World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
31
Citations
6728
World Ranking
13399
National Ranking
644

Ralf Möller publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Ralf Möller sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 225 publications — 55th percentile

55% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Ralf Möller D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Ralf Möller sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 31 D-Index — 6th percentile

6% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Overview

Ralf Möller is affiliated with the University of Lübeck in Germany and has contributed extensively to the fields of computer science and engineering. Their research spans several subfields, including artificial intelligence, control and systems engineering, computer vision and pattern recognition, signal processing, and pulmonary and respiratory medicine.

The scientist's work focuses primarily on neural networks and applications, blind source separation techniques, control systems and identification, face and expression recognition, robotics and sensor-based localization, fault detection and control systems, and the treatment of shoulder injuries.

Frequent coauthors associated with Ralf Möller include Benedikt Kamp, Nico Migenda, Wolfram Schenck, Armin M. Nagel, and Hans-Jörg Wittsack. Their collaborative efforts have resulted in multiple publications across various venues.

The main publication venues where Ralf Möller has contributed are:

  • arXiv (Cornell University)
  • PLoS ONE
  • Magnetic Resonance in Medicine
  • Pattern Recognition
  • Forests

Among recent papers authored or coauthored by Ralf Möller are:

  • Adaptive dimensionality reduction for neural network-based online principal component analysis, 2021, PLoS ONE
  • Emergency ventilator for COVID-19, 2020, PLoS ONE
  • Adaptive local Principal Component Analysis improves the clustering of high-dimensional data, 2023, Pattern Recognition
  • The Pivotal Role of Microscopy in Unravelling the Nature of Microbial Deterioration of Waterlogged Wood: A Review, 2024, Forests
  • Colour Passing Revisited: Lifted Model Construction with Commutative Factors, 2024, Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence

Best Publications

  • RACER System Description

    Volker Haarslev;Ralf Möller

  • Description of the RACER System and its Applications.

    Volker Haarslev;Ralf Möller

  • Racer: A Core Inference Engine for the Semantic Web.

    Volker Haarslev;Ralf Möller

  • On scene interpretation with description logics

    Bernd Neumann;Ralf Möller

  • The DIG Description Logic Interface

    Sean Bechhofer;Ralf Möller;Peter Crowther;Diego Calvanese

  • Querying the Semantic Web with Racer + nRQL

    Volker Haarslev;Ralf Möller;Michael Wessel

  • The racerpro knowledge representation and reasoning system

    Volker Haarslev;Kay Hidde;Ralf Möller;Michael Wessel

  • High performance reasoning with very large knowledge bases: a practical case study

    Volker Haarslev;Ralf Möller

  • Racer: An OWL Reasoning Agent for the Semantic Web

    Volker Haarslev;Ralf Möller

  • A Description Logic with Concrete Domains and a Role-forming Predicate Operator ∗

    Volker Haarslev;Carsten Lutz;Ralf Möller

  • Foundations of spatioterminological reasoning with description logics

    Volker Haarslev;Carsten Lutz;Ralf Möller

  • State of the Art Survey

    Deliverable D;A. Cal̀ı;D. Calvanese;B. Cuenca Grau

  • Semantic access to streaming and static data at Siemens

    Evgeny Kharlamov;Theofilos Mailis;Gulnar Mehdi;Christian Neuenstadt

  • A Stream-Temporal Query Language for Ontology Based Data Access.

    Özgür Lütfü Özçep;Ralf Möller;Christian Neuenstadt

  • Exploiting Pseudo Models for TBox and ABox Reasoning in Expressive Description Logics

    Volker Haarslev;Ralf Möller;Anni-Yasmin Turhan

  • A High Performance Semantic Web Query Answering Engine.

    Michael Wessel;Ralf Möller

  • Ontology-Based Reasoning Techniques for Multimedia Interpretation and Retrieval

    Ralf Möller;Bernd Neumann

  • Reasoning on UML Class Diagrams using Description Logic Based Systems

    Günther Görz;Volker Haarslev;Carsten Lutz;Ralf Möller

  • Multimedia Interpretation for Dynamic Ontology Evolution

    Silvana Castano;Irma Sofia Espinosa Peraldi;Alfio Ferrara;Vangelis Karkaletsis

  • High Performance Reasoning with Very Large Knowledge Bases.

    Volker Haarslev;Ralf Möller

  • Proceedings of the 1999 International Workshop on Description Logics

    Patrick Lambrix;Alex Borgida;Maurizio Lenzerini;Ralf Möller

Frequent Co-Authors

Evgeny Kharlamov
Evgeny Kharlamov University of Oslo
Yannis E. Ioannidis
Yannis E. Ioannidis National and Kapodistrian University of Athens
Ian Horrocks
Ian Horrocks University of Oxford
Yannis Kotidis
Yannis Kotidis Athens University of Economics and Business
Carsten Lutz
Carsten Lutz Leipzig University
Diego Calvanese
Diego Calvanese Free University of Bozen-Bolzano
Ernesto Jiménez-Ruiz
Ernesto Jiménez-Ruiz City, University of London
Manolis Koubarakis
Manolis Koubarakis National and Kapodistrian University of Athens
Maurizio Lenzerini
Maurizio Lenzerini Sapienza University of Rome
Peter F. Patel-Schneider
Peter F. Patel-Schneider Palo Alto Research Center

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing Computer Science in the USA opens doors to diverse online degree options and fast-tracked career pathways. If you’re interested in multidisciplinary study, consider exploring an online physics bachelor's degree. This pathway is ideal for students with strengths in mathematics and analytical thinking.

Data science continues to be a highly in-demand field. For those who want to further specialize and save on costs, the cheapest master in data science programs offer excellent value and solid career potential.

Engineering students can benefit from flexible learning too—explore online electrical engineering courses USA to chart a high-tech career path with strong job prospects.

If you’re looking for quicker, job-ready credentials, several quick certifications that pay well can launch your career faster. These options are perfect for those wanting to upskill or pivot into high-demand tech roles without committing to a full degree.

Best Scientists Citing Ralf Möller

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles