World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Neuroscience

D-Index
35
Citations
6057
World Ranking
9144
National Ranking
3856

Rina Zelmann publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Rina Zelmann sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientists 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 887+

This scientist: 61 publications — 2nd percentile

2% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

Rina Zelmann D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Rina Zelmann sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 35 D-Index — 5th percentile

5% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

Overview

Rina Zelmann is affiliated with Massachusetts General Hospital in the United States and has a research focus primarily within the field of Neuroscience. Their work spans several subfields, including Cognitive Neuroscience, Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Neurology, Pharmacology, and Psychiatry and Mental Health.

The scientist's research topics cover a range of areas within brain science and neural interfaces. Key topics include EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces, Functional Brain Connectivity Studies, Neural Dynamics and Brain Function, Neuroscience and Neural Engineering, Neurological Disorders and Treatments, Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Studies, and the Treatment of Major Depression.

Some of the recent publications by Rina Zelmann are:

  • "Closed-loop enhancement and neural decoding of cognitive control in humans," 2021, Nature Biomedical Engineering
  • "Local and distant cortical responses to single pulse intracranial stimulation in the human brain are differentially modulated by specific stimulation parameters," 2022, Brain Stimulation
  • "Characterizing brain dynamics during ketamine-induced dissociation and subsequent interactions with propofol using human intracranial neurophysiology," 2023, Nature Communications
  • "CLoSES: A platform for closed-loop intracranial stimulation in humans," 2020, NeuroImage
  • "Differential cortical network engagement during states of un/consciousness in humans," 2023, Neuron

Zelmann frequently publishes in venues such as Brain Stimulation, bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory), Nature Communications, Journal of Neural Engineering, and Nature Biomedical Engineering.

Their collaboration network includes regular co-authors such as Angelique C. Paulk, Sydney S. Cash, G. Rees Cosgrove, Ziv M. Williams, and Darin D. Dougherty. These partnerships reflect an interdisciplinary approach spanning neural engineering and clinical neuroscience.

Best Publications

  • High-frequency electroencephalographic oscillations correlate with outcome of epilepsy surgery.

    Julia Jacobs;Maeike Zijlmans;Rina Zelmann;Claude-Édouard Chatillon

  • High-frequency oscillations as a new biomarker in epilepsy.

    Maeike Zijlmans;Premysl Jiruska;Rina Zelmann;Frans S.S. Leijten

  • Interictal scalp fast oscillations as a marker of the seizure onset zone

    L.P. Andrade-Valenca;F. Dubeau;F. Mari;R. Zelmann

  • High-frequency oscillations mirror disease activity in patients with epilepsy.

    M. Zijlmans;J. Jacobs;R. Zelmann;F. Dubeau

  • Atlas of the normal intracranial electroencephalogram: neurophysiological awake activity in different cortical areas.

    Birgit Frauscher;Birgit Frauscher;Nicolas von Ellenrieder;Rina Zelmann;Rina Zelmann;Irena Doležalová

  • Recording and analysis techniques for high-frequency oscillations

    G. A. Worrell;K. Jerbi;K. Kobayashi;Jean-Marc Lina

  • High-Frequency Oscillations in the Normal Human Brain.

    Birgit Frauscher;Birgit Frauscher;Nicolás von Ellenrieder;Rina Zelmann;Rina Zelmann;Christine Rogers

  • High-frequency oscillations, extent of surgical resection, and surgical outcome in drug-resistant focal epilepsy

    Claire Haegelen;Piero Perucca;Claude Edouard Châtillon;Luciana Andrade-Valença

  • Ictal and interictal high frequency oscillations in patients with focal epilepsy.

    Maeike Zijlmans;Julia Jacobs;Yusuf U. Kahn;Rina Zelmann

  • Removing high-frequency oscillations: A prospective multicenter study on seizure outcome

    Julia Jacobs;Joyce Y. Wu;Piero Cesare Perucca;Rina Zelmann

  • A comparison between detectors of high frequency oscillations.

    R. Zelmann;F. Mari;J. Jacobs;M. Zijlmans

  • Scalp EEG is not a Blur: It Can See High Frequency Oscillations Although Their Generators are Small

    R. Zelmann;J. M. Lina;A. Schulze-Bonhage;J. Gotman

  • High frequency oscillations (80–500 Hz) in the preictal period in patients with focal seizures

    Julia Jacobs;Rina Zelmann;Jeffrey Jirsch;Rahul Chander

  • Residual fast ripples in the intraoperative corticogram predict epilepsy surgery outcome

    Maryse A. van 't Klooster;Nicole E.C. van Klink;Frans S.S. Leijten;Rina Zelmann

  • Tailoring epilepsy surgery with fast ripples in the intraoperative electrocorticogram

    Maryse A. van 't Klooster;Nicole E.C. van Klink;Willemiek J.E.M. Zweiphenning;Frans S.S. Leijten

  • Improving the identification of High Frequency Oscillations.

    Rina Zelmann;Maeike Zijlmans;Julia Jacobs;Claude-E. Châtillon

  • IBIS: an OR ready open-source platform for image-guided neurosurgery

    Simon Drouin;Anna Kochanowska;Marta Kersten-Oertel;Ian J. Gerard

  • Automatic detector of High Frequency Oscillations for human recordings with macroelectrodes

    R. Zelmann;F. Mari;J. Jacobs;M. Zijlmans

  • High frequency oscillations in intra-operative electrocorticography before and after epilepsy surgery

    van N.E.C. Klink;van N.E.C. Klink;van 't M.A. Klooster;R. Zelmann;F.S.S. Leijten

  • Occurrence of scalp-fast oscillations among patients with different spiking rate and their role as epileptogenicity marker

    Federico Melani;Rina Zelmann;François Dubeau;Jean Gotman

Frequent Co-Authors

Jean Gotman
Jean Gotman Montreal Neurological Institute and Hospital
François Dubeau
François Dubeau McGill University
Julia Jacobs
Julia Jacobs University of Calgary
Maeike Zijlmans
Maeike Zijlmans Utrecht University
Emad N. Eskandar
Emad N. Eskandar Albert Einstein College of Medicine
Sydney S. Cash
Sydney S. Cash Harvard University
Darin D. Dougherty
Darin D. Dougherty Harvard University
Birgit Frauscher
Birgit Frauscher Duke University
André Olivier
André Olivier McGill University
G. Rees Cosgrove
G. Rees Cosgrove Brigham and Women's Hospital

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For those interested in neuroscience, various online degrees can provide valuable complementary knowledge and career opportunities. Many students begin by earning an online degree in psychology, which builds a foundational understanding of mental processes and behavior relevant to neuroscience.

If you’re looking to expand your expertise into social services or counseling, you might explore an online master’s in social work. This pathway opens doors to careers in mental health advocacy and clinical practice.

For those focused on clinical psychology, there are top-tier psy d programs online. These provide advanced training for those aiming to become licensed psychologists, including essential neuroscience components.

If marriage and family therapy is your interest, completing one of the online masters mft programs can prepare you to work with families and couples, where understanding neurological factors often plays a key role.

These related online degrees can broaden your skillset and enhance your career pathways in neuroscience, psychology, counseling, and mental health services.

Best Scientists Citing Rina Zelmann

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles