World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Environmental Sciences

D-Index
35
Citations
8089
World Ranking
9229
National Ranking
426

Rym Msadek publication distribution in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Environmental Sciences in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Rym Msadek sits on this spectrum.

41–50 publications: 21 scientists 51–60 publications: 62 scientists 61–70 publications: 133 scientists 71–80 publications: 257 scientists 81–90 publications: 361 scientists 91–100 publications: 440 scientists 101–110 publications: 492 scientists 111–120 publications: 541 scientists 121–130 publications: 617 scientists 131–140 publications: 544 scientists 141–150 publications: 541 scientists 151–160 publications: 539 scientists 161–170 publications: 444 scientists 171–180 publications: 444 scientists 181–190 publications: 400 scientists 191–200 publications: 377 scientists 201–210 publications: 318 scientists 211–220 publications: 283 scientists 221–230 publications: 263 scientists 231–240 publications: 220 scientists 241–250 publications: 217 scientists 251–260 publications: 180 scientists 261–270 publications: 181 scientists 271–280 publications: 155 scientists 281–290 publications: 130 scientists 291–300 publications: 127 scientists 301–310 publications: 130 scientists 311–320 publications: 85 scientists 321–330 publications: 106 scientists 331–340 publications: 80 scientists 341–350 publications: 83 scientists 351–360 publications: 75 scientists 361–370 publications: 69 scientists 371–380 publications: 52 scientists 381–390 publications: 54 scientists 391–400 publications: 56 scientists 401–410 publications: 44 scientists 411–420 publications: 40 scientists 421–430 publications: 36 scientists 431–440 publications: 25 scientists 441–450 publications: 25 scientists 451–460 publications: 32 scientists 461–470 publications: 29 scientists 471–480 publications: 21 scientists 481–490 publications: 26 scientists 491–500 publications: 25 scientists 501–510 publications: 17 scientists 511–520 publications: 18 scientists 521–530 publications: 15 scientists 531–540 publications: 22 scientists 541–550 publications: 12 scientists 551–560 publications: 15 scientists 561–570 publications: 11 scientists 571–580 publications: 19 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 9 scientists 601–610 publications: 7 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 5 scientists 631–640 publications: 5 scientists 641–650 publications: 6 scientists 651–660 publications: 3 scientists 661–670 publications: 3 scientists 671–680 publications: 4 scientists 681–686 publications: 3 scientists 687+ publications: 100 scientists
41 publications 687+

This scientist: 88 publications — 8th percentile

8% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 687 publications or more.

Rym Msadek D-index placement in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Environmental Sciences scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Rym Msadek sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 12 scientists 31 D-Index: 26 scientists 32 D-Index: 51 scientists 33 D-Index: 88 scientists 34 D-Index: 123 scientists 35 D-Index: 163 scientists 36 D-Index: 206 scientists 37 D-Index: 267 scientists 38 D-Index: 265 scientists 39 D-Index: 275 scientists 40 D-Index: 321 scientists 41 D-Index: 343 scientists 42 D-Index: 305 scientists 43 D-Index: 336 scientists 44 D-Index: 330 scientists 45 D-Index: 348 scientists 46 D-Index: 291 scientists 47 D-Index: 275 scientists 48 D-Index: 272 scientists 49 D-Index: 273 scientists 50 D-Index: 263 scientists 51 D-Index: 232 scientists 52 D-Index: 266 scientists 53 D-Index: 217 scientists 54 D-Index: 199 scientists 55 D-Index: 177 scientists 56 D-Index: 202 scientists 57 D-Index: 204 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 177 scientists 60 D-Index: 166 scientists 61 D-Index: 152 scientists 62 D-Index: 143 scientists 63 D-Index: 150 scientists 64 D-Index: 124 scientists 65 D-Index: 119 scientists 66 D-Index: 120 scientists 67 D-Index: 118 scientists 68 D-Index: 82 scientists 69 D-Index: 98 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 105 scientists 72 D-Index: 74 scientists 73 D-Index: 84 scientists 74 D-Index: 70 scientists 75 D-Index: 67 scientists 76 D-Index: 78 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 59 scientists 79 D-Index: 52 scientists 80 D-Index: 47 scientists 81 D-Index: 38 scientists 82 D-Index: 48 scientists 83 D-Index: 42 scientists 84 D-Index: 42 scientists 85 D-Index: 43 scientists 86 D-Index: 29 scientists 87 D-Index: 37 scientists 88 D-Index: 29 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 34 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 22 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 19 scientists 95 D-Index: 24 scientists 96 D-Index: 21 scientists 97 D-Index: 20 scientists 98 D-Index: 24 scientists 99 D-Index: 17 scientists 100 D-Index: 17 scientists 101 D-Index: 21 scientists 102 D-Index: 25 scientists 103 D-Index: 18 scientists 104 D-Index: 26 scientists 105 D-Index: 19 scientists 106 D-Index: 15 scientists 107 D-Index: 10 scientists 108 D-Index: 13 scientists 109 D-Index: 15 scientists 110 D-Index: 12 scientists 111 D-Index: 8 scientists 112 D-Index: 7 scientists 113 D-Index: 9 scientists 114 D-Index: 6 scientists 115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116 D-Index: 7 scientists 117 D-Index: 8 scientists 118 D-Index: 3 scientists 119 D-Index: 5 scientists 120 D-Index: 7 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 4 scientists 123 D-Index: 8 scientists 124 D-Index: 7 scientists 125+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 125+

This scientist: 35 D-Index — 5th percentile

5% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 125 D-Index or more.

Overview

Rym Msadek is affiliated with the Centre national de la recherche scientifique (CNRS) in France. Their research primarily spans Earth and Planetary Sciences and Environmental Science, with notable contributions in the subfields of Atmospheric Science, Global and Planetary Change, Oceanography, Sociology and Political Science, and Environmental Chemistry.

The main topics in Msadek's body of work include:

  • Climate variability and models
  • Arctic and Antarctic ice dynamics
  • Climate change and permafrost
  • Oceanographic and Atmospheric Processes
  • Meteorological Phenomena and Simulations
  • Arctic and Russian Policy Studies
  • Geology and Paleoclimatology Research

Their recent papers demonstrate a focus on climate dynamics related to Arctic sea ice and broader atmospheric responses. Selected publications include:

  • Robust but weak winter atmospheric circulation response to future Arctic sea ice loss, 2022, Nature Communications
  • Impacts of Atlantic multidecadal variability on the tropical Pacific: a multi-model study, 2021, npj Climate and Atmospheric Science
  • Impact of Reduced Arctic Sea Ice on Northern Hemisphere Climate and Weather in Autumn and Winter, 2021, Journal of Climate
  • Clarifying the Relation between AMOC and Thermal Wind: Application to the Centennial Variability in a Coupled Climate Model, 2020, Journal of Physical Oceanography
  • Summertime changes in climate extremes over the peripheral Arctic regions after a sudden sea ice retreat, 2022, Weather and Climate Dynamics

Msadek frequently publishes in the following venues:

  • Journal of Climate
  • npj Climate and Atmospheric Science
  • HAL (Le Centre pour la Communication Scientifique Directe)
  • Nature Communications
  • Journal of Physical Oceanography

Collaboration is a significant aspect of Msadek's research, with frequent coauthors including Christophe Cassou, Emilia Sánchez-Gómez, Laurent Terray, Svenya Chripko, and James A. Screen.

Best Publications

  • Evaluation of CMIP6 DECK Experiments With CNRM-CM6-1

    A. Voldoire;D. Saint‐Martin;S. Sénési;B. Decharme

  • Evaluation of CNRM Earth System Model, CNRM‐ESM2‐1: Role of Earth System Processes in Present‐Day and Future Climate

    Roland Séférian;Pierre Nabat;Martine Michou;David Saint‐Martin

  • Decadal Climate Prediction: An Update from the Trenches

    Gerald A. Meehl;Lisa Goddard;George Boer;Robert Burgman

  • On the Seasonal Forecasting of Regional Tropical Cyclone Activity

    G. A. Vecchi;T. Delworth;R. Gudgel;S. Kapnick

  • The Decadal Climate Prediction Project (DCPP) contribution to CMIP6

    George J. Boer;Douglas M. Smith;Christophe Cassou;Francisco Doblas-Reyes

  • Have Aerosols Caused the Observed Atlantic Multidecadal Variability

    Rong Zhang;Thomas L. Delworth;Rowan Sutton;Daniel L. R. Hodson

  • A verification framework for interannual-to-decadal predictions experiments

    L. Goddard;A. Kumar;A. Solomon;D. Smith

  • The Polar Amplification Model Intercomparison Project (PAMIP) contribution to CMIP6: investigating the causes and consequences of polar amplification

    Doug M. Smith;James A. Screen;Clara Deser;Judah Cohen

  • Robust but weak winter atmospheric circulation response to future Arctic sea ice loss

    Unknown

  • Assessing the Climate Impacts of the Observed Atlantic Multidecadal Variability Using the GFDL CM2.1 and NCAR CESM1 Global Coupled Models

    Yohan Ruprich-Robert;Rym Msadek;Frederic Castruccio;Stephen Yeager

  • Managing living marine resources in a dynamic environment: The role of seasonal to decadal climate forecasts

    Desiree Tommasi;Charles A. Stock;Alistair J. Hobday;Rick Methot

  • Improved Seasonal Prediction of Temperature and Precipitation over Land in a High-Resolution GFDL Climate Model

    Liwei Jia;Xiaosong Yang;Gabriel Andres Vecchi;Richard G. Gudgel

  • Seasonal to interannual Arctic sea ice predictability in current global climate models

    S. Tietsche;J. J. Day;V. Guemas;W. J. Hurlin

  • Intercomparison of the Arctic sea ice cover in global ocean–sea ice reanalyses from the ORA-IP project

    Matthieu Chevallier;Gregory C. Smith;Frédéric Dupont;Jean-François Lemieux

  • Atlantic multidecadal oceanic variability and its influence on the atmosphere in a climate model

    Rym Msadek;Claude Frankignoul

  • Skillful regional prediction of Arctic sea ice on seasonal timescales

    Mitchell Bushuk;Rym Msadek;Michael Winton;Gabriel A. Vecchi

  • A Predictable AMO-Like Pattern in the GFDL Fully Coupled Ensemble Initialization and Decadal Forecasting System

    Xiaosong Yang;Xiaosong Yang;Anthony Rosati;Shaoqing Zhang;Thomas L. Delworth

  • Importance of initial conditions in seasonal predictions of Arctic sea ice extent

    R. Msadek;R. Msadek;G. A. Vecchi;M. Winton;R. G. Gudgel

  • Assessing the predictability of the Atlantic meridional overturning circulation and associated fingerprints

    R. Msadek;K. W. Dixon;T. L. Delworth;W. Hurlin

  • Predicting a Decadal Shift in North Atlantic Climate Variability Using the GFDL Forecast System

    Rym Msadek;T. L. Delworth;A. Rosati;W. Anderson

  • Mechanisms of the atmospheric response to North Atlantic multidecadal variability: a model study

    Rym Msadek;Rym Msadek;Claude Frankignoul;Laurent Z. X. Li

Frequent Co-Authors

Thomas L. Delworth
Thomas L. Delworth Geophysical Fluid Dynamics Laboratory
Gabriel A. Vecchi
Gabriel A. Vecchi Princeton University
Anthony Rosati
Anthony Rosati National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
Andrew T. Wittenberg
Andrew T. Wittenberg Geophysical Fluid Dynamics Laboratory
Fanrong Zeng
Fanrong Zeng Geophysical Fluid Dynamics Laboratory
Gokhan Danabasoglu
Gokhan Danabasoglu National Center for Atmospheric Research
Rong Zhang
Rong Zhang National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
Ed Hawkins
Ed Hawkins University of Reading
Stephen G. Yeager
Stephen G. Yeager National Center for Atmospheric Research
Gabriele Villarini
Gabriele Villarini Princeton University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For students interested in Environmental Sciences, exploring related online degrees can broaden career opportunities. Some may consider pursuing one of the easy bachelor's degree options to complement their studies or to gain foundational knowledge in a shorter timeframe.

Specialized fields like Geoscience offer focused insights into Earth's physical processes. Earning a geoscience online degree allows learners to study from anywhere, preparing them for careers in environmental consulting, resource management, or research.

Another complementary path is a degree in Geographic Information Systems (GIS), which equips students with skills in spatial data analysis. This makes a geographic information systems degree valuable for roles in environmental planning, conservation, and urban development.

For those aspiring to leadership roles in public policy or environmental administration, a Master of Public Administration can be ideal. Accelerated options like a 1 year mpa online program provide efficient pathways to enhance management expertise relevant to environmental governance.

Best Scientists Citing Rym Msadek

Trending Scientists