World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Biology and Biochemistry

D-Index
61
Citations
22477
World Ranking
11113
National Ranking
4809

Scott Powers publication distribution in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Biology and Biochemistry in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Scott Powers sits on this spectrum.

47–56 publications: 8 scientists 57–66 publications: 35 scientists 67–76 publications: 106 scientists 77–86 publications: 231 scientists 87–96 publications: 414 scientists 97–106 publications: 546 scientists 107–116 publications: 704 scientists 117–126 publications: 849 scientists 127–136 publications: 980 scientists 137–146 publications: 942 scientists 147–156 publications: 969 scientists 157–166 publications: 950 scientists 167–176 publications: 951 scientists 177–186 publications: 915 scientists 187–196 publications: 787 scientists 197–206 publications: 841 scientists 207–216 publications: 735 scientists 217–226 publications: 709 scientists 227–236 publications: 651 scientists 237–246 publications: 605 scientists 247–256 publications: 510 scientists 257–266 publications: 524 scientists 267–276 publications: 434 scientists 277–286 publications: 418 scientists 287–296 publications: 350 scientists 297–306 publications: 363 scientists 307–316 publications: 315 scientists 317–326 publications: 296 scientists 327–336 publications: 261 scientists 337–346 publications: 240 scientists 347–356 publications: 219 scientists 357–366 publications: 197 scientists 367–376 publications: 154 scientists 377–386 publications: 161 scientists 387–396 publications: 155 scientists 397–406 publications: 145 scientists 407–416 publications: 124 scientists 417–426 publications: 112 scientists 427–436 publications: 132 scientists 437–446 publications: 116 scientists 447–456 publications: 99 scientists 457–466 publications: 81 scientists 467–476 publications: 91 scientists 477–486 publications: 80 scientists 487–496 publications: 80 scientists 497–506 publications: 60 scientists 507–516 publications: 36 scientists 517–526 publications: 46 scientists 527–536 publications: 54 scientists 537–546 publications: 44 scientists 547–556 publications: 43 scientists 557–566 publications: 43 scientists 567–576 publications: 42 scientists 577–586 publications: 25 scientists 587–596 publications: 34 scientists 597–606 publications: 23 scientists 607–616 publications: 33 scientists 617–626 publications: 31 scientists 627–636 publications: 27 scientists 637–646 publications: 25 scientists 647–656 publications: 28 scientists 657–666 publications: 34 scientists 667–676 publications: 18 scientists 677–686 publications: 16 scientists 687–696 publications: 10 scientists 697–706 publications: 12 scientists 707–716 publications: 21 scientists 717–726 publications: 12 scientists 727–736 publications: 12 scientists 737–746 publications: 10 scientists 747–756 publications: 7 scientists 757–766 publications: 13 scientists 767–776 publications: 15 scientists 777–786 publications: 13 scientists 787–796 publications: 9 scientists 797–806 publications: 9 scientists 807–816 publications: 7 scientists 817–826 publications: 4 scientists 827–836 publications: 9 scientists 837–846 publications: 7 scientists 847–856 publications: 3 scientists 857–866 publications: 5 scientists 867–876 publications: 5 scientists 877–886 publications: 11 scientists 887–896 publications: 3 scientists 897–906 publications: 4 scientists 907–916 publications: 7 scientists 917–926 publications: 5 scientists 927–936 publications: 6 scientists 937–946 publications: 6 scientists 947–956 publications: 3 scientists 957–966 publications: 7 scientists 967–976 publications: 2 scientists 977–986 publications: 2 scientists 987–996 publications: 1 scientists 997–1,006 publications: 5 scientists 1,007–1,016 publications: 2 scientists 1,017–1,026 publications: 2 scientists 1,027 publications: 1 scientists 1,028+ publications: 100 scientists
47 publications 1,028+

This scientist: 141 publications — 22nd percentile

22% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,028 publications or more.

Scott Powers D-index placement in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Biology and Biochemistry scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Scott Powers sits on this spectrum.

40–41 D-Index: 80 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 183 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 317 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 504 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 718 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 900 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 1,026 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 1,150 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 1,236 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 1,253 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 1,163 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 1,131 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 1,032 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 897 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 814 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 715 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 709 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 596 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 512 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 473 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 412 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 373 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 358 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 285 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 273 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 227 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 208 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 193 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 153 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 157 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 148 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 120 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 113 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 100 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 86 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 67 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 72 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 73 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 64 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 53 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 60 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 54 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 43 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 38 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 49 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 26 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 18 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 23 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 32 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 32 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 27 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 19 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 22 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 12 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 16 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 14 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 10 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 13 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 10 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 7 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 9 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 13 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 4 scientists 166 D-Index: 4 scientists 167+ D-Index: 98 scientists
40 D-Index 167+

This scientist: 61 D-Index — 44th percentile

44% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 167 D-Index or more.

Overview

Scott Powers is affiliated with Stony Brook University in the United States. Their research spans multiple domains within biochemistry, genetics, molecular biology, and medicine, with a notable focus on molecular biology and oncology. Their work is indexed in significant publication venues, reflecting contributions to cancer research and related biomedical fields.

Their recent publications cover a range of topics related to cancer biology, immunology, and cellular dynamics. Notable papers include:

  • A framework for advancing our understanding of cancer-associated fibroblasts, 2020, Nature reviews. Cancer
  • A microRNA polycistron as a potential human oncogene, 2020, UNC Libraries
  • KRAS drives immune evasion in a genetic model of pancreatic cancer, 2021, Nature Communications
  • Senescent CAFs Mediate Immunosuppression and Drive Breast Cancer Progression, 2024, Cancer Discovery
  • Coordinated single-cell tumor microenvironment dynamics reinforce pancreatic cancer subtype, 2023, Nature Communications

Frequent publication venues for Scott Powers include:

  • Cancer Research
  • UNC Libraries
  • Nature Communications
  • Research Square (Research Square)
  • Nature reviews. Cancer

They have collaborated frequently with several co-authors, including:

  • Ana Paula Delgado
  • Sheila A. Stewart
  • Manisha Rao
  • Jinyu Li
  • David G. DeNardo

Scott Powers' research interests can be categorized into several main topics:

  • Cancer Genomics and Diagnostics
  • Cancer Cells and Metastasis
  • Immune cells in cancer
  • Single-cell and spatial transcriptomics
  • Pancreatic and Hepatic Oncology Research
  • Epigenetics and DNA Methylation
  • Telomeres, Telomerase, and Senescence

Their fields of study highlight a strong grounding in:

  • Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
  • Medicine

Subfields where their contributions are concentrated include:

  • Molecular Biology
  • Oncology
  • Cancer Research
  • Immunology
  • Physiology

Best Publications

  • A microRNA polycistron as a potential human oncogene

    Lin Xiang He;J. Michael Thomson;Michael T Hemann;Eva Hernando-Monge

  • In yeast, RAS proteins are controlling elements of adenylate cyclase

    Takashi Toda;Isao Uno;Tatsuo Ishikawa;Scott Powers

  • Identification and validation of oncogenes in liver cancer using an integrative oncogenomic approach

    Lars. Zender;Mona S. Spector;Wen. Xue;Peer. Flemming

  • Guidelines for the use and interpretation of assays for monitoring autophagy (3rd edition)

    Daniel J. Klionsky;Kotb Abdelmohsen;Akihisa Abe;Joynal Abedin

  • Substantial contribution of extrinsic risk factors to cancer development

    Song Wu;Sarah E Powers;Wenquan Zhu;Yusuf A. Hannun

  • The S. cerevisiae CDC25 gene product regulates the RAS/adenylate cyclase pathway

    Daniel Broek;Takashi Toda;Tamar Michaeli;Lonny Levin

  • Genetic analysis of yeast RAS1 and RAS2 genes.

    T. Kataoka;S. Powers;C. McGill;O. Fasano

  • Representational Oligonucleotide Microarray Analysis: A High-Resolution Method to Detect Genome Copy Number Variation

    Robert Lucito;John Healy;Joan Alexander;Andrew Reiner

  • Genes in S. cerevisiae encoding proteins with domains homologous to the mammalian ras proteins.

    S. Powers;T. Kataoka;O. Fasano;M. Goldfarb

  • An Oncogenomics-Based In Vivo RNAi Screen Identifies Tumor Suppressors in Liver Cancer

    Lars Zender;Wen Xue;Johannes Zuber;Camile P. Semighini

  • Identification of a Therapeutic Strategy Targeting Amplified FGF19 in Liver Cancer by Oncogenomic Screening

    Eric T. Sawey;Maia Chanrion;Chunlin Cai;Guanming Wu

  • A Transposon-Based Genetic Screen in Mice Identifies Genes Altered in Colorectal Cancer

    Timothy K. Starr;Raha Allaei;Kevin A. T. Silverstein;Rodney A. Staggs

  • Functional homology of mammalian and yeast RAS genes

    Tohru Kataoka;Scott Powers;Scott Cameron;Ottavio Fasano

  • Endosome pH measured in single cells by dual fluorescence flow cytometry: rapid acidification of insulin to pH 6.

    R F Murphy;S Powers;C R Cantor

  • Identification of driver genes in hepatocellular carcinoma by exome sequencing.

    Sean P. Cleary;William R. Jeck;Xiaobei Zhao;Kui Chen

  • Oncogenic properties of PPM1D located within a breast cancer amplification epicenter at 17q23.

    Jing Li;Ying Yang;Yue Peng;Richard J. Austin

  • Cloning and characterization of CAP, the S. cerevisiae gene encoding the 70 kd adenylyl cyclase-associated protein

    J. Field;A. Vojtek;R. Ballester;G. Bolger

  • In vivo RNAi screening identifies a mechanism of sorafenib resistance in liver cancer

    Ramona Rudalska;Daniel Dauch;Thomas Longerich;Katherine McJunkin

  • RAM, a gene of yeast required for a functional modification of RAS proteins and for production of mating pheromone a-factor

    Scott Powers;Susan Michaelis;Daniel Broek;Anna A. Sonia Santa

  • Abstract 4598: Identification of driver genes in hepatocellular carcinoma by exome sequencing.

    Sean P. Cleary;William R. Jeck;Xiaobei Zhao;Sara R. Selitsky

Frequent Co-Authors

Michael Wigler
Michael Wigler Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory
Scott W. Lowe
Scott W. Lowe Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center
Lars Zender
Lars Zender German Cancer Research Center
Gregory J. Hannon
Gregory J. Hannon University of Cambridge
Wen Xue
Wen Xue University of Massachusetts Chan Medical School
James R. Broach
James R. Broach Pennsylvania State University
Carlos Cordon-Cardo
Carlos Cordon-Cardo Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai
Jeffrey Field
Jeffrey Field University of Pennsylvania
Robert F. Murphy
Robert F. Murphy Carnegie Mellon University
Tohru Kataoka
Tohru Kataoka Kobe University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Biology and Biochemistry opens doors to a diverse range of specialized healthcare and science careers. For those with a passion for patient care, progressing your education with a post masters np program can help you become a family nurse practitioner and advance your clinical skills quickly through flexible, online pathways.

Interested in the growing field of health and nutrition? Earning a nutritionist degree online is a popular choice for those who want to become registered dietitians or nutrition professionals, offering affordable and accessible programs for science-oriented students.

Nursing professionals can also advance by enrolling in an rn to bsn online no clinicals program, which is ideal for registered nurses seeking to complete a Bachelor of Science in Nursing with minimal in-person clinical requirements.

For those interested in leadership roles, a masters degree in healthcare management presents a fast-track route to careers in healthcare administration, operations, and policy.

Best Scientists Citing Scott Powers

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles