| Discipline name | D-Index | World Ranking | National Ranking | Publications | Citations |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Plant Science and Agronomy | 34 | 5474 | 1333 | 117 | 3751 |
The chart shows the history of publications by Ronald E. Talbert between 1964 and 2012, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Ronald E. Talbert published across 49 years, from 1964 to 2012, averaging 2.4 papers a year. Output peaked at 11 publications in 2005. 1 of the 119 publications appeared in the last two years.
119 publications in total across all disciplines
| Year | Publications |
|---|---|
| 1964 | 1 |
| 1965 | 1 |
| 1966 | 0 |
| 1967 | 0 |
| 1968 | 0 |
| 1969 | 0 |
| 1970 | 1 |
| 1971 | 1 |
| 1972 | 0 |
| 1973 | 0 |
| 1974 | 0 |
| 1975 | 0 |
| 1976 | 1 |
| 1977 | 1 |
| 1978 | 0 |
| 1979 | 3 |
| 1980 | 1 |
| 1981 | 3 |
| 1982 | 4 |
| 1983 | 2 |
| 1984 | 0 |
| 1985 | 6 |
| 1986 | 3 |
| 1987 | 0 |
| 1988 | 4 |
| 1989 | 3 |
| 1990 | 1 |
| 1991 | 7 |
| 1992 | 6 |
| 1993 | 6 |
| 1994 | 7 |
| 1995 | 5 |
| 1996 | 3 |
| 1997 | 2 |
| 1998 | 1 |
| 1999 | 5 |
| 2000 | 6 |
| 2001 | 3 |
| 2002 | 2 |
| 2003 | 0 |
| 2004 | 7 |
| 2005 | 11 |
| 2006 | 4 |
| 2007 | 5 |
| 2008 | 0 |
| 2009 | 1 |
| 2010 | 1 |
| 2011 | 0 |
| 2012 | 1 |
| Total | 119 |
The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Plant Science and Agronomy in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Ronald E. Talbert sits on this spectrum.
This scientist: 117 publications — 37th percentile
37% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.
The last bar groups every scientist with 467 publications or more.
| Publications | Scientists | This scientist |
|---|---|---|
| 36–40 | 2 | |
| 41–45 | 7 | |
| 46–50 | 40 | |
| 51–55 | 58 | |
| 56–60 | 60 | |
| 61–65 | 107 | |
| 66–70 | 130 | |
| 71–75 | 153 | |
| 76–80 | 191 | |
| 81–85 | 199 | |
| 86–90 | 206 | |
| 91–95 | 218 | |
| 96–100 | 226 | |
| 101–105 | 227 | |
| 106–110 | 247 | |
| 111–115 | 255 | |
| 116–120 | 253 | 117 |
| 121–125 | 233 | |
| 126–130 | 219 | |
| 131–135 | 201 | |
| 136–140 | 194 | |
| 141–145 | 176 | |
| 146–150 | 157 | |
| 151–155 | 147 | |
| 156–160 | 151 | |
| 161–165 | 159 | |
| 166–170 | 137 | |
| 171–175 | 128 | |
| 176–180 | 126 | |
| 181–185 | 98 | |
| 186–190 | 114 | |
| 191–195 | 100 | |
| 196–200 | 90 | |
| 201–205 | 71 | |
| 206–210 | 98 | |
| 211–215 | 70 | |
| 216–220 | 86 | |
| 221–225 | 61 | |
| 226–230 | 58 | |
| 231–235 | 53 | |
| 236–240 | 64 | |
| 241–245 | 39 | |
| 246–250 | 46 | |
| 251–255 | 51 | |
| 256–260 | 36 | |
| 261–265 | 44 | |
| 266–270 | 35 | |
| 271–275 | 30 | |
| 276–280 | 33 | |
| 281–285 | 35 | |
| 286–290 | 36 | |
| 291–295 | 26 | |
| 296–300 | 26 | |
| 301–305 | 31 | |
| 306–310 | 30 | |
| 311–315 | 21 | |
| 316–320 | 29 | |
| 321–325 | 14 | |
| 326–330 | 15 | |
| 331–335 | 15 | |
| 336–340 | 17 | |
| 341–345 | 15 | |
| 346–350 | 12 | |
| 351–355 | 17 | |
| 356–360 | 18 | |
| 361–365 | 12 | |
| 366–370 | 11 | |
| 371–375 | 6 | |
| 376–380 | 6 | |
| 381–385 | 11 | |
| 386–390 | 9 | |
| 391–395 | 10 | |
| 396–400 | 8 | |
| 401–405 | 4 | |
| 406–410 | 9 | |
| 411–415 | 11 | |
| 416–420 | 4 | |
| 421–425 | 7 | |
| 426–430 | 4 | |
| 431–435 | 3 | |
| 436–440 | 5 | |
| 441–445 | 8 | |
| 446–450 | 6 | |
| 451–455 | 7 | |
| 456–460 | 5 | |
| 461–465 | 6 | |
| 466 | 2 | |
| 467+ | 99 |
The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Plant Science and Agronomy scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Ronald E. Talbert sits on this spectrum.
This scientist: 34 D-Index — 19th percentile
19% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.
The last bar groups every scientist with 109 D-Index or more.
| D-Index | Scientists | This scientist |
|---|---|---|
| 30 | 200 | |
| 31 | 236 | |
| 32 | 253 | |
| 33 | 283 | |
| 34 | 288 | 34 |
| 35 | 240 | |
| 36 | 246 | |
| 37 | 243 | |
| 38 | 247 | |
| 39 | 229 | |
| 40 | 232 | |
| 41 | 230 | |
| 42 | 228 | |
| 43 | 219 | |
| 44 | 193 | |
| 45 | 164 | |
| 46 | 158 | |
| 47 | 143 | |
| 48 | 131 | |
| 49 | 127 | |
| 50 | 122 | |
| 51 | 122 | |
| 52 | 110 | |
| 53 | 102 | |
| 54 | 98 | |
| 55 | 79 | |
| 56 | 85 | |
| 57 | 88 | |
| 58 | 91 | |
| 59 | 62 | |
| 60 | 61 | |
| 61 | 59 | |
| 62 | 54 | |
| 63 | 61 | |
| 64 | 59 | |
| 65 | 58 | |
| 66 | 41 | |
| 67 | 49 | |
| 68 | 39 | |
| 69 | 32 | |
| 70 | 40 | |
| 71 | 47 | |
| 72 | 38 | |
| 73 | 28 | |
| 74 | 29 | |
| 75 | 28 | |
| 76 | 22 | |
| 77 | 21 | |
| 78 | 25 | |
| 79 | 26 | |
| 80 | 19 | |
| 81 | 16 | |
| 82 | 12 | |
| 83 | 16 | |
| 84 | 14 | |
| 85 | 11 | |
| 86 | 17 | |
| 87 | 13 | |
| 88 | 10 | |
| 89 | 12 | |
| 90 | 18 | |
| 91 | 16 | |
| 92 | 16 | |
| 93 | 17 | |
| 94 | 12 | |
| 95 | 8 | |
| 96 | 9 | |
| 97 | 9 | |
| 98 | 11 | |
| 99 | 12 | |
| 100 | 5 | |
| 101 | 8 | |
| 102 | 4 | |
| 103 | 11 | |
| 104 | 5 | |
| 105 | 9 | |
| 106 | 7 | |
| 107 | 4 | |
| 108 | 8 | |
| 109+ | 99 |
Nilda R. Burgos;Ronald E. Talbert
Amadou Diarra;Roy J. Smith;Ronald E. Talbert
Amadou Diarra;Roy J. Smith;Ronald E. Talbert
Ronald E. Talbert;Nilda R. Burgos
Unknown
Nilda R. Burgos;Ronald E. Talbert
L. R. Oliver;R. E. Frans;R. E. Talbert
Leopoldo E. Estorninos;David R. Gealy;Edward E. Gbur;Ronald E. Talbert
Nilda R. Burgos;Ronald E. Talbert;John D. Mattice
V. Frank Carey;Robert E. Hoagland;Ronald E. Talbert
Larry G. Stauber;Roy J. Smith;Ronald E. Talbert
Brian V. Ottis;Kenneth L. Smith;Robert C. Scott;Ronald E. Talbert
Sam L. Kwon;Roy J. Smith;Ronald E. Talbert
Leopoldo E. Estorninos;David R. Gealy;Ronald E. Talbert
Brian V. Ottis;Ronald E. Talbert
Nilda R Burgos;Yong‐In Kuk;Ronald E Talbert
V. Frank Carey;Robert E. Hoagland;Ronald E. Talbert
David H. Johnson;David L. Jordan;William G. Johnson;Ronald E. Talbert
Sam L. Kwon;Roy J. Smith;Ronald E. Talbert
Mayank S. Malik;Nilda R. Burgos;Ronald E. Talbert
Jerome B. Weber;Gail G. Wilkerson;H. Michael Linker;John W. Wilcut
Jason K. Norsworthy;Ronald E. Talbert;Robert E. Hoagland
David R. Gealy;Nestor E. Saldain;Ronald E. Talbert
If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.