World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Engineering and Technology 49 4390 4220 289 271 200 7864

James Marco publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by James Marco between 2001 and 2026, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. James Marco published across 26 years, from 2001 to 2026, averaging 11.3 papers a year. Output peaked at 32 publications in 2017. 34 of the 295 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
10 20 30
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2001 to 2026. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 32. Peak 32 publications in 2017. 2001: 3 publications 2002: 1 publication 2003: 0 publications 2004: 0 publications 2005: 1 publication 2006: 2 publications 2007: 5 publications 2008: 3 publications 2009: 2 publications 2010: 5 publications 2011: 4 publications 2012: 10 publications 2013: 3 publications 2014: 4 publications 2015: 7 publications 2016: 21 publications 2017: 32 publications 2018: 29 publications 2019: 23 publications 2020: 11 publications 2021: 27 publications 2022: 23 publications 2023: 23 publications 2024: 22 publications 2025: 32 publications 2026: 2 publications
2001 2026

295 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
James Marco: publications per year, 2001 to 2026
Year Publications
2001 3
2002 1
2003 0
2004 0
2005 1
2006 2
2007 5
2008 3
2009 2
2010 5
2011 4
2012 10
2013 3
2014 4
2015 7
2016 21
2017 32
2018 29
2019 23
2020 11
2021 27
2022 23
2023 23
2024 22
2025 32
2026 2
Total 295
Download as CSV

James Marco publication distribution in Engineering and Technology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Engineering and Technology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where James Marco sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400
Bar chart with 78 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 38–47 to 804+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 457. Most scientists, 457, have 148–157 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 804 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 198–207 publications, is where this scientist sits. 38–47 publications: 20 scientists 48–57 publications: 35 scientists 58–67 publications: 96 scientists 68–77 publications: 135 scientists 78–87 publications: 190 scientists 88–97 publications: 259 scientists 98–107 publications: 283 scientists 108–117 publications: 369 scientists 118–127 publications: 341 scientists 128–137 publications: 386 scientists 138–147 publications: 372 scientists 148–157 publications: 457 scientists 158–167 publications: 415 scientists 168–177 publications: 407 scientists 178–187 publications: 421 scientists 188–197 publications: 378 scientists 198–207 publications: 403 scientists 208–217 publications: 317 scientists 218–227 publications: 346 scientists 228–237 publications: 321 scientists 238–247 publications: 260 scientists 248–257 publications: 280 scientists 258–267 publications: 240 scientists 268–277 publications: 214 scientists 278–287 publications: 242 scientists 288–297 publications: 203 scientists 298–307 publications: 166 scientists 308–317 publications: 154 scientists 318–327 publications: 175 scientists 328–337 publications: 159 scientists 338–347 publications: 99 scientists 348–357 publications: 131 scientists 358–367 publications: 106 scientists 368–377 publications: 118 scientists 378–387 publications: 97 scientists 388–397 publications: 108 scientists 398–407 publications: 82 scientists 408–417 publications: 71 scientists 418–427 publications: 64 scientists 428–437 publications: 55 scientists 438–447 publications: 54 scientists 448–457 publications: 60 scientists 458–467 publications: 47 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 30 scientists 488–497 publications: 29 scientists 498–507 publications: 38 scientists 508–517 publications: 40 scientists 518–527 publications: 32 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 28 scientists 548–557 publications: 23 scientists 558–567 publications: 19 scientists 568–577 publications: 16 scientists 578–587 publications: 17 scientists 588–597 publications: 18 scientists 598–607 publications: 22 scientists 608–617 publications: 15 scientists 618–627 publications: 9 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 21 scientists 648–657 publications: 12 scientists 658–667 publications: 9 scientists 668–677 publications: 11 scientists 678–687 publications: 9 scientists 688–697 publications: 6 scientists 698–707 publications: 14 scientists 708–717 publications: 7 scientists 718–727 publications: 8 scientists 728–737 publications: 10 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 5 scientists 758–767 publications: 5 scientists 768–777 publications: 11 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 2 scientists 798–803 publications: 4 scientists 804+ publications: 100 scientists
38–47 publications 804+

This scientist: 200 publications — 48th percentile

48% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 804 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Engineering and Technology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,796 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
38–47 20
48–57 35
58–67 96
68–77 135
78–87 190
88–97 259
98–107 283
108–117 369
118–127 341
128–137 386
138–147 372
148–157 457
158–167 415
168–177 407
178–187 421
188–197 378
198–207 403 200
208–217 317
218–227 346
228–237 321
238–247 260
248–257 280
258–267 240
268–277 214
278–287 242
288–297 203
298–307 166
308–317 154
318–327 175
328–337 159
338–347 99
348–357 131
358–367 106
368–377 118
378–387 97
388–397 108
398–407 82
408–417 71
418–427 64
428–437 55
438–447 54
448–457 60
458–467 47
468–477 40
478–487 30
488–497 29
498–507 38
508–517 40
518–527 32
528–537 23
538–547 28
548–557 23
558–567 19
568–577 16
578–587 17
588–597 18
598–607 22
608–617 15
618–627 9
628–637 11
638–647 21
648–657 12
658–667 9
668–677 11
678–687 9
688–697 6
698–707 14
708–717 7
718–727 8
728–737 10
738–747 9
748–757 5
758–767 5
768–777 11
778–787 7
788–797 2
798–803 4
804+ 100
Download as CSV

James Marco D-index placement in Engineering and Technology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Engineering and Technology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where James Marco sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400
Bar chart with 78 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 107+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 426. Most scientists, 426, have 42 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 107 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 49 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 59 scientists 31 D-Index: 114 scientists 32 D-Index: 129 scientists 33 D-Index: 189 scientists 34 D-Index: 200 scientists 35 D-Index: 262 scientists 36 D-Index: 311 scientists 37 D-Index: 312 scientists 38 D-Index: 350 scientists 39 D-Index: 385 scientists 40 D-Index: 348 scientists 41 D-Index: 362 scientists 42 D-Index: 426 scientists 43 D-Index: 380 scientists 44 D-Index: 310 scientists 45 D-Index: 341 scientists 46 D-Index: 301 scientists 47 D-Index: 306 scientists 48 D-Index: 271 scientists 49 D-Index: 246 scientists 50 D-Index: 210 scientists 51 D-Index: 253 scientists 52 D-Index: 213 scientists 53 D-Index: 221 scientists 54 D-Index: 195 scientists 55 D-Index: 186 scientists 56 D-Index: 170 scientists 57 D-Index: 167 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 144 scientists 60 D-Index: 152 scientists 61 D-Index: 141 scientists 62 D-Index: 138 scientists 63 D-Index: 131 scientists 64 D-Index: 118 scientists 65 D-Index: 114 scientists 66 D-Index: 119 scientists 67 D-Index: 95 scientists 68 D-Index: 87 scientists 69 D-Index: 77 scientists 70 D-Index: 89 scientists 71 D-Index: 69 scientists 72 D-Index: 54 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 55 scientists 75 D-Index: 54 scientists 76 D-Index: 49 scientists 77 D-Index: 53 scientists 78 D-Index: 46 scientists 79 D-Index: 28 scientists 80 D-Index: 39 scientists 81 D-Index: 36 scientists 82 D-Index: 24 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 36 scientists 85 D-Index: 18 scientists 86 D-Index: 25 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 26 scientists 89 D-Index: 27 scientists 90 D-Index: 23 scientists 91 D-Index: 15 scientists 92 D-Index: 12 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 15 scientists 95 D-Index: 10 scientists 96 D-Index: 13 scientists 97 D-Index: 13 scientists 98 D-Index: 9 scientists 99 D-Index: 7 scientists 100 D-Index: 7 scientists 101 D-Index: 8 scientists 102 D-Index: 7 scientists 103 D-Index: 7 scientists 104 D-Index: 9 scientists 105 D-Index: 6 scientists 106 D-Index: 9 scientists 107+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 107+

This scientist: 49 D-Index — 57th percentile

57% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 107 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Engineering and Technology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,796 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 59
31 114
32 129
33 189
34 200
35 262
36 311
37 312
38 350
39 385
40 348
41 362
42 426
43 380
44 310
45 341
46 301
47 306
48 271
49 246 49
50 210
51 253
52 213
53 221
54 195
55 186
56 170
57 167
58 166
59 144
60 152
61 141
62 138
63 131
64 118
65 114
66 119
67 95
68 87
69 77
70 89
71 69
72 54
73 46
74 55
75 54
76 49
77 53
78 46
79 28
80 39
81 36
82 24
83 26
84 36
85 18
86 25
87 19
88 26
89 27
90 23
91 15
92 12
93 9
94 15
95 10
96 13
97 13
98 9
99 7
100 7
101 8
102 7
103 7
104 9
105 6
106 9
107+ 99
Download as CSV

Overview

James Marco is affiliated with the University of Warwick in the United Kingdom, focusing on research in engineering, particularly within electrical and electronic engineering, automotive engineering, mechanical engineering, industrial and manufacturing engineering, and control and systems engineering.

Their recent publications demonstrate a strong emphasis on lithium-ion battery technologies, including materials, diagnostics, and manufacturing processes. Notable papers include:

  • Feature Analyses and Modeling of Lithium-Ion Battery Manufacturing Based on Random Forest Classification, 2021, IEEE/ASME Transactions on Mechatronics
  • A new on-line method for lithium plating detection in lithium-ion batteries, 2020, Journal of Power Sources
  • Embedded Distributed Temperature Sensing Enabled Multistate Joint Observation of Smart Lithium-Ion Battery, 2022, IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics
  • Design of experiments applied to lithium-ion batteries: A literature review, 2022, Applied Energy
  • A review on various optical fibre sensing methods for batteries, 2021, Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews

James Marco collaborates frequently with several co-authors, including Mona Faraji Niri, Geanina Apachitei, Begum Gulsoy, Timothy A. Vincent, and Michael Lain. These collaborations reflect a continued engagement in interdisciplinary and team-based research efforts.

The scientist's main fields of study encompass:

  • Engineering (311 publications)

Within these, subfields include:

  • Electrical and Electronic Engineering (158 publications)
  • Automotive Engineering (118 publications)
  • Mechanical Engineering (11 publications)
  • Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering (10 publications)
  • Control and Systems Engineering (8 publications)

James Marco's research topics focus largely on advanced battery technologies and materials, with significant contributions in the following areas:

  • Advanced Battery Technologies Research (218 publications)
  • Advancements in Battery Materials (134 publications)
  • Advanced Battery Materials and Technologies (74 publications)
  • Electric Vehicles and Infrastructure (26 publications)
  • Extraction and Separation Processes (18 publications)
  • Wireless Power Transfer Systems (16 publications)
  • Fault Detection and Control Systems (16 publications)

The scientist's articles have been published extensively at venues such as:

  • Journal of Energy Storage (19 publications)
  • SSRN Electronic Journal (16 publications)
  • Journal of Power Sources (15 publications)
  • Energies (9 publications)
  • Data in Brief (7 publications)

James Marco's research demonstrates a comprehensive integration of experimental methods, data-driven modeling, and sensing technologies applied to the development and evaluation of lithium-ion battery systems and their manufacturing processes.

Best Publications

  • A Comparison between Electrochemical Impedance Spectroscopy and Incremental Capacity-Differential Voltage as Li-ion Diagnostic Techniques to Identify and Quantify the Effects of Degradation Modes within Battery Management Systems

    Carlos Pastor-Fernández;Kotub Uddin;Gael H. Chouchelamane;W. Dhammika Widanage

  • Online estimation of battery equivalent circuit model parameters and state of charge using decoupled least squares technique

    Cheng Zhang;Walid Allafi;Quang Dinh;Pedro Ascencio

  • Modelling and experimental evaluation of parallel connected lithium ion cells for an electric vehicle battery system

    Thomas Bruen;James Marco

  • On the possibility of extending the lifetime of lithium-ion batteries through optimal V2G facilitated by an integrated vehicle and smart-grid system

    Kotub Uddin;Tim Jackson;Widanalage Dhammika Widanage;Gael Chouchelamane

  • Vehicle-to-Grid Aggregator to Support Power Grid and Reduce Electric Vehicle Charging Cost

    Sid Ali Amamra;James Marco

  • The effects of high frequency current ripple on electric vehicle battery performance

    Kotub Uddin;Andrew D. Moore;Anup Barai;James Marco

  • Techno-economic analysis of the viability of residential photovoltaic systems using lithium-ion batteries for energy storage in the United Kingdom

    Kotub Uddin;Rebecca Gough;Jonathan Radcliffe;James Marco

  • A study of the open circuit voltage characterization technique and hysteresis assessment of lithium-ion cells

    Anup Barai;W. Dhammika Widanage;James Marco;Andrew McGordon

  • Characterising Lithium-Ion Battery Degradation through the Identification and Tracking of Electrochemical Battery Model Parameters

    Kotub Uddin;Surak Perera;Widanalage Dhammika Widanage;Limhi Somerville

  • Critical review of non-invasive diagnosis techniques for quantification of degradation modes in lithium-ion batteries

    Carlos Pastor-Fernández;Tung Fai Yu;W. Dhammika Widanage;James Marco

  • A systematic approach for electrochemical-thermal modelling of a large format lithium-ion battery for electric vehicle application

    Elham Hosseinzadeh;Ronny Genieser;Daniel Worwood;Anup Barai

  • A Study of Cell-to-Cell Interactions and Degradation in Parallel Strings: Implications for the Battery Management System

    Carlos Pastor-Fernandez;Thomas Bruen;Widanalage Dhammika Widanage;Miguel-Angel Gama-Valdez

  • Feature Analyses and Modelling of Lithium-ion Batteries Manufacturing based on Random Forest Classification

    Kailong Liu;Xiaosong Hu;Huiyu Zhou;Lei Tong

  • A new on-line method for lithium plating detection in lithium-ion batteries

    Upender Rao Koleti;Truong Quang Dinh;James Marco

  • Method for estimating the energy consumption of electric vehicles and plug-in hybrid electric vehicles under real-world driving conditions

    Ravi Shankar;James Marco

  • Large format lithium ion pouch cell full thermal characterisation for improved electric vehicle thermal management

    Thomas R. B. Grandjean;Anup Barai;Elham Hosseinzadeh;Yue Guo

  • A new approach to the internal thermal management of cylindrical battery cells for automotive applications

    Daniel Worwood;Quirin Kellner;Malgorzata Wojtala;Widanalage Dhammika Widanage

  • Characterising the in-vehicle vibration inputs to the high voltage battery of an electric vehicle

    James Michael Hooper;James Marco

  • Aqueous solution discharge of cylindrical lithium-ion cells

    James Shaw-Stewart;Anna Alvarez-Reguera;Agata Greszta;James Marco

  • A review on various optical fibre sensing methods for batteries

    Gaoce Han;Gaoce Han;Jize Yan;Zhen Guo;David G. Greenwood

  • Identification and quantification of ageing mechanisms in Lithium-ion batteries using the EIS technique

    Carlos Pastor-Fernandez;W. Dhammika Widanage;James Marco;Miguel-Angel Gama-Valdez

Frequent Co-Authors

Truong Quang Dinh
Truong Quang Dinh University of Warwick
Widanalage Dhammika Widanage
Widanalage Dhammika Widanage University of Warwick
Kyoung Kwan Ahn
Kyoung Kwan Ahn University of Ulsan
Emma Kendrick
Emma Kendrick University of Birmingham
Malcolm McCulloch
Malcolm McCulloch University of Oxford
Matthieu Dubarry
Matthieu Dubarry University of Hawaii at Manoa
Huiyu Zhou
Huiyu Zhou University of Leicester
Xiaosong Hu
Xiaosong Hu Chongqing University
Dan J. L. Brett
Dan J. L. Brett University College London
Paul R. Shearing
Paul R. Shearing University College London

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Engineering and Technology in the USA opens doors to a wide range of dynamic career paths. Many students and professionals are now looking to boost their credentials further with specialized online degrees tailored to industry trends and workforce demands.

For those interested in overseeing technical teams and complex engineering projects, pursuing a project management degree can provide essential leadership and organizational skills. The rise of digital currencies and financial technologies has also increased demand for technical roles in the fintech sector. Exploring blockchain degree programs allows students to gain expertise in one of the most rapidly evolving areas of technology.

Another pathway is the field of sports and event management, which calls for tech-savvy professionals to innovate sports operations. Enrolling in a sports management degree online can build relevant business and analytical skills. Additionally, with cities relying on data and smart technologies for growth, studying with urban planning masters programs online offers a strong foundation for those aspiring to impact urban development through technology-driven solutions.

Best Scientists Citing James Marco

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles