World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Social Sciences and Humanities

D-Index
83
Citations
21095
World Ranking
316
National Ranking
144

Medicine

D-Index
82
Citations
20548
World Ranking
16299
National Ranking
8195

Bonita Stanton publication distribution in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Bonita Stanton sits on this spectrum.

44–53 publications: 28 scientists 54–63 publications: 61 scientists 64–73 publications: 161 scientists 74–83 publications: 225 scientists 84–93 publications: 301 scientists 94–103 publications: 390 scientists 104–113 publications: 406 scientists 114–123 publications: 474 scientists 124–133 publications: 453 scientists 134–143 publications: 434 scientists 144–153 publications: 407 scientists 154–163 publications: 411 scientists 164–173 publications: 391 scientists 174–183 publications: 313 scientists 184–193 publications: 319 scientists 194–203 publications: 304 scientists 204–213 publications: 285 scientists 214–223 publications: 246 scientists 224–233 publications: 213 scientists 234–243 publications: 170 scientists 244–253 publications: 167 scientists 254–263 publications: 162 scientists 264–273 publications: 138 scientists 274–283 publications: 138 scientists 284–293 publications: 113 scientists 294–303 publications: 106 scientists 304–313 publications: 95 scientists 314–323 publications: 101 scientists 324–333 publications: 81 scientists 334–343 publications: 69 scientists 344–353 publications: 56 scientists 354–363 publications: 36 scientists 364–373 publications: 42 scientists 374–383 publications: 41 scientists 384–393 publications: 44 scientists 394–403 publications: 27 scientists 404–413 publications: 30 scientists 414–423 publications: 20 scientists 424–433 publications: 29 scientists 434–443 publications: 29 scientists 444–453 publications: 25 scientists 454–463 publications: 19 scientists 464–473 publications: 21 scientists 474–483 publications: 11 scientists 484–493 publications: 17 scientists 494–503 publications: 7 scientists 504–513 publications: 6 scientists 514–523 publications: 12 scientists 524–533 publications: 10 scientists 534–543 publications: 7 scientists 544–553 publications: 6 scientists 554–563 publications: 12 scientists 564–569 publications: 8 scientists 570+ publications: 100 scientists
44 publications 570+

This scientist: 414 publications — 96th percentile

96% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more.

Bonita Stanton D-index placement in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Bonita Stanton sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 177 scientists 31 D-Index: 210 scientists 32 D-Index: 222 scientists 33 D-Index: 188 scientists 34 D-Index: 181 scientists 35 D-Index: 243 scientists 36 D-Index: 261 scientists 37 D-Index: 272 scientists 38 D-Index: 278 scientists 39 D-Index: 300 scientists 40 D-Index: 297 scientists 41 D-Index: 308 scientists 42 D-Index: 313 scientists 43 D-Index: 300 scientists 44 D-Index: 269 scientists 45 D-Index: 260 scientists 46 D-Index: 228 scientists 47 D-Index: 251 scientists 48 D-Index: 203 scientists 49 D-Index: 186 scientists 50 D-Index: 187 scientists 51 D-Index: 166 scientists 52 D-Index: 138 scientists 53 D-Index: 141 scientists 54 D-Index: 131 scientists 55 D-Index: 137 scientists 56 D-Index: 109 scientists 57 D-Index: 129 scientists 58 D-Index: 95 scientists 59 D-Index: 105 scientists 60 D-Index: 106 scientists 61 D-Index: 86 scientists 62 D-Index: 94 scientists 63 D-Index: 77 scientists 64 D-Index: 79 scientists 65 D-Index: 59 scientists 66 D-Index: 68 scientists 67 D-Index: 51 scientists 68 D-Index: 49 scientists 69 D-Index: 40 scientists 70 D-Index: 43 scientists 71 D-Index: 40 scientists 72 D-Index: 50 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 43 scientists 75 D-Index: 45 scientists 76 D-Index: 45 scientists 77 D-Index: 30 scientists 78 D-Index: 25 scientists 79 D-Index: 31 scientists 80 D-Index: 29 scientists 81 D-Index: 18 scientists 82 D-Index: 21 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 15 scientists 85 D-Index: 15 scientists 86 D-Index: 19 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 12 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 19 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 13 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 8 scientists 96 D-Index: 7 scientists 97 D-Index: 6 scientists 98 D-Index: 6 scientists 99 D-Index: 6 scientists 100+ D-Index: 97 scientists
30 D-Index 100+

This scientist: 83 D-Index — 96th percentile

96% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more.

Overview

Bonita Stanton was affiliated with Seton Hall University in the United States. Their research focused primarily on health professions and medicine, with a prominent emphasis on general health professions and public health, environmental and occupational health. They contributed notably to pediatrics, perinatology and child health as well as clinical psychology and speech and hearing subfields.

Their work addressed a variety of specific topics, including:

  • Health Policy Implementation Science
  • Community Health and Development
  • Food Security and Health in Diverse Populations
  • Adolescent Sexual and Reproductive Health
  • HIV/AIDS Research and Interventions
  • Mobile Health and mHealth Applications
  • School Health and Nursing Education

Stanton published extensively, with frequent contributions to certain journals and venues. The major publication venues included:

  • Pediatric Clinics of North America
  • Academic Medicine
  • UNC Libraries
  • AIDS and Behavior
  • AIDS

Significant papers authored or coauthored by Stanton included:

  • Global Burden of Violence, 2021, Pediatric Clinics of North America
  • Medical Students on the Virtual Front Line: A Literature Review Elective to Provide COVID-19 Clinical Teams With Essential Information, 2021, Academic Medicine

In the broader collaborative network, Stanton worked frequently with several coauthors:

  • Xiaoming Li
  • Lynette Deveaux
  • Richard Adderley
  • Sharon Marshall
  • Nikkiah Forbes

Their research included advances in HIV prevention strategies, as reflected in related publications by coauthors, aligning with Stanton's interest in adolescent and community health. The work encompassed a combination of behavioral, clinical, and policy-related health issues, often integrating implementation science perspectives.

Best Publications

  • Impact of perceived parental monitoring on adolescent risk behavior over 4 years

    Xiaoming Li;Bonita Stanton;Susan Feigelman

  • Social influences on the sexual behavior of youth at risk for HIV exposure.

    Daniel Romer;Maureen Black;Izabel Ricardo;Susan Feigelman

  • Perceived parental monitoring and health risk behaviors among urban low-income African-American children and adolescents

    Xiaoming Li;Susan Feigelman;Bonita Stanton

  • Relative influences of perceived parental monitoring and perceived peer involvement on adolescent risk behaviors: an analysis of six cross-sectional data sets.

    Alia A Rai;Bonita Stanton;Ying Wu;Xiaoming Li

  • Parental Influence on Adolescent Sexual Behavior in High-Poverty Settings

    Daniel Romer;Bonita Stanton;Jennifer Galbraith;Susan Feigelman

  • HIV/Std Risk Behaviors and Perceptions Among Rural-to-Urban Migrants in China

    Xiaoming Li;Xiaoyi Fang;Danhua Lin;Rong Mao

  • A Randomized, Controlled Effectiveness Trial of an AIDS Prevention Program for Low-Income African-American Youths

    Bonita F. Stanton;Xiaoming Li;Izabel Ricardo;Jennifer Galbraith

  • Parental underestimates of adolescent risk behavior: a randomized, controlled trial of a parental monitoring intervention

    Bonita F Stanton;Xiaoming Li;Jennifer Galbraith;George Cornick

  • Effectiveness of the 40 adolescent AIDS-risk reduction interventions: A quantitative review

    Nina Kim;Bonita Stanton;X Li;Kay Dickersin

  • Heterosexual transmission of HIV in China: a systematic review of behavioral studies in the past two decades.

    Hongmei Yang;Xiaoming Li;Bonita Stanton;Hongjie Liu

  • Randomized Trial of a Parent Intervention: Parents Can Make a Difference in Long-term Adolescent Risk Behaviors, Perceptions, and Knowledge

    Bonita Stanton;Matthew Cole;Jennifer Galbraith;Xiaoming Li

  • Personal Social Capital Scale: an instrument for health and behavioral research

    X. Chen;B. Stanton;J. Gong;X. Fang

  • Alcohol use among female sex workers and male clients: an integrative review of global literature

    Qing Li;Xiaoming Li;Bonita Stanton

  • Social stigma and mental health among rural-to-urban migrants in China: A conceptual framework and future research needs.

    Xiaoming Li;Bonita Stanton;Xiaoyi Fang;Danhua Lin

  • Longitudinal influence of perceptions of peer and parental factors on African American adolescent risk involvement.

    Bonita Stanton;Xiaoming Li;Robert Pack;Lesley Cottrell

  • A Controlled Evaluation of the Risk of Bacterial Endocarditis in Persons with Mitral-Valve Prolapse

    John D. Clemens;Ralph I. Horwitz;C. Carl Jaffe;Alvan R. Feinstein

  • The influence of social stigma and discriminatory experience on psychological distress and quality of life among rural-to-urban migrants in China

    Bo Wang;Xiaoming Li;Bonita Stanton;Xiaoyi Fang

  • AN EDUCATIONAL INTERVENTION FOR ALTERING WATER-SANITATION BEHAVIORS TO REDUCE CHILDHOOD DIARRHEA IN URBAN BANGLADESH II. A RANDOMIZED TRIAL TO ASSESS THE IMPACT OF THE INTERVENTION ON HYGIENIC BEHAVIORS AND RATES OF DIARRHEA

    Bonita F. Stanton;John D. Clemens

  • Sustaining and Broadening Intervention Impact: A Longitudinal Randomized Trial of 3 Adolescent Risk Reduction Approaches

    Ying Wu;Bonita F. Stanton;Jennifer Galbraith;Linda Kaljee

  • Discrimination, perceived social inequity, and mental health among rural-to-urban migrants in China.

    Danhua Lin;Xiaoming Li;Bo Wang;Yan Hong

  • Parent and Adolescent Perceptions of Parental Monitoring and Adolescent Risk Involvement

    Lesley Cottrell;Xiaoming Li;Carole Harris;Dawn D'Alessandri

  • Increased protected sex and abstinence among Namibian youth following a HIV risk-reduction intervention: a randomized, longitudinal study

    Bonita F. Stanton;Xiaoming Li;Joshua Kahihuata;Ann M. Fitzgerald

Frequent Co-Authors

Xiaoyi Fang
Xiaoyi Fang Beijing Normal University
Xinguang Chen
Xinguang Chen University of Florida
Danhua Lin
Danhua Lin Beijing Normal University
Daniel Romer
Daniel Romer University of Pennsylvania
Michael P. Carey
Michael P. Carey Brown University
John D. Clemens
John D. Clemens University of California, Los Angeles
Peter A. Vanable
Peter A. Vanable Syracuse University
Robert F. Valois
Robert F. Valois University of South Carolina
Ralph J. DiClemente
Ralph J. DiClemente New York University
Larry K. Brown
Larry K. Brown Brown University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Social Sciences and Humanities can lead to diverse and fulfilling careers. For students drawn to counseling, consider cacrep accredited programs that ensure high educational standards for future counselors.

Those interested in supporting couples and families might pursue an online master's degree in marriage and family therapy. These programs emphasize communication, relationship dynamics, and mental well-being.

Psychology remains a popular path, with many students seeking flexible and affordable options. Discover the most affordable online schools for psychology to find a program that fits your needs and budget.

Social work is another growing field. For those aiming to complete a Master of Social Work quickly—especially without a Bachelor of Social Work—look into 1 year msw programs online no bsw.

Each of these pathways offers unique opportunities to make a difference, whether through research, advocacy, or direct support. Online programs bring added flexibility, making it easier to balance education, work, and life.

Best Scientists Citing Bonita Stanton