World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Genetics

D-Index
71
Citations
21335
World Ranking
2174
National Ranking
986

Stuart Schwartz publication distribution in Genetics in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Genetics in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Stuart Schwartz sits on this spectrum.

45–54 publications: 6 scientists 55–64 publications: 10 scientists 65–74 publications: 35 scientists 75–84 publications: 84 scientists 85–94 publications: 102 scientists 95–104 publications: 151 scientists 105–114 publications: 175 scientists 115–124 publications: 203 scientists 125–134 publications: 217 scientists 135–144 publications: 205 scientists 145–154 publications: 193 scientists 155–164 publications: 188 scientists 165–174 publications: 170 scientists 175–184 publications: 178 scientists 185–194 publications: 164 scientists 195–204 publications: 173 scientists 205–214 publications: 159 scientists 215–224 publications: 134 scientists 225–234 publications: 143 scientists 235–244 publications: 105 scientists 245–254 publications: 114 scientists 255–264 publications: 92 scientists 265–274 publications: 88 scientists 275–284 publications: 87 scientists 285–294 publications: 80 scientists 295–304 publications: 62 scientists 305–314 publications: 75 scientists 315–324 publications: 67 scientists 325–334 publications: 60 scientists 335–344 publications: 52 scientists 345–354 publications: 40 scientists 355–364 publications: 48 scientists 365–374 publications: 47 scientists 375–384 publications: 46 scientists 385–394 publications: 31 scientists 395–404 publications: 27 scientists 405–414 publications: 40 scientists 415–424 publications: 30 scientists 425–434 publications: 43 scientists 435–444 publications: 29 scientists 445–454 publications: 14 scientists 455–464 publications: 28 scientists 465–474 publications: 21 scientists 475–484 publications: 21 scientists 485–494 publications: 22 scientists 495–504 publications: 17 scientists 505–514 publications: 12 scientists 515–524 publications: 11 scientists 525–534 publications: 8 scientists 535–544 publications: 8 scientists 545–554 publications: 14 scientists 555–564 publications: 4 scientists 565–574 publications: 11 scientists 575–584 publications: 5 scientists 585–594 publications: 11 scientists 595–604 publications: 12 scientists 605–614 publications: 7 scientists 615–624 publications: 6 scientists 625–634 publications: 10 scientists 635–644 publications: 9 scientists 645–654 publications: 10 scientists 655–664 publications: 6 scientists 665–674 publications: 6 scientists 675–684 publications: 6 scientists 685–694 publications: 4 scientists 695–702 publications: 6 scientists 703+ publications: 100 scientists
45 publications 703+

This scientist: 228 publications — 60th percentile

60% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 703 publications or more.

Stuart Schwartz D-index placement in Genetics in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Genetics scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Stuart Schwartz sits on this spectrum.

40–41 D-Index: 24 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 52 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 84 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 112 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 118 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 141 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 143 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 145 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 179 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 162 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 175 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 191 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 172 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 184 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 164 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 158 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 150 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 136 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 127 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 127 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 111 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 110 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 110 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 102 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 66 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 72 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 70 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 54 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 60 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 55 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 45 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 42 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 28 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 39 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 25 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 31 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 34 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 29 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 29 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 27 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 22 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 16 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 11 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 21 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 4 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 9 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 14 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 6 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 10 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 7 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 9 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 8 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 8 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 9 scientists 160+ D-Index: 96 scientists
40 D-Index 160+

This scientist: 71 D-Index — 51st percentile

51% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 160 D-Index or more.

Overview

Stuart Schwartz is affiliated with LabCorp in the United States and has contributed extensively to research in medicine, particularly in the areas of biochemistry, genetics, and molecular biology. Their work encompasses a broad range of topics including prenatal screening and diagnostics, genomic variations and chromosomal abnormalities, genetic syndromes and imprinting, biomedical ethics and regulation, CAR-T cell therapy research, cancer genomics and diagnostics, and chronic myeloid leukemia treatments.

The scientist's recent publications include:

  • Partnering with patients to get better outcomes with chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy: towards engagement of patients in early phase trials (2020) - Research Involvement and Engagement
  • Hematologists' barriers and enablers to screening and recruiting patients to a chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cell therapy trial: a theory-informed interview study (2021) - Trials
  • Navigating choice in the face of uncertainty: using a theory informed qualitative approach to identifying potential patient barriers and enablers to participating in an early phase chimeric antigen receptor T (CAR-T) cell therapy trial (2021) - BMJ Open
  • Near haploidization is a genomic hallmark which defines a molecular subgroup of giant cell glioblastoma (2020) - Neuro-Oncology Advances
  • Deletion rescue resulting in segmental homozygosity: A mechanism underlying discordant NIPT results (2020) - American Journal of Medical Genetics Part A

Frequent coauthors collaborating with Stuart Schwartz include:

  • Andrea Penton
  • Gloria Haskell
  • Inder Gadi
  • Alexandra Arreola
  • James Tepperberg

Schwartz has published numerous articles in various scientific journals, with a particular focus on:

  • Genetics in Medicine Open
  • American Journal of Medical Genetics Part A
  • Molecular Cytogenetics
  • Cancer Genetics
  • Research Involvement and Engagement

In terms of fields of study, their work spans across:

  • Medicine
  • Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology

More specifically, their research delves into subfields such as:

  • Genetics
  • Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health
  • Hematology
  • Molecular Biology
  • Physiology

Their research topics cover:

  • Prenatal Screening and Diagnostics
  • Genomic variations and chromosomal abnormalities
  • Genetic Syndromes and Imprinting
  • Biomedical Ethics and Regulation
  • CAR-T cell therapy research
  • Cancer Genomics and Diagnostics
  • Chronic Myeloid Leukemia Treatments

Best Publications

  • Recent Segmental Duplications in the Human Genome

    Jeffrey A. Bailey;Zhiping Gu;Royden A. Clark;Knut Reinert

  • Prader-Willi syndrome

    Suzanne B. Cassidy;Stuart Schwartz;Jennifer L. Miller;Daniel J. Driscoll

  • Segmental Duplications and Copy-Number Variation in the Human Genome

    Andrew J. Sharp;Devin P. Locke;Sean D. McGrath;Ze Cheng

  • Recurrent Rearrangements of Chromosome 1q21.1 and Variable Pediatric Phenotypes

    Heather C Mefford;Andrew J Sharp;Carl Baker;Andy Itsara

  • A new human prostate carcinoma cell line, 22Rv1.

    R. Michael Sramkoski;Thomas G. Pretlow;Joseph M. Giaconia;Theresa P. Pretlow

  • Discovery of previously unidentified genomic disorders from the duplication architecture of the human genome

    Andrew J Sharp;Sierra Hansen;Rebecca R Selzer;Ze Cheng

  • Inherited microdeletions in the Angelman and Prader-Willi syndromes define an imprinting centre on human chromosome 15.

    Karin Buiting;Shinji Saitoh;Shinji Saitoh;Stephanie Gross;Bärbel Dittrich

  • Evaluation of mental retardation: Recommendations of a consensus conference

    Cynthia J. Curry;Roger E. Stevenson;David Aughton;Janice Byrne

  • The changing purpose of Prader-Willi syndrome clinical diagnostic criteria and proposed revised criteria.

    Meral Gunay-Aygun;Stuart Schwartz;Shauna Heeger;Mary Ann O'Riordan

  • Linkage Disequilibrium and Heritability of Copy-Number Polymorphisms within Duplicated Regions of the Human Genome

    Devin P. Locke;Andrew J. Sharp;Steven A. McCarroll;Steven A. McCarroll;Sean D. McGrath

  • CACP, encoding a secreted proteoglycan, is mutated in camptodactyly-arthropathy-coxa vara-pericarditis syndrome.

    Jose Marcelino;John D. Carpten;Wafaa M. Suwairi;Orlando M. Gutierrez

  • CWR22: The First Human Prostate Cancer Xenograft with Strongly Androgen-dependent and Relapsed Strains Both in Vivo and in Soft Agar

    Moolky Nagabhushan;Casey M. Miller;Theresa P. Pretlow;Joseph M. Giaconia

  • CWR22: Androgen-dependent Xenograft Model Derived from a Primary Human Prostatic Carcinoma

    Mark A. Wainstein;Feng He;Daniel Robinson;Hsing-Jien Kung

  • Mutations in the novel protocadherin PCDH15 cause Usher syndrome type 1F

    Kumar N. Alagramam;Huijun Yuan;Markus H. Kuehn;Crystal L. Murcia

  • Chromosome breakage in the Prader-Willi and Angelman syndromes involves recombination between large, transcribed repeats at proximal and distal breakpoints.

    James M. Amos-Landgraf;Yonggang Ji;Wayne Gottlieb;Theresa Depinet

  • Structure of Chromosomal Duplicons and their Role in Mediating Human Genomic Disorders

    Yonggang Ji;Evan E. Eichler;Stuart Schwartz;Robert D. Nicholls

  • Covariation of synaptonemal complex length and mammalian meiotic exchange rates.

    Audrey Lynn;Kara E. Koehler;LuAnn Judis;Ernest R. Chan

  • Microdeletion/microduplication of proximal 15q11.2 between BP1 and BP2: a susceptibility region for neurological dysfunction including developmental and language delay

    Rachel D. Burnside;Romela Pasion;Fady M. Mikhail;Andrew J. Carroll

  • Comparison of phenotype between patients with Prader-Willi syndrome due to deletion 15q and uniparental disomy 15.

    S. B. Cassidy;M. Forsythe;S. Heeger;R. D. Nicholls

  • Identification of centromeric antigens in dicentric Robertsonian translocations: CENP-C and CENP-E are necessary components of functional centromeres

    Beth A. Sullivan;Stuart Schwartz

Frequent Co-Authors

Evan E. Eichler
Evan E. Eichler University of Washington
Robert D. Nicholls
Robert D. Nicholls University of Pittsburgh
Cynthia C. Morton
Cynthia C. Morton Brigham and Women's Hospital
Urvashi Surti
Urvashi Surti University of Pittsburgh
Terry J. Hassold
Terry J. Hassold Washington State University
Yiping Shen
Yiping Shen Boston Children's Hospital
Andrew J. Sharp
Andrew J. Sharp Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai
Susanne M. Gollin
Susanne M. Gollin University of Pittsburgh
James F. Gusella
James F. Gusella Harvard University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For students passionate about Genetics, numerous online degrees and career pathways in healthcare are available beyond traditional laboratory research. These options can lead to impactful roles in the growing health sector, and many offer flexible, accessible formats for remote learning.

One popular route is pursuing a medical billing and coding course. This field combines knowledge of healthcare systems with expertise in data management and healthcare regulations, making it an excellent fit for those interested in the administrative side of genetics and healthcare.

Aspiring nurses can explore what is the easiest nursing program to get into to find accessible options for starting a clinical career. Nursing skills often complement a background in Genetics, especially in areas like genetic counseling or patient care.

For leadership or organizational roles, consider a health administration degree. These programs prepare students for managing healthcare facilities, programs, or research initiatives and can be earned efficiently through online or accelerated tracks.

Cost is often crucial, and students can explore the cheapest mha programs online for affordable pathways to a master's in healthcare administration. These advanced programs can open doors to executive opportunities in the ever-evolving field of healthcare.

Best Scientists Citing Stuart Schwartz

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles