World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking National Ranking Publications Citations
Social Sciences and Humanities 83 316 144 414 21095
Medicine 82 16299 8195 408 20548

Bonita Stanton publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Bonita Stanton between 1982 and 2024, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Bonita Stanton published across 43 years, from 1982 to 2024, averaging 10.2 papers a year. Output peaked at 34 publications in 2015. 1 of the 438 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
10 20 30
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1982 to 2024. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 34. Peak 34 publications in 2015. 1982: 1 publication 1983: 0 publications 1984: 2 publications 1985: 0 publications 1986: 1 publication 1987: 4 publications 1988: 1 publication 1989: 1 publication 1990: 0 publications 1991: 0 publications 1992: 2 publications 1993: 7 publications 1994: 8 publications 1995: 6 publications 1996: 9 publications 1997: 5 publications 1998: 4 publications 1999: 5 publications 2000: 6 publications 2001: 5 publications 2002: 5 publications 2003: 10 publications 2004: 13 publications 2005: 26 publications 2006: 21 publications 2007: 32 publications 2008: 20 publications 2009: 26 publications 2010: 22 publications 2011: 28 publications 2012: 20 publications 2013: 17 publications 2014: 22 publications 2015: 34 publications 2016: 14 publications 2017: 13 publications 2018: 14 publications 2019: 10 publications 2020: 9 publications 2021: 10 publications 2022: 4 publications 2023: 0 publications 2024: 1 publication
1982 2024

438 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Bonita Stanton: publications per year, 1982 to 2024
Year Publications
1982 1
1983 0
1984 2
1985 0
1986 1
1987 4
1988 1
1989 1
1990 0
1991 0
1992 2
1993 7
1994 8
1995 6
1996 9
1997 5
1998 4
1999 5
2000 6
2001 5
2002 5
2003 10
2004 13
2005 26
2006 21
2007 32
2008 20
2009 26
2010 22
2011 28
2012 20
2013 17
2014 22
2015 34
2016 14
2017 13
2018 14
2019 10
2020 9
2021 10
2022 4
2023 0
2024 1
Total 438
Download as CSV

Bonita Stanton publications per year - data summary

  • Bonita Stanton, a Social Sciences and Humanities scholar from Seton Hall University, has 438 publications recorded across 43 years, from 1982 to 2024.
  • The oldest publication on record dates to 1982 and the most recent to 2024.
  • The most productive year is 2015, with 34 publications.
  • The least productive years with any output are 1982, 1986, 1988, 1989 and others, with 1 publication each.
  • 5 of the 43 years in the span carry no publications at all (1983, 1985, 1990, 1991 and others).
  • The rate of publication averages 10.2 papers per year over the whole span, or 11.5 per year counting only the 38 years with at least one publication.
  • The last 5 years on the chart (2020-2024) hold 24 publications, 5% of the career total.
  • Split into equal eras - 1982-1996: 42 publications (2.8 per year); 1997-2011: 228 publications (15.2 per year); 2012-2024: 168 publications (12.9 per year).
  • Comparing the opening and closing eras, the overall trend of publication is rising.

Bonita Stanton publication distribution in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Bonita Stanton sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400
Bar chart with 54 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 44–53 to 570+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 474. Most scientists, 474, have 114–123 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 414–423 publications, is where this scientist sits. 44–53 publications: 28 scientists 54–63 publications: 61 scientists 64–73 publications: 161 scientists 74–83 publications: 225 scientists 84–93 publications: 301 scientists 94–103 publications: 390 scientists 104–113 publications: 406 scientists 114–123 publications: 474 scientists 124–133 publications: 453 scientists 134–143 publications: 434 scientists 144–153 publications: 407 scientists 154–163 publications: 411 scientists 164–173 publications: 391 scientists 174–183 publications: 313 scientists 184–193 publications: 319 scientists 194–203 publications: 304 scientists 204–213 publications: 285 scientists 214–223 publications: 246 scientists 224–233 publications: 213 scientists 234–243 publications: 170 scientists 244–253 publications: 167 scientists 254–263 publications: 162 scientists 264–273 publications: 138 scientists 274–283 publications: 138 scientists 284–293 publications: 113 scientists 294–303 publications: 106 scientists 304–313 publications: 95 scientists 314–323 publications: 101 scientists 324–333 publications: 81 scientists 334–343 publications: 69 scientists 344–353 publications: 56 scientists 354–363 publications: 36 scientists 364–373 publications: 42 scientists 374–383 publications: 41 scientists 384–393 publications: 44 scientists 394–403 publications: 27 scientists 404–413 publications: 30 scientists 414–423 publications: 20 scientists 424–433 publications: 29 scientists 434–443 publications: 29 scientists 444–453 publications: 25 scientists 454–463 publications: 19 scientists 464–473 publications: 21 scientists 474–483 publications: 11 scientists 484–493 publications: 17 scientists 494–503 publications: 7 scientists 504–513 publications: 6 scientists 514–523 publications: 12 scientists 524–533 publications: 10 scientists 534–543 publications: 7 scientists 544–553 publications: 6 scientists 554–563 publications: 12 scientists 564–569 publications: 8 scientists 570+ publications: 100 scientists
44–53 publications 570+

This scientist: 414 publications — 96th percentile

96% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 7,777 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
44–53 28
54–63 61
64–73 161
74–83 225
84–93 301
94–103 390
104–113 406
114–123 474
124–133 453
134–143 434
144–153 407
154–163 411
164–173 391
174–183 313
184–193 319
194–203 304
204–213 285
214–223 246
224–233 213
234–243 170
244–253 167
254–263 162
264–273 138
274–283 138
284–293 113
294–303 106
304–313 95
314–323 101
324–333 81
334–343 69
344–353 56
354–363 36
364–373 42
374–383 41
384–393 44
394–403 27
404–413 30
414–423 20 414
424–433 29
434–443 29
444–453 25
454–463 19
464–473 21
474–483 11
484–493 17
494–503 7
504–513 6
514–523 12
524–533 10
534–543 7
544–553 6
554–563 12
564–569 8
570+ 100
Download as CSV

Bonita Stanton publication distribution in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026 - data summary

  • The chart plots the publication count of all 7,777 Social Sciences and Humanities scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026, grouped into 54 ranges running from 44–53 to 570+ publications.
  • Bonita Stanton, a Social Sciences and Humanities scholar from Seton Hall University, records 414 publications - the 96th percentile of the discipline.
  • 96% of ranked Social Sciences and Humanities scientists score the same or lower than Bonita Stanton, and about 4% score higher.
  • The median of the discipline falls in the 164–173 publications range, and Bonita Stanton ranks above the median.
  • The most crowded range is 114–123 publications, holding 474 scientists (6% of the field).
  • 57% of the field sits in the lowest quarter of the value range (up to 174–183 publications), so the distribution is heavily right-skewed and high scores are rare.
  • The final bar has no upper bound: it groups every scientist with 570 publications or more, 100 scientists in all (1% of the field).

Bonita Stanton D-index placement in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Bonita Stanton sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300
Bar chart with 71 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 100+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 313. Most scientists, 313, have 42 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 83 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 177 scientists 31 D-Index: 210 scientists 32 D-Index: 222 scientists 33 D-Index: 188 scientists 34 D-Index: 181 scientists 35 D-Index: 243 scientists 36 D-Index: 261 scientists 37 D-Index: 272 scientists 38 D-Index: 278 scientists 39 D-Index: 300 scientists 40 D-Index: 297 scientists 41 D-Index: 308 scientists 42 D-Index: 313 scientists 43 D-Index: 300 scientists 44 D-Index: 269 scientists 45 D-Index: 260 scientists 46 D-Index: 228 scientists 47 D-Index: 251 scientists 48 D-Index: 203 scientists 49 D-Index: 186 scientists 50 D-Index: 187 scientists 51 D-Index: 166 scientists 52 D-Index: 138 scientists 53 D-Index: 141 scientists 54 D-Index: 131 scientists 55 D-Index: 137 scientists 56 D-Index: 109 scientists 57 D-Index: 129 scientists 58 D-Index: 95 scientists 59 D-Index: 105 scientists 60 D-Index: 106 scientists 61 D-Index: 86 scientists 62 D-Index: 94 scientists 63 D-Index: 77 scientists 64 D-Index: 79 scientists 65 D-Index: 59 scientists 66 D-Index: 68 scientists 67 D-Index: 51 scientists 68 D-Index: 49 scientists 69 D-Index: 40 scientists 70 D-Index: 43 scientists 71 D-Index: 40 scientists 72 D-Index: 50 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 43 scientists 75 D-Index: 45 scientists 76 D-Index: 45 scientists 77 D-Index: 30 scientists 78 D-Index: 25 scientists 79 D-Index: 31 scientists 80 D-Index: 29 scientists 81 D-Index: 18 scientists 82 D-Index: 21 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 15 scientists 85 D-Index: 15 scientists 86 D-Index: 19 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 12 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 19 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 13 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 8 scientists 96 D-Index: 7 scientists 97 D-Index: 6 scientists 98 D-Index: 6 scientists 99 D-Index: 6 scientists 100+ D-Index: 97 scientists
30 D-Index 100+

This scientist: 83 D-Index — 96th percentile

96% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 7,777 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 177
31 210
32 222
33 188
34 181
35 243
36 261
37 272
38 278
39 300
40 297
41 308
42 313
43 300
44 269
45 260
46 228
47 251
48 203
49 186
50 187
51 166
52 138
53 141
54 131
55 137
56 109
57 129
58 95
59 105
60 106
61 86
62 94
63 77
64 79
65 59
66 68
67 51
68 49
69 40
70 43
71 40
72 50
73 46
74 43
75 45
76 45
77 30
78 25
79 31
80 29
81 18
82 21
83 26 83
84 15
85 15
86 19
87 19
88 12
89 7
90 19
91 20
92 13
93 9
94 13
95 8
96 7
97 6
98 6
99 6
100+ 97
Download as CSV

Bonita Stanton D-index placement in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026 - data summary

  • The chart plots the discipline H-index (D-index) of all 7,777 Social Sciences and Humanities scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026, grouped into 71 ranges running from 30 to 100+ D-Index.
  • Bonita Stanton, a Social Sciences and Humanities scholar from Seton Hall University, records 83 D-Index - the 96th percentile of the discipline.
  • 96% of ranked Social Sciences and Humanities scientists score the same or lower than Bonita Stanton, and about 4% score higher.
  • The median of the discipline falls in the 45 D-Index range, and Bonita Stanton ranks above the median.
  • The most crowded range is 42 D-Index, holding 313 scientists (4% of the field).
  • 59% of the field sits in the lowest quarter of the value range (up to 47 D-Index), so the distribution is heavily right-skewed and high scores are rare.
  • The final bar has no upper bound: it groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more, 97 scientists in all (1% of the field).

Overview

Bonita Stanton was affiliated with Seton Hall University in the United States. Their research focused primarily on health professions and medicine, with a prominent emphasis on general health professions and public health, environmental and occupational health. They contributed notably to pediatrics, perinatology and child health as well as clinical psychology and speech and hearing subfields.

Their work addressed a variety of specific topics, including:

  • Health Policy Implementation Science
  • Community Health and Development
  • Food Security and Health in Diverse Populations
  • Adolescent Sexual and Reproductive Health
  • HIV/AIDS Research and Interventions
  • Mobile Health and mHealth Applications
  • School Health and Nursing Education

Stanton published extensively, with frequent contributions to certain journals and venues. The major publication venues included:

  • Pediatric Clinics of North America
  • Academic Medicine
  • UNC Libraries
  • AIDS and Behavior
  • AIDS

Significant papers authored or coauthored by Stanton included:

  • Global Burden of Violence, 2021, Pediatric Clinics of North America
  • Medical Students on the Virtual Front Line: A Literature Review Elective to Provide COVID-19 Clinical Teams With Essential Information, 2021, Academic Medicine

In the broader collaborative network, Stanton worked frequently with several coauthors:

  • Xiaoming Li
  • Lynette Deveaux
  • Richard Adderley
  • Sharon Marshall
  • Nikkiah Forbes

Their research included advances in HIV prevention strategies, as reflected in related publications by coauthors, aligning with Stanton's interest in adolescent and community health. The work encompassed a combination of behavioral, clinical, and policy-related health issues, often integrating implementation science perspectives.

Best Publications

  • Impact of perceived parental monitoring on adolescent risk behavior over 4 years

    Xiaoming Li;Bonita Stanton;Susan Feigelman

  • Social influences on the sexual behavior of youth at risk for HIV exposure.

    Daniel Romer;Maureen Black;Izabel Ricardo;Susan Feigelman

  • Perceived parental monitoring and health risk behaviors among urban low-income African-American children and adolescents

    Xiaoming Li;Susan Feigelman;Bonita Stanton

  • Relative influences of perceived parental monitoring and perceived peer involvement on adolescent risk behaviors: an analysis of six cross-sectional data sets.

    Alia A Rai;Bonita Stanton;Ying Wu;Xiaoming Li

  • Parental Influence on Adolescent Sexual Behavior in High-Poverty Settings

    Daniel Romer;Bonita Stanton;Jennifer Galbraith;Susan Feigelman

  • HIV/Std Risk Behaviors and Perceptions Among Rural-to-Urban Migrants in China

    Xiaoming Li;Xiaoyi Fang;Danhua Lin;Rong Mao

  • A Randomized, Controlled Effectiveness Trial of an AIDS Prevention Program for Low-Income African-American Youths

    Bonita F. Stanton;Xiaoming Li;Izabel Ricardo;Jennifer Galbraith

  • Parental underestimates of adolescent risk behavior: a randomized, controlled trial of a parental monitoring intervention

    Bonita F Stanton;Xiaoming Li;Jennifer Galbraith;George Cornick

  • Effectiveness of the 40 adolescent AIDS-risk reduction interventions: A quantitative review

    Nina Kim;Bonita Stanton;X Li;Kay Dickersin

  • Heterosexual transmission of HIV in China: a systematic review of behavioral studies in the past two decades.

    Hongmei Yang;Xiaoming Li;Bonita Stanton;Hongjie Liu

  • Randomized Trial of a Parent Intervention: Parents Can Make a Difference in Long-term Adolescent Risk Behaviors, Perceptions, and Knowledge

    Bonita Stanton;Matthew Cole;Jennifer Galbraith;Xiaoming Li

  • Personal Social Capital Scale: an instrument for health and behavioral research

    X. Chen;B. Stanton;J. Gong;X. Fang

  • Alcohol use among female sex workers and male clients: an integrative review of global literature

    Qing Li;Xiaoming Li;Bonita Stanton

  • Social stigma and mental health among rural-to-urban migrants in China: A conceptual framework and future research needs.

    Xiaoming Li;Bonita Stanton;Xiaoyi Fang;Danhua Lin

  • Longitudinal influence of perceptions of peer and parental factors on African American adolescent risk involvement.

    Bonita Stanton;Xiaoming Li;Robert Pack;Lesley Cottrell

  • A Controlled Evaluation of the Risk of Bacterial Endocarditis in Persons with Mitral-Valve Prolapse

    John D. Clemens;Ralph I. Horwitz;C. Carl Jaffe;Alvan R. Feinstein

  • The influence of social stigma and discriminatory experience on psychological distress and quality of life among rural-to-urban migrants in China

    Bo Wang;Xiaoming Li;Bonita Stanton;Xiaoyi Fang

  • AN EDUCATIONAL INTERVENTION FOR ALTERING WATER-SANITATION BEHAVIORS TO REDUCE CHILDHOOD DIARRHEA IN URBAN BANGLADESH II. A RANDOMIZED TRIAL TO ASSESS THE IMPACT OF THE INTERVENTION ON HYGIENIC BEHAVIORS AND RATES OF DIARRHEA

    Bonita F. Stanton;John D. Clemens

  • Sustaining and Broadening Intervention Impact: A Longitudinal Randomized Trial of 3 Adolescent Risk Reduction Approaches

    Ying Wu;Bonita F. Stanton;Jennifer Galbraith;Linda Kaljee

  • Discrimination, perceived social inequity, and mental health among rural-to-urban migrants in China.

    Danhua Lin;Xiaoming Li;Bo Wang;Yan Hong

  • Parent and Adolescent Perceptions of Parental Monitoring and Adolescent Risk Involvement

    Lesley Cottrell;Xiaoming Li;Carole Harris;Dawn D'Alessandri

  • Increased protected sex and abstinence among Namibian youth following a HIV risk-reduction intervention: a randomized, longitudinal study

    Bonita F. Stanton;Xiaoming Li;Joshua Kahihuata;Ann M. Fitzgerald

Frequent Co-Authors

Xiaoyi Fang
Xiaoyi Fang Beijing Normal University
Xinguang Chen
Xinguang Chen University of Florida
Danhua Lin
Danhua Lin Beijing Normal University
Daniel Romer
Daniel Romer University of Pennsylvania
Michael P. Carey
Michael P. Carey Brown University
John D. Clemens
John D. Clemens University of California, Los Angeles
Peter A. Vanable
Peter A. Vanable Syracuse University
Robert F. Valois
Robert F. Valois University of South Carolina
Ralph J. DiClemente
Ralph J. DiClemente New York University
Larry K. Brown
Larry K. Brown Brown University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Social Sciences and Humanities can lead to diverse and fulfilling careers. For students drawn to counseling, consider cacrep accredited programs that ensure high educational standards for future counselors.

Those interested in supporting couples and families might pursue an online master's degree in marriage and family therapy. These programs emphasize communication, relationship dynamics, and mental well-being.

Psychology remains a popular path, with many students seeking flexible and affordable options. Discover the most affordable online schools for psychology to find a program that fits your needs and budget.

Social work is another growing field. For those aiming to complete a Master of Social Work quickly—especially without a Bachelor of Social Work—look into 1 year msw programs online no bsw.

Each of these pathways offers unique opportunities to make a difference, whether through research, advocacy, or direct support. Online programs bring added flexibility, making it easier to balance education, work, and life.

Best Scientists Citing Bonita Stanton

Recently Published Articles