World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Biology and Biochemistry

D-Index
80
Citations
22370
World Ranking
4089
National Ranking
2009

Ruth Sager publication distribution in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Biology and Biochemistry in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Ruth Sager sits on this spectrum.

47–56 publications: 8 scientists 57–66 publications: 35 scientists 67–76 publications: 106 scientists 77–86 publications: 231 scientists 87–96 publications: 414 scientists 97–106 publications: 546 scientists 107–116 publications: 704 scientists 117–126 publications: 849 scientists 127–136 publications: 980 scientists 137–146 publications: 942 scientists 147–156 publications: 969 scientists 157–166 publications: 950 scientists 167–176 publications: 951 scientists 177–186 publications: 915 scientists 187–196 publications: 787 scientists 197–206 publications: 841 scientists 207–216 publications: 735 scientists 217–226 publications: 709 scientists 227–236 publications: 651 scientists 237–246 publications: 605 scientists 247–256 publications: 510 scientists 257–266 publications: 524 scientists 267–276 publications: 434 scientists 277–286 publications: 418 scientists 287–296 publications: 350 scientists 297–306 publications: 363 scientists 307–316 publications: 315 scientists 317–326 publications: 296 scientists 327–336 publications: 261 scientists 337–346 publications: 240 scientists 347–356 publications: 219 scientists 357–366 publications: 197 scientists 367–376 publications: 154 scientists 377–386 publications: 161 scientists 387–396 publications: 155 scientists 397–406 publications: 145 scientists 407–416 publications: 124 scientists 417–426 publications: 112 scientists 427–436 publications: 132 scientists 437–446 publications: 116 scientists 447–456 publications: 99 scientists 457–466 publications: 81 scientists 467–476 publications: 91 scientists 477–486 publications: 80 scientists 487–496 publications: 80 scientists 497–506 publications: 60 scientists 507–516 publications: 36 scientists 517–526 publications: 46 scientists 527–536 publications: 54 scientists 537–546 publications: 44 scientists 547–556 publications: 43 scientists 557–566 publications: 43 scientists 567–576 publications: 42 scientists 577–586 publications: 25 scientists 587–596 publications: 34 scientists 597–606 publications: 23 scientists 607–616 publications: 33 scientists 617–626 publications: 31 scientists 627–636 publications: 27 scientists 637–646 publications: 25 scientists 647–656 publications: 28 scientists 657–666 publications: 34 scientists 667–676 publications: 18 scientists 677–686 publications: 16 scientists 687–696 publications: 10 scientists 697–706 publications: 12 scientists 707–716 publications: 21 scientists 717–726 publications: 12 scientists 727–736 publications: 12 scientists 737–746 publications: 10 scientists 747–756 publications: 7 scientists 757–766 publications: 13 scientists 767–776 publications: 15 scientists 777–786 publications: 13 scientists 787–796 publications: 9 scientists 797–806 publications: 9 scientists 807–816 publications: 7 scientists 817–826 publications: 4 scientists 827–836 publications: 9 scientists 837–846 publications: 7 scientists 847–856 publications: 3 scientists 857–866 publications: 5 scientists 867–876 publications: 5 scientists 877–886 publications: 11 scientists 887–896 publications: 3 scientists 897–906 publications: 4 scientists 907–916 publications: 7 scientists 917–926 publications: 5 scientists 927–936 publications: 6 scientists 937–946 publications: 6 scientists 947–956 publications: 3 scientists 957–966 publications: 7 scientists 967–976 publications: 2 scientists 977–986 publications: 2 scientists 987–996 publications: 1 scientists 997–1,006 publications: 5 scientists 1,007–1,016 publications: 2 scientists 1,017–1,026 publications: 2 scientists 1,027 publications: 1 scientists 1,028+ publications: 100 scientists
47 publications 1,028+

This scientist: 258 publications — 69th percentile

69% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,028 publications or more.

Ruth Sager D-index placement in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Biology and Biochemistry scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Ruth Sager sits on this spectrum.

40–41 D-Index: 80 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 183 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 317 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 504 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 718 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 900 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 1,026 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 1,150 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 1,236 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 1,253 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 1,163 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 1,131 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 1,032 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 897 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 814 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 715 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 709 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 596 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 512 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 473 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 412 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 373 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 358 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 285 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 273 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 227 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 208 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 193 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 153 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 157 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 148 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 120 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 113 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 100 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 86 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 67 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 72 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 73 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 64 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 53 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 60 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 54 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 43 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 38 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 49 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 26 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 18 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 23 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 32 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 32 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 27 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 19 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 22 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 12 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 16 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 14 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 10 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 13 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 10 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 7 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 9 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 13 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 4 scientists 166 D-Index: 4 scientists 167+ D-Index: 98 scientists
40 D-Index 167+

This scientist: 80 D-Index — 80th percentile

80% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 167 D-Index or more.

Overview

Ruth Sager was affiliated with Harvard University in the United States. Their scientific career and contributions are documented primarily through affiliations rather than individual publications or specific research topics available in the provided data.

Throughout their academic tenure, Ruth Sager did not have detailed records of recent papers, co-authors, or frequent publication venues noted in the current dataset. Consequently, there is no specific information on collaborative networks or publication patterns to outline.

No data on main fields or subfields of study related to Ruth Sager's work was provided. Similarly, there are no records of main topics addressed in their work or book publications attributed to them. This limits the ability to specify the precise nature or focus of their scientific investigations.

There is no information on awards or honors received by Ruth Sager, and their date of death indicates that their scientific contributions are from a concluded academic period.

Best Publications

  • Maspin, a serpin with tumor-suppressing activity in human mammary epithelial cells

    Zhiqiang Zou;Anthony Anisowicz;Mary J. C. Hendrix;Ann Thor

  • Tumor suppressor genes: the puzzle and the promise

    Ruth Sager

  • Differential display and cloning of messenger RNAs from human breast cancer versus mammary epithelial cells.

    Peng Liang;Lidia Averboukh;Khandan Keyomarsi;Ruth Sager

  • Maspin acts at the cell membrane to inhibit invasion and motility of mammary and prostatic cancer cells

    Shijie Sheng;Juliana Carey;Elisabeth A. Seftor;Lauren Dias

  • Positive selection of candidate tumor-suppressor genes by subtractive hybridization.

    Sam W. Lee;Catherine Tomasetto;Ruth Sager

  • Human papilloma virus DNAs immortalize normal human mammary epithelial cells and reduce their growth factor requirements.

    Vimla Band;Deborah Zajchowski;Victoria Kulesa;Ruth Sager

  • Cytoplasmic Genes and Organelles

    Ruth Sager

  • Distinctive traits of normal and tumor-derived human mammary epithelial cells expressed in a medium that supports long-term growth of both cell types.

    Vimla Band;Ruth Sager

  • Constitutive overexpression of a growth-regulated gene in transformed Chinese hamster and human cells

    Anthony Anisowicz;Lee Bardwell;Ruth Sager

  • Gap junction genes Cx26 and Cx43 individually suppress the cancer phenotype of human mammary carcinoma cells and restore differentiation potential

    Karen K. Hirschi;Cheng-en Xu;Tetsuya Tsukamoto;Ruth Sager

  • Identification of three related human GRO genes encoding cytokine functions

    Stephen Haskill;Amy Peace;John Morris;Sarah A. Sporn

  • Transcriptional downregulation of gap-junction proteins blocks junctional communication in human mammary tumor cell lines.

    S. W. Lee;C. Tomasetto;D. Paul;Khandan Keyomarsi

  • Expression genetics in cancer: shifting the focus from DNA to RNA.

    Ruth Sager

  • Structure and development of the chloroplast in Chlamydomonas. I. The normal green cell.

    Ruth Sager;George E. Palade

  • Enhanced expression of an insulin growth factor-like binding protein (mac25) in senescent human mammary epithelial cells and induced expression with retinoic acid

    Karen Swisshelm;Karen Ryan;Karen Tsuchiya;Ruth Sager

  • Selective silencing of eukaryotic DNA.

    Ruth Sager;Robert Kitchin

  • Down-regulation of retinoic acid receptor beta in mammary carcinoma cell lines and its up-regulation in senescing normal mammary epithelial cells

    K. Swisshelm;K. Ryan;Xinhua Lee;H. C. Tsou

  • CHLOROPLAST DNA IN CHLAMYDOMONAS

    Ruth Sager;M. R. Ishida

  • Senescence as a mode of tumor suppression.

    Ruth Sager

  • Distinctive traits of normal and tumor-derived human mammary epithelial cells expressed in a medium that supports long-term growth of both cell types (DFCI-1 medium/primary breast tumors/tumor antigens/rhodamine 123)

    Vimla Band;Ruth Sager

Frequent Co-Authors

Arthur B. Pardee
Arthur B. Pardee Harvard University
Göran Stenman
Göran Stenman University of Gothenburg
Mary J.C. Hendrix
Mary J.C. Hendrix Northwestern University
Catherine Tomasetto
Catherine Tomasetto Institute of Genetics and Molecular and Cellular Biology
Sam W. Lee
Sam W. Lee Broad Institute
Barbara L. Smith
Barbara L. Smith Harvard University
Hiroshi Sano
Hiroshi Sano Nara Institute of Science and Technology
James L. Connolly
James L. Connolly Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center
Khandan Keyomarsi
Khandan Keyomarsi The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center
Richard J. Roberts
Richard J. Roberts New England Biolabs

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

A foundation in Biology or Biochemistry can unlock diverse healthcare and science careers. Many students now choose flexible online learning to earn credentials and launch their professions faster. For those interested in medical imaging, consider enrolling in an online ultrasound tech school, where you can learn essential diagnostic skills needed in hospitals and clinics.

Radiology is another growing field, with increased demand for certified radiologic technologists. Explore the best online radiology tech programs to find affordable paths toward becoming a radiology professional.

Those passionate about nutrition can pursue further studies through the top dietetics programs in the US, which equip graduates for roles in public health, wellness, and clinical dietetics.

Finally, if you want to gain clinical experience quickly, look into medical assistant classes online with financial aid. These programs help you enter the workforce with vital hands-on skills and support.

Online options in healthcare and biosciences are expanding, offering flexible, affordable routes to high-impact careers.

Best Scientists Citing Ruth Sager

Recently Published Articles