D-index placement in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Environmental Sciences scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where T. Prabhakar Clement sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 12 scientists 31 D-Index: 26 scientists 32 D-Index: 51 scientists 33 D-Index: 88 scientists 34 D-Index: 123 scientists 35 D-Index: 163 scientists 36 D-Index: 206 scientists 37 D-Index: 267 scientists 38 D-Index: 265 scientists 39 D-Index: 275 scientists 40 D-Index: 321 scientists 41 D-Index: 343 scientists 42 D-Index: 305 scientists 43 D-Index: 336 scientists 44 D-Index: 330 scientists 45 D-Index: 348 scientists 46 D-Index: 291 scientists 47 D-Index: 275 scientists 48 D-Index: 272 scientists 49 D-Index: 273 scientists 50 D-Index: 263 scientists 51 D-Index: 232 scientists 52 D-Index: 266 scientists 53 D-Index: 217 scientists 54 D-Index: 199 scientists 55 D-Index: 177 scientists 56 D-Index: 202 scientists 57 D-Index: 204 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 177 scientists 60 D-Index: 166 scientists 61 D-Index: 152 scientists 62 D-Index: 143 scientists 63 D-Index: 150 scientists 64 D-Index: 124 scientists 65 D-Index: 119 scientists 66 D-Index: 120 scientists 67 D-Index: 118 scientists 68 D-Index: 82 scientists 69 D-Index: 98 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 105 scientists 72 D-Index: 74 scientists 73 D-Index: 84 scientists 74 D-Index: 70 scientists 75 D-Index: 67 scientists 76 D-Index: 78 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 59 scientists 79 D-Index: 52 scientists 80 D-Index: 47 scientists 81 D-Index: 38 scientists 82 D-Index: 48 scientists 83 D-Index: 42 scientists 84 D-Index: 42 scientists 85 D-Index: 43 scientists 86 D-Index: 29 scientists 87 D-Index: 37 scientists 88 D-Index: 29 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 34 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 22 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 19 scientists 95 D-Index: 24 scientists 96 D-Index: 21 scientists 97 D-Index: 20 scientists 98 D-Index: 24 scientists 99 D-Index: 17 scientists 100 D-Index: 17 scientists 101 D-Index: 21 scientists 102 D-Index: 25 scientists 103 D-Index: 18 scientists 104 D-Index: 26 scientists 105 D-Index: 19 scientists 106 D-Index: 15 scientists 107 D-Index: 10 scientists 108 D-Index: 13 scientists 109 D-Index: 15 scientists 110 D-Index: 12 scientists 111 D-Index: 8 scientists 112 D-Index: 7 scientists 113 D-Index: 9 scientists 114 D-Index: 6 scientists 115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116 D-Index: 7 scientists 117 D-Index: 8 scientists 118 D-Index: 3 scientists 119 D-Index: 5 scientists 120 D-Index: 7 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 4 scientists 123 D-Index: 8 scientists 124 D-Index: 7 scientists 125+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 125+

This scientist: 43 D-Index — 29th percentile

29% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 125 D-Index or more.

Best Publications

  • A modified Langmuir-Freundlich isotherm model for simulating pH-dependent adsorption effects.

    Unknown

  • Processes in microbial transport in the natural subsurface

    Timothy R. Ginn;Brian D. Wood;Kirk E. Nelson;Timothy D. Scheibe

  • Does sea-level rise have an impact on saltwater intrusion?

    Sun Woo Chang;T. Prabhakar Clement;Matthew J. Simpson;Kang-Kun Lee

  • Laboratory‐scale investigation of saltwater intrusion dynamics

    Unknown

  • Two Dimensional Transport Characteristics of Surface Stabilized Zero-valent Iron Nanoparticles in Porous Media

    S. R. Kanel;R. R. Goswami;T. P. Clement;M. O. Barnett

  • Modeling Multispecies Reactive Transport in Ground Water

    Unknown

  • Natural attenuation of chlorinated ethene compounds: model development and field-scale application at the Dover site

    Unknown

  • Theoretical analysis of the worthiness of Henry and Elder problems as benchmarks of density-dependent groundwater flow models

    M.J. Simpson;T.P. Clement;T.P. Clement

  • A physically based, two-dimensional, finite-difference algorithm for modeling variably saturated flow

    T.P. Clement;William R. Wise;Fred J. Molz

  • Macroscopic Models for Predicting Changes in Saturated Porous Media Properties Caused by Microbial Growth

    Unknown

  • Natural attenuation of BTEX compounds: model development and field-scale application.

    G Lu;T P Clement;C Zheng;T H Wiedemeier

  • Improving the worthiness of the Henry problem as a benchmark for density-dependent groundwater flow models

    Matthew J. Simpson;T. Prabhakar Clement

  • Impacts of the 2004 tsunami on groundwater resources in Sri Lanka

    Tissa H. Illangasekare;Scott W. Tyler;T. Prabhakar Clement;Karen G. Villholth

  • Nitrogen transformation and transport modeling in groundwater aquifers

    Mee-Sun Lee;Kang-Kun Lee;Yunjung Hyun;T. Prabhakar Clement

  • Generalized solution to multispecies transport equations coupled with a first-order reaction network

    Unknown

  • Microbial growth and transport in porous media under denitrification conditions : experiments and simulations

    Unknown

  • Interaction between shallow groundwater, saline surface water and contaminant discharge at a seasonally and tidally forced estuarine boundary

    S.J. Westbrook;S.J. Westbrook;J.L. Rayner;G.B. Davis;T.P. Clement;T.P. Clement

  • Experimental and numerical investigation of saltwater intrusion dynamics in flux-controlled groundwater systems.

    Unknown

  • Development of analytical solutions for multispecies transport with serial and parallel reactions

    Unknown

  • Long-term monitoring data to describe the fate of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in Deepwater Horizon oil submerged off Alabama's beaches.

    Unknown

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Environmental Sciences in the USA opens doors to diverse career opportunities that often require interdisciplinary skills. One valuable area to consider is Geographic Information Systems (GIS), which plays a crucial role in environmental data analysis and spatial planning. Exploring the best gis undergraduate programs can provide specialized knowledge essential for careers in environmental consulting, urban planning, and resource management.

Many environmental professionals also benefit from public administration expertise, particularly those aiming for roles in policy making and sustainability management. For such career goals, enrolling in online mpa degrees offers flexibility and focused training without interrupting your current work life.

Understanding social dynamics is another key aspect of environmental work, as solutions often involve community engagement and behavioral insights. Pursuing a bachelors degree in sociology online complements environmental studies by providing a broader perspective on societal impacts and ethical considerations.

For advanced learners seeking leadership or academic positions, doctoral options that limit traditional barriers can be appealing. Programs like doctoral programs online no dissertation represent innovative pathways to achieve terminal degrees while focusing on applied research and practical skills.