World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Biology and Biochemistry

D-Index
51
Citations
14641
World Ranking
16966
National Ranking
1337

Andrew J. Doig publication distribution in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Biology and Biochemistry in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Andrew J. Doig sits on this spectrum.

47–56 publications: 8 scientists 57–66 publications: 35 scientists 67–76 publications: 106 scientists 77–86 publications: 231 scientists 87–96 publications: 414 scientists 97–106 publications: 546 scientists 107–116 publications: 704 scientists 117–126 publications: 849 scientists 127–136 publications: 980 scientists 137–146 publications: 942 scientists 147–156 publications: 969 scientists 157–166 publications: 950 scientists 167–176 publications: 951 scientists 177–186 publications: 915 scientists 187–196 publications: 787 scientists 197–206 publications: 841 scientists 207–216 publications: 735 scientists 217–226 publications: 709 scientists 227–236 publications: 651 scientists 237–246 publications: 605 scientists 247–256 publications: 510 scientists 257–266 publications: 524 scientists 267–276 publications: 434 scientists 277–286 publications: 418 scientists 287–296 publications: 350 scientists 297–306 publications: 363 scientists 307–316 publications: 315 scientists 317–326 publications: 296 scientists 327–336 publications: 261 scientists 337–346 publications: 240 scientists 347–356 publications: 219 scientists 357–366 publications: 197 scientists 367–376 publications: 154 scientists 377–386 publications: 161 scientists 387–396 publications: 155 scientists 397–406 publications: 145 scientists 407–416 publications: 124 scientists 417–426 publications: 112 scientists 427–436 publications: 132 scientists 437–446 publications: 116 scientists 447–456 publications: 99 scientists 457–466 publications: 81 scientists 467–476 publications: 91 scientists 477–486 publications: 80 scientists 487–496 publications: 80 scientists 497–506 publications: 60 scientists 507–516 publications: 36 scientists 517–526 publications: 46 scientists 527–536 publications: 54 scientists 537–546 publications: 44 scientists 547–556 publications: 43 scientists 557–566 publications: 43 scientists 567–576 publications: 42 scientists 577–586 publications: 25 scientists 587–596 publications: 34 scientists 597–606 publications: 23 scientists 607–616 publications: 33 scientists 617–626 publications: 31 scientists 627–636 publications: 27 scientists 637–646 publications: 25 scientists 647–656 publications: 28 scientists 657–666 publications: 34 scientists 667–676 publications: 18 scientists 677–686 publications: 16 scientists 687–696 publications: 10 scientists 697–706 publications: 12 scientists 707–716 publications: 21 scientists 717–726 publications: 12 scientists 727–736 publications: 12 scientists 737–746 publications: 10 scientists 747–756 publications: 7 scientists 757–766 publications: 13 scientists 767–776 publications: 15 scientists 777–786 publications: 13 scientists 787–796 publications: 9 scientists 797–806 publications: 9 scientists 807–816 publications: 7 scientists 817–826 publications: 4 scientists 827–836 publications: 9 scientists 837–846 publications: 7 scientists 847–856 publications: 3 scientists 857–866 publications: 5 scientists 867–876 publications: 5 scientists 877–886 publications: 11 scientists 887–896 publications: 3 scientists 897–906 publications: 4 scientists 907–916 publications: 7 scientists 917–926 publications: 5 scientists 927–936 publications: 6 scientists 937–946 publications: 6 scientists 947–956 publications: 3 scientists 957–966 publications: 7 scientists 967–976 publications: 2 scientists 977–986 publications: 2 scientists 987–996 publications: 1 scientists 997–1,006 publications: 5 scientists 1,007–1,016 publications: 2 scientists 1,017–1,026 publications: 2 scientists 1,027 publications: 1 scientists 1,028+ publications: 100 scientists
47 publications 1,028+

This scientist: 128 publications — 16th percentile

16% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,028 publications or more.

Andrew J. Doig D-index placement in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Biology and Biochemistry scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Andrew J. Doig sits on this spectrum.

40–41 D-Index: 80 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 183 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 317 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 504 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 718 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 900 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 1,026 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 1,150 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 1,236 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 1,253 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 1,163 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 1,131 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 1,032 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 897 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 814 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 715 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 709 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 596 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 512 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 473 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 412 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 373 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 358 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 285 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 273 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 227 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 208 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 193 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 153 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 157 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 148 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 120 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 113 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 100 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 86 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 67 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 72 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 73 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 64 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 53 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 60 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 54 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 43 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 38 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 49 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 26 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 18 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 23 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 32 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 32 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 27 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 19 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 22 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 12 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 16 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 14 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 10 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 13 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 10 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 7 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 9 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 13 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 4 scientists 166 D-Index: 4 scientists 167+ D-Index: 98 scientists
40 D-Index 167+

This scientist: 51 D-Index — 14th percentile

14% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 167 D-Index or more.

Overview

Andrew J. Doig is affiliated with the University of Manchester in the United Kingdom. Their research spans several fields, primarily focusing on biochemistry, genetics, and molecular biology, with additional contributions in medicine. The scientist's work encompasses multiple subfields including molecular biology, physiology, neurology, genetics, and biological psychiatry.

The main topics of their research include:

  • Alzheimer's disease research and treatments
  • Protein structure and dynamics
  • Bioinformatics and genomic networks
  • Heat shock proteins research
  • RNA research and splicing
  • Machine learning in bioinformatics
  • Gene expression and cancer classification

Andrew J. Doig has contributed to a number of significant publications. Some recent papers include:

  • Amyloid Oligomers: A Joint Experimental/Computational Perspective on Alzheimer's Disease, Parkinson's Disease, Type II Diabetes, and Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis, 2021, Chemical Reviews
  • Viral Involvement in Alzheimer's Disease, 2021, ACS Chemical Neuroscience
  • Raman Spectroscopy to Monitor Post-Translational Modifications and Degradation in Monoclonal Antibody Therapeutics, 2020, Analytical Chemistry
  • Quantification of protein glycation using vibrational spectroscopy, 2020, The Analyst
  • Glycine rich segments adopt polyproline II helices: Implications for biomolecular condensate formation, 2021, Archives of Biochemistry and Biophysics

Frequent collaboration is a notable aspect of their work. Regular co-authors include Bethan S. McAvan, Amro Safadi, Simon C. Lovell, Bikash R. Sahoo, and Peter Faller.

The scientist has published frequently in venues such as bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory), Scientific Reports, Chemical Reviews, ACS Chemical Neuroscience, and Analytical Chemistry.

Best Publications

  • Drug repurposing: progress, challenges and recommendations

    Sudeep Pushpakom;Francesco Iorio;Patrick A Eyers;K Jane Escott

  • Amyloid β Protein and Alzheimer’s Disease: When Computer Simulations Complement Experimental Studies

    Jessica Nasica-Labouze;Phuong H. Nguyen;Fabio Sterpone;Olivia Berthoumieu

  • Amyloid oligomers: A joint experimental/computational perspective on Alzheimer's disease, Parkinson's disease, type II diabetes, and amyotrophic lateral sclerosis

    Phuong H. Nguyen;Ayyalusamy Ramamoorthy;Bikash R. Sahoo;Jie Zheng

  • Distinguishing enzyme structures from non-enzymes without alignments.

    Paul D. Dobson;Andrew J. Doig

  • N- and C-capping preferences for all 20 amino acids in alpha-helical peptides.

    Andrew J. Doig;Robert L. Baldwin

  • Side-chain conformational entropy in protein folding

    Andrew J. Doig;Michael J. E. Sternberg

  • Properties and identification of human protein drug targets

    Tala M. Bakheet;Andrew J. Doig

  • Inhibition of protein aggregation and amyloid formation by small molecules.

    Andrew J Doig;Philippe Derreumaux;Philippe Derreumaux

  • Inhibition of toxicity in the beta-amyloid peptide fragment beta -(25-35) using N-methylated derivatives: a general strategy to prevent amyloid formation.

    Eleri Hughes;Ron M. Burke;Andrew J. Doig

  • Helix capping propensities in peptides parallel those in proteins

    Avijit Chakrabartty;Andrew J. Doig;Robert L. Baldwin

  • Toward the semiquantitative estimation of binding constants guides for peptide peptide binding in aqueous solution

    Dudley H. Williams;Jonathan P. L. Cox;Andrew J. Doig;Mark Gardner

  • Is polyproline II helix the killer conformation? A Raman optical activity study of the amyloidogenic prefibrillar intermediate of human lysozyme.

    Ewan W Blanch;Ludmilla A Morozova-Roche;Duncan A.E Cochran;Andrew J Doig

  • N-Methylated Peptide Inhibitors of β-Amyloid Aggregation and Toxicity. Optimization of the Inhibitor Structure†

    Nicoleta Kokkoni;Kelvin Stott;Hozefa Amijee;Jody M. Mason

  • Determination of free energies of N-capping in alpha-helices by modification of the Lifson-Roig helix-coil therapy to include N- and C-capping.

    Andrew J. Doig;Avijit Chakrabartty;Tod M. Klingler;Robert L. Baldwin

  • Is the hydrophobic effect stabilizing or destabilizing in proteins? The contribution of disulphide bonds to protein stability.

    Andrew J. Doig;Dudley H. Williams

  • Why Is Research on Amyloid-β Failing to Give New Drugs for Alzheimer’s Disease?

    Andrew J. Doig;Maria P. del Castillo-Frias;Olivia Berthoumieu;Olivia Berthoumieu;Bogdan Tarus

  • Predicting enzyme class from protein structure without alignments

    Paul D. Dobson;Andrew J. Doig

  • Design strategies for anti-amyloid agents.

    Jody M Mason;Nicoleta Kokkoni;Kelvin Stott;Andrew J Doig

  • Binding energy of an amide-amide hydrogen bond in aqueous and nonpolar solvents

    Andrew J. Doig;Dudley H. Williams

  • Effect of phosphorylation on α-helix stability as a function of position

    Charles D. Andrew;Jim Warwicker;Gareth R. Jones;Andrew J. Doig

Frequent Co-Authors

Philippe Derreumaux
Philippe Derreumaux Ton Duc Thang University
Ewan W. Blanch
Ewan W. Blanch RMIT University
Peter Faller
Peter Faller University of Strasbourg
Dudley H. Williams
Dudley H. Williams University of Cambridge
Robert L. Baldwin
Robert L. Baldwin Stanford University
Simon J. Hubbard
Simon J. Hubbard Manchester Academic Health Science Centre
Claire Wilson
Claire Wilson University of Glasgow
Yu-Dong Cai
Yu-Dong Cai Shanghai University
Avijit Chakrabartty
Avijit Chakrabartty University of Toronto
Philip J. R. Day
Philip J. R. Day University of Manchester

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Biology and Biochemistry opens doors to versatile careers. Many students find rewarding opportunities in health information management, medical coding, and related health data fields.

For those interested in data-driven healthcare roles, obtaining a bachelor's degree health information management can be a smart move. This credential makes you eligible for medical coding positions where salaries vary based on certification. It’s important to understand the ccs vs cpc salary differences as you consider your certification pathway.

Curious about earning potential? Learn more about how much do medical coders make, salary averages, and career growth within this sector. The demand for skilled coders and billers is growing due to healthcare industry expansion. Read about the medical coding job outlook to get insights into job stability and advancement.

Online degree programs offer flexibility for those aiming to blend biology, data analysis, and technology—unlocking a wide range of career pathways in healthcare.

Best Scientists Citing Andrew J. Doig

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles