World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Peter Van den Bossche

Peter Van den Bossche

D-Index & Metrics

Engineering and Technology

D-Index
42
Citations
10414
World Ranking
6392
National Ranking
82

Peter Van den Bossche publication distribution in Engineering and Technology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Engineering and Technology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Peter Van den Bossche sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 20 scientists 48–57 publications: 35 scientists 58–67 publications: 96 scientists 68–77 publications: 135 scientists 78–87 publications: 190 scientists 88–97 publications: 259 scientists 98–107 publications: 283 scientists 108–117 publications: 369 scientists 118–127 publications: 341 scientists 128–137 publications: 386 scientists 138–147 publications: 372 scientists 148–157 publications: 457 scientists 158–167 publications: 415 scientists 168–177 publications: 407 scientists 178–187 publications: 421 scientists 188–197 publications: 378 scientists 198–207 publications: 403 scientists 208–217 publications: 317 scientists 218–227 publications: 346 scientists 228–237 publications: 321 scientists 238–247 publications: 260 scientists 248–257 publications: 280 scientists 258–267 publications: 240 scientists 268–277 publications: 214 scientists 278–287 publications: 242 scientists 288–297 publications: 203 scientists 298–307 publications: 166 scientists 308–317 publications: 154 scientists 318–327 publications: 175 scientists 328–337 publications: 159 scientists 338–347 publications: 99 scientists 348–357 publications: 131 scientists 358–367 publications: 106 scientists 368–377 publications: 118 scientists 378–387 publications: 97 scientists 388–397 publications: 108 scientists 398–407 publications: 82 scientists 408–417 publications: 71 scientists 418–427 publications: 64 scientists 428–437 publications: 55 scientists 438–447 publications: 54 scientists 448–457 publications: 60 scientists 458–467 publications: 47 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 30 scientists 488–497 publications: 29 scientists 498–507 publications: 38 scientists 508–517 publications: 40 scientists 518–527 publications: 32 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 28 scientists 548–557 publications: 23 scientists 558–567 publications: 19 scientists 568–577 publications: 16 scientists 578–587 publications: 17 scientists 588–597 publications: 18 scientists 598–607 publications: 22 scientists 608–617 publications: 15 scientists 618–627 publications: 9 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 21 scientists 648–657 publications: 12 scientists 658–667 publications: 9 scientists 668–677 publications: 11 scientists 678–687 publications: 9 scientists 688–697 publications: 6 scientists 698–707 publications: 14 scientists 708–717 publications: 7 scientists 718–727 publications: 8 scientists 728–737 publications: 10 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 5 scientists 758–767 publications: 5 scientists 768–777 publications: 11 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 2 scientists 798–803 publications: 4 scientists 804+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 804+

This scientist: 267 publications — 69th percentile

69% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 804 publications or more.

Peter Van den Bossche D-index placement in Engineering and Technology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Engineering and Technology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Peter Van den Bossche sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 59 scientists 31 D-Index: 114 scientists 32 D-Index: 129 scientists 33 D-Index: 189 scientists 34 D-Index: 200 scientists 35 D-Index: 262 scientists 36 D-Index: 311 scientists 37 D-Index: 312 scientists 38 D-Index: 350 scientists 39 D-Index: 385 scientists 40 D-Index: 348 scientists 41 D-Index: 362 scientists 42 D-Index: 426 scientists 43 D-Index: 380 scientists 44 D-Index: 310 scientists 45 D-Index: 341 scientists 46 D-Index: 301 scientists 47 D-Index: 306 scientists 48 D-Index: 271 scientists 49 D-Index: 246 scientists 50 D-Index: 210 scientists 51 D-Index: 253 scientists 52 D-Index: 213 scientists 53 D-Index: 221 scientists 54 D-Index: 195 scientists 55 D-Index: 186 scientists 56 D-Index: 170 scientists 57 D-Index: 167 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 144 scientists 60 D-Index: 152 scientists 61 D-Index: 141 scientists 62 D-Index: 138 scientists 63 D-Index: 131 scientists 64 D-Index: 118 scientists 65 D-Index: 114 scientists 66 D-Index: 119 scientists 67 D-Index: 95 scientists 68 D-Index: 87 scientists 69 D-Index: 77 scientists 70 D-Index: 89 scientists 71 D-Index: 69 scientists 72 D-Index: 54 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 55 scientists 75 D-Index: 54 scientists 76 D-Index: 49 scientists 77 D-Index: 53 scientists 78 D-Index: 46 scientists 79 D-Index: 28 scientists 80 D-Index: 39 scientists 81 D-Index: 36 scientists 82 D-Index: 24 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 36 scientists 85 D-Index: 18 scientists 86 D-Index: 25 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 26 scientists 89 D-Index: 27 scientists 90 D-Index: 23 scientists 91 D-Index: 15 scientists 92 D-Index: 12 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 15 scientists 95 D-Index: 10 scientists 96 D-Index: 13 scientists 97 D-Index: 13 scientists 98 D-Index: 9 scientists 99 D-Index: 7 scientists 100 D-Index: 7 scientists 101 D-Index: 8 scientists 102 D-Index: 7 scientists 103 D-Index: 7 scientists 104 D-Index: 9 scientists 105 D-Index: 6 scientists 106 D-Index: 9 scientists 107+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 107+

This scientist: 42 D-Index — 35th percentile

35% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 107 D-Index or more.

Best Publications

  • Critical review of state of health estimation methods of Li-ion batteries for real applications

    M. Berecibar;M. Berecibar;I. Gandiaga;I. Villarreal;N. Omar

  • Lithium iron phosphate based battery: Assessment of the aging parameters and development of cycle life model

    Noshin Omar;Noshin Omar;Mohamed Abdel Monem;Mohamed Abdel Monem;Yousef Firouz;Justin Salminen

  • Random forest regression for online capacity estimation of lithium-ion batteries

    Yi Li;Changfu Zou;Maitane Berecibar;Elise Nanini-Maury

  • Passive and active battery balancing comparison based on MATLAB simulation

    Mohamed Daowd;Noshin Omar;Peter Van Den Bossche;Joeri Van Mierlo

  • A review of international abuse testing standards and regulations for lithium ion batteries in electric and hybrid electric vehicles

    V. Ruiz;A. Pfrang;A. Kriston;N. Omar

  • A quick on-line state of health estimation method for Li-ion battery with incremental capacity curves processed by Gaussian filter

    Yi Li;Yi Li;Mohamed Abdel-Monem;Mohamed Abdel-Monem;Rahul Gopalakrishnan;Maitane Berecibar

  • Phase-change materials (PCM) for automotive applications: A review

    Joris Jaguemont;Noshin Omar;Peter Van den Bossche;Joeri Mierlo

  • SUBAT: An assessment of sustainable battery technology

    Peter Van den Bossche;Frédéric Vergels;Joeri Van Mierlo;Julien Matheys

  • Models of energy sources for EV and HEV: fuel cells, batteries, ultracapacitors, flywheels and engine-generators

    Joeri Van Mierlo;Peter Van den Bossche;Gaston Maggetto

  • Combined cycling and calendar capacity fade modeling of a Nickel-Manganese-Cobalt Oxide Cell with real-life profile validation

    Joris de Hoog;Jean-Marc Timmermans;Daniel Ioan-Stroe;Maciej Swierczynski

  • Rechargeable Energy Storage Systems for Plug-in Hybrid Electric Vehicles—Assessment of Electrical Characteristics

    Noshin Omar;Mohamed Ali Abdelfattah Hamoda Daowd;Peter Van Den Bossche;Omar Hegazy

  • Lithium-ion batteries: Evaluation study of different charging methodologies based on aging process

    Mohamed Abdel Monem;Khiem Trad;Noshin Omar;Omar Hegazy

  • Lithium-Ion Batteries Health Prognosis Considering Aging Conditions

    Asmae El Mejdoubi;Hicham Chaoui;Hamid Gualous;Peter Van Den Bossche

  • Impact of Tab Location on Large Format Lithium-Ion Pouch Cell Based on Fully Coupled Tree-Dimensional Electrochemical-Thermal Modeling

    Ahmadou Samba;Ahmadou Samba;Noshin Omar;Hamid Gualous;Odile Capron

  • Influence analysis of static and dynamic fast-charging current profiles on ageing performance of commercial lithium-ion batteries

    Mohamed Abdel-Monem;Khiem Trad;Noshin Omar;Omar Hegazy;Omar Hegazy

  • Single Switched Capacitor Battery Balancing System Enhancements

    Mohamed Daowd;Mailier Antoine;Noshin Omar;Peter van den Bossche

  • Development of an Advanced Two-Dimensional Thermal Model for Large size Lithium-ion Pouch Cells

    Ahmadou Samba;Ahmadou Samba;Noshin Omar;Hamid Gualous;Youssef Firouz

  • Comparative Study of Surface Temperature Behavior of Commercial Li-Ion Pouch Cells of Different Chemistries and Capacities by Infrared Thermography

    Shovon Goutam;Jean-Marc Timmermans;Noshin Omar;Peter Van den Bossche

  • Comparison of commercial battery cells in relation to material properties

    Grietus Mulder;Grietus Mulder;Noshin Omar;Stijn Pauwels;Marcel Meeus

  • The Cell versus the System: Standardization challenges for electricity storage devices

    P. Van den Bossche;F. Van Mulders;B. Verbrugge;N. Omar

  • Status and future perspectives of reliability assessment for electric vehicles

    Foad Heidari Gandoman;Abdollah Ahmadi;Peter Van Den Bossche;Joeri Van Mierlo

Frequent Co-Authors

Joeri Van Mierlo
Joeri Van Mierlo Vrije Universiteit Brussel
Noshin Omar
Noshin Omar Vrije Universiteit Brussel
Omar Hegazy
Omar Hegazy Vrije Universiteit Brussel
Joris Jaguemont
Joris Jaguemont Vrije Universiteit Brussel
Hamid Gualous
Hamid Gualous Université de Caen Normandie
Maitane Berecibar
Maitane Berecibar Vrije Universiteit Brussel
Cathy Macharis
Cathy Macharis Vrije Universiteit Brussel
Maciej Swierczynski
Maciej Swierczynski Aalborg University
Marc A. Rosen
Marc A. Rosen University of Ontario Institute of Technology
Tanja Kallio
Tanja Kallio Aalto University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring online education in Engineering and Technology opens up flexible options for different needs and lifestyles. For those looking to fast-track their careers, consider the 6 months masters degree online. This accelerated path can help you gain advanced skills and qualifications quickly.

If you’re focused on immediate workforce entry or a career switch, 12 month certificate programs that pay well offer a practical route. These certificates are designed to prepare you for high-demand tech roles in under a year.

Balance is key for many learners—especially parents. There are tailored degrees for stay at home moms that provide convenience and flexibility, allowing you to manage both family and study goals.

For those needing a quicker skill boost or specific knowledge upgrade, 6 week online courses deliver focused learning in a short timeframe. These options are great for staying competitive in the dynamic field of Engineering and Technology.

Best Scientists Citing Peter Van den Bossche

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles