World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Shiliang Su

Shiliang Su

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Environmental Sciences 51 4829 4624 510 506 81 7499

Shiliang Su publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Shiliang Su between 2008 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Shiliang Su published across 18 years, from 2008 to 2025, averaging 5.7 papers a year. Output peaked at 12 publications in 2019. 14 of the 102 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2008 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 12. Peak 12 publications in 2019. 2008: 1 publication 2009: 2 publications 2010: 1 publication 2011: 7 publications 2012: 6 publications 2013: 7 publications 2014: 8 publications 2015: 2 publications 2016: 6 publications 2017: 11 publications 2018: 2 publications 2019: 12 publications 2020: 8 publications 2021: 5 publications 2022: 7 publications 2023: 3 publications 2024: 9 publications 2025: 5 publications
2008 2025

102 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Shiliang Su: publications per year, 2008 to 2025
Year Publications
2008 1
2009 2
2010 1
2011 7
2012 6
2013 7
2014 8
2015 2
2016 6
2017 11
2018 2
2019 12
2020 8
2021 5
2022 7
2023 3
2024 9
2025 5
Total 102
Download as CSV

Shiliang Su publication distribution in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Environmental Sciences in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Shiliang Su sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 66 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 41–50 to 690+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 617. Most scientists, 617, have 121–130 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 690 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 81–90 publications, is where this scientist sits. 41–50 publications: 21 scientists 51–60 publications: 62 scientists 61–70 publications: 133 scientists 71–80 publications: 257 scientists 81–90 publications: 361 scientists 91–100 publications: 440 scientists 101–110 publications: 492 scientists 111–120 publications: 541 scientists 121–130 publications: 617 scientists 131–140 publications: 544 scientists 141–150 publications: 541 scientists 151–160 publications: 539 scientists 161–170 publications: 444 scientists 171–180 publications: 444 scientists 181–190 publications: 400 scientists 191–200 publications: 377 scientists 201–210 publications: 318 scientists 211–220 publications: 282 scientists 221–230 publications: 263 scientists 231–240 publications: 220 scientists 241–250 publications: 217 scientists 251–260 publications: 180 scientists 261–270 publications: 181 scientists 271–280 publications: 155 scientists 281–290 publications: 130 scientists 291–300 publications: 127 scientists 301–310 publications: 130 scientists 311–320 publications: 85 scientists 321–330 publications: 106 scientists 331–340 publications: 80 scientists 341–350 publications: 83 scientists 351–360 publications: 75 scientists 361–370 publications: 69 scientists 371–380 publications: 52 scientists 381–390 publications: 54 scientists 391–400 publications: 56 scientists 401–410 publications: 44 scientists 411–420 publications: 40 scientists 421–430 publications: 36 scientists 431–440 publications: 25 scientists 441–450 publications: 25 scientists 451–460 publications: 32 scientists 461–470 publications: 29 scientists 471–480 publications: 21 scientists 481–490 publications: 26 scientists 491–500 publications: 26 scientists 501–510 publications: 17 scientists 511–520 publications: 19 scientists 521–530 publications: 15 scientists 531–540 publications: 22 scientists 541–550 publications: 12 scientists 551–560 publications: 15 scientists 561–570 publications: 11 scientists 571–580 publications: 19 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 9 scientists 601–610 publications: 7 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 5 scientists 631–640 publications: 5 scientists 641–650 publications: 6 scientists 651–660 publications: 3 scientists 661–670 publications: 3 scientists 671–680 publications: 4 scientists 681–689 publications: 4 scientists 690+ publications: 100 scientists
41–50 publications 690+

This scientist: 81 publications — 5th percentile

5% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 690 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Environmental Sciences scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,676 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
41–50 21
51–60 62
61–70 133
71–80 257
81–90 361 81
91–100 440
101–110 492
111–120 541
121–130 617
131–140 544
141–150 541
151–160 539
161–170 444
171–180 444
181–190 400
191–200 377
201–210 318
211–220 282
221–230 263
231–240 220
241–250 217
251–260 180
261–270 181
271–280 155
281–290 130
291–300 127
301–310 130
311–320 85
321–330 106
331–340 80
341–350 83
351–360 75
361–370 69
371–380 52
381–390 54
391–400 56
401–410 44
411–420 40
421–430 36
431–440 25
441–450 25
451–460 32
461–470 29
471–480 21
481–490 26
491–500 26
501–510 17
511–520 19
521–530 15
531–540 22
541–550 12
551–560 15
561–570 11
571–580 19
581–590 9
591–600 9
601–610 7
611–620 11
621–630 5
631–640 5
641–650 6
651–660 3
661–670 3
671–680 4
681–689 4
690+ 100
Download as CSV

Shiliang Su D-index placement in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Environmental Sciences scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Shiliang Su sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300
Bar chart with 97 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 126+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 348. Most scientists, 348, have 45 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 126 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 51 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 12 scientists 31 D-Index: 26 scientists 32 D-Index: 51 scientists 33 D-Index: 88 scientists 34 D-Index: 123 scientists 35 D-Index: 163 scientists 36 D-Index: 206 scientists 37 D-Index: 267 scientists 38 D-Index: 265 scientists 39 D-Index: 275 scientists 40 D-Index: 321 scientists 41 D-Index: 343 scientists 42 D-Index: 305 scientists 43 D-Index: 336 scientists 44 D-Index: 330 scientists 45 D-Index: 348 scientists 46 D-Index: 291 scientists 47 D-Index: 275 scientists 48 D-Index: 272 scientists 49 D-Index: 273 scientists 50 D-Index: 263 scientists 51 D-Index: 232 scientists 52 D-Index: 266 scientists 53 D-Index: 217 scientists 54 D-Index: 198 scientists 55 D-Index: 177 scientists 56 D-Index: 202 scientists 57 D-Index: 204 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 177 scientists 60 D-Index: 166 scientists 61 D-Index: 152 scientists 62 D-Index: 143 scientists 63 D-Index: 150 scientists 64 D-Index: 124 scientists 65 D-Index: 119 scientists 66 D-Index: 120 scientists 67 D-Index: 118 scientists 68 D-Index: 82 scientists 69 D-Index: 98 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 105 scientists 72 D-Index: 74 scientists 73 D-Index: 84 scientists 74 D-Index: 70 scientists 75 D-Index: 67 scientists 76 D-Index: 78 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 59 scientists 79 D-Index: 52 scientists 80 D-Index: 47 scientists 81 D-Index: 38 scientists 82 D-Index: 48 scientists 83 D-Index: 42 scientists 84 D-Index: 42 scientists 85 D-Index: 43 scientists 86 D-Index: 29 scientists 87 D-Index: 37 scientists 88 D-Index: 29 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 34 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 22 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 19 scientists 95 D-Index: 24 scientists 96 D-Index: 21 scientists 97 D-Index: 20 scientists 98 D-Index: 24 scientists 99 D-Index: 17 scientists 100 D-Index: 17 scientists 101 D-Index: 21 scientists 102 D-Index: 25 scientists 103 D-Index: 18 scientists 104 D-Index: 26 scientists 105 D-Index: 20 scientists 106 D-Index: 15 scientists 107 D-Index: 10 scientists 108 D-Index: 13 scientists 109 D-Index: 15 scientists 110 D-Index: 12 scientists 111 D-Index: 8 scientists 112 D-Index: 7 scientists 113 D-Index: 9 scientists 114 D-Index: 6 scientists 115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116 D-Index: 7 scientists 117 D-Index: 8 scientists 118 D-Index: 3 scientists 119 D-Index: 5 scientists 120 D-Index: 7 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 4 scientists 123 D-Index: 8 scientists 124 D-Index: 7 scientists 125 D-Index: 9 scientists 126+ D-Index: 92 scientists
30 D-Index 126+

This scientist: 51 D-Index — 52nd percentile

52% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 126 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Environmental Sciences scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,676 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 12
31 26
32 51
33 88
34 123
35 163
36 206
37 267
38 265
39 275
40 321
41 343
42 305
43 336
44 330
45 348
46 291
47 275
48 272
49 273
50 263
51 232 51
52 266
53 217
54 198
55 177
56 202
57 204
58 166
59 177
60 166
61 152
62 143
63 150
64 124
65 119
66 120
67 118
68 82
69 98
70 94
71 105
72 74
73 84
74 70
75 67
76 78
77 60
78 59
79 52
80 47
81 38
82 48
83 42
84 42
85 43
86 29
87 37
88 29
89 30
90 34
91 20
92 22
93 17
94 19
95 24
96 21
97 20
98 24
99 17
100 17
101 21
102 25
103 18
104 26
105 20
106 15
107 10
108 13
109 15
110 12
111 8
112 7
113 9
114 6
115 12
116 7
117 8
118 3
119 5
120 7
121 2
122 4
123 8
124 7
125 9
126+ 92
Download as CSV

Overview

Shiliang Su is a researcher affiliated with Wuhan University in China, with a focus on social sciences and a substantial body of work related to urban transport, land use, and human mobility. Their research spans several interconnected subfields such as transportation, global and planetary change, economics and econometrics, sociology and political science, and building and construction.

The main topics explored in their work include urban transport and accessibility, land use and ecosystem services, human mobility and location-based analysis, transportation planning and optimization, diverse aspects of tourism research, housing market and economics, and urban green space and health.

Frequent publication venues for Shiliang Su are the Journal of Transport Geography, Habitat International, Transactions in GIS, Journal of Maps, and Applied Geography. The researcher has contributed multiple papers to these journals, indicating an active role within these disciplinary communities.

Their recent significant papers include:

  • Transit-oriented development (TOD) typologies around metro station areas in urban China: A comparative analysis of five typical megacities for planning implications, 2020, Journal of Transport Geography
  • Unraveling the impact of TOD on housing rental prices and implications on spatial planning: A comparative analysis of five Chinese megacities, 2020, Habitat International
  • Unraveling the relative contribution of TOD structural factors to metro ridership: A novel localized modeling approach with implications on spatial planning, 2022, Journal of Transport Geography

Collaboration is evident in their frequent co-authorship with several researchers, including Mengjun Kang, Min Weng, Bozhao Li, Shenjing He, and Lirong Hu. These collaborations reflect a network of scholars working on related themes, potentially enriching interdisciplinary approaches in transportation and urban studies.

Best Publications

  • Characterizing landscape pattern and ecosystem service value changes for urbanization impacts at an eco-regional scale

    Shiliang Su;Rui Xiao;Zhenlan Jiang;Yuan Zhang

  • The 15-Minute Walkable Neighborhoods: Measurement, Social Inequalities and Implications for Building Healthy Communities in Urban China

    Min Weng;Ning Ding;Jing Li;Xianfeng Jin

  • Transformation of agricultural landscapes under rapid urbanization: A threat to sustainability in Hang-Jia-Hu region, China

    Shiliang Su;Zhenlan Jiang;Qi Zhang;Yuan Zhang

  • Social inequalities in neighborhood visual walkability: Using street view imagery and deep learning technologies to facilitate healthy city planning

    Hao Zhou;Shenjing He;Yuyang Cai;Miao Wang

  • Determinants of urban expansion and their relative importance: A comparative analysis of 30 major metropolitans in China

    Qianwen Zhang;Shiliang Su

  • Monitoring housing rental prices based on social media:An integrated approach of machine-learning algorithms and hedonic modeling to inform equitable housing policies

    Lirong Hu;Shenjing He;Zixuan Han;He Xiao

  • Multi-scale analysis of spatially varying relationships between agricultural landscape patterns and urbanization using geographically weighted regression

    Shiliang Su;Rui Xiao;Yuan Zhang

  • Temporal trend and source apportionment of water pollution in different functional zones of Qiantang River, China.

    Shiliang Su;Dan Li;Qi Zhang;Rui Xiao

  • Land use changes to cash crop plantations: crop types, multilevel determinants and policy implications

    Shiliang Su;Xiangcheng Zhou;Chen Wan;Yunke Li

  • Social inequalities of park accessibility in Shenzhen, China: The role of park quality, transport modes, and hierarchical socioeconomic characteristics

    Mengya Xu;Jing Xin;Shiliang Su;Min Weng

  • Spatially non-stationary response of ecosystem service value changes to urbanization in Shanghai, China

    Shiliang Su;Delong Li;Yi’na Hu;Rui Xiao

  • Socioeconomic drivers of forest loss and fragmentation: A comparison between different land use planning schemes and policy implications

    Yaolin Liu;Yuhao Feng;Zhe Zhao;Qianwen Zhang

  • Auditing street walkability and associated social inequalities for planning implications

    Shiliang Su;Hao Zhou;Mengya Xu;Hu Ru

  • Assessing land ecological security in Shanghai (China) based on catastrophe theory

    Shiliang Su;Dan Li;Xiang Yu;Zhonghao Zhang

  • Transit oriented development among metro station areas in Shanghai, China: Variations, typology, optimization and implications for land use planning

    Zekun Li;Zixuan Han;Jing Xin;Xin Luo

  • Identifying determinants of urban growth from a multi-scale perspective: A case study of the urban agglomeration around Hangzhou Bay, China

    Zhonghao Zhang;Shiliang Su;Rui Xiao;Diwei Jiang

  • Community deprivation, walkability, and public health: Highlighting the social inequalities in land use planning for health promotion

    Shiliang Su;Jianhua Pi;Huan Xie;Zhongliang Cai

  • Agricultural landscape pattern changes in response to urbanization at ecoregional scale

    Shiliang Su;Shiliang Su;Xiaoya Ma;Rui Xiao

  • Does the establishment of development zones really improve industrial land use efficiency? Implications for China’s high-quality development policy

    Yifan Sun;Anbing Ma;Haorui Su;Shiliang Su

  • Farmland fragmentation due to anthropogenic activity in rapidly developing region

    Shiliang Su;Yi’na Hu;Fanghan Luo;Gengchen Mai

  • Spatial determinants of hazardous chemicals in surface water of Qiantang River, China

    Shiliang Su;Shiliang Su;Rui Xiao;Xiaoya Mi;Xiangyang Xu

Frequent Co-Authors

Jiaping Wu
Jiaping Wu Zhejiang University
Shenjing He
Shenjing He University of Hong Kong
Jiaguo Qi
Jiaguo Qi Michigan State University
Yaolin Liu
Yaolin Liu Wuhan University
Wei Gao
Wei Gao Colorado State University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Environmental Sciences in the USA opens doors to various related online degrees and career paths that complement this field. For professionals interested in expanding their expertise in social work as it relates to environmental advocacy, there are fully funded dsw programs that provide advanced training with financial support to ease the burden of higher education costs.

Many students also seek flexible and budget-friendly options to balance their studies with other commitments. A budget friendly online general studies degree offers a versatile foundation, allowing learners to tailor their education towards environmental, scientific, or policy-oriented careers without overwhelming expenses.

For those looking for manageable academic commitments, understanding the easiest bachelor degree to get can be valuable. While this may not always be the focus for all students, choosing an accessible program can provide a smoother pathway into environmental fields, especially for individuals changing careers or returning to education after a break.

Lastly, specialized study choices like a geoscience online degree offer targeted knowledge relevant to environmental sciences. This degree supports careers in geology, earth systems, and environmental consulting, combining scientific rigor with the convenience of online learning.

Best Scientists Citing Shiliang Su

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles