World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
P.M. van Bodegom

P.M. van Bodegom

D-Index & Metrics

Environmental Sciences

D-Index
40
Citations
9976
World Ranking
7920
National Ranking
194

P.M. van Bodegom publication distribution in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Environmental Sciences in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where P.M. van Bodegom sits on this spectrum.

41–50 publications: 21 scientists 51–60 publications: 62 scientists 61–70 publications: 133 scientists 71–80 publications: 257 scientists 81–90 publications: 361 scientists 91–100 publications: 440 scientists 101–110 publications: 492 scientists 111–120 publications: 541 scientists 121–130 publications: 617 scientists 131–140 publications: 544 scientists 141–150 publications: 541 scientists 151–160 publications: 539 scientists 161–170 publications: 444 scientists 171–180 publications: 444 scientists 181–190 publications: 400 scientists 191–200 publications: 377 scientists 201–210 publications: 318 scientists 211–220 publications: 283 scientists 221–230 publications: 263 scientists 231–240 publications: 220 scientists 241–250 publications: 217 scientists 251–260 publications: 180 scientists 261–270 publications: 181 scientists 271–280 publications: 155 scientists 281–290 publications: 130 scientists 291–300 publications: 127 scientists 301–310 publications: 130 scientists 311–320 publications: 85 scientists 321–330 publications: 106 scientists 331–340 publications: 80 scientists 341–350 publications: 83 scientists 351–360 publications: 75 scientists 361–370 publications: 69 scientists 371–380 publications: 52 scientists 381–390 publications: 54 scientists 391–400 publications: 56 scientists 401–410 publications: 44 scientists 411–420 publications: 40 scientists 421–430 publications: 36 scientists 431–440 publications: 25 scientists 441–450 publications: 25 scientists 451–460 publications: 32 scientists 461–470 publications: 29 scientists 471–480 publications: 21 scientists 481–490 publications: 26 scientists 491–500 publications: 25 scientists 501–510 publications: 17 scientists 511–520 publications: 18 scientists 521–530 publications: 15 scientists 531–540 publications: 22 scientists 541–550 publications: 12 scientists 551–560 publications: 15 scientists 561–570 publications: 11 scientists 571–580 publications: 19 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 9 scientists 601–610 publications: 7 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 5 scientists 631–640 publications: 5 scientists 641–650 publications: 6 scientists 651–660 publications: 3 scientists 661–670 publications: 3 scientists 671–680 publications: 4 scientists 681–686 publications: 3 scientists 687+ publications: 100 scientists
41 publications 687+

This scientist: 108 publications — 17th percentile

17% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 687 publications or more.

P.M. van Bodegom D-index placement in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Environmental Sciences scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where P.M. van Bodegom sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 12 scientists 31 D-Index: 26 scientists 32 D-Index: 51 scientists 33 D-Index: 88 scientists 34 D-Index: 123 scientists 35 D-Index: 163 scientists 36 D-Index: 206 scientists 37 D-Index: 267 scientists 38 D-Index: 265 scientists 39 D-Index: 275 scientists 40 D-Index: 321 scientists 41 D-Index: 343 scientists 42 D-Index: 305 scientists 43 D-Index: 336 scientists 44 D-Index: 330 scientists 45 D-Index: 348 scientists 46 D-Index: 291 scientists 47 D-Index: 275 scientists 48 D-Index: 272 scientists 49 D-Index: 273 scientists 50 D-Index: 263 scientists 51 D-Index: 232 scientists 52 D-Index: 266 scientists 53 D-Index: 217 scientists 54 D-Index: 199 scientists 55 D-Index: 177 scientists 56 D-Index: 202 scientists 57 D-Index: 204 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 177 scientists 60 D-Index: 166 scientists 61 D-Index: 152 scientists 62 D-Index: 143 scientists 63 D-Index: 150 scientists 64 D-Index: 124 scientists 65 D-Index: 119 scientists 66 D-Index: 120 scientists 67 D-Index: 118 scientists 68 D-Index: 82 scientists 69 D-Index: 98 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 105 scientists 72 D-Index: 74 scientists 73 D-Index: 84 scientists 74 D-Index: 70 scientists 75 D-Index: 67 scientists 76 D-Index: 78 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 59 scientists 79 D-Index: 52 scientists 80 D-Index: 47 scientists 81 D-Index: 38 scientists 82 D-Index: 48 scientists 83 D-Index: 42 scientists 84 D-Index: 42 scientists 85 D-Index: 43 scientists 86 D-Index: 29 scientists 87 D-Index: 37 scientists 88 D-Index: 29 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 34 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 22 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 19 scientists 95 D-Index: 24 scientists 96 D-Index: 21 scientists 97 D-Index: 20 scientists 98 D-Index: 24 scientists 99 D-Index: 17 scientists 100 D-Index: 17 scientists 101 D-Index: 21 scientists 102 D-Index: 25 scientists 103 D-Index: 18 scientists 104 D-Index: 26 scientists 105 D-Index: 19 scientists 106 D-Index: 15 scientists 107 D-Index: 10 scientists 108 D-Index: 13 scientists 109 D-Index: 15 scientists 110 D-Index: 12 scientists 111 D-Index: 8 scientists 112 D-Index: 7 scientists 113 D-Index: 9 scientists 114 D-Index: 6 scientists 115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116 D-Index: 7 scientists 117 D-Index: 8 scientists 118 D-Index: 3 scientists 119 D-Index: 5 scientists 120 D-Index: 7 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 4 scientists 123 D-Index: 8 scientists 124 D-Index: 7 scientists 125+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 125+

This scientist: 40 D-Index — 19th percentile

19% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 125 D-Index or more.

Overview

What is he best known for?

The fields of study he is best known for:

  • Ecology
  • Ecosystem
  • Biodiversity

His primary scientific interests are in Ecology, Trait, Methane, Vegetation and Soil water. P.M. van Bodegom regularly links together related areas like Statistical model in his Ecology studies. His Methane research is multidisciplinary, incorporating perspectives in Wetland and Precipitation.

As a part of the same scientific family, P.M. van Bodegom mostly works in the field of Precipitation, focusing on Spatial ecology and, on occasion, Tropics. His Vegetation research includes elements of Adaptation, Range, Terrestrial ecosystem and Water cycle. His work on Mineralization is typically connected to Q10 as part of general Soil water study, connecting several disciplines of science.

His most cited work include:

  • TRY - a global database of plant traits (1611 citations)
  • Present state of global wetland extent and wetland methane modelling: conclusions from a model inter-comparison project (WETCHIMP) (350 citations)
  • Nutrient limitation reduces land carbon uptake in simulations with a model of combined carbon, nitrogen and phosphorus cycling (207 citations)

What are the main themes of his work throughout his whole career to date?

His scientific interests lie mostly in Ecology, Soil water, Methane, Agronomy and Ecosystem. P.M. van Bodegom performs multidisciplinary studies into Ecology and Trait in his work. P.M. van Bodegom interconnects Environmental chemistry, Nutrient and Nitrogen cycle in the investigation of issues within Soil water.

P.M. van Bodegom works mostly in the field of Methane, limiting it down to topics relating to Paddy field and, in certain cases, Methane emissions, as a part of the same area of interest. His work investigates the relationship between Biome and topics such as Global warming that intersect with problems in Arid, Life stage, Woody plant and Grassland. His studies in Vegetation integrate themes in fields like Land cover and Wetland.

He most often published in these fields:

  • Ecology (40.48%)
  • Soil water (17.86%)
  • Methane (17.86%)

What were the highlights of his more recent work (between 2012-2021)?

  • Ecology (40.48%)
  • Environmental resource management (8.33%)
  • Trait (10.71%)

In recent papers he was focusing on the following fields of study:

The scientist’s investigation covers issues in Ecology, Environmental resource management, Trait, Ecosystem and Biome. He incorporates Ecology and Biogeosciences in his research. His work carried out in the field of Environmental resource management brings together such families of science as Climate change, Species distribution and Ecosystem services.

His Ecosystem study combines topics from a wide range of disciplines, such as Biotic component and Abiotic component. His Biome research integrates issues from Tundra, Grassland, Life stage, Arid and Plant community. His research in Global warming intersects with topics in Agroforestry, Soil carbon, Temperate climate, Woody plant and Plant ecology.

Between 2012 and 2021, his most popular works were:

  • Present state of global wetland extent and wetland methane modelling: conclusions from a model inter-comparison project (WETCHIMP) (350 citations)
  • A quantitative framework for assessing spatial flows of ecosystem services (133 citations)
  • A fully traits-based approach to modeling global vegetation distribution (130 citations)

In his most recent research, the most cited papers focused on:

  • Ecology
  • Ecosystem
  • Biodiversity

P.M. van Bodegom mainly focuses on Ecology, Precipitation, Wetland methane emissions, Forcing and Methane. P.M. van Bodegom applies his multidisciplinary studies on Ecology and Trait in his research. Among his Trait studies, there is a synthesis of other scientific areas such as Vegetation, Climate change, Regression, Statistical model and Vegetation type.

His Precipitation study incorporates themes from Range, Carbon dioxide in Earth's atmosphere and Wetland. His study on Wetland methane emissions is mostly dedicated to connecting different topics, such as Spatial ecology. His Tropics research includes themes of Earth system model and Terrestrial vegetation, Vegetation.

Best Publications

  • TRY - a global database of plant traits

    J. Kattge;S. Díaz;S. Lavorel;I. C. Prentice

  • Present state of global wetland extent and wetland methane modelling: conclusions from a model inter-comparison project (WETCHIMP)

    J. R. Melton;J. R. Melton;R. Wania;E. L. Hodson;B. Poulter

  • Global negative vegetation feedback to climate warming responses of leaf litter decomposition rates in cold biomes

    Johannes H. C. Cornelissen;Peter M. van Bodegom;Rien Aerts;Terry V. Callaghan

  • A quantitative framework for assessing spatial flows of ecosystem services

    H.M. Serna-Chavez;C.J.E. Schulp;P.M. van Bodegom;W. Bouten

  • Nutrient limitation reduces land carbon uptake in simulations with a model of combined carbon, nitrogen and phosphorus cycling

    Daniel Goll;Victor Brovkin;Bikash Parida;Christian H. Reick

  • A global Fine-Root Ecology Database to address below-ground challenges in plant ecology.

    Colleen M. Iversen;M. Luke McCormack;A. Shafer Powell;Christopher B. Blackwood

  • A fully traits-based approach to modeling global vegetation distribution

    P.M. van Bodegom;J.C. Douma;L.M. Verheijen

  • Going beyond limitations of plant functional types when predicting global ecosystem–atmosphere fluxes: exploring the merits of traits‐based approaches

    P. M. Van Bodegom;J. C. Douma;J. P. M. Witte;J. C. Ordoñez

  • Climate change effects on soil arthropod communities from the Falkland Islands and the Maritime Antarctic

    S.F. Bokhorst;A.H.L. Huiskes;P. Convey;P.M. van Bodegom

  • Global root traits (GRooT) database

    Nathaly R. Guerrero-Ramírez;Liesje Mommer;Grégoire T. Freschet;Colleen M. Iversen

  • Impacts of trait variation through observed trait–climate relationships on performance of an Earth system model: a conceptual analysis

    L. M. Verheijen;V. Brovkin;R. Aerts;Gerhard Bönisch

  • Present state of global wetland extent and wetland methane modelling: methodology of a model inter-comparison project (WETCHIMP)

    Rita Wania;Joe Melton;Joe Melton;EL Hodson;B Poulter

  • Temperature effects on soil methane production: an explanation for observed variability

    J.B. van Hulzen;R. Segers;P.M. van Bodegom;P.A. Leffelaar

  • Forests, savannas, and grasslands: bridging the knowledge gap between ecology and Dynamic Global Vegetation Models

    M. Baudena;S. C. Dekker;P. M. van Bodegom;P. M. van Bodegom;B. Cuesta

  • Global quantification of contrasting leaf life span strategies for deciduous and evergreen species in response to environmental conditions

    A. E. E. van Ommen Kloeke;J. C. Douma;J. C. Ordoñez;P. B. Reich

  • Effects of alternative electron acceptors and temperature on methanogenesis in rice paddy soils

    P.M.van Bodegom;A.J.M. Stams

  • Plant-driven variation in decomposition rates improves projections of global litter stock distribution.

    V. Brovkin;P. M. Van Bodegom;T. Kleinen;C. Wirth

  • Invasive species' leaf traits and dissimilarity from natives shape their impact on nitrogen cycling: a meta-analysis

    Marissa R. Lee;Emily S. Bernhardt;Peter M. van Bodegom;J. Hans C. Cornelissen

  • Global plant trait relationships extend to the climatic extremes of the tundra biome

    H. J. D. Thomas;A. D. Bjorkman;A. D. Bjorkman;I. H. Myers-Smith;S. C. Elmendorf

  • Ferrous iron stimulates phenol oxidase activity and organic matter decomposition in waterlogged wetlands.

    P.M. van Bodegom;R.A. Broekman;J. van Dijk;C. Bakker

  • Quantification of uncertainties in global grazing systems assessment

    T. Fetzel;P. Havlik;M. Herrero;J. O. Kaplan

  • Tropical Forests, Savannas and Grasslands: Bridging the Knowledge Gap Between Ecology and Dynamic Global Vegetation Models

    M. Baudena;S. C. Dekker;P. M. van Bodegom;B. Cuesta

Frequent Co-Authors

Rien Aerts
Rien Aerts Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam
Peter B. Reich
Peter B. Reich University of Minnesota
Peter H. Verburg
Peter H. Verburg Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam
Johannes H. C. Cornelissen
Johannes H. C. Cornelissen Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam
Victor Brovkin
Victor Brovkin Max Planck Society
Jens Kattge
Jens Kattge Max Planck Society
Sander Houweling
Sander Houweling Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam
William K. Cornwell
William K. Cornwell University of New South Wales
Renato Spahni
Renato Spahni University of Bern
Ülo Niinemets
Ülo Niinemets Estonian University of Life Sciences

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For students interested in Environmental Sciences, exploring related online degrees can open diverse career opportunities. Programs like dsw programs online offer pathways into community and environmental social work, emphasizing sustainability and social justice.

Those seeking flexibility and affordability might consider an online general studies bachelor degree cheap, which allows customization of coursework that can include environmental policy, science, and management topics.

For learners aiming for a lighter academic load, some of the easy bachelor's degree options could provide foundational knowledge in environmental concepts while balancing work and life commitments effectively.

Lastly, those passionate about the earth’s physical systems might explore one of the best online geology degree programs, combining geology and geoscience with environmental focus to prepare for careers in sustainability, conservation, and resource management.

Best Scientists Citing P.M. van Bodegom

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles