World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Ecology and Evolution 37 6756 6526 685 656 86 9209

Jonas Geldmann publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Jonas Geldmann between 2005 and 2026, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Jonas Geldmann published across 22 years, from 2005 to 2026, averaging 4.5 papers a year. Output peaked at 13 publications in 2022. 11 of the 98 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2005 to 2026. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 13. Peak 13 publications in 2022. 2005: 1 publication 2006: 0 publications 2007: 1 publication 2008: 0 publications 2009: 0 publications 2010: 0 publications 2011: 0 publications 2012: 0 publications 2013: 2 publications 2014: 3 publications 2015: 4 publications 2016: 3 publications 2017: 4 publications 2018: 9 publications 2019: 8 publications 2020: 10 publications 2021: 10 publications 2022: 13 publications 2023: 10 publications 2024: 9 publications 2025: 10 publications 2026: 1 publication
2005 2026

98 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Jonas Geldmann: publications per year, 2005 to 2026
Year Publications
2005 1
2006 0
2007 1
2008 0
2009 0
2010 0
2011 0
2012 0
2013 2
2014 3
2015 4
2016 3
2017 4
2018 9
2019 8
2020 10
2021 10
2022 13
2023 10
2024 9
2025 10
2026 1
Total 98
Download as CSV

Jonas Geldmann publication distribution in Ecology and Evolution in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Ecology and Evolution in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jonas Geldmann sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300
Bar chart with 100 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 37–41 to 531+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 333. Most scientists, 333, have 97–101 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 531 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 82–86 publications, is where this scientist sits. 37–41 publications: 2 scientists 42–46 publications: 9 scientists 47–51 publications: 10 scientists 52–56 publications: 31 scientists 57–61 publications: 56 scientists 62–66 publications: 91 scientists 67–71 publications: 92 scientists 72–76 publications: 127 scientists 77–81 publications: 173 scientists 82–86 publications: 236 scientists 87–91 publications: 227 scientists 92–96 publications: 240 scientists 97–101 publications: 333 scientists 102–106 publications: 280 scientists 107–111 publications: 300 scientists 112–116 publications: 285 scientists 117–121 publications: 305 scientists 122–126 publications: 287 scientists 127–131 publications: 278 scientists 132–136 publications: 289 scientists 137–141 publications: 273 scientists 142–146 publications: 262 scientists 147–151 publications: 246 scientists 152–156 publications: 235 scientists 157–161 publications: 205 scientists 162–166 publications: 199 scientists 167–171 publications: 174 scientists 172–176 publications: 164 scientists 177–181 publications: 173 scientists 182–186 publications: 189 scientists 187–191 publications: 170 scientists 192–196 publications: 139 scientists 197–201 publications: 128 scientists 202–206 publications: 117 scientists 207–211 publications: 115 scientists 212–216 publications: 107 scientists 217–221 publications: 124 scientists 222–226 publications: 81 scientists 227–231 publications: 82 scientists 232–236 publications: 85 scientists 237–241 publications: 75 scientists 242–246 publications: 66 scientists 247–251 publications: 81 scientists 252–256 publications: 69 scientists 257–261 publications: 70 scientists 262–266 publications: 55 scientists 267–271 publications: 64 scientists 272–276 publications: 49 scientists 277–281 publications: 48 scientists 282–286 publications: 44 scientists 287–291 publications: 45 scientists 292–296 publications: 36 scientists 297–301 publications: 39 scientists 302–306 publications: 38 scientists 307–311 publications: 30 scientists 312–316 publications: 34 scientists 317–321 publications: 25 scientists 322–326 publications: 22 scientists 327–331 publications: 28 scientists 332–336 publications: 30 scientists 337–341 publications: 22 scientists 342–346 publications: 30 scientists 347–351 publications: 26 scientists 352–356 publications: 22 scientists 357–361 publications: 29 scientists 362–366 publications: 21 scientists 367–371 publications: 12 scientists 372–376 publications: 18 scientists 377–381 publications: 17 scientists 382–386 publications: 13 scientists 387–391 publications: 21 scientists 392–396 publications: 13 scientists 397–401 publications: 10 scientists 402–406 publications: 15 scientists 407–411 publications: 8 scientists 412–416 publications: 9 scientists 417–421 publications: 8 scientists 422–426 publications: 4 scientists 427–431 publications: 10 scientists 432–436 publications: 10 scientists 437–441 publications: 5 scientists 442–446 publications: 4 scientists 447–451 publications: 10 scientists 452–456 publications: 2 scientists 457–461 publications: 4 scientists 462–466 publications: 7 scientists 467–471 publications: 7 scientists 472–476 publications: 6 scientists 477–481 publications: 6 scientists 482–486 publications: 3 scientists 487–491 publications: 3 scientists 492–496 publications: 4 scientists 497–501 publications: 4 scientists 502–506 publications: 8 scientists 507–511 publications: 5 scientists 512–516 publications: 4 scientists 517–521 publications: 5 scientists 522–526 publications: 4 scientists 527–530 publications: 5 scientists 531+ publications: 100 scientists
37–41 publications 531+

This scientist: 86 publications — 10th percentile

10% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 531 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Ecology and Evolution scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 8,381 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
37–41 2
42–46 9
47–51 10
52–56 31
57–61 56
62–66 91
67–71 92
72–76 127
77–81 173
82–86 236 86
87–91 227
92–96 240
97–101 333
102–106 280
107–111 300
112–116 285
117–121 305
122–126 287
127–131 278
132–136 289
137–141 273
142–146 262
147–151 246
152–156 235
157–161 205
162–166 199
167–171 174
172–176 164
177–181 173
182–186 189
187–191 170
192–196 139
197–201 128
202–206 117
207–211 115
212–216 107
217–221 124
222–226 81
227–231 82
232–236 85
237–241 75
242–246 66
247–251 81
252–256 69
257–261 70
262–266 55
267–271 64
272–276 49
277–281 48
282–286 44
287–291 45
292–296 36
297–301 39
302–306 38
307–311 30
312–316 34
317–321 25
322–326 22
327–331 28
332–336 30
337–341 22
342–346 30
347–351 26
352–356 22
357–361 29
362–366 21
367–371 12
372–376 18
377–381 17
382–386 13
387–391 21
392–396 13
397–401 10
402–406 15
407–411 8
412–416 9
417–421 8
422–426 4
427–431 10
432–436 10
437–441 5
442–446 4
447–451 10
452–456 2
457–461 4
462–466 7
467–471 7
472–476 6
477–481 6
482–486 3
487–491 3
492–496 4
497–501 4
502–506 8
507–511 5
512–516 4
517–521 5
522–526 4
527–530 5
531+ 100
Download as CSV

Jonas Geldmann D-index placement in Ecology and Evolution in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Ecology and Evolution scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jonas Geldmann sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150 200 250
Bar chart with 92 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 121+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 280. Most scientists, 280, have 40 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 121 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 37 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 95 scientists 31 D-Index: 123 scientists 32 D-Index: 191 scientists 33 D-Index: 245 scientists 34 D-Index: 252 scientists 35 D-Index: 244 scientists 36 D-Index: 249 scientists 37 D-Index: 244 scientists 38 D-Index: 254 scientists 39 D-Index: 254 scientists 40 D-Index: 280 scientists 41 D-Index: 274 scientists 42 D-Index: 266 scientists 43 D-Index: 233 scientists 44 D-Index: 248 scientists 45 D-Index: 208 scientists 46 D-Index: 201 scientists 47 D-Index: 213 scientists 48 D-Index: 207 scientists 49 D-Index: 172 scientists 50 D-Index: 209 scientists 51 D-Index: 199 scientists 52 D-Index: 153 scientists 53 D-Index: 169 scientists 54 D-Index: 163 scientists 55 D-Index: 148 scientists 56 D-Index: 120 scientists 57 D-Index: 146 scientists 58 D-Index: 137 scientists 59 D-Index: 140 scientists 60 D-Index: 104 scientists 61 D-Index: 119 scientists 62 D-Index: 118 scientists 63 D-Index: 99 scientists 64 D-Index: 77 scientists 65 D-Index: 100 scientists 66 D-Index: 86 scientists 67 D-Index: 83 scientists 68 D-Index: 75 scientists 69 D-Index: 94 scientists 70 D-Index: 57 scientists 71 D-Index: 68 scientists 72 D-Index: 59 scientists 73 D-Index: 63 scientists 74 D-Index: 66 scientists 75 D-Index: 60 scientists 76 D-Index: 42 scientists 77 D-Index: 49 scientists 78 D-Index: 39 scientists 79 D-Index: 37 scientists 80 D-Index: 43 scientists 81 D-Index: 41 scientists 82 D-Index: 45 scientists 83 D-Index: 34 scientists 84 D-Index: 40 scientists 85 D-Index: 35 scientists 86 D-Index: 55 scientists 87 D-Index: 24 scientists 88 D-Index: 24 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 23 scientists 91 D-Index: 25 scientists 92 D-Index: 27 scientists 93 D-Index: 27 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 23 scientists 96 D-Index: 12 scientists 97 D-Index: 14 scientists 98 D-Index: 19 scientists 99 D-Index: 16 scientists 100 D-Index: 14 scientists 101 D-Index: 5 scientists 102 D-Index: 21 scientists 103 D-Index: 16 scientists 104 D-Index: 10 scientists 105 D-Index: 7 scientists 106 D-Index: 7 scientists 107 D-Index: 7 scientists 108 D-Index: 6 scientists 109 D-Index: 9 scientists 110 D-Index: 11 scientists 111 D-Index: 12 scientists 112 D-Index: 9 scientists 113 D-Index: 7 scientists 114 D-Index: 3 scientists 115 D-Index: 8 scientists 116 D-Index: 5 scientists 117 D-Index: 11 scientists 118 D-Index: 4 scientists 119 D-Index: 2 scientists 120 D-Index: 5 scientists 121+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 121+

This scientist: 37 D-Index — 20th percentile

20% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 121 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Ecology and Evolution scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 8,381 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 95
31 123
32 191
33 245
34 252
35 244
36 249
37 244 37
38 254
39 254
40 280
41 274
42 266
43 233
44 248
45 208
46 201
47 213
48 207
49 172
50 209
51 199
52 153
53 169
54 163
55 148
56 120
57 146
58 137
59 140
60 104
61 119
62 118
63 99
64 77
65 100
66 86
67 83
68 75
69 94
70 57
71 68
72 59
73 63
74 66
75 60
76 42
77 49
78 39
79 37
80 43
81 41
82 45
83 34
84 40
85 35
86 55
87 24
88 24
89 30
90 23
91 25
92 27
93 27
94 13
95 23
96 12
97 14
98 19
99 16
100 14
101 5
102 21
103 16
104 10
105 7
106 7
107 7
108 6
109 9
110 11
111 12
112 9
113 7
114 3
115 8
116 5
117 11
118 4
119 2
120 5
121+ 100
Download as CSV

Overview

Jonas Geldmann is affiliated with the University of Cambridge in the United Kingdom. Their research primarily focuses on Environmental Science, with extensive work spanning subfields such as Global and Planetary Change, Ecology, Economics and Econometrics, Ecological Modeling, and Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law.

The main topics covered in their research include Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management; Economic and Environmental Valuation; Wildlife Ecology and Conservation; Species Distribution and Climate Change; Land Use and Ecosystem Services; Environmental Conservation and Management; and Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies.

Jonas Geldmann has published multiple papers, notable recent works being:

  • Protected Planet Report 2014, 2021, published in Issue Lab (Candid)
  • Protected areas have a mixed impact on waterbirds, but management helps, 2022, published in Nature
  • Using the IUCN Red List to map threats to terrestrial vertebrates at global scale, 2021, published in Nature Ecology & Evolution
  • Evaluating Impact Using Time-Series Data, 2020, published in Trends in Ecology & Evolution
  • The positive impact of conservation action, 2024, published in Science

Their frequent co-authors include Andrew Balmford, Julia P. G. Jones, Carsten Rahbek, Johanna Eklund, and Mike Harfoot. These collaborators have partnered with Geldmann across numerous studies, contributing to the breadth of their research.

Jonas Geldmann's work has appeared often in several publication venues, especially:

  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • Biological Conservation
  • Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
  • Nature Ecology & Evolution
  • Conservation Letters

Best Publications

  • Effectiveness of terrestrial protected areas in reducing habitat loss and population declines

    Jonas Geldmann;Megan Barnes;Lauren Coad;Ian D. Craigie

  • Capacity shortfalls hinder the performance of marine protected areas globally

    David A. Gill;Michael B. Mascia;Gabby N. Ahmadia;Louise Glew

  • Protected Planet Report 2014

    D. Juffe-Bignoli;N.D. Burgess;H. Bingham;E.M.S. Belle

  • A global-level assessment of the effectiveness of protected areas at resisting anthropogenic pressures.

    Jonas Geldmann;Andrea Manica;Neil D Burgess;Lauren Coad

  • Shortfalls and Solutions for Meeting National and Global Conservation Area Targets

    Stuart H.M. Butchart;Martin Clarke;Robert J. Smith;Rachel E. Sykes

  • An assessment of threats to terrestrial protected areas

    Katharina Schulze;Katharina Schulze;Kathryn Knights;Lauren Coad;Lauren Coad;Lauren Coad;Jonas Geldmann;Jonas Geldmann

  • Protected areas have a mixed impact on waterbirds, but management helps

    Unknown

  • Filling in biodiversity threat gaps

    L. N. Joppa;B. O'Connor;P. Visconti;C. Smith

  • Widespread shortfalls in protected area resourcing undermine efforts to conserve biodiversity

    Lauren Coad;James E. M. Watson;James E. M. Watson;Jonas Geldmann;Neil D. Burgess;Neil D. Burgess

  • Mapping change in human pressure globally on land and within protected areas.

    Jonas Geldmann;Jonas Geldmann;Lucas N. Joppa;Lucas N. Joppa;Neil David Burgess;Neil David Burgess;Neil David Burgess

  • What determines spatial bias in citizen science? Exploring four recording schemes with different proficiency requirements

    Jonas Geldmann;Jacob Heilmann-Clausen;Thomas E. Holm;Irina Levinsky

  • Measuring impact of protected area management interventions: current and future use of the Global Database of Protected Area Management Effectiveness

    Lauren Coad;Fiona Leverington;Kathryn Knights;Jonas Geldmann

  • Changes in protected area management effectiveness over time: a global analysis

    Jonas Geldmann;Lauren Coad;Lauren Coad;Megan Barnes;Ian D. Craigie

  • Using the IUCN Red List to map threats to terrestrial vertebrates at global scale

    Michael B. J. Harfoot;Alison Johnston;Alison Johnston;Andrew Balmford;Neil D. Burgess;Neil D. Burgess;Neil D. Burgess

  • Wildlife population trends in protected areas predicted by national socio-economic metrics and body size.

    Megan D. Barnes;Ian D. Craigie;Luke B. Harrison;Jonas Geldmann;Jonas Geldmann

  • Conserving honey bees does not help wildlife.

    Jonas Geldmann;Juan P. González-Varo

  • A global analysis of management capacity and ecological outcomes in terrestrial protected areas

    Jonas Geldmann;Jonas Geldmann;Lauren Coad;Lauren Coad;Lauren Coad;Megan D. Barnes;Megan D. Barnes;Ian D. Craigie

  • Statistical matching for conservation science

    Judith Schleicher;Johanna Eklund;Megan D. Barnes;Jonas Geldmann

  • Commonalities and complementarities among approaches to conservation monitoring and evaluation

    Michael B. Mascia;Sharon Pailler;Michele L. Thieme;Andy Rowe

  • The positive impact of conservation action

    Unknown

  • Opportunities and challenges of other effective area-based conservation measures (OECMs) for biodiversity conservation

    Helena Alves-Pinto;Helena Alves-Pinto;Helena Alves-Pinto;Jonas Geldmann;Jonas Geldmann;Harry Jonas;Veronica Maioli;Veronica Maioli

  • PROGRESS TOWARDS THE CBD PROTECTED AREA MANAGEMENT EFFECTIVENESS TARGETS

    Lauren Coad;Fiona Leverington;Neil D. Burgess;Ivon C. Cuadros

  • A novel framework for analyzing conservation impacts: evaluation, theory, and marine protected areas

    Michael B. Mascia;Helen E. Fox;Louise Glew;Gabby N. Ahmadia

Frequent Co-Authors

Neil D. Burgess
Neil D. Burgess University of Copenhagen
Marc Hockings
Marc Hockings University of Queensland
Andrew Balmford
Andrew Balmford University of Cambridge
Thomas M. Brooks
Thomas M. Brooks International Union for Conservation of Nature
James E. M. Watson
James E. M. Watson University of Queensland
Tatsuya Amano
Tatsuya Amano University of Queensland
Stuart H. M. Butchart
Stuart H. M. Butchart BirdLife international, UK
Carsten Rahbek
Carsten Rahbek University of Copenhagen
Michael B. Mascia
Michael B. Mascia Duke University
Emily S. Darling
Emily S. Darling Wildlife Conservation Society

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For students interested in the wider spectrum of life and behavioral sciences, there is a growing range of online degree options that offer flexibility and career advancement. Fields such as speech-language pathology, nursing, and psychiatric care all offer online pathways catering to diverse backgrounds.

Those looking to enter speech-language pathology without a directly related undergraduate degree can consider speech pathology bridge programs, which are designed to help non-SLP majors transition smoothly into the field. If accreditation is a priority, programs that are asha approved online speech pathology programs ensure that curriculum and clinical experiences meet industry standards for licensure.

For students from non-nursing backgrounds, online accelerated nursing programs for non nurses provide a fast-track option to become registered nurses. For those considering advanced nursing careers, understanding earning potential as a psych np salary by state can guide your career choices.

These flexible online programs connect closely with ecology, evolution, and healthcare, offering interdisciplinary paths for growth and specialization.

Best Scientists Citing Jonas Geldmann

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles