World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Biology and Biochemistry

D-Index
53
Citations
7243
World Ranking
16389
National Ranking
6774

Stuart E. Dryer publication distribution in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Biology and Biochemistry in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Stuart E. Dryer sits on this spectrum.

47–56 publications: 8 scientists 57–66 publications: 35 scientists 67–76 publications: 106 scientists 77–86 publications: 231 scientists 87–96 publications: 414 scientists 97–106 publications: 546 scientists 107–116 publications: 704 scientists 117–126 publications: 849 scientists 127–136 publications: 980 scientists 137–146 publications: 942 scientists 147–156 publications: 969 scientists 157–166 publications: 950 scientists 167–176 publications: 951 scientists 177–186 publications: 915 scientists 187–196 publications: 787 scientists 197–206 publications: 841 scientists 207–216 publications: 735 scientists 217–226 publications: 709 scientists 227–236 publications: 651 scientists 237–246 publications: 605 scientists 247–256 publications: 510 scientists 257–266 publications: 524 scientists 267–276 publications: 434 scientists 277–286 publications: 418 scientists 287–296 publications: 350 scientists 297–306 publications: 363 scientists 307–316 publications: 315 scientists 317–326 publications: 296 scientists 327–336 publications: 261 scientists 337–346 publications: 240 scientists 347–356 publications: 219 scientists 357–366 publications: 197 scientists 367–376 publications: 154 scientists 377–386 publications: 161 scientists 387–396 publications: 155 scientists 397–406 publications: 145 scientists 407–416 publications: 124 scientists 417–426 publications: 112 scientists 427–436 publications: 132 scientists 437–446 publications: 116 scientists 447–456 publications: 99 scientists 457–466 publications: 81 scientists 467–476 publications: 91 scientists 477–486 publications: 80 scientists 487–496 publications: 80 scientists 497–506 publications: 60 scientists 507–516 publications: 36 scientists 517–526 publications: 46 scientists 527–536 publications: 54 scientists 537–546 publications: 44 scientists 547–556 publications: 43 scientists 557–566 publications: 43 scientists 567–576 publications: 42 scientists 577–586 publications: 25 scientists 587–596 publications: 34 scientists 597–606 publications: 23 scientists 607–616 publications: 33 scientists 617–626 publications: 31 scientists 627–636 publications: 27 scientists 637–646 publications: 25 scientists 647–656 publications: 28 scientists 657–666 publications: 34 scientists 667–676 publications: 18 scientists 677–686 publications: 16 scientists 687–696 publications: 10 scientists 697–706 publications: 12 scientists 707–716 publications: 21 scientists 717–726 publications: 12 scientists 727–736 publications: 12 scientists 737–746 publications: 10 scientists 747–756 publications: 7 scientists 757–766 publications: 13 scientists 767–776 publications: 15 scientists 777–786 publications: 13 scientists 787–796 publications: 9 scientists 797–806 publications: 9 scientists 807–816 publications: 7 scientists 817–826 publications: 4 scientists 827–836 publications: 9 scientists 837–846 publications: 7 scientists 847–856 publications: 3 scientists 857–866 publications: 5 scientists 867–876 publications: 5 scientists 877–886 publications: 11 scientists 887–896 publications: 3 scientists 897–906 publications: 4 scientists 907–916 publications: 7 scientists 917–926 publications: 5 scientists 927–936 publications: 6 scientists 937–946 publications: 6 scientists 947–956 publications: 3 scientists 957–966 publications: 7 scientists 967–976 publications: 2 scientists 977–986 publications: 2 scientists 987–996 publications: 1 scientists 997–1,006 publications: 5 scientists 1,007–1,016 publications: 2 scientists 1,017–1,026 publications: 2 scientists 1,027 publications: 1 scientists 1,028+ publications: 100 scientists
47 publications 1,028+

This scientist: 151 publications — 27th percentile

27% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,028 publications or more.

Stuart E. Dryer D-index placement in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Biology and Biochemistry scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Stuart E. Dryer sits on this spectrum.

40–41 D-Index: 80 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 183 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 317 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 504 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 718 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 900 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 1,026 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 1,150 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 1,236 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 1,253 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 1,163 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 1,131 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 1,032 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 897 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 814 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 715 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 709 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 596 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 512 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 473 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 412 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 373 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 358 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 285 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 273 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 227 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 208 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 193 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 153 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 157 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 148 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 120 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 113 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 100 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 86 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 67 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 72 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 73 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 64 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 53 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 60 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 54 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 43 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 38 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 49 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 26 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 18 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 23 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 32 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 32 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 27 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 19 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 22 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 12 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 16 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 14 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 10 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 13 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 10 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 7 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 9 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 13 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 4 scientists 166 D-Index: 4 scientists 167+ D-Index: 98 scientists
40 D-Index 167+

This scientist: 53 D-Index — 19th percentile

19% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 167 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2009 - Fellow of the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS)

Overview

Stuart E. Dryer is affiliated with the University of Houston in the United States and conducts research primarily in the fields of Medicine and Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology. Their work focuses extensively on Nephrology, Molecular Biology, Sensory Systems, Plant Science, and Clinical Biochemistry.

Their research spans key topics related to Renal Diseases and Glomerulopathies, Ion Transport and Channel Regulation, Ion Channels and Receptors, Cynara cardunculus studies, Paraoxonase enzyme and polymorphisms, Chronic Kidney Disease and Diabetes, as well as Advanced Glycation End Products research.

Recent publications by Stuart E. Dryer include the following:

  • "Ion channels and channelopathies in glomeruli," 2022, Physiological Reviews
  • "Effects of TRPC6 Inactivation on Glomerulosclerosis and Renal Fibrosis in Aging Rats," 2021, Cells
  • "The small GTPase regulatory protein Rac1 drives podocyte injury independent of cationic channel protein TRPC5," 2023, Kidney International
  • "The Effects of TRPC6 Knockout in Animal Models of Kidney Disease," 2022, Biomolecules
  • "RAGE and αVβ3-integrin are essential for suPAR signaling in podocytes," 2021, Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) - Molecular Basis of Disease

Frequent publication venues for their work include:

  • Cells
  • Physiological Reviews
  • Kidney International
  • Biomolecules
  • Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) - Molecular Basis of Disease

Stuart E. Dryer has collaborated with several researchers multiple times. These frequent co-authors include Eun Young Kim, Alexander Staruschenko, Onur Polat, Yashwanth R. Sudhini, and Ke Zhu.

In terms of recognition, Stuart E. Dryer was named a Fellow of the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS) in 2009.

Best Publications

  • Circadian rhythms in olfactory responses of Drosophila melanogaster

    Balaji Krishnan;Stuart E. Dryer;Paul E. Hardin

  • Maintenance of Acetylcholine Receptor Number by Neuregulins at the Neuromuscular Junction in Vivo

    Alfred W. Sandrock;Stuart E. Dryer;Stuart E. Dryer;Kenneth M. Rosen;Kenneth M. Rosen;Shai N. Gozani;Shai N. Gozani

  • A new role for cryptochrome in a Drosophila circadian oscillator

    Balaji Krishnan;Joel D. Levine;M. Kathlea S. Lynch;Harold B. Dowse

  • Circadian clocks in antennal neurons are necessary and sufficient for olfaction rhythms in Drosophila.

    Shintaro Tanoue;Parthasarathy Krishnan;Balaji Krishnan;Stuart E Dryer

  • TRPC6 channels and their binding partners in podocytes: role in glomerular filtration and pathophysiology

    Stuart E. Dryer;Jochen Reiser

  • Na+-activated K+ channels: a new family of large-conductance ion channels

    Stuart E. Dryer

  • A cyclic GMP-activated channel in dissociated cells of the chick pineal gland.

    Stuart E. Dryer;Dori Henderson

  • Canonical Transient Receptor Potential Channel (TRPC) 3 and TRPC6 Associate with Large-Conductance Ca2+-Activated K+ (BKCa) Channels: Role in BKCa Trafficking to the Surface of Cultured Podocytes

    Eun Young Kim;Claudia P. Alvarez-Baron;Stuart E. Dryer

  • Circadian regulation of cGMP-gated cationic channels of chick retinal cones. Erk MAP Kinase and Ca2+/calmodulin-dependent protein kinase II.

    Gladys Y.-P. Ko;Michael L. Ko;Stuart E. Dryer

  • Insulin increases surface expression of TRPC6 channels in podocytes: role of NADPH oxidases and reactive oxygen species.

    Eun Young Kim;Marc Anderson;Stuart E. Dryer

  • A Na+-activated K+ current in cultured brain stem neurones from chicks.

    S E Dryer;J T Fujii;A R Martin

  • Opposing effects of podocin on the gating of podocyte TRPC6 channels evoked by membrane stretch or diacylglycerol.

    Marc Anderson;Eun Young Kim;Henning Hagmann;Thomas Benzing

  • Functional dependence of Ca(2+)-activated K+ current on L- and N-type Ca2+ channels: differences between chicken sympathetic and parasympathetic neurons suggest different regulatory mechanisms

    Mary E. Wisgirda;Stuart E. Dryer

  • Innervation and target tissue interactions differentially regulate acetylcholine receptor subunit mRNA levels in developing neurons in situ.

    Marjory Schwartz Levey;Craig L Brumwell;Stuart E Dryer;Michele H. Jacob

  • NOX2 interacts with podocyte TRPC6 channels and contributes to their activation by diacylglycerol: essential role of podocin in formation of this complex.

    Eun Young Kim;Marc Anderson;Cory Wilson;Henning Hagmann

  • Functional development of the parasympathetic neurons of the avian ciliary ganglion: a classic model system for the study of neuronal differentiation and development.

    Stuart E. Dryer

  • Enhancement of Mitochondrial, Cyanide-resistant Superoxide Dismutase in the Livers of Rats Treated with 2,4-Dinitrophenol*

    S E Dryer;R L Dryer;A P Autor

  • Na(+)-activated K+ channels and voltage-evoked ionic currents in brain stem and parasympathetic neurones of the chick.

    S E Dryer

  • Changes in the electrical properties of chick ciliary ganglion neurones during embryonic development.

    M M Dourado;S E Dryer

  • Angiotensin II activation of TRPC6 channels in rat podocytes requires generation of reactive oxygen species.

    Marc Anderson;Hila Roshanravan;Justin Khine;Stuart E. Dryer;Stuart E. Dryer

Frequent Co-Authors

Paul E. Hardin
Paul E. Hardin Texas A&M University
Thomas Benzing
Thomas Benzing University of Cologne
Katsumi Aida
Katsumi Aida University of Tokyo
Masaomi Iyo
Masaomi Iyo Chiba University
Sato Honma
Sato Honma Hokkaido University
Ken-ichi Honma
Ken-ichi Honma Hokkaido University
Bernhard Schermer
Bernhard Schermer University of Cologne
Gerald D. Fischbach
Gerald D. Fischbach Columbia University
Pedro Beltrao
Pedro Beltrao European Bioinformatics Institute
Jeffrey C. Hall
Jeffrey C. Hall Brandeis University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Biology and Biochemistry can open doors to diverse careers in healthcare, research, and biotechnology. Many students choose to boost their credentials with online degrees—one popular option is online healthcare MBA programs, which prepare graduates for leadership roles in hospitals, clinics, and biotech companies.

If you are more interested in careers behind the scenes, medical coding and billing could be a great fit. Understanding the differences between professional certifications is essential; this guide on ccs vs cpc certification covers their requirements, costs, and salary outcomes to help you choose the right path.

Medical coding is a growing field with solid earning potential. To get an idea of what you could earn, check out current medical coding salary trends and pathways for entering the profession.

Wondering if medical coding is a good career move? Weigh the advantages and challenges in this article: is medical coding a good job.

Best Scientists Citing Stuart E. Dryer

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles