What is he best known for?
The fields of study he is best known for:
His primary scientific interests are in Dynein, Chlamydomonas, Microtubule, Cell biology and Dynein ATPase.
Stephen M. King combines subjects such as Immunoglobulin light chain, Flagellum and Biochemistry with his study of Dynein.
Stephen M. King has researched Chlamydomonas in several fields, including Biophysics and Kinesin.
His Microtubule research integrates issues from Molecular biology and Peptide sequence.
He interconnects Protein structure and Axoneme in the investigation of issues within Cell biology.
His Cilium research includes elements of Mutation, Intraflagellar transport and Zebrafish.
His most cited work include:
- The Proapoptotic Activity of the Bcl-2 Family Member Bim Is Regulated by Interaction with the Dynein Motor Complex (965 citations)
- The dynein microtubule motor. (297 citations)
- Genetic analysis of the cytoplasmic dynein subunit families (249 citations)
What are the main themes of his work throughout his whole career to date?
His primary areas of study are Dynein, Cell biology, Chlamydomonas, Microtubule and Flagellum.
His Dynein study incorporates themes from Outer dynein arm, Axoneme, Biophysics and Biochemistry.
As part of his studies on Cell biology, Stephen M. King often connects relevant subjects like Chlamydomonas reinhardtii.
His studies deal with areas such as Protein subunit, T-Complex Genome Region and Protein family as well as Chlamydomonas.
The study incorporates disciplines such as Immunoglobulin light chain, Peptide sequence, Molecular motor and Protein structure in addition to Microtubule.
The concepts of his Flagellum study are interwoven with issues in Sea urchin and Nucleoside-diphosphate kinase.
He most often published in these fields:
- Dynein (71.43%)
- Cell biology (54.55%)
- Chlamydomonas (49.35%)
What were the highlights of his more recent work (between 2012-2021)?
- Cell biology (54.55%)
- Cilium (29.87%)
- Dynein (71.43%)
In recent papers he was focusing on the following fields of study:
The scientist’s investigation covers issues in Cell biology, Cilium, Dynein, Chlamydomonas and Microtubule.
His research in Cell biology intersects with topics in Zebrafish and Chlamydomonas reinhardtii.
His Motile cilium study, which is part of a larger body of work in Cilium, is frequently linked to Planaria, Schmidtea mediterranea and Planarian, bridging the gap between disciplines.
His studies in Dynein integrate themes in fields like Axoneme, Flagellum, Intraflagellar transport, Outer dynein arm assembly and Cytoplasm.
His Chlamydomonas study integrates concerns from other disciplines, such as HEK 293 cells and Subtilisin.
His Microtubule research is multidisciplinary, incorporating perspectives in Outer dynein arm, Biophysics and Protein structure.
Between 2012 and 2021, his most popular works were:
- Correction: Corrigendum: TCTEX1D2 mutations underlie Jeune asphyxiating thoracic dystrophy with impaired retrograde intraflagellar transport (219 citations)
- Zebrafish Ciliopathy Screen Plus Human Mutational Analysis Identifies C21orf59 and CCDC65 Defects as Causing Primary Ciliary Dyskinesia (129 citations)
- The Chlamydomonas genome project: a decade on (100 citations)
In his most recent research, the most cited papers focused on:
Stephen M. King mostly deals with Dynein, Cilium, Cell biology, Microtubule and Flagellum.
Stephen M. King has included themes like Outer dynein arm assembly and Genetic testing in his Cilium study.
His Cell biology research is multidisciplinary, relying on both Mutation and Zebrafish.
Stephen M. King works mostly in the field of Microtubule, limiting it down to topics relating to Axoneme and, in certain cases, Biophysics, Plasma protein binding, Cooperative binding, Chlamydomonas reinhardtii and Dynactin.
His research on Flagellum often connects related topics like Chlamydomonas.
The various areas that Stephen M. King examines in his Chlamydomonas study include Protein structure, Radial spoke and Protein subunit.
This overview was generated by a machine learning system which analysed the scientist’s
body of work. If you have any feedback, you can
contact us
here.
