World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Shiliang Su

Shiliang Su

D-Index & Metrics

Environmental Sciences

D-Index
51
Citations
7499
World Ranking
4827
National Ranking
507

Shiliang Su publication distribution in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Environmental Sciences in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Shiliang Su sits on this spectrum.

41–50 publications: 21 scientists 51–60 publications: 62 scientists 61–70 publications: 133 scientists 71–80 publications: 257 scientists 81–90 publications: 361 scientists 91–100 publications: 440 scientists 101–110 publications: 492 scientists 111–120 publications: 541 scientists 121–130 publications: 617 scientists 131–140 publications: 544 scientists 141–150 publications: 541 scientists 151–160 publications: 539 scientists 161–170 publications: 444 scientists 171–180 publications: 444 scientists 181–190 publications: 400 scientists 191–200 publications: 377 scientists 201–210 publications: 318 scientists 211–220 publications: 283 scientists 221–230 publications: 263 scientists 231–240 publications: 220 scientists 241–250 publications: 217 scientists 251–260 publications: 180 scientists 261–270 publications: 181 scientists 271–280 publications: 155 scientists 281–290 publications: 130 scientists 291–300 publications: 127 scientists 301–310 publications: 130 scientists 311–320 publications: 85 scientists 321–330 publications: 106 scientists 331–340 publications: 80 scientists 341–350 publications: 83 scientists 351–360 publications: 75 scientists 361–370 publications: 69 scientists 371–380 publications: 52 scientists 381–390 publications: 54 scientists 391–400 publications: 56 scientists 401–410 publications: 44 scientists 411–420 publications: 40 scientists 421–430 publications: 36 scientists 431–440 publications: 25 scientists 441–450 publications: 25 scientists 451–460 publications: 32 scientists 461–470 publications: 29 scientists 471–480 publications: 21 scientists 481–490 publications: 26 scientists 491–500 publications: 25 scientists 501–510 publications: 17 scientists 511–520 publications: 18 scientists 521–530 publications: 15 scientists 531–540 publications: 22 scientists 541–550 publications: 12 scientists 551–560 publications: 15 scientists 561–570 publications: 11 scientists 571–580 publications: 19 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 9 scientists 601–610 publications: 7 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 5 scientists 631–640 publications: 5 scientists 641–650 publications: 6 scientists 651–660 publications: 3 scientists 661–670 publications: 3 scientists 671–680 publications: 4 scientists 681–686 publications: 3 scientists 687+ publications: 100 scientists
41 publications 687+

This scientist: 81 publications — 5th percentile

5% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 687 publications or more.

Shiliang Su D-index placement in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Environmental Sciences scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Shiliang Su sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 12 scientists 31 D-Index: 26 scientists 32 D-Index: 51 scientists 33 D-Index: 88 scientists 34 D-Index: 123 scientists 35 D-Index: 163 scientists 36 D-Index: 206 scientists 37 D-Index: 267 scientists 38 D-Index: 265 scientists 39 D-Index: 275 scientists 40 D-Index: 321 scientists 41 D-Index: 343 scientists 42 D-Index: 305 scientists 43 D-Index: 336 scientists 44 D-Index: 330 scientists 45 D-Index: 348 scientists 46 D-Index: 291 scientists 47 D-Index: 275 scientists 48 D-Index: 272 scientists 49 D-Index: 273 scientists 50 D-Index: 263 scientists 51 D-Index: 232 scientists 52 D-Index: 266 scientists 53 D-Index: 217 scientists 54 D-Index: 199 scientists 55 D-Index: 177 scientists 56 D-Index: 202 scientists 57 D-Index: 204 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 177 scientists 60 D-Index: 166 scientists 61 D-Index: 152 scientists 62 D-Index: 143 scientists 63 D-Index: 150 scientists 64 D-Index: 124 scientists 65 D-Index: 119 scientists 66 D-Index: 120 scientists 67 D-Index: 118 scientists 68 D-Index: 82 scientists 69 D-Index: 98 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 105 scientists 72 D-Index: 74 scientists 73 D-Index: 84 scientists 74 D-Index: 70 scientists 75 D-Index: 67 scientists 76 D-Index: 78 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 59 scientists 79 D-Index: 52 scientists 80 D-Index: 47 scientists 81 D-Index: 38 scientists 82 D-Index: 48 scientists 83 D-Index: 42 scientists 84 D-Index: 42 scientists 85 D-Index: 43 scientists 86 D-Index: 29 scientists 87 D-Index: 37 scientists 88 D-Index: 29 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 34 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 22 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 19 scientists 95 D-Index: 24 scientists 96 D-Index: 21 scientists 97 D-Index: 20 scientists 98 D-Index: 24 scientists 99 D-Index: 17 scientists 100 D-Index: 17 scientists 101 D-Index: 21 scientists 102 D-Index: 25 scientists 103 D-Index: 18 scientists 104 D-Index: 26 scientists 105 D-Index: 19 scientists 106 D-Index: 15 scientists 107 D-Index: 10 scientists 108 D-Index: 13 scientists 109 D-Index: 15 scientists 110 D-Index: 12 scientists 111 D-Index: 8 scientists 112 D-Index: 7 scientists 113 D-Index: 9 scientists 114 D-Index: 6 scientists 115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116 D-Index: 7 scientists 117 D-Index: 8 scientists 118 D-Index: 3 scientists 119 D-Index: 5 scientists 120 D-Index: 7 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 4 scientists 123 D-Index: 8 scientists 124 D-Index: 7 scientists 125+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 125+

This scientist: 51 D-Index — 52nd percentile

52% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 125 D-Index or more.

Overview

Shiliang Su is a researcher affiliated with Wuhan University in China, with a focus on social sciences and a substantial body of work related to urban transport, land use, and human mobility. Their research spans several interconnected subfields such as transportation, global and planetary change, economics and econometrics, sociology and political science, and building and construction.

The main topics explored in their work include urban transport and accessibility, land use and ecosystem services, human mobility and location-based analysis, transportation planning and optimization, diverse aspects of tourism research, housing market and economics, and urban green space and health.

Frequent publication venues for Shiliang Su are the Journal of Transport Geography, Habitat International, Transactions in GIS, Journal of Maps, and Applied Geography. The researcher has contributed multiple papers to these journals, indicating an active role within these disciplinary communities.

Their recent significant papers include:

  • Transit-oriented development (TOD) typologies around metro station areas in urban China: A comparative analysis of five typical megacities for planning implications, 2020, Journal of Transport Geography
  • Unraveling the impact of TOD on housing rental prices and implications on spatial planning: A comparative analysis of five Chinese megacities, 2020, Habitat International
  • Unraveling the relative contribution of TOD structural factors to metro ridership: A novel localized modeling approach with implications on spatial planning, 2022, Journal of Transport Geography

Collaboration is evident in their frequent co-authorship with several researchers, including Mengjun Kang, Min Weng, Bozhao Li, Shenjing He, and Lirong Hu. These collaborations reflect a network of scholars working on related themes, potentially enriching interdisciplinary approaches in transportation and urban studies.

Best Publications

  • Characterizing landscape pattern and ecosystem service value changes for urbanization impacts at an eco-regional scale

    Shiliang Su;Rui Xiao;Zhenlan Jiang;Yuan Zhang

  • The 15-Minute Walkable Neighborhoods: Measurement, Social Inequalities and Implications for Building Healthy Communities in Urban China

    Min Weng;Ning Ding;Jing Li;Xianfeng Jin

  • Transformation of agricultural landscapes under rapid urbanization: A threat to sustainability in Hang-Jia-Hu region, China

    Shiliang Su;Zhenlan Jiang;Qi Zhang;Yuan Zhang

  • Social inequalities in neighborhood visual walkability: Using street view imagery and deep learning technologies to facilitate healthy city planning

    Hao Zhou;Shenjing He;Yuyang Cai;Miao Wang

  • Determinants of urban expansion and their relative importance: A comparative analysis of 30 major metropolitans in China

    Qianwen Zhang;Shiliang Su

  • Monitoring housing rental prices based on social media:An integrated approach of machine-learning algorithms and hedonic modeling to inform equitable housing policies

    Lirong Hu;Shenjing He;Zixuan Han;He Xiao

  • Multi-scale analysis of spatially varying relationships between agricultural landscape patterns and urbanization using geographically weighted regression

    Shiliang Su;Rui Xiao;Yuan Zhang

  • Temporal trend and source apportionment of water pollution in different functional zones of Qiantang River, China.

    Shiliang Su;Dan Li;Qi Zhang;Rui Xiao

  • Land use changes to cash crop plantations: crop types, multilevel determinants and policy implications

    Shiliang Su;Xiangcheng Zhou;Chen Wan;Yunke Li

  • Social inequalities of park accessibility in Shenzhen, China: The role of park quality, transport modes, and hierarchical socioeconomic characteristics

    Mengya Xu;Jing Xin;Shiliang Su;Min Weng

  • Spatially non-stationary response of ecosystem service value changes to urbanization in Shanghai, China

    Shiliang Su;Delong Li;Yi’na Hu;Rui Xiao

  • Socioeconomic drivers of forest loss and fragmentation: A comparison between different land use planning schemes and policy implications

    Yaolin Liu;Yuhao Feng;Zhe Zhao;Qianwen Zhang

  • Auditing street walkability and associated social inequalities for planning implications

    Shiliang Su;Hao Zhou;Mengya Xu;Hu Ru

  • Assessing land ecological security in Shanghai (China) based on catastrophe theory

    Shiliang Su;Dan Li;Xiang Yu;Zhonghao Zhang

  • Transit oriented development among metro station areas in Shanghai, China: Variations, typology, optimization and implications for land use planning

    Zekun Li;Zixuan Han;Jing Xin;Xin Luo

  • Identifying determinants of urban growth from a multi-scale perspective: A case study of the urban agglomeration around Hangzhou Bay, China

    Zhonghao Zhang;Shiliang Su;Rui Xiao;Diwei Jiang

  • Community deprivation, walkability, and public health: Highlighting the social inequalities in land use planning for health promotion

    Shiliang Su;Jianhua Pi;Huan Xie;Zhongliang Cai

  • Agricultural landscape pattern changes in response to urbanization at ecoregional scale

    Shiliang Su;Shiliang Su;Xiaoya Ma;Rui Xiao

  • Does the establishment of development zones really improve industrial land use efficiency? Implications for China’s high-quality development policy

    Yifan Sun;Anbing Ma;Haorui Su;Shiliang Su

  • Farmland fragmentation due to anthropogenic activity in rapidly developing region

    Shiliang Su;Yi’na Hu;Fanghan Luo;Gengchen Mai

  • Spatial determinants of hazardous chemicals in surface water of Qiantang River, China

    Shiliang Su;Shiliang Su;Rui Xiao;Xiaoya Mi;Xiangyang Xu

Frequent Co-Authors

Jiaping Wu
Jiaping Wu Zhejiang University
Shenjing He
Shenjing He University of Hong Kong
Jiaguo Qi
Jiaguo Qi Michigan State University
Yaolin Liu
Yaolin Liu Wuhan University
Wei Gao
Wei Gao Colorado State University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Environmental Sciences in the USA opens doors to various related online degrees and career paths that complement this field. For professionals interested in expanding their expertise in social work as it relates to environmental advocacy, there are fully funded dsw programs that provide advanced training with financial support to ease the burden of higher education costs.

Many students also seek flexible and budget-friendly options to balance their studies with other commitments. A budget friendly online general studies degree offers a versatile foundation, allowing learners to tailor their education towards environmental, scientific, or policy-oriented careers without overwhelming expenses.

For those looking for manageable academic commitments, understanding the easiest bachelor degree to get can be valuable. While this may not always be the focus for all students, choosing an accessible program can provide a smoother pathway into environmental fields, especially for individuals changing careers or returning to education after a break.

Lastly, specialized study choices like a geoscience online degree offer targeted knowledge relevant to environmental sciences. This degree supports careers in geology, earth systems, and environmental consulting, combining scientific rigor with the convenience of online learning.

Best Scientists Citing Shiliang Su

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles