World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Plant Science and Agronomy

D-Index
42
Citations
5816
World Ranking
3534
National Ranking
889

Pierluigi Bonello publication distribution in Plant Science and Agronomy in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Plant Science and Agronomy in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Pierluigi Bonello sits on this spectrum.

36–40 publications: 2 scientists 41–45 publications: 7 scientists 46–50 publications: 40 scientists 51–55 publications: 58 scientists 56–60 publications: 60 scientists 61–65 publications: 107 scientists 66–70 publications: 130 scientists 71–75 publications: 153 scientists 76–80 publications: 191 scientists 81–85 publications: 199 scientists 86–90 publications: 206 scientists 91–95 publications: 218 scientists 96–100 publications: 226 scientists 101–105 publications: 227 scientists 106–110 publications: 247 scientists 111–115 publications: 255 scientists 116–120 publications: 253 scientists 121–125 publications: 233 scientists 126–130 publications: 219 scientists 131–135 publications: 201 scientists 136–140 publications: 194 scientists 141–145 publications: 176 scientists 146–150 publications: 157 scientists 151–155 publications: 147 scientists 156–160 publications: 151 scientists 161–165 publications: 159 scientists 166–170 publications: 137 scientists 171–175 publications: 128 scientists 176–180 publications: 126 scientists 181–185 publications: 98 scientists 186–190 publications: 114 scientists 191–195 publications: 100 scientists 196–200 publications: 90 scientists 201–205 publications: 71 scientists 206–210 publications: 98 scientists 211–215 publications: 70 scientists 216–220 publications: 86 scientists 221–225 publications: 61 scientists 226–230 publications: 58 scientists 231–235 publications: 53 scientists 236–240 publications: 64 scientists 241–245 publications: 39 scientists 246–250 publications: 46 scientists 251–255 publications: 51 scientists 256–260 publications: 36 scientists 261–265 publications: 44 scientists 266–270 publications: 35 scientists 271–275 publications: 30 scientists 276–280 publications: 33 scientists 281–285 publications: 35 scientists 286–290 publications: 36 scientists 291–295 publications: 26 scientists 296–300 publications: 26 scientists 301–305 publications: 31 scientists 306–310 publications: 30 scientists 311–315 publications: 21 scientists 316–320 publications: 29 scientists 321–325 publications: 14 scientists 326–330 publications: 15 scientists 331–335 publications: 15 scientists 336–340 publications: 17 scientists 341–345 publications: 15 scientists 346–350 publications: 12 scientists 351–355 publications: 17 scientists 356–360 publications: 18 scientists 361–365 publications: 12 scientists 366–370 publications: 11 scientists 371–375 publications: 6 scientists 376–380 publications: 6 scientists 381–385 publications: 11 scientists 386–390 publications: 9 scientists 391–395 publications: 10 scientists 396–400 publications: 8 scientists 401–405 publications: 4 scientists 406–410 publications: 9 scientists 411–415 publications: 11 scientists 416–420 publications: 4 scientists 421–425 publications: 7 scientists 426–430 publications: 4 scientists 431–435 publications: 3 scientists 436–440 publications: 5 scientists 441–445 publications: 8 scientists 446–450 publications: 6 scientists 451–455 publications: 7 scientists 456–460 publications: 5 scientists 461–465 publications: 6 scientists 466 publications: 2 scientists 467+ publications: 99 scientists
36 publications 467+

This scientist: 155 publications — 60th percentile

60% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 467 publications or more.

Pierluigi Bonello D-index placement in Plant Science and Agronomy in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Plant Science and Agronomy scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Pierluigi Bonello sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 200 scientists 31 D-Index: 236 scientists 32 D-Index: 253 scientists 33 D-Index: 283 scientists 34 D-Index: 288 scientists 35 D-Index: 240 scientists 36 D-Index: 246 scientists 37 D-Index: 243 scientists 38 D-Index: 247 scientists 39 D-Index: 229 scientists 40 D-Index: 232 scientists 41 D-Index: 230 scientists 42 D-Index: 228 scientists 43 D-Index: 219 scientists 44 D-Index: 193 scientists 45 D-Index: 164 scientists 46 D-Index: 158 scientists 47 D-Index: 143 scientists 48 D-Index: 131 scientists 49 D-Index: 127 scientists 50 D-Index: 122 scientists 51 D-Index: 122 scientists 52 D-Index: 110 scientists 53 D-Index: 102 scientists 54 D-Index: 98 scientists 55 D-Index: 79 scientists 56 D-Index: 85 scientists 57 D-Index: 88 scientists 58 D-Index: 91 scientists 59 D-Index: 62 scientists 60 D-Index: 61 scientists 61 D-Index: 59 scientists 62 D-Index: 54 scientists 63 D-Index: 61 scientists 64 D-Index: 59 scientists 65 D-Index: 58 scientists 66 D-Index: 41 scientists 67 D-Index: 49 scientists 68 D-Index: 39 scientists 69 D-Index: 32 scientists 70 D-Index: 40 scientists 71 D-Index: 47 scientists 72 D-Index: 38 scientists 73 D-Index: 28 scientists 74 D-Index: 29 scientists 75 D-Index: 28 scientists 76 D-Index: 22 scientists 77 D-Index: 21 scientists 78 D-Index: 25 scientists 79 D-Index: 26 scientists 80 D-Index: 19 scientists 81 D-Index: 16 scientists 82 D-Index: 12 scientists 83 D-Index: 16 scientists 84 D-Index: 14 scientists 85 D-Index: 11 scientists 86 D-Index: 17 scientists 87 D-Index: 13 scientists 88 D-Index: 10 scientists 89 D-Index: 12 scientists 90 D-Index: 18 scientists 91 D-Index: 16 scientists 92 D-Index: 16 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 12 scientists 95 D-Index: 8 scientists 96 D-Index: 9 scientists 97 D-Index: 9 scientists 98 D-Index: 11 scientists 99 D-Index: 12 scientists 100 D-Index: 5 scientists 101 D-Index: 8 scientists 102 D-Index: 4 scientists 103 D-Index: 11 scientists 104 D-Index: 5 scientists 105 D-Index: 9 scientists 106 D-Index: 7 scientists 107 D-Index: 4 scientists 108 D-Index: 8 scientists 109+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 109+

This scientist: 42 D-Index — 49th percentile

49% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 109 D-Index or more.

Best Publications

  • Induced resistance to pests and pathogens in trees

    Alieta Eyles;Pierluigi Bonello;Rebecca Ganley;Caroline Mohammed;Caroline Mohammed

  • Preserving accuracy in GenBank

    Thomas D. Bruns;Meredith Blackwell;Ivan Edwards;Andy F.S. Taylor

  • Phenolic Metabolites in Leaves of the Invasive Shrub, Lonicera maackii, and Their Potential Phytotoxic and Anti-Herbivore Effects

    Don Cipollini;Randall Stevenson;Stephanie Enright;Alieta Eyles;Alieta Eyles

  • Nature and ecological implications of pathogen-induced systemic resistance in conifers: A novel hypothesis

    Pierluigi Bonello;Thomas R. Gordon;Daniel A. Herms;David L. Wood

  • Genetic structure of a natural population of the ectomycorrhizal fungus Suillus pungens

    Pierluigi Bonello;Pierluigi Bonello;Thomas D. Bruns;Monique Gardes

  • Pinus nigra -Sphaeropsis sapinea as a model pathosystem to investigate local and systemic effects of fungal infection of pines

    Pierluigi Bonello;James T Blodgett

  • Comparative phloem chemistry of Manchurian (Fraxinus mandshurica) and two North American ash species (Fraxinus americana and Fraxinus pennsylvanica).

    Alieta Eyles;Alieta Eyles;William Jones;Ken Riedl;Don Cipollini

  • Preserving accuracy in GenBank

    M. I. Bidartondo;Thomas D. Bruns;Meredith Blackwell;Ivan Edwards

  • Systemic induction of phloem secondary metabolism and its relationship to resistance to a canker pathogen in Austrian pine

    C. Wallis;A. Eyles;R. Chorbadjian;B. McSpadden Gardener

  • Genetic relationships and cross pathogenicities of Verticillium dahliae isolates from cauliflower and other crops.

    K. V. Subbarao;A. Chassot;T. R. Gordon;J. C. Hubbard

  • Systemic induction of traumatic resin ducts and resin flow in Austrian pine by wounding and inoculation with Sphaeropsis sapinea and Diplodia scrobiculata.

    Nicola Luchi;Rui Ma;Paolo Capretti;Pierluigi Bonello

  • Progress and gaps in understanding mechanisms of ash tree resistance to emerald ash borer, a model for wood-boring insects that kill angiosperms

    Caterina Villari;Daniel A. Herms;Justin G. A. Whitehill;Don Cipollini

  • Tissue-specific transcriptomics of the exotic invasive insect pest emerald ash borer (Agrilus planipennis).

    Omprakash Mittapalli;Xiaodong Bai;Praveen Mamidala;Swapna Priya Rajarapu

  • Interspecific comparison of constitutive ash phloem phenolic chemistry reveals compounds unique to manchurian ash, a species resistant to emerald ash borer.

    Justin G. A. Whitehill;Justin G. A. Whitehill;Stephen O. Opiyo;Jennifer L. Koch;Daniel A. Herms

  • Distinguishing Defensive Characteristics in the Phloem of Ash Species Resistant and Susceptible to Emerald Ash Borer

    Don Cipollini;Qin Wang;Justin G. A. Whitehill;Jeff R. Powell

  • Organ-dependent induction of systemic resistance and systemic susceptibility in Pinus nigra inoculated with Sphaeropsis sapinea and Diplodia scrobiculata.

    James T. Blodgett;James T. Blodgett;Alieta Eyles;Pierluigi Bonello

  • Resistance to pitch canker disease, caused by Fusarium subglutinans f.sp. pini, in Monterey pine (Pinus radiata)

    T. R. Gordon;K. R. Wikler;S. L. Clark;D. Okamoto

  • Transcriptomic Signatures of Ash (Fraxinus spp.) Phloem

    Xiaodong Bai;Loren Rivera-Vega;Praveen Mamidala;Pierluigi Bonello

  • Ozone effects on root-disease susceptibility and defence responses in mycorrhizal and non-mycorrhizal seedlings of Scots pine (Pinus sylvestris L.)

    Pierluigi Bonello;Werner Heller;Heinrich Sandermann

  • Advanced spectroscopy-based phenotyping offers a potential solution to the ash dieback epidemic

    Caterina Villari;Caterina Villari;Arnaud Dowkiw;Rasmus Enderle;Rasmus Enderle;Marjan Ghasemkhani

  • Effects of fertilization on red pine defense chemistry and resistance to Sphaeropsis sapinea

    James T. Blodgett;Daniel A. Herms;Pierluigi Bonello

Frequent Co-Authors

Daniel A. Herms
Daniel A. Herms The Ohio State University
Don Cipollini
Don Cipollini Wright State University
Alieta Eyles
Alieta Eyles University of Tasmania
Luis E. Rodriguez-Saona
Luis E. Rodriguez-Saona The Ohio State University
Paolo Capretti
Paolo Capretti University of Florence
Thomas D. Bruns
Thomas D. Bruns University of California, Berkeley
Kenneth F. Raffa
Kenneth F. Raffa University of Wisconsin–Madison
Thomas Kirisits
Thomas Kirisits BOKU University
Thomas R. Gordon
Thomas R. Gordon University of California, Davis
Jason E. Stajich
Jason E. Stajich University of California, Riverside

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Best Scientists Citing Pierluigi Bonello

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles