World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Environmental Sciences

D-Index
37
Citations
4673
World Ranking
8956
National Ranking
3211

Robert J. Oglesby publication distribution in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Environmental Sciences in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Robert J. Oglesby sits on this spectrum.

41–50 publications: 21 scientists 51–60 publications: 62 scientists 61–70 publications: 133 scientists 71–80 publications: 257 scientists 81–90 publications: 361 scientists 91–100 publications: 440 scientists 101–110 publications: 492 scientists 111–120 publications: 541 scientists 121–130 publications: 617 scientists 131–140 publications: 544 scientists 141–150 publications: 541 scientists 151–160 publications: 539 scientists 161–170 publications: 444 scientists 171–180 publications: 444 scientists 181–190 publications: 400 scientists 191–200 publications: 377 scientists 201–210 publications: 318 scientists 211–220 publications: 283 scientists 221–230 publications: 263 scientists 231–240 publications: 220 scientists 241–250 publications: 217 scientists 251–260 publications: 180 scientists 261–270 publications: 181 scientists 271–280 publications: 155 scientists 281–290 publications: 130 scientists 291–300 publications: 127 scientists 301–310 publications: 130 scientists 311–320 publications: 85 scientists 321–330 publications: 106 scientists 331–340 publications: 80 scientists 341–350 publications: 83 scientists 351–360 publications: 75 scientists 361–370 publications: 69 scientists 371–380 publications: 52 scientists 381–390 publications: 54 scientists 391–400 publications: 56 scientists 401–410 publications: 44 scientists 411–420 publications: 40 scientists 421–430 publications: 36 scientists 431–440 publications: 25 scientists 441–450 publications: 25 scientists 451–460 publications: 32 scientists 461–470 publications: 29 scientists 471–480 publications: 21 scientists 481–490 publications: 26 scientists 491–500 publications: 25 scientists 501–510 publications: 17 scientists 511–520 publications: 18 scientists 521–530 publications: 15 scientists 531–540 publications: 22 scientists 541–550 publications: 12 scientists 551–560 publications: 15 scientists 561–570 publications: 11 scientists 571–580 publications: 19 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 9 scientists 601–610 publications: 7 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 5 scientists 631–640 publications: 5 scientists 641–650 publications: 6 scientists 651–660 publications: 3 scientists 661–670 publications: 3 scientists 671–680 publications: 4 scientists 681–686 publications: 3 scientists 687+ publications: 100 scientists
41 publications 687+

This scientist: 136 publications — 34th percentile

34% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 687 publications or more.

Robert J. Oglesby D-index placement in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Environmental Sciences scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Robert J. Oglesby sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 12 scientists 31 D-Index: 26 scientists 32 D-Index: 51 scientists 33 D-Index: 88 scientists 34 D-Index: 123 scientists 35 D-Index: 163 scientists 36 D-Index: 206 scientists 37 D-Index: 267 scientists 38 D-Index: 265 scientists 39 D-Index: 275 scientists 40 D-Index: 321 scientists 41 D-Index: 343 scientists 42 D-Index: 305 scientists 43 D-Index: 336 scientists 44 D-Index: 330 scientists 45 D-Index: 348 scientists 46 D-Index: 291 scientists 47 D-Index: 275 scientists 48 D-Index: 272 scientists 49 D-Index: 273 scientists 50 D-Index: 263 scientists 51 D-Index: 232 scientists 52 D-Index: 266 scientists 53 D-Index: 217 scientists 54 D-Index: 199 scientists 55 D-Index: 177 scientists 56 D-Index: 202 scientists 57 D-Index: 204 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 177 scientists 60 D-Index: 166 scientists 61 D-Index: 152 scientists 62 D-Index: 143 scientists 63 D-Index: 150 scientists 64 D-Index: 124 scientists 65 D-Index: 119 scientists 66 D-Index: 120 scientists 67 D-Index: 118 scientists 68 D-Index: 82 scientists 69 D-Index: 98 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 105 scientists 72 D-Index: 74 scientists 73 D-Index: 84 scientists 74 D-Index: 70 scientists 75 D-Index: 67 scientists 76 D-Index: 78 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 59 scientists 79 D-Index: 52 scientists 80 D-Index: 47 scientists 81 D-Index: 38 scientists 82 D-Index: 48 scientists 83 D-Index: 42 scientists 84 D-Index: 42 scientists 85 D-Index: 43 scientists 86 D-Index: 29 scientists 87 D-Index: 37 scientists 88 D-Index: 29 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 34 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 22 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 19 scientists 95 D-Index: 24 scientists 96 D-Index: 21 scientists 97 D-Index: 20 scientists 98 D-Index: 24 scientists 99 D-Index: 17 scientists 100 D-Index: 17 scientists 101 D-Index: 21 scientists 102 D-Index: 25 scientists 103 D-Index: 18 scientists 104 D-Index: 26 scientists 105 D-Index: 19 scientists 106 D-Index: 15 scientists 107 D-Index: 10 scientists 108 D-Index: 13 scientists 109 D-Index: 15 scientists 110 D-Index: 12 scientists 111 D-Index: 8 scientists 112 D-Index: 7 scientists 113 D-Index: 9 scientists 114 D-Index: 6 scientists 115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116 D-Index: 7 scientists 117 D-Index: 8 scientists 118 D-Index: 3 scientists 119 D-Index: 5 scientists 120 D-Index: 7 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 4 scientists 123 D-Index: 8 scientists 124 D-Index: 7 scientists 125+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 125+

This scientist: 37 D-Index — 10th percentile

10% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 125 D-Index or more.

Overview

Robert J. Oglesby was affiliated with the University of Nebraska-Lincoln in the United States. Their research primarily focused on Earth and Planetary Sciences, with particular attention to the subfields of Atmospheric Science and Global and Planetary Change.

Their main topics of work included:

  • Meteorological Phenomena and Simulations
  • Climate variability and models
  • Precipitation Measurement and Analysis

Oglesby contributed to the scientific community with publications in key venues such as Atmosphere and the Journal of Emergency Nursing. Their recent papers included:

  • "Weather Research and Forecasting Model (WRF) Sensitivity to Choice of Parameterization Options over Ethiopia," 2024, published in Atmosphere
  • "Celebrating Our Accomplishments Amidst the Many Challenges We All Face," 2025, published in Journal of Emergency Nursing

Collaborations were an important aspect of Oglesby's work. Frequent coauthors included:

  • Andualem Shiferaw
  • Tsegaye Tadesse
  • Clinton M. Rowe

These collaborations and the research topics indicate a focus on atmospheric modeling, climate variability, and emergency nursing challenges related to environmental factors. Oglesby's work contributed to understanding meteorological phenomena and improving forecasting models, particularly through the analysis of parameterization options in weather research frameworks.

Best Publications

  • Temporal and spatial patterns of Holocene dune activity on the Great Plains of North America: megadroughts and climate links

    Steven L. Forman;Robert Oglesby;Robert S. Webb

  • Soil Moisture and the Persistence of North American Drought

    Robert J. Oglesby;David J. Erickson

  • Weakening of Indian Summer Monsoon Rainfall due to Changes in Land Use Land Cover.

    Supantha Paul;Subimal Ghosh;Robert Oglesby;Amey Pathak

  • Lake sediments record large-scale shifts in moisture regimes across the northern prairies of North America during the past two millennia

    Kathleen R. Laird;Brian F. Cumming;Sybille Wunsam;James A. Rusak;James A. Rusak

  • Middle east climate simulation and dominant precipitation processes

    Jason P. Evans;Ronald B. Smith;Robert J. Oglesby

  • Polar MM5 Simulations of the Winter Climate of the Laurentide Ice Sheet at the LGM

    David H. Bromwich;E. Richard Toracinta;Helin Wei;Robert J. Oglesby

  • Paleoclimatic significance of Late Quaternary eolian deposition on the Piedmont and High Plains, Central United States

    Steven L. Forman;Robert Oglesby;Vera Markgraf;Thomas Stafford

  • Influence of Atlantic sea surface temperatures on persistent drought in North America

    Song Feng;Qi Hu;Robert J. Oglesby

  • Climatological features of blocking anticyclones : a study of Northern Hemisphere CCM1 model blocking events in present-day and double CO2 concentration atmospheres

    A. R. Lupo;R. J. Oglesby;I. I. Mokhov

  • Variations in North American Summer Precipitation Driven by the Atlantic Multidecadal Oscillation

    Qi Hu;Song Feng;Robert J. Oglesby

  • An improved snow hydrology for GCMs. Part 1: snow cover fraction, albedo, grain size, and age

    Susan Marshall;Robert J. Oglesby

  • Large Wind Shift on the Great Plains during the Medieval Warm Period

    Venkataramana Sridhar;David B. Loope;James B. Swinehart;Joseph A. Mason

  • Springtime Soil Moisture, Natural Climatic Variability, and North American Drought as Simulated by the NCAR Community Climate Model 1

    Robert J. Oglesby

  • Atlantic and Pacific SST influences on Medieval drought in North America simulated by the Community Atmospheric Model

    Song Feng;Robert J Oglesby;Clinton M. Rowe;David B Loope

  • Collapse of the Maya: Could deforestation have contributed?

    Robert J. Oglesby;Thomas L. Sever;William Saturno;David J. Erickson

  • LGM Summer Climate on the Southern Margin of the Laurentide Ice Sheet: Wet or Dry?*

    David H. Bromwich;E. Richard Toracinta;Robert J. Oglesby;James L. Fastook

  • The role of the Atlantic Multidecadal Oscillation on medieval drought in North America: Synthesizing results from proxy data and climate models

    Robert Oglesby;Song Feng;Qi Hu;Clinton Rowe

  • Sensitivity of a general circulation model to changes in northern hemisphere ice sheets

    Benjamin Felzer;Robert J. Oglesby;Thompson Webb;Dena E. Hyman

  • Using Clustered Climate Regimes to Analyze and Compare Predictions from Fully Coupled General Circulation Models

    Forrest M Hoffman;William Walter Hargrove;David J Erickson Iii;Robert J Oglesby

  • Understanding the Mid-Holocene Climate

    Sang-Ik Shin;Prashant D. Sardeshmukh;Robert S. Webb;Robert J. Oglesby

Frequent Co-Authors

Song Feng
Song Feng University of Arkansas at Fayetteville
David J. Erickson
David J. Erickson Oak Ridge National Laboratory
John O. Roads
John O. Roads University of California, San Diego
Barry Saltzman
Barry Saltzman Yale University
Qi Hu
Qi Hu University of Nebraska–Lincoln
Forrest M. Hoffman
Forrest M. Hoffman Oak Ridge National Laboratory
Kirk A. Maasch
Kirk A. Maasch University of Maine
David H. Bromwich
David H. Bromwich The Ohio State University
Brian F. Cumming
Brian F. Cumming Queen's University
James L. Fastook
James L. Fastook University of Maine

External Links

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Environmental Sciences in the USA opens doors to diverse career pathways that often benefit from interdisciplinary knowledge. For instance, Geographic Information Systems (GIS) play a crucial role in environmental analysis, mapping, and resource management. Students interested in this area can explore the best GIS undergraduate programs to build strong technical skills applicable across multiple sectors.

Public administration is another complementary field, focusing on environmental policy and program management. Professionals aiming to advance in leadership roles or specialize in environmental governance might consider accelerated options like mpa one year programs for efficient career progression.

Understanding societal dynamics is vital for addressing environmental challenges, making sociology a valuable allied discipline. Students can pursue holistic insights through the best online bachelors in sociology programs that emphasize social factors affecting environmental outcomes.

Finally, educators and researchers interested in advancing environmental knowledge without extensive dissertation work can look into practical leadership degrees such as online ed d programs without dissertation, which combine research and applied learning to enhance impact in academic or community settings.

Best Scientists Citing Robert J. Oglesby

Recently Published Articles