World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
64
Citations
13981
World Ranking
2997
National Ranking
1717

Karen M. Gil publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Karen M. Gil sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 107 publications — 25th percentile

25% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Karen M. Gil D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Karen M. Gil sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 64 D-Index — 75th percentile

75% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 1995 - Fellow of the American Psychological Association (APA)

Overview

Karen M. Gil is affiliated with the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill in the United States. Their research focuses on various aspects of plant sciences, particularly within agricultural and biological sciences as well as biochemistry, genetics, and molecular biology.

Their recent publications include:

  • Colombian Orchidaceae: A Catalogue of the Pleurothallidinae (2023, Lankesteriana)
  • New species and records of Orchidaceae from Costa Rica. IV. (2024, Lankesteriana)
  • Restrepia santanderensis (Orchidaceae: Pleurothallidinae), a new species from the western slope of the eastern Andes in Colombia (2023, Phytotaxa)
  • Two new species of Pleurothallidinae (Orchidaceae) from cloud forest remnants in the eastern Andes of Colombia (2024, Lankesteriana)
  • Pollination ecology of Dracula erythrochaete (Orchidaceae): brood-site imitation or food deception? (2024, Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society)

Research topics covered by Karen M. Gil include:

  • Plant and animal studies
  • Botany, Ecology, and Taxonomy Studies
  • Plant Pathogens and Fungal Diseases
  • Plant and Fungal Species Descriptions
  • Fern and Epiphyte Biology
  • Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies
  • Biological Control of Invasive Species

Main fields of study and subfields where they have contributed include:

  • Agricultural and Biological Sciences
  • Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
  • Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics
  • Plant Science
  • Cell Biology
  • Molecular Biology
  • Nature and Landscape Conservation

Frequent publication venues where Karen M. Gil's work has appeared are:

  • Lankesteriana
  • Phytotaxa
  • Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society

Collaborations have been established with several co-authors, including:

  • Adam P. Karremans
  • Nicolas Gutierrez
  • Juan Sebastián Moreno
  • Eugenio Restrepo
  • Lizbeth Oses

Karen M. Gil was recognized as a Fellow of the American Psychological Association (APA) in 1995.

Best Publications

  • Conceptualizing and testing random indirect effects and moderated mediation in multilevel models: new procedures and recommendations.

    Daniel J. Bauer;Kristopher J. Preacher;Karen M. Gil

  • Mindfulness-based relationship enhancement

    James W. Carson;Kimberly M. Carson;Karen M. Gil;Donald H. Baucom

  • Pain coping strategies in osteoarthritis patients.

    Francis J. Keefe;David S. Caldwell;Kate T. Queen;Karen M. Gil

  • Pain coping skills training in the management of osteoarthritic knee pain: A comparative study

    Francis J. Keefe;David S. Caldwell;David A. Williams;Karen M. Gil

  • Sickle cell disease pain: relation of coping strategies to adjustment.

    Karen M. Gil;Mary R. Abrams;George Phillips;Francis J. Keefe

  • Sickle Cell Disease in Children and Adolescents: The Relation of Child and Parent Pain Coping Strategies to Adjustment

    Karen M. Gil;David A. Williams;Robert J. Thompson;Thomas R. Kinney

  • Benefits from an uncertainty management intervention for African–American and Caucasian older long-term breast cancer survivors

    Merle H. Mishel;Barbara B. Germino;Karen M. Gil;Michael Belyea

  • Daily stress, coping, and dietary restraint in binge eating

    Lisa M. Yacono Freeman;Karen M. Gil

  • Daily pain and symptoms in children with polyarticular arthritis.

    Laura E. Schanberg;Kelly K. Anthony;Karen M. Gil;Elana C. Maurin

  • Daily mood and stress predict pain, health care use, and work activity in African American adults with sickle-cell disease.

    Karen M. Gil;James W. Carson;Laura S. Porter;Cindy Scipio

  • Role of Child and Maternal Processes in the Psychological Adjustment of Children with Sickle Cell Disease.

    Robert J. Thompson;Karen M. Gil;Daniel J. Burbach;Barbara R. Keith

  • Osteoarthritic knee pain: a behavioral analysis

    Francis J. Keefe;David S. Caldwell;Kate Queen;Karen M. Gil

  • Pain coping skills training in the management of osteoarthritic knee pain-II: Follow-up results *

    Francis J. Keefe;David S. Caldwell;David A. Williams;Karen M. Gil

  • Triggers of uncertainty about recurrence and long-term treatment side effects in older African American and Caucasian breast cancer survivors.

    Karen M. Gil;Merle H. Mishel;Michael Belyea;Barbara Germino

  • Daily Stress and Mood and Their Association With Pain, Health-Care Use, and School Activity in Adolescents With Sickle Cell Disease

    Karen M Gil;James W Carson;Laura S Porter;Jawana Ready

  • Experimental induction of pain: Utility in the study of clinical pain

    Jennifer L. Edens;Karen M. Gil

  • The relationship of negative thoughts to pain and psychological distress

    Karen M. Gil;David A. Williams;Francis J. Keefe;Jean C. Beckham

  • Crisis intervention team training for police officers responding to mental disturbance calls.

    Unknown

  • Social support and pain behavior

    Karen M. Gil;Francis J. Keefe;James E. Crisson;Pamela J. Van Dalfsen

  • Sickle Cell Disease Pain in Children and Adolescents: Change in Pain Frequency and Coping Strategies Over Time

    Karen M. Gil;Robert J. Thompson;Barbara R. Keith;Mary Tota-Faucette

  • Psychological Adjustment of Mothers of Children and Adolescents with Sickle Cell Disease: The Role of Stress, Coping Methods, and Family Functioning

    Robert J. Thompson;Karen M. Gil;Daniel J. Burbach;Barbara R. Keith

Frequent Co-Authors

Francis J. Keefe
Francis J. Keefe Duke University
David A. Williams
David A. Williams Boston Children's Hospital
Laura S. Porter
Laura S. Porter Duke University
Robert J. Thompson
Robert J. Thompson Duke University
Michael Belyea
Michael Belyea Arizona State University
James A. Nunley
James A. Nunley Duke University
Donald H. Baucom
Donald H. Baucom University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
Jean C. Beckham
Jean C. Beckham Duke University
Hugh A. Sampson
Hugh A. Sampson Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai
Linda K. George
Linda K. George Duke University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying psychology in the USA opens a variety of online degree and career paths designed to suit your interests and goals. Whether you’re interested in clinical practice, research, or specialized areas, flexible online programs provide accessible options at every academic level.

Start your advanced journey with an master's in psychology online, which can help you deepen your expertise or prepare for licensure. If you are passionate about helping individuals with behavioral challenges, applied behavior analysis masters programs online focus on practical skills in assessment and intervention, equipping you for work with diverse populations.

For those aspiring to lead in academia, research, or clinical settings, a doctorate degree in psychology online can pave the way. Professionals interested in the connection between brain and behavior may consider the best neuropsychology doctoral programs online to specialize in neurological assessment and cognitive functioning.

Each of these online programs blends rigorous academics with the flexibility needed for working adults, supporting your pathway to meaningful psychology careers.

Best Scientists Citing Karen M. Gil

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles