World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
94
Citations
45353
World Ranking
10289
National Ranking
5292

Philip R. Schauer publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Philip R. Schauer sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 611 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 483 publications — 55th percentile

55% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Philip R. Schauer D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Philip R. Schauer sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 400 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 94 D-Index — 49th percentile

49% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

Philip R. Schauer is affiliated with the Pennington Biomedical Research Center in the United States. Their research primarily focuses on medicine with particular emphasis on surgery, physiology, and endocrinology related to diabetes and metabolism.

Their work extensively covers topics such as bariatric surgery and outcomes, diet and metabolism studies, diabetes treatment and management, obesity and health practices, body contouring and surgery, metabolism in relation to diabetes and cancer, and pharmacology related to obesity treatment.

Frequent co-authors associated with Philip R. Schauer include Vance L. Albaugh, Ali Aminian, John P. Kirwan, Michael Kachmar, and Sangeeta R. Kashyap.

They have published numerous papers in a variety of scientific venues. Notable publication venues with multiple contributions are Surgery for Obesity and Related Diseases, Diabetes Care, Obesity Surgery, Diabetes, and The Lancet Diabetes & Endocrinology.

Significant recent publications include the following:

  • Joint international consensus statement for ending stigma of obesity, 2020, Nature Medicine
  • Definition and diagnostic criteria of clinical obesity, 2025, The Lancet Diabetes & Endocrinology
  • Consensus Report: Definition and Interpretation of Remission in Type 2 Diabetes, 2021, Diabetes Care
  • Association of Bariatric Surgery With Major Adverse Liver and Cardiovascular Outcomes in Patients With Biopsy-Proven Nonalcoholic Steatohepatitis, 2021, JAMA
  • Association of Bariatric Surgery With Cancer Risk and Mortality in Adults With Obesity, 2022, JAMA

Best Publications

  • Bariatric Surgery Versus Intensive Medical Therapy in Obese Patients With Diabetes

    Philip R. Schauer;Sangeeta R. Kashyap;Kathy Wolski;Stacy A. Brethauer

  • Bariatric Surgery versus Intensive Medical Therapy for Diabetes — 5-Year Outcomes

    Philip R. Schauer;Deepak L. Bhatt;John P. Kirwan;Kathy Wolski

  • Outcomes After Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass for Morbid Obesity

    Philip R. Schauer;Sayeed Ikramuddin;William Gourash;Ramesh Ramanathan

  • Metabolic Surgery in the Treatment Algorithm for Type 2 Diabetes: a Joint Statement by International Diabetes Organizations.

    Francesco Rubino;David M Nathan;Robert H Eckel;Philip R Schauer

  • Bariatric Surgery versus Intensive Medical Therapy for Diabetes — 3-Year Outcomes

    Philip R. Schauer;Deepak L. Bhatt;John P. Kirwan;Kathy Wolski

  • Bariatric surgery versus non-surgical treatment for obesity: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials

    Viktoria L Gloy;Matthias Briel;Matthias Briel;Deepak L Bhatt;Sangeeta R Kashyap

  • Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy: Outcomes in 222 Patients

    James D. Luketich;Miguel Alvelo-Rivera;Percival O. Buenaventura;Neil A. Christie

  • Metabolic Surgery in the Treatment Algorithm for Type 2 Diabetes: A Joint Statement by International Diabetes Organizations

    Francesco Rubino;David M. Nathan;Robert H. Eckel;Philip R. Schauer

  • Update on Prevention of Cardiovascular Disease in Adults With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus in Light of Recent Evidence: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association and the American Diabetes Association.

    Caroline S. Fox;Sherita Hill Golden;Cheryl Anderson;George A. Bray

  • Systematic review of sleeve gastrectomy as staging and primary bariatric procedure.

    Stacy A. Brethauer;Jeffrey P. Hammel;Philip R. Schauer

  • Can diabetes be surgically cured? Long-term metabolic effects of bariatric surgery in obese patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus.

    Stacy A. Brethauer;Ali Aminian;Héctor Romero-Talamás;Esam Batayyah

  • The chronic inflammatory hypothesis for the morbidity associated with morbid obesity: implications and effects of weight loss.

    Daniel R. Cottam;Samer G. Mattar;Emma Barinas-Mitchell;George Eid

  • Gastric bypass surgery for morbid obesity leads to an increase in bone turnover and a decrease in bone mass.

    Penelope S. Coates;John D. Fernstrom;Madelyn H. Fernstrom;Philip R. Schauer

  • Metabolic Surgery to Treat Type 2 Diabetes: Clinical Outcomes and Mechanisms of Action

    Francesco Rubino;Philip R. Schauer;Lee M. Kaplan;David E. Cummings

  • Surgically-Induced Weight Loss Significantly Improves Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease and the Metabolic Syndrome

    Samer G. Mattar;Laura M. Velcu;Mordechai Rabinovitz;A J. Demetris

  • The Diabetes Surgery Summit consensus conference: recommendations for the evaluation and use of gastrointestinal surgery to treat type 2 diabetes mellitus.

    Francesco Rubino;Lee M. Kaplan;Philip R. Schauer;David E. Cummings

  • Symptomatic improvement in gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) following laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass.

    E. E. Frezza;S. Ikramuddin;W. Gourash;T. Rakitt

  • Weight Loss Interventions in Chronic Kidney Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

    Sankar D. Navaneethan;Hans Yehnert;Fady Moustarah;Martin J. Schreiber

  • Adipocyte Apoptosis, a Link between Obesity, Insulin Resistance, and Hepatic Steatosis

    Naim Alkhouri;Agnieszka Gornicka;Michael P. Berk;Samjhana Thapaliya

  • Consensus statement of the consortium for laparoendoscopic single-site surgery

    Inderbir S. Gill;Arnold P. Advincula;Monish Aron;Jeffrey Caddedu

Frequent Co-Authors

Lee M. Kaplan
Lee M. Kaplan Harvard University
David E. Cummings
David E. Cummings University of Washington
Robert H. Eckel
Robert H. Eckel University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus
Stephanie A. Amiel
Stephanie A. Amiel King's College London
Michael Pignone
Michael Pignone The University of Texas at Austin
Sherita Hill Golden
Sherita Hill Golden Johns Hopkins University
William H. Herman
William H. Herman University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Prakash Deedwania
Prakash Deedwania United States Department of Veterans Affairs
Silvio E. Inzucchi
Silvio E. Inzucchi Yale University
Caroline S. Fox
Caroline S. Fox MSD (United States)

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

If you're interested in healthcare but not sure about medical school, there are several flexible and affordable online degree pathways to consider. These programs offer robust training and career growth opportunities, especially for those balancing work or family commitments.

Nursing remains one of the most popular alternatives. For aspiring nurses, you can find the cheapest online bsn programs that provide foundational knowledge and clinical skills. Registered nurses can advance further by enrolling in the cheapest rn to bsn program online to expand their qualifications and job prospects.

For those seeking advanced practice roles, consider the cheapest fnp programs online to become a Family Nurse Practitioner. Meanwhile, experienced nurses looking to move into research or academic roles might explore phd nursing programs online, which open doors to leadership positions and policymaking.

Exploring these online healthcare degrees can lead to rewarding careers beyond traditional medical school, offering both flexibility and cost-effectiveness.

Best Scientists Citing Philip R. Schauer

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles