World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
R. Grant Ingram

R. Grant Ingram

D-Index & Metrics

Environmental Sciences

D-Index
36
Citations
4638
World Ranking
9168
National Ranking
425

R. Grant Ingram publication distribution in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Environmental Sciences in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where R. Grant Ingram sits on this spectrum.

41–50 publications: 21 scientists 51–60 publications: 62 scientists 61–70 publications: 133 scientists 71–80 publications: 257 scientists 81–90 publications: 361 scientists 91–100 publications: 440 scientists 101–110 publications: 492 scientists 111–120 publications: 541 scientists 121–130 publications: 617 scientists 131–140 publications: 544 scientists 141–150 publications: 541 scientists 151–160 publications: 539 scientists 161–170 publications: 444 scientists 171–180 publications: 444 scientists 181–190 publications: 400 scientists 191–200 publications: 377 scientists 201–210 publications: 318 scientists 211–220 publications: 283 scientists 221–230 publications: 263 scientists 231–240 publications: 220 scientists 241–250 publications: 217 scientists 251–260 publications: 180 scientists 261–270 publications: 181 scientists 271–280 publications: 155 scientists 281–290 publications: 130 scientists 291–300 publications: 127 scientists 301–310 publications: 130 scientists 311–320 publications: 85 scientists 321–330 publications: 106 scientists 331–340 publications: 80 scientists 341–350 publications: 83 scientists 351–360 publications: 75 scientists 361–370 publications: 69 scientists 371–380 publications: 52 scientists 381–390 publications: 54 scientists 391–400 publications: 56 scientists 401–410 publications: 44 scientists 411–420 publications: 40 scientists 421–430 publications: 36 scientists 431–440 publications: 25 scientists 441–450 publications: 25 scientists 451–460 publications: 32 scientists 461–470 publications: 29 scientists 471–480 publications: 21 scientists 481–490 publications: 26 scientists 491–500 publications: 25 scientists 501–510 publications: 17 scientists 511–520 publications: 18 scientists 521–530 publications: 15 scientists 531–540 publications: 22 scientists 541–550 publications: 12 scientists 551–560 publications: 15 scientists 561–570 publications: 11 scientists 571–580 publications: 19 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 9 scientists 601–610 publications: 7 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 5 scientists 631–640 publications: 5 scientists 641–650 publications: 6 scientists 651–660 publications: 3 scientists 661–670 publications: 3 scientists 671–680 publications: 4 scientists 681–686 publications: 3 scientists 687+ publications: 100 scientists
41 publications 687+

This scientist: 91 publications — 9th percentile

9% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 687 publications or more.

R. Grant Ingram D-index placement in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Environmental Sciences scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where R. Grant Ingram sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 12 scientists 31 D-Index: 26 scientists 32 D-Index: 51 scientists 33 D-Index: 88 scientists 34 D-Index: 123 scientists 35 D-Index: 163 scientists 36 D-Index: 206 scientists 37 D-Index: 267 scientists 38 D-Index: 265 scientists 39 D-Index: 275 scientists 40 D-Index: 321 scientists 41 D-Index: 343 scientists 42 D-Index: 305 scientists 43 D-Index: 336 scientists 44 D-Index: 330 scientists 45 D-Index: 348 scientists 46 D-Index: 291 scientists 47 D-Index: 275 scientists 48 D-Index: 272 scientists 49 D-Index: 273 scientists 50 D-Index: 263 scientists 51 D-Index: 232 scientists 52 D-Index: 266 scientists 53 D-Index: 217 scientists 54 D-Index: 199 scientists 55 D-Index: 177 scientists 56 D-Index: 202 scientists 57 D-Index: 204 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 177 scientists 60 D-Index: 166 scientists 61 D-Index: 152 scientists 62 D-Index: 143 scientists 63 D-Index: 150 scientists 64 D-Index: 124 scientists 65 D-Index: 119 scientists 66 D-Index: 120 scientists 67 D-Index: 118 scientists 68 D-Index: 82 scientists 69 D-Index: 98 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 105 scientists 72 D-Index: 74 scientists 73 D-Index: 84 scientists 74 D-Index: 70 scientists 75 D-Index: 67 scientists 76 D-Index: 78 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 59 scientists 79 D-Index: 52 scientists 80 D-Index: 47 scientists 81 D-Index: 38 scientists 82 D-Index: 48 scientists 83 D-Index: 42 scientists 84 D-Index: 42 scientists 85 D-Index: 43 scientists 86 D-Index: 29 scientists 87 D-Index: 37 scientists 88 D-Index: 29 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 34 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 22 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 19 scientists 95 D-Index: 24 scientists 96 D-Index: 21 scientists 97 D-Index: 20 scientists 98 D-Index: 24 scientists 99 D-Index: 17 scientists 100 D-Index: 17 scientists 101 D-Index: 21 scientists 102 D-Index: 25 scientists 103 D-Index: 18 scientists 104 D-Index: 26 scientists 105 D-Index: 19 scientists 106 D-Index: 15 scientists 107 D-Index: 10 scientists 108 D-Index: 13 scientists 109 D-Index: 15 scientists 110 D-Index: 12 scientists 111 D-Index: 8 scientists 112 D-Index: 7 scientists 113 D-Index: 9 scientists 114 D-Index: 6 scientists 115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116 D-Index: 7 scientists 117 D-Index: 8 scientists 118 D-Index: 3 scientists 119 D-Index: 5 scientists 120 D-Index: 7 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 4 scientists 123 D-Index: 8 scientists 124 D-Index: 7 scientists 125+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 125+

This scientist: 36 D-Index — 7th percentile

7% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 125 D-Index or more.

Overview

R. Grant Ingram was affiliated with the University of British Columbia in Canada. Their research primarily focused on fields related to health professions and social sciences. Within these domains, the work touched on subfields such as general health professions, demography, psychiatry and mental health, and sociology and political science.

The main topics explored in Ingram's research included geriatric care and nursing homes, migration, aging and tourism studies, aging, elder care and social issues, dementia and cognitive impairment research, and intergenerational family dynamics and caregiving.

Ingram contributed to several publications, with research appearing notably in the following venues:

  • Journal of Aging and Long-Term Care
  • Clinical Gerontologist

Frequent collaborators included Katie L. Granier, Katie Oltz, and Daniel L. Segal. Collaboration with Granier was the most extensive, reflected in joint authorship of papers.

Their recent papers included the following:

  • "Getting the Seal of Approval: A Critical Literature Review of the Evidence for the Use of the PARO Robotic Companion Seal with Older Adults with Cognitive Impairment in Long-Term Care" (2023), published in the Journal of Aging and Long-Term Care
  • "Implementation and Evaluation of a Virtual Skills-Based Dementia Caregiver Group Intervention within a VA Setting: A Pilot Study" (2024), published in Clinical Gerontologist

Best Publications

  • Identification, characterization, and change of the near-surface temperature maximum in the Canada Basin, 1993-2008

    J. M. Jackson;E. C. Carmack;F. A. McLaughlin;S. E. Allen

  • Variability in oceanographic and ecological processes in the Canadian Arctic Archipelago

    C. Michel;R.G. Ingram;L.R. Harris

  • Carbon budget of sea‐ice algae in spring: Evidence of a significant transfer to zooplankton grazers

    C. Michel;L. Legendre;R. G. Ingram;M. Gosselin

  • Flow around islands in Rupert Bay: An investigation of the bottom friction effect

    R. Grant Ingram;Vincent H. Chu

  • Responses of Sea-Ice Microalgae to Climatic and Fortnightly Tidal Energy Inputs (Manitounuk Sound, Hudson Bay)

    M. Gosselin;L. Legendre;S. Demers;R. G. Ingram

  • Interannual variability of sea‐ice cover in Hudson bay, Baffin bay and the Labrador sea

    Jia Wang;Lawrence A. Mysak;R. Grant Ingram

  • The anomalous sea‐ice extent in Hudson bay, Baffin bay and the Labrador sea during three simultaneous NAO and ENSO episodes

    L.A. Mysak;R.G. Ingram;J. Wang;A. van der Baaren

  • Under-ice feeding and diel migration by the planktonic copepods calanus glacialis and Pseudocalanus minutus in relation to the ice algal production cycle in southeastern Hudson bay, Canada

    J. A. Runge;R. G. Ingram

  • Vertical Flux of Biogenic Carbon in the Ocean: Is There Food Web Control?

    Richard B. Rivkin;Louis Legendre;Don Deibel;Jean-Éric Tremblay

  • Underice grazing by planktonic, calanoid copepods in relation to a bloom of ice microalgae in southeastern Hudson Bay

    Jeffrey A. Runge;R. Grant Ingram

  • An overview of physical processes in the North Water

    R.Grant Ingram;Julie Bâcle;David G Barber;Yves Gratton

  • Ecology of bottom ice algae: I. Environmental controls and variability

    G.F Cota;L Legendre;M Gosselin;R.G Ingram

  • Abundance of larval rainbow smelt (Osmerus mordax) in relation to the maximum turbidity zone and associated macroplanktonic fauna of the middle St. Lawrence estuary

    Julian J. Dodson;Jean-Claude Dauvin;R. Grant Ingram;B. d’Anglejan

  • Experimental evidence of passive accumulation of marine bivalve larvae on filamentous epibenthic structures

    Michel Harvey;Edwin Bourget;R. Grant Ingram

  • Water masses and biogeography of picoeukaryote assemblages in a cold hydrographically complex system

    Andrew K. Hamilton;Connie Lovejoy;Pierre E. Galand;R. Grant Ingram

  • Joint effects of wind and ice motion in forcing upwelling in Mackenzie Trough, Beaufort Sea

    William J. Williams;Eddy C. Carmack;Koji Shimada;Humfrey Melling

  • Characteristics of the Great Whale River plume

    R. Grant Ingram

  • Water column structure and circulation under the North Water during spring transition: April July 1998

    Julie Bâcle;Eddy C Carmack;R.Grant Ingram

  • Variability of an under-ice river plume in Hudson Bay

    R. Grant Ingram;Pierre Larouche

  • Archaeal diversity and a gene for ammonia oxidation are coupled to oceanic circulation

    Pierre E. Galand;Pierre E. Galand;Connie Lovejoy;Andrew K. Hamilton;R. Grant Ingram

Frequent Co-Authors

Jianping Gan
Jianping Gan Hong Kong University of Science and Technology
Louis Legendre
Louis Legendre Université Paris Cité
Humfrey Melling
Humfrey Melling Fisheries and Oceans Canada
Eddy C. Carmack
Eddy C. Carmack Fisheries and Oceans Canada
Lawrence A. Mysak
Lawrence A. Mysak McGill University Health Centre
Connie Lovejoy
Connie Lovejoy Université Laval
Jean-Claude Therriault
Jean-Claude Therriault Fisheries and Oceans Canada
Pierre E. Galand
Pierre E. Galand Observatoire Océanologique de Banyuls-sur-Mer
Richard J. Greatbatch
Richard J. Greatbatch GEOMAR Helmholtz Centre for Ocean Research Kiel
Jeffrey A. Runge
Jeffrey A. Runge University of Maine

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Environmental Sciences opens doors to a variety of impactful careers. Many students pursue complementary degrees to enhance their expertise and broaden their professional options. For those interested in public policy and administration, exploring the best online MPA programs can provide valuable skills in government and nonprofit sectors focused on environmental issues.

Social dynamics also play a crucial role in environmental decision-making. An online sociology bachelor programs can offer insights into human behavior and social structures, aiding careers in community planning and environmental justice.

For those aiming for leadership and advanced research roles, doctoral education is essential. Many prospective students seek a doctorate degree online no dissertation options to efficiently balance study with professional responsibilities.

Continuing education pathways like eds to edd program offer structured progressions for educators and environmental trainers aiming to deepen their expertise while advancing career goals.

Choosing the right complementary degree can significantly enhance your Environmental Sciences career prospects by developing diverse skills and expertise, whether in policy, sociology, or leadership.

Best Scientists Citing R. Grant Ingram

Recently Published Articles