World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
46
Citations
8299
World Ranking
6434
National Ranking
3485

Ravenna Helson publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Ravenna Helson sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 150 publications — 49th percentile

49% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Ravenna Helson D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Ravenna Helson sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 46 D-Index — 45th percentile

45% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Ravenna Helson is affiliated with the University of California, Berkeley in the United States. Their research output is primarily documented through a series of assessments connected to the Mills Longitudinal Study, focusing on various age milestones. These works are published in the Harvard Dataverse, indicating a consistent venue for data sharing and academic dissemination.

Recent publications include:

  • 5. Mills Longitudinal Study - Age 61 Assessment (2020, Harvard Dataverse)
  • 4. Mills Longitudinal Study - Age 52 Assessment (2020, Harvard Dataverse)
  • 1. Mills Longitudinal Study - Age 21 Assessment (2020, Harvard Dataverse)
  • Mills Longitudinal Study - Publication List (2020, Harvard Dataverse)
  • 2. Mills Longitudinal Study - Age 27 Assessment (2020, Harvard Dataverse)

The body of work revolves around longitudinal data collection and analysis, with assessments conducted at different stages of the subjects' lives. This approach highlights the use of longitudinal methodologies in psychological or social research contexts.

Their frequent coauthor is Oliver P. John, with whom they have collaborated on at least two publications.

Publication venues are consistent, all of which are within the Harvard Dataverse, suggesting a focus on data transparency and accessibility in research.

Best Publications

  • Personality change over 40 years of adulthood: Hierarchical linear modeling analyses of two longitudinal samples.

    Ravenna Helson;Constance Jones;Virginia S Y Kwan

  • Personality change in women from college to midlife.

    Ravenna Helson;Geraldine Moane

  • Personality change in women from the early 40s to the early 50s.

    Ravenna Helson;Paul Wink

  • Personality and patterns of adherence and nonadherence to the social clock.

    Ravenna Helson;Valory Mitchell;Geraldine Moane

  • The growing evidence for personality change in adulthood: Findings from research with personality inventories

    Ravenna Helson;Virginia S.Y Kwan;Oliver P John;Constance Jones

  • Three paths of adult development: conservers, seekers, and achievers.

    Ravenna Helson;Sanjay Srivastava

  • Practical and transcendent wisdom: Their nature and some longitudinal findings

    Paul Wink;Ravenna Helson

  • Two conceptions of maturity examined in the findings of a longitudinal study.

    Ravenna Helson;Paul Wink

  • Women mathematicians and the creative personality.

    Ravenna Helson

  • Middle Aging in Women: Patterns of Personality Change from the 30s to the 50s

    Abigail J. Stewart;Joan M. Ostrove;Ravenna Helson

  • Personality development and growth in women across 30 years: three perspectives.

    Brent W. Roberts;Ravenna Helson;Eva C. Klohnen

  • Up and down in middle age: monotonic and nonmonotonic changes in roles, status, and personality.

    Ravenna Helson;Christopher J. Soto

  • Ego development and personality change in adulthood.

    Ravenna Helson;Brent W. Roberts

  • In Search of the Creative Personality

    Ravenna Helson

  • Personality characteristics and developmental history of creative college women.

    Ravenna Helson

  • Changes in culture, changes in personality: The influence of individualism in a longitudinal study of women.

    Brent W. Roberts;Ravenna Helson

  • Mathematicians: the creative researcher and the average PhD.

    Ravenna Helson;Richard S. Crutchfield

  • Contextualizing Change in Marital Satisfaction During Middle Age An 18-Year Longitudinal Study

    Sara M. Gorchoff;Oliver P. John;Ravenna Helson

  • Personality development in adulthood: The broad picture and processes in one longitudinal sample

    Ravenna Helson;Sau Kwan

  • Identity in Three Cohorts of Midlife Women

    Ravenna Helson;Abigail J. Stewart;Joan Ostrove

  • Masculinity and Femininity: Their Psychological Dimensions, Correlates, and Antecedents

    Ravenna Helson

Frequent Co-Authors

Brent W. Roberts
Brent W. Roberts University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
Oliver P. John
Oliver P. John University of California, Berkeley
Abigail J. Stewart
Abigail J. Stewart University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Christopher J. Soto
Christopher J. Soto Colby College
Sanjay K. Srivastava
Sanjay K. Srivastava Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center
Marjorie Solomon
Marjorie Solomon University of California, Davis
Harrison G. Gough
Harrison G. Gough University of California, Berkeley

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying psychology in the USA opens doors to a variety of online degrees and rewarding career pathways. Mental health professions, particularly marriage and family therapy (MFT), are in high demand across the country. Many online psychology and counseling programs are designed to meet state licensure requirements, but specific educational criteria can differ depending on your location.

For example, Los Angeles mft education requirements focus on an accredited graduate degree and substantial supervised clinical hours. Similarly, those interested in learning how to become an mft in Louisville must follow state-specific guidelines for coursework and licensing exams.

If you’re interested in pursuing therapy careers in other regions, it's important to understand Lubbock mft education requirements and also know how to become a marriage and family therapist in Madison. Each location has unique standards for clinical training and licensing.

Whether you’re just starting or seeking advanced credentials, exploring these related online degrees and regional career pathways is essential to achieving your professional psychology goals in the U.S.

Best Scientists Citing Ravenna Helson

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles