World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Environmental Sciences 56 3716 3549 153 145 119 9443

Sangeeta Sharma publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Sangeeta Sharma between 1996 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Sangeeta Sharma published across 30 years, from 1996 to 2025, averaging 4.5 papers a year. Output peaked at 13 publications in 2019. 7 of the 135 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1996 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 13. Peak 13 publications in 2019. 1996: 1 publication 1997: 1 publication 1998: 1 publication 1999: 4 publications 2000: 0 publications 2001: 0 publications 2002: 2 publications 2003: 1 publication 2004: 2 publications 2005: 1 publication 2006: 6 publications 2007: 3 publications 2008: 0 publications 2009: 2 publications 2010: 5 publications 2011: 10 publications 2012: 4 publications 2013: 6 publications 2014: 3 publications 2015: 4 publications 2016: 11 publications 2017: 11 publications 2018: 7 publications 2019: 13 publications 2020: 7 publications 2021: 9 publications 2022: 11 publications 2023: 3 publications 2024: 2 publications 2025: 5 publications
1996 2025

135 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Sangeeta Sharma: publications per year, 1996 to 2025
Year Publications
1996 1
1997 1
1998 1
1999 4
2000 0
2001 0
2002 2
2003 1
2004 2
2005 1
2006 6
2007 3
2008 0
2009 2
2010 5
2011 10
2012 4
2013 6
2014 3
2015 4
2016 11
2017 11
2018 7
2019 13
2020 7
2021 9
2022 11
2023 3
2024 2
2025 5
Total 135
Download as CSV

Sangeeta Sharma publication distribution in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Environmental Sciences in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Sangeeta Sharma sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 66 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 41–50 to 690+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 617. Most scientists, 617, have 121–130 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 690 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 111–120 publications, is where this scientist sits. 41–50 publications: 21 scientists 51–60 publications: 62 scientists 61–70 publications: 133 scientists 71–80 publications: 257 scientists 81–90 publications: 361 scientists 91–100 publications: 440 scientists 101–110 publications: 492 scientists 111–120 publications: 541 scientists 121–130 publications: 617 scientists 131–140 publications: 544 scientists 141–150 publications: 541 scientists 151–160 publications: 539 scientists 161–170 publications: 444 scientists 171–180 publications: 444 scientists 181–190 publications: 400 scientists 191–200 publications: 377 scientists 201–210 publications: 318 scientists 211–220 publications: 282 scientists 221–230 publications: 263 scientists 231–240 publications: 220 scientists 241–250 publications: 217 scientists 251–260 publications: 180 scientists 261–270 publications: 181 scientists 271–280 publications: 155 scientists 281–290 publications: 130 scientists 291–300 publications: 127 scientists 301–310 publications: 130 scientists 311–320 publications: 85 scientists 321–330 publications: 106 scientists 331–340 publications: 80 scientists 341–350 publications: 83 scientists 351–360 publications: 75 scientists 361–370 publications: 69 scientists 371–380 publications: 52 scientists 381–390 publications: 54 scientists 391–400 publications: 56 scientists 401–410 publications: 44 scientists 411–420 publications: 40 scientists 421–430 publications: 36 scientists 431–440 publications: 25 scientists 441–450 publications: 25 scientists 451–460 publications: 32 scientists 461–470 publications: 29 scientists 471–480 publications: 21 scientists 481–490 publications: 26 scientists 491–500 publications: 26 scientists 501–510 publications: 17 scientists 511–520 publications: 19 scientists 521–530 publications: 15 scientists 531–540 publications: 22 scientists 541–550 publications: 12 scientists 551–560 publications: 15 scientists 561–570 publications: 11 scientists 571–580 publications: 19 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 9 scientists 601–610 publications: 7 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 5 scientists 631–640 publications: 5 scientists 641–650 publications: 6 scientists 651–660 publications: 3 scientists 661–670 publications: 3 scientists 671–680 publications: 4 scientists 681–689 publications: 4 scientists 690+ publications: 100 scientists
41–50 publications 690+

This scientist: 119 publications — 23rd percentile

23% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 690 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Environmental Sciences scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,676 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
41–50 21
51–60 62
61–70 133
71–80 257
81–90 361
91–100 440
101–110 492
111–120 541 119
121–130 617
131–140 544
141–150 541
151–160 539
161–170 444
171–180 444
181–190 400
191–200 377
201–210 318
211–220 282
221–230 263
231–240 220
241–250 217
251–260 180
261–270 181
271–280 155
281–290 130
291–300 127
301–310 130
311–320 85
321–330 106
331–340 80
341–350 83
351–360 75
361–370 69
371–380 52
381–390 54
391–400 56
401–410 44
411–420 40
421–430 36
431–440 25
441–450 25
451–460 32
461–470 29
471–480 21
481–490 26
491–500 26
501–510 17
511–520 19
521–530 15
531–540 22
541–550 12
551–560 15
561–570 11
571–580 19
581–590 9
591–600 9
601–610 7
611–620 11
621–630 5
631–640 5
641–650 6
651–660 3
661–670 3
671–680 4
681–689 4
690+ 100
Download as CSV

Sangeeta Sharma D-index placement in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Environmental Sciences scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Sangeeta Sharma sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300
Bar chart with 97 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 126+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 348. Most scientists, 348, have 45 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 126 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 56 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 12 scientists 31 D-Index: 26 scientists 32 D-Index: 51 scientists 33 D-Index: 88 scientists 34 D-Index: 123 scientists 35 D-Index: 163 scientists 36 D-Index: 206 scientists 37 D-Index: 267 scientists 38 D-Index: 265 scientists 39 D-Index: 275 scientists 40 D-Index: 321 scientists 41 D-Index: 343 scientists 42 D-Index: 305 scientists 43 D-Index: 336 scientists 44 D-Index: 330 scientists 45 D-Index: 348 scientists 46 D-Index: 291 scientists 47 D-Index: 275 scientists 48 D-Index: 272 scientists 49 D-Index: 273 scientists 50 D-Index: 263 scientists 51 D-Index: 232 scientists 52 D-Index: 266 scientists 53 D-Index: 217 scientists 54 D-Index: 198 scientists 55 D-Index: 177 scientists 56 D-Index: 202 scientists 57 D-Index: 204 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 177 scientists 60 D-Index: 166 scientists 61 D-Index: 152 scientists 62 D-Index: 143 scientists 63 D-Index: 150 scientists 64 D-Index: 124 scientists 65 D-Index: 119 scientists 66 D-Index: 120 scientists 67 D-Index: 118 scientists 68 D-Index: 82 scientists 69 D-Index: 98 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 105 scientists 72 D-Index: 74 scientists 73 D-Index: 84 scientists 74 D-Index: 70 scientists 75 D-Index: 67 scientists 76 D-Index: 78 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 59 scientists 79 D-Index: 52 scientists 80 D-Index: 47 scientists 81 D-Index: 38 scientists 82 D-Index: 48 scientists 83 D-Index: 42 scientists 84 D-Index: 42 scientists 85 D-Index: 43 scientists 86 D-Index: 29 scientists 87 D-Index: 37 scientists 88 D-Index: 29 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 34 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 22 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 19 scientists 95 D-Index: 24 scientists 96 D-Index: 21 scientists 97 D-Index: 20 scientists 98 D-Index: 24 scientists 99 D-Index: 17 scientists 100 D-Index: 17 scientists 101 D-Index: 21 scientists 102 D-Index: 25 scientists 103 D-Index: 18 scientists 104 D-Index: 26 scientists 105 D-Index: 20 scientists 106 D-Index: 15 scientists 107 D-Index: 10 scientists 108 D-Index: 13 scientists 109 D-Index: 15 scientists 110 D-Index: 12 scientists 111 D-Index: 8 scientists 112 D-Index: 7 scientists 113 D-Index: 9 scientists 114 D-Index: 6 scientists 115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116 D-Index: 7 scientists 117 D-Index: 8 scientists 118 D-Index: 3 scientists 119 D-Index: 5 scientists 120 D-Index: 7 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 4 scientists 123 D-Index: 8 scientists 124 D-Index: 7 scientists 125 D-Index: 9 scientists 126+ D-Index: 92 scientists
30 D-Index 126+

This scientist: 56 D-Index — 63rd percentile

63% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 126 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Environmental Sciences scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,676 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 12
31 26
32 51
33 88
34 123
35 163
36 206
37 267
38 265
39 275
40 321
41 343
42 305
43 336
44 330
45 348
46 291
47 275
48 272
49 273
50 263
51 232
52 266
53 217
54 198
55 177
56 202 56
57 204
58 166
59 177
60 166
61 152
62 143
63 150
64 124
65 119
66 120
67 118
68 82
69 98
70 94
71 105
72 74
73 84
74 70
75 67
76 78
77 60
78 59
79 52
80 47
81 38
82 48
83 42
84 42
85 43
86 29
87 37
88 29
89 30
90 34
91 20
92 22
93 17
94 19
95 24
96 21
97 20
98 24
99 17
100 17
101 21
102 25
103 18
104 26
105 20
106 15
107 10
108 13
109 15
110 12
111 8
112 7
113 9
114 6
115 12
116 7
117 8
118 3
119 5
120 7
121 2
122 4
123 8
124 7
125 9
126+ 92
Download as CSV

Overview

Sangeeta Sharma is affiliated with Environment and Climate Change Canada, where their research primarily focuses on atmospheric sciences and environmental studies. Their work broadly covers Earth and Planetary Sciences as well as Environmental Science, with significant contributions in atmospheric chemistry and aerosols, atmospheric ozone and climate, and gas dynamics within the atmosphere.

Their research spans several subfields, including:

  • Atmospheric Science
  • Global and Planetary Change
  • Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis
  • Nature and Landscape Conservation
  • Environmental Chemistry

Sharma's main topics of work include:

  • Atmospheric chemistry and aerosols
  • Atmospheric Ozone and Climate
  • Atmospheric and Environmental Gas Dynamics
  • Atmospheric aerosols and clouds
  • Air Quality and Health Impacts
  • Arctic and Antarctic ice dynamics
  • Climate change and permafrost

The scientist has published extensively in several journals, with frequent publication venues including:

  • Atmospheric chemistry and physics
  • Atmospheric measurement techniques
  • Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society
  • Journal of Geophysical Research Atmospheres
  • Nature Geoscience

Some of their recent papers are:

  • "A global analysis of climate-relevant aerosol properties retrieved from the network of Global Atmosphere Watch (GAW) near-surface observatories" (2020) Atmospheric measurement techniques
  • "Multidecadal trend analysis of in situ aerosol radiative properties around the world" (2020) Atmospheric chemistry and physics
  • "Pan-Arctic seasonal cycles and long-term trends of aerosol properties from 10 observatories" (2022) Atmospheric chemistry and physics
  • "AWARE: The Atmospheric Radiation Measurement (ARM) West Antarctic Radiation Experiment" (2020) Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society
  • "Equal abundance of summertime natural and wintertime anthropogenic Arctic organic aerosols" (2022) Nature Geoscience

The scientist collaborates regularly with several colleagues, with frequent co-authors including:

  • Konstantinos Eleftheriadis
  • Elisabeth Andrews
  • Andreas Maßling
  • Tuukka Petäjä
  • Julia Schmale

Best Publications

  • A global database of sea surface dimethylsulfide (DMS) measurements and a procedure to predict sea surface DMS as a function of latitude, longitude, and month

    A. J. Kettle;M. O. Andreae;D. Amouroux;T. W. Andreae

  • Characterization and intercomparison of aerosol absorption photometers: result of two intercomparison workshops

    T. Müller;J.S. Henzing;G. De Leeuw;G. De Leeuw;G. De Leeuw;A. Wiedensohler

  • Sources, distribution, and acidity of sulfate–ammonium aerosol in the Arctic in winter–spring

    Jenny A. Fisher;Daniel James Jacob;Qiaoqiao Wang;Roya Bahreini;Roya Bahreini

  • Pan-Arctic enhancements of light absorbing aerosol concentrations due to North American boreal forest fires during summer 2004

    A. Stohl;E. Andrews;E. Andrews;J. F. Burkhart;C. Forster

  • Aerosols in polar regions: A historical overview based on optical depth and in situ observations

    C. Tomasi;V. Vitale;A. Lupi;C. Di Carmine

  • Variations and sources of the equivalent black carbon in the high Arctic revealed by long‐term observations at Alert and Barrow: 1989–2003

    S. Sharma;E. Andrews;E. Andrews;L. A. Barrie;L. A. Barrie;J. A. Ogren

  • 16‐year simulation of Arctic black carbon: Transport, source contribution, and sensitivity analysis on deposition

    S. Sharma;M. Ishizawa;D. Chan;D. Lavoué

  • Long-term trends of the black carbon concentrations in the Canadian Arctic

    S. Sharma;D. Lavoué;D. Lavoué;H. Cachier;L. A. Barrie;L. A. Barrie

  • Overview paper: New insights into aerosol and climate in the Arctic

    Jonathan P. D. Abbatt;W. Richard Leaitch;Amir A. Aliabadi;Allan K. Bertram

  • Light absorption and thermal measurements of black carbon in different regions of Canada

    S. Sharma;J. R. Brook;H. Cachier;J. Chow

  • Pan-Arctic enhancement of light absorbing aerosol concentration due to North American boreal forest fires during summer 2004

    A. Stohl;E. Andrews;J. F. Burkhart;C. Forster

  • Dimethyl sulfide control of the clean summertime Arctic aerosol and cloud

    W. Richard Leaitch;Sangeeta Sharma;Lin Huang;Desiree Toom-Sauntry

  • Current model capabilities for simulating black carbon and sulfate concentrations in the Arctic atmosphere: a multi-model evaluation using a comprehensive measurement data set

    S. Eckhardt;Boris Quennehen;Boris Quennehen;D. J. L. Olivié;T. K. Berntsen

  • Climatology of aerosol radiative properties in the free troposphere

    E. Andrews;E. Andrews;J.A. Ogren;P. Bonasoni;A. Marinoni

  • Reduced anthropogenic aerosol radiative forcing caused by biogenic new particle formation

    Hamish Gordon;Kamalika Sengupta;Alexandru Rap;Jonathan Duplissy

  • Multidecadal trends in aerosol radiative forcing over the Arctic: Contribution of changes in anthropogenic aerosol to Arctic warming since 1980

    Thomas J. Breider;Loretta J. Mickley;Daniel J. Jacob;Cui Ge

  • Sources of aerosol sulphate at Alert: Apportionment using stable isotopes

    A. L. Norman;L. A. Barrie;D. Toom-Sauntry;A. Sirois

  • Pan-Arctic seasonal cycles and long-term trends of aerosol properties from 10 observatories

    Unknown

  • The role of scavenging in the seasonal transport of black carbon and sulfate to the Arctic

    Timothy J. Garrett;Sara Brattström;Sangeeta Sharma;Douglas E. J. Worthy

  • Seasonality of aerosol optical properties in the Arctic

    Lauren Schmeisser;Lauren Schmeisser;Lauren Schmeisser;John Backman;John A. Ogren;John A. Ogren;Elisabeth Andrews

  • Influence of transport and ocean ice extent on biogenic aerosol sulfur in the Arctic atmosphere

    S Sharma;E Chan;M Ishizawa;D Toom-Sauntry

  • Identification of trends and interannual variability of sulfate and black carbon in the Canadian High Arctic: 1981–2007

    S. L. Gong;T. L. Zhao;S. Sharma;D. Toom-Sauntry

  • On Aethalometer measurement uncertainties and an instrument correction factor for the Arctic

    John Backman;Lauren N. Schmeisser;Lauren N. Schmeisser;Aki Virkkula;Aki Virkkula;Aki Virkkula;John A. Ogren;John A. Ogren

Frequent Co-Authors

Elisabeth Andrews
Elisabeth Andrews Cooperative Institute for Research in Environmental Sciences
John A. Ogren
John A. Ogren National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
Paolo Laj
Paolo Laj Grenoble Alpes University
Anne Jefferson
Anne Jefferson University of Colorado Boulder
Konstantinos Eleftheriadis
Konstantinos Eleftheriadis National Centre of Scientific Research Demokritos
Neng-Huei Lin
Neng-Huei Lin National Central University
Randall V. Martin
Randall V. Martin Washington University in St. Louis
Patrick J. Sheridan
Patrick J. Sheridan National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
Leonard A. Barrie
Leonard A. Barrie Stockholm University
Maurice Levasseur
Maurice Levasseur Université Laval

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Environmental Sciences in the USA opens the door to interdisciplinary career paths that often intersect with social sciences and education. For those interested in the societal impacts of environmental issues, pursuing a sociology bachelor degree online can provide valuable insights into community dynamics and social behaviors related to environmental policies.

Advanced degrees are also an important consideration for career growth. Many educators and professionals seek online doctoral programs without dissertation to balance rigorous study with personal commitments. These programs offer flexible paths to doctoral-level credentials that can enhance leadership and research abilities in environmental education.

Furthermore, the progression from an EdS to an EdD degree is a popular route for educators aiming to deepen their expertise. Exploring the best eds to edd programs allows students to find tailored options that emphasize environmental curriculum development and policy influence.

Lastly, those interested in social work aspects within environmental contexts might consider fully funded dsw programs. These programs often focus on sustainability, community resilience, and environmental justice, equipping graduates to address environmental challenges through social intervention.

Best Scientists Citing Sangeeta Sharma

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles