World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Ecology and Evolution

D-Index
39
Citations
8286
World Ranking
6292
National Ranking
2133

Stuart H. Gage publication distribution in Ecology and Evolution in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Ecology and Evolution in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Stuart H. Gage sits on this spectrum.

37–41 publications: 2 scientists 42–46 publications: 9 scientists 47–51 publications: 10 scientists 52–56 publications: 31 scientists 57–61 publications: 56 scientists 62–66 publications: 91 scientists 67–71 publications: 92 scientists 72–76 publications: 127 scientists 77–81 publications: 173 scientists 82–86 publications: 236 scientists 87–91 publications: 227 scientists 92–96 publications: 240 scientists 97–101 publications: 333 scientists 102–106 publications: 280 scientists 107–111 publications: 300 scientists 112–116 publications: 285 scientists 117–121 publications: 305 scientists 122–126 publications: 287 scientists 127–131 publications: 278 scientists 132–136 publications: 289 scientists 137–141 publications: 273 scientists 142–146 publications: 262 scientists 147–151 publications: 246 scientists 152–156 publications: 235 scientists 157–161 publications: 205 scientists 162–166 publications: 199 scientists 167–171 publications: 174 scientists 172–176 publications: 164 scientists 177–181 publications: 173 scientists 182–186 publications: 189 scientists 187–191 publications: 170 scientists 192–196 publications: 139 scientists 197–201 publications: 128 scientists 202–206 publications: 117 scientists 207–211 publications: 115 scientists 212–216 publications: 107 scientists 217–221 publications: 124 scientists 222–226 publications: 81 scientists 227–231 publications: 82 scientists 232–236 publications: 85 scientists 237–241 publications: 75 scientists 242–246 publications: 66 scientists 247–251 publications: 81 scientists 252–256 publications: 69 scientists 257–261 publications: 70 scientists 262–266 publications: 55 scientists 267–271 publications: 64 scientists 272–276 publications: 49 scientists 277–281 publications: 48 scientists 282–286 publications: 44 scientists 287–291 publications: 45 scientists 292–296 publications: 36 scientists 297–301 publications: 39 scientists 302–306 publications: 38 scientists 307–311 publications: 30 scientists 312–316 publications: 34 scientists 317–321 publications: 25 scientists 322–326 publications: 22 scientists 327–331 publications: 28 scientists 332–336 publications: 30 scientists 337–341 publications: 22 scientists 342–346 publications: 30 scientists 347–351 publications: 26 scientists 352–356 publications: 22 scientists 357–361 publications: 29 scientists 362–366 publications: 21 scientists 367–371 publications: 12 scientists 372–376 publications: 18 scientists 377–381 publications: 17 scientists 382–386 publications: 13 scientists 387–391 publications: 21 scientists 392–396 publications: 13 scientists 397–401 publications: 10 scientists 402–406 publications: 15 scientists 407–411 publications: 8 scientists 412–416 publications: 9 scientists 417–421 publications: 8 scientists 422–426 publications: 4 scientists 427–431 publications: 10 scientists 432–436 publications: 10 scientists 437–441 publications: 5 scientists 442–446 publications: 4 scientists 447–451 publications: 10 scientists 452–456 publications: 2 scientists 457–461 publications: 4 scientists 462–466 publications: 7 scientists 467–471 publications: 7 scientists 472–476 publications: 6 scientists 477–481 publications: 6 scientists 482–486 publications: 3 scientists 487–491 publications: 3 scientists 492–496 publications: 4 scientists 497–501 publications: 4 scientists 502–506 publications: 8 scientists 507–511 publications: 5 scientists 512–516 publications: 4 scientists 517–521 publications: 5 scientists 522–526 publications: 4 scientists 527–530 publications: 5 scientists 531+ publications: 100 scientists
37 publications 531+

This scientist: 105 publications — 22nd percentile

22% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 531 publications or more.

Stuart H. Gage D-index placement in Ecology and Evolution in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Ecology and Evolution scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Stuart H. Gage sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 95 scientists 31 D-Index: 123 scientists 32 D-Index: 191 scientists 33 D-Index: 245 scientists 34 D-Index: 252 scientists 35 D-Index: 244 scientists 36 D-Index: 249 scientists 37 D-Index: 244 scientists 38 D-Index: 254 scientists 39 D-Index: 254 scientists 40 D-Index: 280 scientists 41 D-Index: 274 scientists 42 D-Index: 266 scientists 43 D-Index: 233 scientists 44 D-Index: 248 scientists 45 D-Index: 208 scientists 46 D-Index: 201 scientists 47 D-Index: 213 scientists 48 D-Index: 207 scientists 49 D-Index: 172 scientists 50 D-Index: 209 scientists 51 D-Index: 199 scientists 52 D-Index: 153 scientists 53 D-Index: 169 scientists 54 D-Index: 163 scientists 55 D-Index: 148 scientists 56 D-Index: 120 scientists 57 D-Index: 146 scientists 58 D-Index: 137 scientists 59 D-Index: 140 scientists 60 D-Index: 104 scientists 61 D-Index: 119 scientists 62 D-Index: 118 scientists 63 D-Index: 99 scientists 64 D-Index: 77 scientists 65 D-Index: 100 scientists 66 D-Index: 86 scientists 67 D-Index: 83 scientists 68 D-Index: 75 scientists 69 D-Index: 94 scientists 70 D-Index: 57 scientists 71 D-Index: 68 scientists 72 D-Index: 59 scientists 73 D-Index: 63 scientists 74 D-Index: 66 scientists 75 D-Index: 60 scientists 76 D-Index: 42 scientists 77 D-Index: 49 scientists 78 D-Index: 39 scientists 79 D-Index: 37 scientists 80 D-Index: 43 scientists 81 D-Index: 41 scientists 82 D-Index: 45 scientists 83 D-Index: 34 scientists 84 D-Index: 40 scientists 85 D-Index: 35 scientists 86 D-Index: 55 scientists 87 D-Index: 24 scientists 88 D-Index: 24 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 23 scientists 91 D-Index: 25 scientists 92 D-Index: 27 scientists 93 D-Index: 27 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 23 scientists 96 D-Index: 12 scientists 97 D-Index: 14 scientists 98 D-Index: 19 scientists 99 D-Index: 16 scientists 100 D-Index: 14 scientists 101 D-Index: 5 scientists 102 D-Index: 21 scientists 103 D-Index: 16 scientists 104 D-Index: 10 scientists 105 D-Index: 7 scientists 106 D-Index: 7 scientists 107 D-Index: 7 scientists 108 D-Index: 6 scientists 109 D-Index: 9 scientists 110 D-Index: 11 scientists 111 D-Index: 12 scientists 112 D-Index: 9 scientists 113 D-Index: 7 scientists 114 D-Index: 3 scientists 115 D-Index: 8 scientists 116 D-Index: 5 scientists 117 D-Index: 11 scientists 118 D-Index: 4 scientists 119 D-Index: 2 scientists 120 D-Index: 5 scientists 121+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 121+

This scientist: 39 D-Index — 26th percentile

26% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 121 D-Index or more.

Overview

Stuart H. Gage is affiliated with Michigan State University in the United States. Their research spans several fields, with a strong focus on Environmental Science and Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology. Subfields of study include Developmental Biology, Ecology, Speech and Hearing, Global and Planetary Change, and Signal Processing.

They have contributed to topics such as Animal Vocal Communication and Behavior, Marine animal studies overview, Noise Effects and Management, Land Use and Ecosystem Services, and Music and Audio Processing.

Their recent published papers include:

  • "Acoustic Footprint of Snowmobile Noise and Natural Quiet Refugia in an Alaskan Wilderness," 2020, Natural Areas Journal
  • "Assessing soundscape disturbance through hierarchical models and acoustic indices: A case study on a shelterwood logged northern Michigan forest," 2020, Ecological Indicators

Frequent collaborators in their work include Timothy C. Mullet, John M. Morton, Falk Huettmann, Bryan C. Pijanowski, and David T. Long.

Their research has appeared notably in the Natural Areas Journal and Ecological Indicators, reflecting an engagement with ecological and environmental monitoring themes.

Best Publications

  • Soundscape Ecology: The Science of Sound in the Landscape

    Bryan C. Pijanowski;Luis J. Villanueva-Rivera;Sarah L. Dumyahn;Almo Farina

  • What is soundscape ecology? An introduction and overview of an emerging new science

    Bryan C. Pijanowski;Almo Farina;Stuart H. Gage;Sarah L. Dumyahn

  • The remote environmental assessment laboratory's acoustic library: An archive for studying soundscape ecology

    Unknown

  • Wireless Sensor Networks for Ecology

    John Porter;Peter Arzberger;Hans-Werner Braun;Pablo Bryant

  • Connecting soundscape to landscape: Which acoustic index best describes landscape configuration?

    Susan Fuller;Anne C. Axel;David Tucker;Stuart H. Gage

  • Landscape approaches to the analysis of aquatic ecosystems

    Lucinda B. Johnson;Stuart H. Gage

  • Principles of the Atmospheric Pathway for Invasive Species Applied to Soybean Rust

    Scott A. Isard;Stuart H. Gage;Paul Comtois;Joseph M. Russo

  • Arrival, Establishment, and Habitat Use of the Multicolored Asian Lady Beetle (Coleoptera: Coccinellidae) in a Michigan Landscape

    Manuel Colunga-Garcia;Stuart H. Gage

  • DOES AGRICULTURAL LANDSCAPE STRUCTURE AFFECT PARASITISM AND PARASITOID DIVERSITY

    Fabián D. Menalled;Paul C. Marino;Stuart H. Gage;Douglas A. Landis

  • Analysis and interpretation of variability in soundscapes along an urban–rural gradient

    Unknown

  • Establishing pathways of energy flow for insect predators using stable isotope ratios: field and laboratory evidence.

    Peggy H. Ostrom;Manuel Colunga-Garcia;Stuart H. Gage

  • Visualization of temporal change in soundscape power of a Michigan lake habitat over a 4-year period

    Stuart H. Gage;Anne C. Axel

  • Linking ecological condition and the soundscape in fragmented Australian forests

    David Tucker;Stuart H. Gage;Ian Williamson;Susan Fuller

  • Linking ecological condition and the soundscape in fragmented Australian forests

    David Tucker;Stuart H. Gage;Ian Williamson;Susan Fuller

  • Habitats and Management Associated with Common Ground Beetles (Coleoptera: Carabidae) in a Michigan Agricultural Landscape

    M. S. Clark;S. H. Gage;J. R. Spence

  • A Land Transformation Model for the Saginaw Bay Watershed

    Bryan C. Pijanowski;Stuart H. Gage;David T. Long;William E. Cooper

  • Flow of Life in the Atmosphere: An Airscape Approach to Understanding Invasive Organisms

    S A Isard;S H Gage

  • SOCRATES—A simple model for predicting long-term changes in soil organic carbon in terrestrial ecosystems

    Peter Grace;Peter Grace;Jeffrey Ladd;G Robertson;Stuart Gage

  • A Perspective of Grasshopper Population Distribution in Saskatchewan and Interrelationship with Weather

    Stuart H. Gage;M. K. Mukerji

  • Measuring and interpreting the temporal variability in the soundscape at four places in Sequoia National Park

    Bernie Krause;Stuart H. Gage;Wooyeong Joo

  • Temporal and spatial variation of a winter soundscape in south-central Alaska

    Timothy C. Mullet;Timothy C. Mullet;Stuart H. Gage;John M. Morton;Falk Huettmann

  • Response of an Assemblage of Coccinellidae (Coleoptera) to a Diverse Agricultural Landscape

    Manuel Colunga-Garcia;Stuart H. Gage;Douglas A. Landis

  • The role of exotic ladybeetles in the decline of native ladybeetle populations: evidence from long-term monitoring

    Christine A. Bahlai;Manuel Colunga-Garcia;Stuart H. Gage;Douglas A. Landis

  • The Potential Impact of Agricultural Management and Climate Change on Soil Organic Carbon of the North Central Region of the United States

    Peter R. Grace;Peter R. Grace;Manuel Colunga-Garcia;Stuart H. Gage;G. Philip Robertson

Frequent Co-Authors

Peter Grace
Peter Grace Queensland University of Technology
Bryan C. Pijanowski
Bryan C. Pijanowski Purdue University West Lafayette
Douglas A. Landis
Douglas A. Landis Michigan State University
Scott A. Isard
Scott A. Isard Pennsylvania State University
Bruno Basso
Bruno Basso Michigan State University
J.N. Ladd
J.N. Ladd Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation
G. Philip Robertson
G. Philip Robertson Michigan State University
G. P. Robertson
G. P. Robertson Michigan State University
Robert A. Haack
Robert A. Haack US Forest Service
David T. Long
David T. Long Michigan State University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

If you’re interested in Ecology and Evolution, there are several related online degree options and career directions to consider. Students often find that combining biology with other disciplines opens up diverse employment opportunities and academic paths.

For those with a strong math background, online math degree programs can enhance analytical skills crucial for research in evolutionary biology, data analysis, and ecological modeling. Similarly, expertise in visual communication is increasingly important for sharing scientific findings with the public—consider exploring an online graphic design degree to master effective science communication and educational outreach.

Many students also pursue best value online interdisciplinary studies degrees to build custom programs that blend ecology, evolution, and complementary subjects like policy or sustainability. This approach can maximize flexibility and career readiness in a rapidly-changing job market.

Lastly, some graduates transition into history or museum-related fields. If you’re curious about educational requirements and earning potential in these areas, see how much do historians make for more information on salaries and advanced study options.

Best Scientists Citing Stuart H. Gage

Trending Scientists