World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Social Sciences and Humanities 49 2948 2701 1429 1290 148 9806

Michael Fendrich publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Michael Fendrich between 1984 and 2026, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Michael Fendrich published across 43 years, from 1984 to 2026, averaging 3.8 papers a year. Output peaked at 15 publications in 2021. 3 of the 164 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1984 to 2026. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 15. Peak 15 publications in 2021. 1984: 1 publication 1985: 0 publications 1986: 0 publications 1987: 0 publications 1988: 0 publications 1989: 0 publications 1990: 5 publications 1991: 2 publications 1992: 5 publications 1993: 1 publication 1994: 5 publications 1995: 4 publications 1996: 3 publications 1997: 4 publications 1998: 4 publications 1999: 6 publications 2000: 7 publications 2001: 3 publications 2002: 4 publications 2003: 6 publications 2004: 6 publications 2005: 6 publications 2006: 1 publication 2007: 4 publications 2008: 4 publications 2009: 6 publications 2010: 5 publications 2011: 2 publications 2012: 5 publications 2013: 4 publications 2014: 1 publication 2015: 1 publication 2016: 2 publications 2017: 5 publications 2018: 5 publications 2019: 6 publications 2020: 4 publications 2021: 15 publications 2022: 8 publications 2023: 4 publications 2024: 7 publications 2025: 2 publications 2026: 1 publication
1984 2026

164 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Michael Fendrich: publications per year, 1984 to 2026
Year Publications
1984 1
1985 0
1986 0
1987 0
1988 0
1989 0
1990 5
1991 2
1992 5
1993 1
1994 5
1995 4
1996 3
1997 4
1998 4
1999 6
2000 7
2001 3
2002 4
2003 6
2004 6
2005 6
2006 1
2007 4
2008 4
2009 6
2010 5
2011 2
2012 5
2013 4
2014 1
2015 1
2016 2
2017 5
2018 5
2019 6
2020 4
2021 15
2022 8
2023 4
2024 7
2025 2
2026 1
Total 164
Download as CSV

Michael Fendrich publication distribution in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Michael Fendrich sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400
Bar chart with 54 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 44–53 to 570+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 474. Most scientists, 474, have 114–123 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 144–153 publications, is where this scientist sits. 44–53 publications: 28 scientists 54–63 publications: 61 scientists 64–73 publications: 161 scientists 74–83 publications: 225 scientists 84–93 publications: 301 scientists 94–103 publications: 390 scientists 104–113 publications: 406 scientists 114–123 publications: 474 scientists 124–133 publications: 453 scientists 134–143 publications: 434 scientists 144–153 publications: 407 scientists 154–163 publications: 411 scientists 164–173 publications: 391 scientists 174–183 publications: 313 scientists 184–193 publications: 319 scientists 194–203 publications: 304 scientists 204–213 publications: 285 scientists 214–223 publications: 246 scientists 224–233 publications: 213 scientists 234–243 publications: 170 scientists 244–253 publications: 167 scientists 254–263 publications: 162 scientists 264–273 publications: 138 scientists 274–283 publications: 138 scientists 284–293 publications: 113 scientists 294–303 publications: 106 scientists 304–313 publications: 95 scientists 314–323 publications: 101 scientists 324–333 publications: 81 scientists 334–343 publications: 69 scientists 344–353 publications: 56 scientists 354–363 publications: 36 scientists 364–373 publications: 42 scientists 374–383 publications: 41 scientists 384–393 publications: 44 scientists 394–403 publications: 27 scientists 404–413 publications: 30 scientists 414–423 publications: 20 scientists 424–433 publications: 29 scientists 434–443 publications: 29 scientists 444–453 publications: 25 scientists 454–463 publications: 19 scientists 464–473 publications: 21 scientists 474–483 publications: 11 scientists 484–493 publications: 17 scientists 494–503 publications: 7 scientists 504–513 publications: 6 scientists 514–523 publications: 12 scientists 524–533 publications: 10 scientists 534–543 publications: 7 scientists 544–553 publications: 6 scientists 554–563 publications: 12 scientists 564–569 publications: 8 scientists 570+ publications: 100 scientists
44–53 publications 570+

This scientist: 148 publications — 40th percentile

40% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 7,777 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
44–53 28
54–63 61
64–73 161
74–83 225
84–93 301
94–103 390
104–113 406
114–123 474
124–133 453
134–143 434
144–153 407 148
154–163 411
164–173 391
174–183 313
184–193 319
194–203 304
204–213 285
214–223 246
224–233 213
234–243 170
244–253 167
254–263 162
264–273 138
274–283 138
284–293 113
294–303 106
304–313 95
314–323 101
324–333 81
334–343 69
344–353 56
354–363 36
364–373 42
374–383 41
384–393 44
394–403 27
404–413 30
414–423 20
424–433 29
434–443 29
444–453 25
454–463 19
464–473 21
474–483 11
484–493 17
494–503 7
504–513 6
514–523 12
524–533 10
534–543 7
544–553 6
554–563 12
564–569 8
570+ 100
Download as CSV

Michael Fendrich D-index placement in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Michael Fendrich sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300
Bar chart with 71 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 100+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 313. Most scientists, 313, have 42 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 49 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 177 scientists 31 D-Index: 210 scientists 32 D-Index: 222 scientists 33 D-Index: 188 scientists 34 D-Index: 181 scientists 35 D-Index: 243 scientists 36 D-Index: 261 scientists 37 D-Index: 272 scientists 38 D-Index: 278 scientists 39 D-Index: 300 scientists 40 D-Index: 297 scientists 41 D-Index: 308 scientists 42 D-Index: 313 scientists 43 D-Index: 300 scientists 44 D-Index: 269 scientists 45 D-Index: 260 scientists 46 D-Index: 228 scientists 47 D-Index: 251 scientists 48 D-Index: 203 scientists 49 D-Index: 186 scientists 50 D-Index: 187 scientists 51 D-Index: 166 scientists 52 D-Index: 138 scientists 53 D-Index: 141 scientists 54 D-Index: 131 scientists 55 D-Index: 137 scientists 56 D-Index: 109 scientists 57 D-Index: 129 scientists 58 D-Index: 95 scientists 59 D-Index: 105 scientists 60 D-Index: 106 scientists 61 D-Index: 86 scientists 62 D-Index: 94 scientists 63 D-Index: 77 scientists 64 D-Index: 79 scientists 65 D-Index: 59 scientists 66 D-Index: 68 scientists 67 D-Index: 51 scientists 68 D-Index: 49 scientists 69 D-Index: 40 scientists 70 D-Index: 43 scientists 71 D-Index: 40 scientists 72 D-Index: 50 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 43 scientists 75 D-Index: 45 scientists 76 D-Index: 45 scientists 77 D-Index: 30 scientists 78 D-Index: 25 scientists 79 D-Index: 31 scientists 80 D-Index: 29 scientists 81 D-Index: 18 scientists 82 D-Index: 21 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 15 scientists 85 D-Index: 15 scientists 86 D-Index: 19 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 12 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 19 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 13 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 8 scientists 96 D-Index: 7 scientists 97 D-Index: 6 scientists 98 D-Index: 6 scientists 99 D-Index: 6 scientists 100+ D-Index: 97 scientists
30 D-Index 100+

This scientist: 49 D-Index — 64th percentile

64% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 7,777 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 177
31 210
32 222
33 188
34 181
35 243
36 261
37 272
38 278
39 300
40 297
41 308
42 313
43 300
44 269
45 260
46 228
47 251
48 203
49 186 49
50 187
51 166
52 138
53 141
54 131
55 137
56 109
57 129
58 95
59 105
60 106
61 86
62 94
63 77
64 79
65 59
66 68
67 51
68 49
69 40
70 43
71 40
72 50
73 46
74 43
75 45
76 45
77 30
78 25
79 31
80 29
81 18
82 21
83 26
84 15
85 15
86 19
87 19
88 12
89 7
90 19
91 20
92 13
93 9
94 13
95 8
96 7
97 6
98 6
99 6
100+ 97
Download as CSV

Overview

Michael Fendrich is affiliated with the University of Connecticut in the United States and specializes primarily in the field of psychology. Their research focus spans several subfields, notably clinical psychology, general health professions, social psychology, epidemiology, and public health, environmental, and occupational health.

Their work addresses diverse topics related to mental health and psychosocial development. Key areas of study include COVID-19 and mental health, child and adolescent psychosocial and emotional development, psychological well-being and life satisfaction, resilience and mental health, substance abuse treatment and outcomes, digital mental health interventions, and posttraumatic stress disorder research.

Frequent coauthors contributing alongside Fendrich include:

  • Crystal L. Park
  • Beth S. Russell
  • Jessica Becker
  • Morica Hutchison
  • Lucy Finkelstein-Fox

Publications commonly appear in several venues, with multiple contributions to "Innovation in Aging," "Psychological Trauma Theory Research Practice and Policy," "Journal of Social Work Practice in the Addictions," "PsycEXTRA Dataset," and "Journal of General Internal Medicine."

Selected recent papers authored or coauthored by Michael Fendrich include:

  • "Americans' COVID-19 Stress, Coping, and Adherence to CDC Guidelines" (2020) published in Journal of General Internal Medicine
  • "Psychological resilience early in the COVID-19 pandemic: Stressors, resources, and coping strategies in a national sample of Americans." (2021) published in American Psychologist
  • "Americans' distress early in the COVID-19 pandemic: Protective resources and coping strategies." (2021) published in Psychological Trauma Theory Research Practice and Policy
  • "Measuring Cumulative Stressfulness: Psychometric Properties of the COVID-19 Stressors Scale" (2020) published in Health Education & Behavior
  • "Lessons learned for recruitment and retention of low-income African Americans" (2020) published in Contemporary Clinical Trials Communications

Best Publications

  • A Longitudinal Assessment of Teacher Perceptions of Parent Involvement in Children's Education and School Performance

    Charles V. Izzo;Roger P. Weissberg;Wesley J. Kasprow;Michael Fendrich

  • Americans' COVID-19 Stress, Coping, and Adherence to CDC Guidelines.

    Crystal L. Park;Beth S. Russell;Michael Fendrich;Lucy Finkelstein-Fox

  • Family risk factors, parental depression, and psychopathology in offspring.

    Michael Fendrich;Virginia Warner;Myrna M. Weissman

  • Screening for depressive disorder in children and adolescents: validating the Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale for Children.

    Michael Fendrich;Myrna M. Weissman;Virginia Warner

  • Sexual harassment and generalized workplace abuse among university employees: prevalence and mental health correlates.

    Judith A. Richman;Kathleen M. Rospenda;Stephanie J. Nawyn;Joseph A. Flaherty

  • Modeling sources of self-report bias in a survey of drug use epidemiology.

    Timothy Johnson;Michael Fendrich

  • Incidence of psychiatric disorder in offspring at high and low risk for depression.

    Myrna M. Weissman;Michael Fendrich;Virginia Warner;Priya Wickramaratne

  • The utility of drug testing in epidemiological research: results from a general population survey

    Michael Fendrich;Timothy P. Johnson;Joseph S. Wislar;Amy Hubbell

  • The course of major depression in the offspring of depressed parents. Incidence, recurrence, and recovery.

    Virginia Warner;M. Weissman;Michael Fendrich;Priya Wickramaratne

  • DIMINISHED LIFETIME SUBSTANCE USE OVER TIME: AN INQUIRY INTO DIFFERENTIAL UNDERREPORTING

    Michael Fendrich;Connie M. Vaughn

  • Validity of Drug Use Reporting in a High-Risk Community Sample: A Comparison of Cocaine and Heroin Survey Reports with Hair Tests

    Michael Fendrich;Timothy P. Johnson;Seymour Sudman;Joseph S. Wislar

  • Tobacco-reporting validity in an epidemiological drug-use survey.

    Michael Fendrich;Mary Ellen Mackesy-Amiti;Timothy P. Johnson;Amy Hubbell

  • A Longitudinal Examination of Familial Risk Factors for Depression Among Inner-City African American Adolescents

    Lynda M. Sagrestano;Roberta L. Paikoff;Grayson N. Holmbeck;Michael Fendrich

  • Sociodemographic correlates of energy drink consumption with and without alcohol: Results of a community survey

    Lisa K. Berger;Michael Fendrich;Han-Yang Chen;Amelia M. Arria

  • Children's ability to delay gratification : Longitudinal relations to mother-child attachment

    Teresa Jacobsen;Michael Huss;Michael Fendrich;Markus J. P. Kruesi

  • Sequence of drug use among serious drug users: typical vs atypical progression.

    Mary Ellen Mackesy-Amiti;Michael Fendrich;Paul J. Goldstein

  • The validity of drug use reports from juvenile arrestees.

    Michael Fendrich;Yanchun Xu

  • The applicability of the theory of planned behavior to abusive men's cessation of violent behavior

    Richard M. Tolman;Jeffrey L. Edleson;Michael Fendrich

  • A contextual profile of club drug use among adults in Chicago.

    Michael Fendrich;Joseph S. Wislar;Timothy P. Johnson;Amy Hubbell

  • Psychological resilience early in the COVID-19 pandemic: Stressors, resources, and coping strategies in a national sample of Americans.

    Crystal L Park;Lucy Finkelstein-Fox;Beth S Russell;Michael Fendrich

  • Depression, Substance Use and HIV Risk in a Probability Sample of Men who Have Sex with Men

    Michael Fendrich;Ozgur Avci;Timothy P. Johnson;Mary Ellen Mackesy-Amiti

Frequent Co-Authors

Timothy P. Johnson
Timothy P. Johnson University of Illinois at Chicago
Virginia Warner
Virginia Warner Columbia University
Myrna M. Weissman
Myrna M. Weissman Columbia University
Crystal L. Park
Crystal L. Park University of Connecticut
Judith A. Richman
Judith A. Richman University of Illinois at Chicago
Lance M. Pollack
Lance M. Pollack University of California, San Francisco
Carol Estwing Ferrans
Carol Estwing Ferrans University of Illinois at Chicago
Laura Mufson
Laura Mufson Columbia University
Norah C. Feeny
Norah C. Feeny Case Western Reserve University
Eileen M. Martin
Eileen M. Martin Rush University Medical Center

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring a Social Sciences or Humanities path in the USA opens doors to flexible online degrees and diverse careers. Many students begin with an online psychology degree, providing foundational knowledge for roles in counseling, human services, or research fields.

For those aiming to become licensed social workers, the msw (Master of Social Work) is a popular and accessible graduate choice. These programs often offer flexible admission requirements and can be completed remotely, making them ideal for working adults.

If you’re interested in pursuing advanced clinical roles, consider the cheapest psyd programs available online. These programs are designed for those seeking clinical psychologist licensure, focusing on practical training and affordability.

Another fast-growing area is marriage and family therapy. The online masters mft (Marriage and Family Therapy) allows students to quickly gain skills and credentials to work with couples and families, often with accelerated timelines to graduation.

Best Scientists Citing Michael Fendrich

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles