World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Engineering and Technology

D-Index
45
Citations
6925
World Ranking
5581
National Ranking
289

Rod Barrett publication distribution in Engineering and Technology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Engineering and Technology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Rod Barrett sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 20 scientists 48–57 publications: 35 scientists 58–67 publications: 96 scientists 68–77 publications: 135 scientists 78–87 publications: 190 scientists 88–97 publications: 259 scientists 98–107 publications: 283 scientists 108–117 publications: 369 scientists 118–127 publications: 341 scientists 128–137 publications: 386 scientists 138–147 publications: 372 scientists 148–157 publications: 457 scientists 158–167 publications: 415 scientists 168–177 publications: 407 scientists 178–187 publications: 421 scientists 188–197 publications: 378 scientists 198–207 publications: 403 scientists 208–217 publications: 317 scientists 218–227 publications: 346 scientists 228–237 publications: 321 scientists 238–247 publications: 260 scientists 248–257 publications: 280 scientists 258–267 publications: 240 scientists 268–277 publications: 214 scientists 278–287 publications: 242 scientists 288–297 publications: 203 scientists 298–307 publications: 166 scientists 308–317 publications: 154 scientists 318–327 publications: 175 scientists 328–337 publications: 159 scientists 338–347 publications: 99 scientists 348–357 publications: 131 scientists 358–367 publications: 106 scientists 368–377 publications: 118 scientists 378–387 publications: 97 scientists 388–397 publications: 108 scientists 398–407 publications: 82 scientists 408–417 publications: 71 scientists 418–427 publications: 64 scientists 428–437 publications: 55 scientists 438–447 publications: 54 scientists 448–457 publications: 60 scientists 458–467 publications: 47 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 30 scientists 488–497 publications: 29 scientists 498–507 publications: 38 scientists 508–517 publications: 40 scientists 518–527 publications: 32 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 28 scientists 548–557 publications: 23 scientists 558–567 publications: 19 scientists 568–577 publications: 16 scientists 578–587 publications: 17 scientists 588–597 publications: 18 scientists 598–607 publications: 22 scientists 608–617 publications: 15 scientists 618–627 publications: 9 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 21 scientists 648–657 publications: 12 scientists 658–667 publications: 9 scientists 668–677 publications: 11 scientists 678–687 publications: 9 scientists 688–697 publications: 6 scientists 698–707 publications: 14 scientists 708–717 publications: 7 scientists 718–727 publications: 8 scientists 728–737 publications: 10 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 5 scientists 758–767 publications: 5 scientists 768–777 publications: 11 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 2 scientists 798–803 publications: 4 scientists 804+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 804+

This scientist: 207 publications — 51st percentile

51% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 804 publications or more.

Rod Barrett D-index placement in Engineering and Technology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Engineering and Technology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Rod Barrett sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 59 scientists 31 D-Index: 114 scientists 32 D-Index: 129 scientists 33 D-Index: 189 scientists 34 D-Index: 200 scientists 35 D-Index: 262 scientists 36 D-Index: 311 scientists 37 D-Index: 312 scientists 38 D-Index: 350 scientists 39 D-Index: 385 scientists 40 D-Index: 348 scientists 41 D-Index: 362 scientists 42 D-Index: 426 scientists 43 D-Index: 380 scientists 44 D-Index: 310 scientists 45 D-Index: 341 scientists 46 D-Index: 301 scientists 47 D-Index: 306 scientists 48 D-Index: 271 scientists 49 D-Index: 246 scientists 50 D-Index: 210 scientists 51 D-Index: 253 scientists 52 D-Index: 213 scientists 53 D-Index: 221 scientists 54 D-Index: 195 scientists 55 D-Index: 186 scientists 56 D-Index: 170 scientists 57 D-Index: 167 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 144 scientists 60 D-Index: 152 scientists 61 D-Index: 141 scientists 62 D-Index: 138 scientists 63 D-Index: 131 scientists 64 D-Index: 118 scientists 65 D-Index: 114 scientists 66 D-Index: 119 scientists 67 D-Index: 95 scientists 68 D-Index: 87 scientists 69 D-Index: 77 scientists 70 D-Index: 89 scientists 71 D-Index: 69 scientists 72 D-Index: 54 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 55 scientists 75 D-Index: 54 scientists 76 D-Index: 49 scientists 77 D-Index: 53 scientists 78 D-Index: 46 scientists 79 D-Index: 28 scientists 80 D-Index: 39 scientists 81 D-Index: 36 scientists 82 D-Index: 24 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 36 scientists 85 D-Index: 18 scientists 86 D-Index: 25 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 26 scientists 89 D-Index: 27 scientists 90 D-Index: 23 scientists 91 D-Index: 15 scientists 92 D-Index: 12 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 15 scientists 95 D-Index: 10 scientists 96 D-Index: 13 scientists 97 D-Index: 13 scientists 98 D-Index: 9 scientists 99 D-Index: 7 scientists 100 D-Index: 7 scientists 101 D-Index: 8 scientists 102 D-Index: 7 scientists 103 D-Index: 7 scientists 104 D-Index: 9 scientists 105 D-Index: 6 scientists 106 D-Index: 9 scientists 107+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 107+

This scientist: 45 D-Index — 46th percentile

46% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 107 D-Index or more.

Overview

Rod Barrett is affiliated with Griffith University in Australia and specializes in research at the intersection of medicine and engineering. Their work primarily focuses on biomedical engineering and orthopedics and sports medicine, with significant contributions in surgery, rheumatology, and pharmacology.

The scientist's research spans several main topics, including:

  • Sports injuries and prevention
  • Muscle activation and electromyography studies
  • Lower extremity biomechanics and pathologies
  • Sports performance and training
  • Hip disorders and treatments
  • Knee injuries and reconstruction techniques
  • Osteoarthritis treatment and mechanisms

Recent publications by Rod Barrett illustrate a focus on neuromusculoskeletal modelling, tendon adaptations, injury risk factors, and osteoarthritis biomechanics. Selected papers include:

  • "Machine learning methods to support personalized neuromusculoskeletal modelling," 2020, Biomechanics and Modeling in Mechanobiology
  • "Mechanical, Material and Morphological Adaptations of Healthy Lower Limb Tendons to Mechanical Loading: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis," 2022, Sports Medicine
  • "Targeted Achilles Tendon Training and Rehabilitation Using Personalized and Real-Time Multiscale Models of the Neuromusculoskeletal System," 2020, Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology
  • "Risk Factors for Lower Limb Injury in Female Team Field and Court Sports: A Systematic Review, Meta-analysis, and Best Evidence Synthesis," 2021, Sports Medicine
  • "Individuals with mild-to-moderate hip osteoarthritis walk with lower hip joint contact forces despite higher levels of muscle co-contraction compared to healthy individuals," 2020, Osteoarthritis and Cartilage

The scientist frequently publishes in several journals, notably:

  • Journal of Science and Medicine in Sport
  • Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise
  • Scandinavian Journal of Medicine and Science in Sports
  • Sports Medicine
  • Journal of Applied Physiology

Frequent collaborators include Laura E. Diamond, David J. Saxby, David G. Lloyd, Matthew N. Bourne, and Tyler J. Collings. These co-authors have contributed extensively alongside Rod Barrett, facilitating interdisciplinary approaches to biomedical and sports research.

Best Publications

  • A systematic review of the effect of ageing and falls history on minimum foot clearance characteristics during level walking

    R. S Barrett;P. M Mills;Rezaul Begg

  • Gross muscle morphology and structure in spastic cerebral palsy: a systematic review

    Rod Barrett;Glen Anthony Lichtwark

  • Automatic tracking of medial gastrocnemius fascicle length during human locomotion

    Neil J. Cronin;Christopher P. Carty;Rod S. Barrett;Glen A. Lichtwark

  • Upper body accelerations during walking in healthy young and elderly men.

    Justin Kavanagh;Rod Barrett;Steven Morrison

  • Reliability of segmental accelerations measured using a new wireless gait analysis system.

    Justin Kavanagh;Steven Morrison;Daniel Arthur James;Rod Barrett

  • Swing phase mechanics of healthy young and elderly men.

    Peter M Mills;Rod S Barrett

  • Muscle weakness in hip osteoarthritis: a systematic review.

    Aderson Loureiro;Peter M. Mills;Rod S. Barrett

  • Validation of a freehand 3D ultrasound system for morphological measures of the medial gastrocnemius muscle

    Lee Anthony Barber;Rod Barrett;Glen Anthony Lichtwark

  • Coordination of head and trunk accelerations during walking.

    Justin Kavanagh;Steven Morrison;Rod Barrett

  • The role of the neck and trunk in facilitating head stability during walking

    Justin Kavanagh;Rod Barrett;Shannon Morrison

  • Passive muscle mechanical properties of the medial gastrocnemius in young adults with spastic cerebral palsy

    Lee Anthony Barber;Rod Barrett;Glen Lichtwark

  • Reliability and accuracy of an automated tracking algorithm to measure controlled passive and active muscle fascicle length changes from ultrasound

    Jarred Gavan Gillett;Rod Barrett;Glen A. Lichtwark

  • Medial gastrocnemius muscle fascicle active torque-length and Achilles tendon properties in young adults with spastic cerebral palsy

    Lee Anthony Barber;Rod Barrett;Glen Lichtwark

  • Age-related differences in postural reaction time and coordination during voluntary sway movements.

    Murray G. Tucker;Justin J. Kavanagh;Rod S. Barrett;Steven Morrison

  • Long-term use of high-heeled shoes alters the neuromechanics of human walking

    Neil J Cronin;Rod Barrett;Christopher Paul Carty

  • Hands-free mobile phone speech while driving degrades coordination and control

    Paul Jaak Treffner;Rod Barrett

  • Recovery from forward loss of balance in young and older adults using the stepping strategy.

    Christopher Paul Carty;Peter Mills;Rod Barrett

  • Repeatability of 3D gait kinematics obtained from an electromagnetic tracking system during treadmill locomotion.

    Peter M. Mills;Peter M. Mills;Steven Morrison;David G. Lloyd;Rod S. Barrett

  • Spatial-temporal gait characteristics in individuals with hip osteoarthritis: A systematic literature review and meta- analysis

    Maria Constantinou;Rod Barrett;Mark Richard Colin Brown;Peter Mills

  • Immediate effect of exercise on achilles tendon properties: systematic review.

    Steven Obst;Rod Barrett;Richard John Newsham-West

  • Recovery from forward loss of balance in young and older adults

    Christopher Paul Carty;Peter Mills;Rod Barrett

Frequent Co-Authors

Thor F. Besier
Thor F. Besier University of Auckland
John R. Hutchinson
John R. Hutchinson Royal Veterinary College
Robbie S. Wilson
Robbie S. Wilson University of Queensland
Robert Adams
Robert Adams Flinders University
Richard Baker
Richard Baker University of Leicester
Per Aagaard
Per Aagaard University of Southern Denmark
Tim J. Gabbett
Tim J. Gabbett University of Southern Queensland
Kathryn M. Refshauge
Kathryn M. Refshauge University of Sydney
Yang D. Teng
Yang D. Teng Spaulding Rehabilitation Hospital
Flavia M. Cicuttini
Flavia M. Cicuttini Monash University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Engineering and Technology in the USA opens doors to a broad range of careers, but related fields also offer strong opportunities—often with more flexible or affordable pathways. Many students are now opting for online degrees that complement their technical education, enabling them to diversify their expertise and boost their employability.

For those interested in management, pursuing a business background can be valuable. Consider the one year online mba entrepreneurship programs for a fast track to leadership roles, or look into the top online mba programs no gmat for a flexible, accessible way to gain management skills without additional testing requirements.

Human resources and communications often intersect with technology fields, particularly in tech companies. If you're interested in helping organizations recruit talent or manage teams, the cheapest online master's in human resources programs can be a strategic choice. Tech professionals aiming to improve workplace communication can benefit from the cheapest online communications degree programs.

These diverse online options can enhance your technical degree, help you stand out in the job market, and provide alternative career pathways within the tech industry.

Best Scientists Citing Rod Barrett

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles