World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Ecology and Evolution

D-Index
32
Citations
4377
World Ranking
8050
National Ranking
788

Philip Riordan publication distribution in Ecology and Evolution in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Ecology and Evolution in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Philip Riordan sits on this spectrum.

37–41 publications: 2 scientists 42–46 publications: 9 scientists 47–51 publications: 10 scientists 52–56 publications: 31 scientists 57–61 publications: 56 scientists 62–66 publications: 91 scientists 67–71 publications: 92 scientists 72–76 publications: 127 scientists 77–81 publications: 173 scientists 82–86 publications: 236 scientists 87–91 publications: 227 scientists 92–96 publications: 240 scientists 97–101 publications: 333 scientists 102–106 publications: 280 scientists 107–111 publications: 300 scientists 112–116 publications: 285 scientists 117–121 publications: 305 scientists 122–126 publications: 287 scientists 127–131 publications: 278 scientists 132–136 publications: 289 scientists 137–141 publications: 273 scientists 142–146 publications: 262 scientists 147–151 publications: 246 scientists 152–156 publications: 235 scientists 157–161 publications: 205 scientists 162–166 publications: 199 scientists 167–171 publications: 174 scientists 172–176 publications: 164 scientists 177–181 publications: 173 scientists 182–186 publications: 189 scientists 187–191 publications: 170 scientists 192–196 publications: 139 scientists 197–201 publications: 128 scientists 202–206 publications: 117 scientists 207–211 publications: 115 scientists 212–216 publications: 107 scientists 217–221 publications: 124 scientists 222–226 publications: 81 scientists 227–231 publications: 82 scientists 232–236 publications: 85 scientists 237–241 publications: 75 scientists 242–246 publications: 66 scientists 247–251 publications: 81 scientists 252–256 publications: 69 scientists 257–261 publications: 70 scientists 262–266 publications: 55 scientists 267–271 publications: 64 scientists 272–276 publications: 49 scientists 277–281 publications: 48 scientists 282–286 publications: 44 scientists 287–291 publications: 45 scientists 292–296 publications: 36 scientists 297–301 publications: 39 scientists 302–306 publications: 38 scientists 307–311 publications: 30 scientists 312–316 publications: 34 scientists 317–321 publications: 25 scientists 322–326 publications: 22 scientists 327–331 publications: 28 scientists 332–336 publications: 30 scientists 337–341 publications: 22 scientists 342–346 publications: 30 scientists 347–351 publications: 26 scientists 352–356 publications: 22 scientists 357–361 publications: 29 scientists 362–366 publications: 21 scientists 367–371 publications: 12 scientists 372–376 publications: 18 scientists 377–381 publications: 17 scientists 382–386 publications: 13 scientists 387–391 publications: 21 scientists 392–396 publications: 13 scientists 397–401 publications: 10 scientists 402–406 publications: 15 scientists 407–411 publications: 8 scientists 412–416 publications: 9 scientists 417–421 publications: 8 scientists 422–426 publications: 4 scientists 427–431 publications: 10 scientists 432–436 publications: 10 scientists 437–441 publications: 5 scientists 442–446 publications: 4 scientists 447–451 publications: 10 scientists 452–456 publications: 2 scientists 457–461 publications: 4 scientists 462–466 publications: 7 scientists 467–471 publications: 7 scientists 472–476 publications: 6 scientists 477–481 publications: 6 scientists 482–486 publications: 3 scientists 487–491 publications: 3 scientists 492–496 publications: 4 scientists 497–501 publications: 4 scientists 502–506 publications: 8 scientists 507–511 publications: 5 scientists 512–516 publications: 4 scientists 517–521 publications: 5 scientists 522–526 publications: 4 scientists 527–530 publications: 5 scientists 531+ publications: 100 scientists
37 publications 531+

This scientist: 88 publications — 11th percentile

11% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 531 publications or more.

Philip Riordan D-index placement in Ecology and Evolution in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Ecology and Evolution scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Philip Riordan sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 95 scientists 31 D-Index: 123 scientists 32 D-Index: 191 scientists 33 D-Index: 245 scientists 34 D-Index: 252 scientists 35 D-Index: 244 scientists 36 D-Index: 249 scientists 37 D-Index: 244 scientists 38 D-Index: 254 scientists 39 D-Index: 254 scientists 40 D-Index: 280 scientists 41 D-Index: 274 scientists 42 D-Index: 266 scientists 43 D-Index: 233 scientists 44 D-Index: 248 scientists 45 D-Index: 208 scientists 46 D-Index: 201 scientists 47 D-Index: 213 scientists 48 D-Index: 207 scientists 49 D-Index: 172 scientists 50 D-Index: 209 scientists 51 D-Index: 199 scientists 52 D-Index: 153 scientists 53 D-Index: 169 scientists 54 D-Index: 163 scientists 55 D-Index: 148 scientists 56 D-Index: 120 scientists 57 D-Index: 146 scientists 58 D-Index: 137 scientists 59 D-Index: 140 scientists 60 D-Index: 104 scientists 61 D-Index: 119 scientists 62 D-Index: 118 scientists 63 D-Index: 99 scientists 64 D-Index: 77 scientists 65 D-Index: 100 scientists 66 D-Index: 86 scientists 67 D-Index: 83 scientists 68 D-Index: 75 scientists 69 D-Index: 94 scientists 70 D-Index: 57 scientists 71 D-Index: 68 scientists 72 D-Index: 59 scientists 73 D-Index: 63 scientists 74 D-Index: 66 scientists 75 D-Index: 60 scientists 76 D-Index: 42 scientists 77 D-Index: 49 scientists 78 D-Index: 39 scientists 79 D-Index: 37 scientists 80 D-Index: 43 scientists 81 D-Index: 41 scientists 82 D-Index: 45 scientists 83 D-Index: 34 scientists 84 D-Index: 40 scientists 85 D-Index: 35 scientists 86 D-Index: 55 scientists 87 D-Index: 24 scientists 88 D-Index: 24 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 23 scientists 91 D-Index: 25 scientists 92 D-Index: 27 scientists 93 D-Index: 27 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 23 scientists 96 D-Index: 12 scientists 97 D-Index: 14 scientists 98 D-Index: 19 scientists 99 D-Index: 16 scientists 100 D-Index: 14 scientists 101 D-Index: 5 scientists 102 D-Index: 21 scientists 103 D-Index: 16 scientists 104 D-Index: 10 scientists 105 D-Index: 7 scientists 106 D-Index: 7 scientists 107 D-Index: 7 scientists 108 D-Index: 6 scientists 109 D-Index: 9 scientists 110 D-Index: 11 scientists 111 D-Index: 12 scientists 112 D-Index: 9 scientists 113 D-Index: 7 scientists 114 D-Index: 3 scientists 115 D-Index: 8 scientists 116 D-Index: 5 scientists 117 D-Index: 11 scientists 118 D-Index: 4 scientists 119 D-Index: 2 scientists 120 D-Index: 5 scientists 121+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 121+

This scientist: 32 D-Index — 5th percentile

5% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 121 D-Index or more.

Overview

Philip Riordan is affiliated with the University of Southampton in the United Kingdom. Their research primarily focuses on Environmental Science, with a significant body of work spanning several related subfields including Ecology, Ecological Modeling, Genetics, Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law, as well as Nature and Landscape Conservation.

The main topics within Riordan's work cover a range of ecological and conservation issues. These include:

  • Wildlife Ecology and Conservation
  • Species Distribution and Climate Change
  • Rangeland Management and Livestock Ecology
  • Primate Behavior and Ecology
  • Genetic diversity and population structure
  • Genetic and phenotypic traits in livestock
  • Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies

Riordan has contributed to research published in a variety of scientific journals, notably the Journal of Resources and Ecology and Oryx, each featuring three of their publications. Other frequent publication venues include the Journal of Arid Environments, Ecology and Evolution, and Heredity.

Their recent papers illustrate a strong emphasis on the study of snow leopards and wildlife ecology in China, with highlighted works such as:

  • Meta-replication, sampling bias, and multi-scale model selection: A case study on snow leopard (Panthera uncia) in western China (2020, Ecology and Evolution)
  • Evidence of spatial genetic structure in a snow leopard population from Gansu, China (2021, Heredity)
  • TICKS PARASITIZING THE SPUR-THIGHED TORTOISE (TESTUDO GRAECA) POPULATION OF TUNISIA (2020, Journal of Wildlife Diseases)
  • The pikas of China: a review of current research priorities and challenges for conservation (2021, Integrative Zoology)
  • Landscape resistance to gene flow in a snow leopard population from Qilianshan National Park, Gansu, China (2023, Landscape Ecology)

Riordan collaborates frequently with several researchers. The most common coauthors include Kun Shi, Tania Gilbert, Marie Petretto, Luciano Atzeni, and Joseph P. Lambert, each contributing significantly to their joint research efforts.

Best Publications

  • Does organic farming reduce environmental impacts?--a meta-analysis of European research.

    H.L. Tuomisto;I.D. Hodge;P. Riordan;D.W. Macdonald

  • Experimental evidence for the interacting effects of forest edge, moisture and soil macrofauna on leaf litter decomposition

    Terhil Riutta;Eleanor M. Slade;Daniel P. Bebber;Michele E. Taylor

  • Culling-induced social perturbation in Eurasian badgers Meles meles and the management of TB in cattle: an analysis of a critical problem in applied ecology

    Stephen P Carter;Richard J Delahay;Graham C Smith;David W Macdonald

  • Optimizing the biodiversity gain from agri-environment schemes

    Thomas Merckx;Ruth E. Feber;Philip Riordan;Martin C. Townsend

  • Life-history traits and landscape characteristics predict macro-moth responses to forest fragmentation

    Eleanor M. Slade;Eleanor M. Slade;Thomas Merckx;Thomas Merckx;Terhil Riutta;Daniel P. Bebber

  • The dragonfly delusion: why it is essential to sample exuviae to avoid biased surveys

    Eva M. Raebel;Eva M. Raebel;Thomas Merckx;Philip Riordan;David W. Macdonald

  • Effect of field margins on moths depends on species mobility: Field-based evidence for landscape-scale conservation

    Thomas Merckx;Ruth E. Feber;Rebecca L. Dulieu;Martin C. Townsend

  • Human wildlife conflict involving large carnivores in Qilianshan, China and the minimal paw-print of snow leopards

    Justine Alexander;Pengju Chen;Peter Damerell;Wang Youkui

  • Biological hurdles to the control of TB in cattle: A test of two hypotheses concerning wildlife to explain the failure of control

    David W. Macdonald;Philip Riordan;Fiona Mathews

  • Shelter benefits less mobile moth species: The field-scale effect of hedgerow trees

    Thomas Merckx;Ruth E. Feber;Claire Mclaughlan;Nigel A.D. Bourn

  • Comparing energy balances, greenhouse gas balances and biodiversity impacts of contrasting farming systems with alternative land uses

    H.L. Tuomisto;I.D. Hodge;P. Riordan;D.W. Macdonald

  • Face Value: Towards Robust Estimates of Snow Leopard Densities

    Justine S. Alexander;Arjun M. Gopalaswamy;Kun Shi;Philip Riordan

  • Exploring a safe operating approach to weighting in life cycle impact assessment – a case study of organic, conventional and integrated farming systems

    H.L. Tuomisto;I.D. Hodge;P. Riordan;D.W. Macdonald

  • Predicting global population connectivity and targeting conservation action for snow leopard across its range

    Philip Riordan;Philip Riordan;Samuel A. Cushman;David Mallon;Kun Shi

  • Multi-scale effects of farmland management on dragonfly and damselfly assemblages of farmland ponds

    Eva M. Raebel;Eva M. Raebel;Thomas Merckx;Thomas Merckx;Ruth E. Feber;Philip Riordan

  • Habitat preferences and survival in wildlife reintroductions: an ecological trap in reintroduced grey partridges

    Elina M. Rantanen;Francis Buner;Philip Riordan;Nick Sotherton

  • Identifying high-quality pond habitats for Odonata in lowland England: implications for agri-environment schemes

    Eva M. Raebel;Eva M. Raebel;Thomas Merckx;Ruth E. Feber;Philip Riordan

  • Comparing global warming potential, energy use and land use of organic, conventional and integrated winter wheat production

    H.L. Tuomisto;I.D. Hodge;P. Riordan;D.W. Macdonald

  • Culling-induced changes in badger (Meles meles) behaviour, social organisation and the epidemiology of bovine tuberculosis.

    Philip Riordan;Richard John Delahay;Chris Cheeseman;Paul James Johnson

  • Unsupervised recognition of individual tigers and snow leopards from their footprints

    P. Riordan

Frequent Co-Authors

David W. Macdonald
David W. Macdonald University of Oxford
Thomas Merckx
Thomas Merckx Vrije Universiteit Brussel
Eleanor M. Slade
Eleanor M. Slade Nanyang Technological University
Richard J. Delahay
Richard J. Delahay Animal and Plant Health Agency
Chris Newman
Chris Newman University of Oxford
David J. Thompson
David J. Thompson University of Liverpool
Alexandros Gasparatos
Alexandros Gasparatos University of Tokyo
Paul J. Johnson
Paul J. Johnson University of Oxford
Shunsuke Managi
Shunsuke Managi Kyushu University
Chris L. Cheeseman
Chris L. Cheeseman Department for Environment Food and Rural Affairs

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Ecology and Evolution lays a strong foundation for various career pathways, but broadening your academic experience with online degrees can further enhance your skills and opportunities. There are numerous flexible programs available that can complement your expertise—for example, a bsc mathematics online helps sharpen data analysis, statistics, and quantitative research abilities that are highly valued in ecological research.

Careers in conservation and science communication also benefit from creative skills, made possible through online graphic design courses. Visual storytelling is essential for raising public awareness about evolutionary biology and environmental issues.

Those interested in combining multiple academic interests might explore online interdisciplinary studies degree career outcomes. This flexible degree can integrate ecology, policy, GIS, and even technology, opening doors to unique roles in academia, government, or NGOs.

For postgraduate plans, consider the quickest cheapest masters degree programs. These can expedite your advancement into research, teaching, or specialized consultancy within the broad fields related to ecology and evolution.

Best Scientists Citing Philip Riordan

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles