World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Richard N. Baumgartner

Richard N. Baumgartner

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
85
Citations
44236
World Ranking
14367
National Ranking
7263

Richard N. Baumgartner publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Richard N. Baumgartner sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 611 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 266 publications — 10th percentile

10% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Richard N. Baumgartner D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Richard N. Baumgartner sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 400 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 85 D-Index — 29th percentile

29% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

Richard N. Baumgartner is affiliated with the University of Louisville in the United States. Their research primarily spans the field of Medicine, with a focus on several subfields including Statistics and Probability, Oncology, Artificial Intelligence, Epidemiology, and Economics and Econometrics.

Their work addresses multiple topics such as Statistical Methods in Clinical Trials, Cancer survivorship and care, Advanced Causal Inference Techniques, Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life, Radiomics and Machine Learning in Medical Imaging, Neural Networks and Applications, and Virology and Viral Diseases.

Baumgartner has published research in various venues, with a notable presence in arXiv (Cornell University), where eight publications appear. Other frequent publication venues include Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention with five publications, Breast Cancer Research and Treatment with two, Statistics in Biopharmaceutical Research with two, and Scientific Reports with one publication.

Frequent co-authors include Stephanie D. Boone, Kathy B. Baumgartner, Avonne E. Connor, Shahrul Mt-Isa, and Natalie Dupré.

Some recent papers authored or co-authored by Baumgartner include:

  • Pyoderma Gangrenosum in Inflammatory Bowel Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis, 2020, Digestive Diseases and Sciences
  • Self-reported symptoms of arm lymphedema and health-related quality of life among female breast cancer survivors, 2021, Scientific Reports
  • Ethnic and biological differences in the association between physical activity and survival after breast cancer, 2020, npj Breast Cancer
  • Optimal Treatment Regimes: A Review and Empirical Comparison, 2023, International Statistical Review
  • Utility of AI digital pathology as an aid for pathologists scoring fibrosis in MASH, 2024, Journal of Hepatology

Best Publications

  • Epidemiology of Sarcopenia among the Elderly in New Mexico

    Richard N. Baumgartner;Kathleen M. Koehler;Dympna Gallagher;Linda Romero

  • Estimation of skeletal muscle mass by bioelectrical impedance analysis.

    Ian Janssen;Steven B. Heymsfield;Richard N. Baumgartner;Robert Ross

  • Cadaver validation of skeletal muscle measurement by magnetic resonance imaging and computerized tomography

    N. Mitsiopoulos;R. N. Baumgartner;S. B. Heymsfield;W. Lyons

  • Skeletal Muscle Cutpoints Associated with Elevated Physical Disability Risk in Older Men and Women

    Ian Janssen;Richard N. Baumgartner;Robert Ross;Irwin H. Rosenberg

  • Body composition in healthy aging.

    R. N. Baumgartner

  • Sarcopenia: Its assessment, etiology, pathogenesis, consequences and future perspectives

    Y. Rolland;S. Czerwinski;G. Abellan van Kan;J. E. Morley

  • Fear of falling and restriction of mobility in elderly fallers

    Bruno J. Vellas;Sharon J. Wayne;Linda J. Romero;Richard N. Baumgartner

  • Appendicular skeletal muscle mass: effects of age, gender, and ethnicity.

    Dympna Gallagher;Marjolein Visser;Ronald E. De Meersman;Dennis Sepúlveda

  • One-Leg Balance Is an Important Predictor of Injurious Falls in Older Persons

    Bruno J. Vellas;Sharon J. Wayne;Linda Romero;Richard N. Baumgartner

  • Sarcopenic obesity predicts instrumental activities of daily living disability in the elderly.

    Richard N. Baumgartner;Sharon J. Wayne;Debra L. Waters;Ian Janssen

  • Predictors of skeletal muscle mass in elderly men and women

    Richard N. Baumgartner;Debra L. Waters;Dympna Gallagher;John E. Morley

  • From the Chicago MeetingsSarcopenia

    John E. Morley;Richard N. Baumgartner;Ronenn Roubenoff;Jean Mayer

  • Longitudinal changes in testosterone, luteinizing hormone, and follicle-stimulating hormone in healthy older men

    John E. Morley;Fran E. Kaiser;Horace M. Perry;Ping Patrick

  • Total-body skeletal muscle mass: estimation by a new dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry method.

    Jaehee Kim;ZiMian Wang;Steven B Heymsfield;Richard N Baumgartner

  • Elevated Biomarkers of Inflammation Are Associated With Reduced Survival Among Breast Cancer Patients

    Brandon L. Pierce;Rachel Ballard-Barbash;Leslie Bernstein;Richard N. Baumgartner

  • Influence of Pre- and Postdiagnosis Physical Activity on Mortality in Breast Cancer Survivors: The Health, Eating, Activity, and Lifestyle Study

    Melinda L. Irwin;Ashley Wilder Smith;Anne McTiernan;Rachel Ballard-Barbash

  • Physical activity levels before and after a diagnosis of breast carcinoma: The health, eating, activity, and lifestyle (HEAL) study

    Melinda L. Irwin;Diane Crumley;Anne McTiernan M.D.;Leslie Bernstein

  • Human body composition: advances in models and methods

    Steven B. Heymsfield;ZiMian Wang;Richard N. Baumgartner;Robert Ross

  • Weight stability masks sarcopenia in elderly men and women.

    Dympna Gallagher;Else Ruts;Marjolein Visser;Stanley Heshka

  • Human Body Composition and the Epidemiology of Chronic Disease

    Richard N. Baumgartner;Steven B. Heymsfield;Alex F. Roche

Frequent Co-Authors

Steven B. Heymsfield
Steven B. Heymsfield Pennington Biomedical Research Center
Rachel Ballard-Barbash
Rachel Ballard-Barbash National Institutes of Health
John E. Morley
John E. Morley Saint Louis University
Leslie Bernstein
Leslie Bernstein University of Southern California
Frank D. Gilliland
Frank D. Gilliland University of Southern California
Bruno Vellas
Bruno Vellas Federal University of Toulouse Midi-Pyrénées
Dympna Gallagher
Dympna Gallagher Columbia University
Robert Ross
Robert Ross Queen's University
Anna R. Giuliano
Anna R. Giuliano University of South Florida
Melinda L. Irwin
Melinda L. Irwin Yale University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring diverse healthcare careers is easier than ever with flexible, accredited online degrees. For students interested in nutrition and preventive medicine, the best online nutrition programs blend core science coursework with practical wellness strategies, preparing graduates for consulting or specialist roles.

Ambitious healthcare professionals looking to move into leadership often pursue a Master of Health Administration. The convenience of cahme accredited online mha programs ensures a rigorous, reputable education without sacrificing career momentum.

Registered nurses seeking to advance clinical knowledge without additional practicum hours may benefit from online rn to bsn programs without clinicals, enabling a smoother pathway to higher qualifications and expanded responsibilities.

For nurses aiming for top-tier practice roles, accelerated dnp programs offer a direct route to a Doctor of Nursing Practice, which opens advanced clinical leadership and academic opportunities.

Whether you’re just starting in healthcare or seeking to advance, these online options can provide the flexibility and specialization needed to reach your career goals.

Best Scientists Citing Richard N. Baumgartner

Trending Scientists