World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Neuroscience

D-Index
58
Citations
10660
World Ranking
4206
National Ranking
117

Kate E. Hoy publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Kate E. Hoy sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientists 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 887+

This scientist: 158 publications — 46th percentile

46% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

Kate E. Hoy D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Kate E. Hoy sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 58 D-Index — 57th percentile

57% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

Overview

Kate E. Hoy is affiliated with the Bionics Institute in Australia and has made significant contributions to the fields of neuroscience and medicine. Their research spans several subfields, including cognitive neuroscience, neurology, cellular and molecular neuroscience, anesthesiology and pain medicine, and epidemiology.

Their scientific output focuses on a range of main topics, with notable emphasis on transcranial magnetic stimulation studies and functional brain connectivity studies. Additional areas of research include neural and behavioral psychology studies, neural dynamics and brain function, genetic neurodegenerative diseases, EEG and brain-computer interfaces, and pain management and treatment.

Frequent publication venues for Kate E. Hoy's work include:

  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • Brain stimulation
  • Clinical Neurophysiology
  • Journal of Affective Disorders
  • SSRN Electronic Journal

Several collaborative relationships are evident in their publication record, with the most frequent co-authors being:

  • Paul B. Fitzgerald
  • Neil W. Bailey
  • Aron T. Hill
  • Hannah L. Coyle
  • Marie-Claire Davis

Examples of recent research papers authored or co-authored by Kate E. Hoy include:

  • "Transcranial random noise stimulation is more effective than transcranial direct current stimulation for enhancing working memory in healthy individuals: Behavioural and electrophysiological evidence," 2020, Brain stimulation
  • "Accelerated theta burst stimulation for the treatment of depression: A randomised controlled trial," 2021, Brain stimulation
  • "Investigating high- and low-frequency neuro-cardiac-guided TMS for probing the frontal vagal pathway," 2020, Brain stimulation
  • "Transforming treatments for schizophrenia: Virtual reality, brain stimulation and social cognition," 2020, Psychiatry Research
  • "Efficacy, efficiency and safety of high-frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation applied more than once a day in depression: A systematic review," 2020, Journal of Affective Disorders

Best Publications

  • Improving working memory: The effect of combining cognitive activity and anodal transcranial direct current stimulation to the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex

    Sophie Andrews;Kate Elizabeth Hoy;Peter Gregory Enticott;Zafiris Jeff Daskalakis

  • Effects of Anodal Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation on Working Memory: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Findings From Healthy and Neuropsychiatric Populations

    Aron Thomas Hill;Paul Bernard Fitzgerald;Kate Elizabeth Hoy

  • A randomized trial of rTMS targeted with MRI based neuro-navigation in treatment-resistant depression

    Paul Bernard Fitzgerald;Kate Elizabeth Hoy;Susan Ann McQueen;Jerome Joseph Maller

  • A meta-analytic study of changes in brain activation in depression.

    P Fitzgerald;J Maller;K Hoy;T Oxley

  • Use of theta-burst stimulation in changing excitability of motor cortex: a systematic review and meta-analysis

    Sung Wook Chung;Aron Hill;Nigel Craig Rogasch;Kate Elizabeth Hoy

  • Testing the limits: Investigating the effect of tDCS dose on working memory enhancement in healthy controls.

    Kate Elizabeth Hoy;Melanie Emonson;Sara Arnold;Richard Hilton Siddall Thomson

  • THETA-BURST STIMULATION: A NEW FORM OF TMS TREATMENT FOR DEPRESSION?

    Sung Wook Chung;Kate E. Hoy;Paul B. Fitzgerald

  • Concurrent Cognitive Control Training Augments the Antidepressant Efficacy of tDCS: A Pilot Study

    Rebecca Anne Segrave;Sara Arnold;Kate Elizabeth Hoy;Paul Bernard Fitzgerald

  • Improving working memory: Exploring the effect of transcranial random noise stimulation and transcranial direct current stimulation on the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex

    Paul G Mulquiney;Kate Elizabeth Hoy;Zafiris Jeff Daskalakis;Paul Bernard Fitzgerald

  • Investigating the Role of Current Strength in tDCS Modulation of Working Memory Performance in Healthy Controls

    Florence Teo;Kate E Hoy;Zafiris J Daskalakis;Paul B Fitzgerald

  • Mirror neuron activation is associated with facial emotion processing

    Peter Gregory Enticott;Patrick Johnston;Sally Elizabeth Herring;Kate Elizabeth Hoy

  • A randomized trial of the anti-depressant effects of low- and high-frequency transcranial magnetic stimulation in treatment-resistant depression.

    Paul Bernard Fitzgerald;Kate Elizabeth Hoy;Zafiris Jeff Daskalakis;Jayashri Kulkarni

  • Investigating the cortical origins of motor overflow

    Kate Elizabeth Hoy;Paul Bernard Fitzgerald;John L Bradshaw;Christine A Armatas

  • A Randomized Double-Blind Sham-Controlled Study of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation for Treatment-Resistant Major Depression

    Daniel M Blumberger;Lisa C Tran;Paul Bernard Fitzgerald;Kate Elizabeth Hoy

  • Exploring the optimal site for the localization of dorsolateral prefrontal cortex in brain stimulation experiments.

    Paul Bernard Fitzgerald;Jerome Joseph Maller;Kate Elizabeth Hoy;Richard Hilton Siddall Thomson

  • Accelerated repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation in the treatment of depression.

    Paul B. Fitzgerald;Kate E. Hoy;David Elliot;R. N. Susan McQueen

  • A STUDY OF THE PATTERN OF RESPONSE TO rTMS TREATMENT IN DEPRESSION.

    Paul B. Fitzgerald;Kate E. Hoy;Rodney J. Anderson;Zafiris J. Daskalakis

  • Responders to rTMS for depression show increased fronto-midline theta and theta connectivity compared to non-responders

    N.W. Bailey;K.E. Hoy;N.C. Rogasch;R.H. Thomson

  • An investigation into the effects of tDCS dose on cognitive performance over time in patients with schizophrenia.

    Kate Elizabeth Hoy;Sara Arnold;Melanie R L Emonson;Zafiris Jeff Daskalakis

  • The effect of γ-tACS on working memory performance in healthy controls.

    Kate E. Hoy;Neil Bailey;Sara Arnold;Kirstyn Windsor

  • Commentary regarding: TDCS increases cortical excitability: Direct evidence from TMS-EEG

    Neil W. Bailey;Richard H. Thomson;Kate E. Hoy;Julio C. Hernandez-Pavon

Frequent Co-Authors

Paul B. Fitzgerald
Paul B. Fitzgerald Australian National University
Zafiris J. Daskalakis
Zafiris J. Daskalakis University of California - San Diego School of Medicine
Nigel C. Rogasch
Nigel C. Rogasch University of Adelaide
Jerome Joseph Maller
Jerome Joseph Maller General Electric (Spain)
Peter G. Enticott
Peter G. Enticott Deakin University
John L. Bradshaw
John L. Bradshaw Monash University
Daniel M. Blumberger
Daniel M. Blumberger Centre for Addiction and Mental Health
Nicholas T. Van Dam
Nicholas T. Van Dam University of Melbourne
Michael Bailey
Michael Bailey Monash University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Best Scientists Citing Kate E. Hoy

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles