World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Environmental Sciences

D-Index
60
Citations
14855
World Ranking
2893
National Ranking
1139

Peter P. Sullivan publication distribution in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Environmental Sciences in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Peter P. Sullivan sits on this spectrum.

41–50 publications: 21 scientists 51–60 publications: 62 scientists 61–70 publications: 133 scientists 71–80 publications: 257 scientists 81–90 publications: 361 scientists 91–100 publications: 440 scientists 101–110 publications: 492 scientists 111–120 publications: 541 scientists 121–130 publications: 617 scientists 131–140 publications: 544 scientists 141–150 publications: 541 scientists 151–160 publications: 539 scientists 161–170 publications: 444 scientists 171–180 publications: 444 scientists 181–190 publications: 400 scientists 191–200 publications: 377 scientists 201–210 publications: 318 scientists 211–220 publications: 283 scientists 221–230 publications: 263 scientists 231–240 publications: 220 scientists 241–250 publications: 217 scientists 251–260 publications: 180 scientists 261–270 publications: 181 scientists 271–280 publications: 155 scientists 281–290 publications: 130 scientists 291–300 publications: 127 scientists 301–310 publications: 130 scientists 311–320 publications: 85 scientists 321–330 publications: 106 scientists 331–340 publications: 80 scientists 341–350 publications: 83 scientists 351–360 publications: 75 scientists 361–370 publications: 69 scientists 371–380 publications: 52 scientists 381–390 publications: 54 scientists 391–400 publications: 56 scientists 401–410 publications: 44 scientists 411–420 publications: 40 scientists 421–430 publications: 36 scientists 431–440 publications: 25 scientists 441–450 publications: 25 scientists 451–460 publications: 32 scientists 461–470 publications: 29 scientists 471–480 publications: 21 scientists 481–490 publications: 26 scientists 491–500 publications: 25 scientists 501–510 publications: 17 scientists 511–520 publications: 18 scientists 521–530 publications: 15 scientists 531–540 publications: 22 scientists 541–550 publications: 12 scientists 551–560 publications: 15 scientists 561–570 publications: 11 scientists 571–580 publications: 19 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 9 scientists 601–610 publications: 7 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 5 scientists 631–640 publications: 5 scientists 641–650 publications: 6 scientists 651–660 publications: 3 scientists 661–670 publications: 3 scientists 671–680 publications: 4 scientists 681–686 publications: 3 scientists 687+ publications: 100 scientists
41 publications 687+

This scientist: 200 publications — 64th percentile

64% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 687 publications or more.

Peter P. Sullivan D-index placement in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Environmental Sciences scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Peter P. Sullivan sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 12 scientists 31 D-Index: 26 scientists 32 D-Index: 51 scientists 33 D-Index: 88 scientists 34 D-Index: 123 scientists 35 D-Index: 163 scientists 36 D-Index: 206 scientists 37 D-Index: 267 scientists 38 D-Index: 265 scientists 39 D-Index: 275 scientists 40 D-Index: 321 scientists 41 D-Index: 343 scientists 42 D-Index: 305 scientists 43 D-Index: 336 scientists 44 D-Index: 330 scientists 45 D-Index: 348 scientists 46 D-Index: 291 scientists 47 D-Index: 275 scientists 48 D-Index: 272 scientists 49 D-Index: 273 scientists 50 D-Index: 263 scientists 51 D-Index: 232 scientists 52 D-Index: 266 scientists 53 D-Index: 217 scientists 54 D-Index: 199 scientists 55 D-Index: 177 scientists 56 D-Index: 202 scientists 57 D-Index: 204 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 177 scientists 60 D-Index: 166 scientists 61 D-Index: 152 scientists 62 D-Index: 143 scientists 63 D-Index: 150 scientists 64 D-Index: 124 scientists 65 D-Index: 119 scientists 66 D-Index: 120 scientists 67 D-Index: 118 scientists 68 D-Index: 82 scientists 69 D-Index: 98 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 105 scientists 72 D-Index: 74 scientists 73 D-Index: 84 scientists 74 D-Index: 70 scientists 75 D-Index: 67 scientists 76 D-Index: 78 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 59 scientists 79 D-Index: 52 scientists 80 D-Index: 47 scientists 81 D-Index: 38 scientists 82 D-Index: 48 scientists 83 D-Index: 42 scientists 84 D-Index: 42 scientists 85 D-Index: 43 scientists 86 D-Index: 29 scientists 87 D-Index: 37 scientists 88 D-Index: 29 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 34 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 22 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 19 scientists 95 D-Index: 24 scientists 96 D-Index: 21 scientists 97 D-Index: 20 scientists 98 D-Index: 24 scientists 99 D-Index: 17 scientists 100 D-Index: 17 scientists 101 D-Index: 21 scientists 102 D-Index: 25 scientists 103 D-Index: 18 scientists 104 D-Index: 26 scientists 105 D-Index: 19 scientists 106 D-Index: 15 scientists 107 D-Index: 10 scientists 108 D-Index: 13 scientists 109 D-Index: 15 scientists 110 D-Index: 12 scientists 111 D-Index: 8 scientists 112 D-Index: 7 scientists 113 D-Index: 9 scientists 114 D-Index: 6 scientists 115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116 D-Index: 7 scientists 117 D-Index: 8 scientists 118 D-Index: 3 scientists 119 D-Index: 5 scientists 120 D-Index: 7 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 4 scientists 123 D-Index: 8 scientists 124 D-Index: 7 scientists 125+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 125+

This scientist: 60 D-Index — 71st percentile

71% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 125 D-Index or more.

Overview

Peter P. Sullivan is affiliated with the National Center for Atmospheric Research in the United States. Their research spans multiple fields within earth and environmental sciences, primarily concentrating on atmospheric and oceanographic studies.

The main fields of study in their work include:

  • Earth and Planetary Sciences
  • Environmental Science

Within these broad fields, their research focuses on several subfields:

  • Atmospheric Science
  • Oceanography
  • Global and Planetary Change
  • Computational Mechanics
  • Environmental Engineering

The topics covered by their publications reflect key areas of oceanographic and atmospheric phenomena:

  • Oceanographic and Atmospheric Processes
  • Meteorological Phenomena and Simulations
  • Tropical and Extratropical Cyclones Research
  • Fluid Dynamics and Turbulent Flows
  • Climate Variability and Models
  • Ocean Waves and Remote Sensing
  • Wind and Air Flow Studies

Peter P. Sullivan has authored and contributed to a substantial number of research papers. Notable recent publications include:

  • Marine Boundary Layers above Heterogeneous SST: Across-Front Winds (2020), Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences
  • EUREC 4 A (2021), Earth system science data
  • Wind Turbulence over Misaligned Surface Waves and Air-Sea Momentum Flux. Part I: Waves Following and Opposing Wind (2021), Journal of Physical Oceanography
  • Wind Turbulence over Misaligned Surface Waves and Air-Sea Momentum Flux. Part II: Waves in Oblique Wind (2021), Journal of Physical Oceanography
  • Modifying the Mixed Layer Eddy Parameterization to Include Frontogenesis Arrest by Boundary Layer Turbulence (2022), Journal of Physical Oceanography

Their frequent collaborators include:

  • James C. McWilliams
  • Edward G. Patton
  • Yalin Fan
  • Baylor Fox-Kemper
  • Tetsu Hara

Peter P. Sullivan's research has been published extensively in several scientific journals, with repeated publications in the following venues:

  • Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences
  • Journal of Physical Oceanography
  • Boundary-Layer Meteorology
  • Journal of Geophysical Research Oceans
  • Atmosphere

Best Publications

  • A Comparison of Shear- and Buoyancy-Driven Planetary Boundary Layer Flows

    Chin-Hoh Moeng;Peter P. Sullivan

  • Langmuir turbulence in the ocean

    James C. McWILLIAMS;Peter P. Sullivan;Chin-Hoh Moeng

  • A SUBGRID-SCALE MODEL FOR LARGE-EDDY SIMULATION OF PLANETARY BOUNDARY-LAYER FLOWS

    Peter P. Sullivan;James C. McWilliams;Chin-Hoh Moeng

  • An intercomparison of large-eddy simulations of the stable boundary layer

    Robert J. Beare;Malcolm K. Macvean;Albert A.M. Holtslag;Joan Cuxart

  • Dynamics of Winds and Currents Coupled to Surface Waves

    Peter P. Sullivan;James C. McWilliams

  • Structure of the Entrainment Zone Capping the Convective Atmospheric Boundary Layer

    Peter P. Sullivan;Chin-Hoh Moeng;Bjorn Stevens;Donald H. Lenschow

  • A global perspective on Langmuir turbulence in the ocean surface boundary layer

    Stephen E. Belcher;Stephen E. Belcher;Alan A.L.M. Grant;Kirsty E. Hanley;Baylor Fox-Kemper;Baylor Fox-Kemper

  • Examining Two-Way Grid Nesting for Large Eddy Simulation of the PBL Using the WRF Model

    C.-H. Moeng;Jimy Dudhia;Joe Klemp;Peter Sullivan

  • The Effect of Mesh Resolution on Convective Boundary Layer Statistics and Structures Generated by Large-Eddy Simulation

    Peter P. Sullivan;Edward G. Patton

  • Simulation of turbulent flow over idealized water waves

    Peter P. Sullivan;James C. McWILLIAMS;Chin-Hoh Moeng

  • An Objective Method for Deriving Atmospheric Structure from Airborne Lidar Observations

    K. J. Davis;N. Gamage;C. R. Hagelberg;C. Kiemle

  • Large-Eddy Simulations and Observations of Atmospheric Marine Boundary Layers above Nonequilibrium Surface Waves

    Peter P. Sullivan;James B. Edson;Tihomir Hristov;James C. McWilliams

  • The Influence of Idealized Heterogeneity on Wet and Dry Planetary Boundary Layers Coupled to the Land Surface.

    Edward G. Patton;Peter P. Sullivan;Chin-Hoh Moeng

  • Large-Eddy Simulation Of The Stably Stratified Planetary Boundary Layer

    Eileen M. Saiki;Chin-Hoh Moeng;Peter P. Sullivan

  • The Coupled Boundary Layers and Air–Sea Transfer Experiment in Low Winds

    James Edson;Timothy Crawford;Jerry Crescenti;Tom Farrar

  • Surface gravity wave effects in the oceanic boundary layer: large-eddy simulation with vortex force and stochastic breakers

    Peter P. Sullivan;James C. McWILLIAMS;W. Kendall Melville

  • Large-Eddy Simulations of Radiatively Driven Convection: Sensitivities to the Representation of Small Scales

    Bjorn Stevens;Chin-Hoh Moeng;Peter P. Sullivan

  • A grid nesting method for large-eddy simulation of planetary boundary-layer flows

    Peter P. Sullivan;James C. McWilliams;James C. McWilliams;Chin-Hoh Moeng

  • A Global Climatology of Wind–Wave Interaction

    Kirsty E. Hanley;Stephen E. Belcher;Peter P. Sullivan

  • EUREC 4 A

    Bjorn Stevens;Sandrine Bony;David Farrell;Felix Ament

  • Vertical Mixing by Langmuir Circulations

    James C. McWilliams;Peter P. Sullivan

Frequent Co-Authors

James C. McWilliams
James C. McWilliams University of California, Los Angeles
Albert J. Plueddemann
Albert J. Plueddemann Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution
Donald H. Lenschow
Donald H. Lenschow National Center for Atmospheric Research
Baylor Fox-Kemper
Baylor Fox-Kemper Brown University
William G. Large
William G. Large National Center for Atmospheric Research
John H. Trowbridge
John H. Trowbridge Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution
Bjorn Stevens
Bjorn Stevens Max Planck Society
James B. Edson
James B. Edson Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution
Ann-Sofi Smedman
Ann-Sofi Smedman Uppsala University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Environmental Sciences in the USA opens doors to various specialized and interdisciplinary fields. Many students explore related areas such as geology, social work, and general studies to complement their understanding of environmental challenges. For those seeking practical applications, online geology programs offer insight into earth sciences, crucial for careers in environmental consulting and conservation.

For students interested in broader educational foundations, pursuing an best affordable online general studies degree programs can provide flexible learning paths that integrate environmental topics with general knowledge. Additionally, some may choose to enhance their impact on community and policy through social initiatives by enrolling in online dsw programs.

It’s also worth noting that students looking for a more accessible entry into environmental disciplines might consider options from the list of easy bachelor's degree programs, which can help build foundational skills before specializing further. Together, these pathways broaden opportunities in environmental careers, encompassing science, policy, and community engagement.

Best Scientists Citing Peter P. Sullivan

Trending Scientists