World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
39
Citations
12201
World Ranking
8389
National Ranking
4476

Paula R. Pietromonaco publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Paula R. Pietromonaco sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 96 publications — 17th percentile

17% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Paula R. Pietromonaco D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Paula R. Pietromonaco sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 39 D-Index — 27th percentile

27% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2013 - Fellow of the American Psychological Association (APA)

Overview

Paula R. Pietromonaco is affiliated with the University of Massachusetts Amherst in the United States. Their research primarily focuses on psychology and social sciences, with a significant emphasis on social psychology, demography, health, clinical psychology, and sociology and political science as subfields.

The main research topics covered by Paula R. Pietromonaco include:

  • Attachment and Relationship Dynamics
  • Family Dynamics and Relationships
  • Intimate Partner and Family Violence
  • Evolutionary Psychology and Human Behavior
  • Maternal Mental Health During Pregnancy and Postpartum
  • Cultural Differences and Values
  • Social and Intergroup Psychology

Recent publications by Paula R. Pietromonaco reflect their focus on relationships, attachment, and the social impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic. Notable papers include:

  • Applying relationship science to evaluate how the COVID-19 pandemic may impact couples' relationships, 2020, American Psychologist
  • Implications of social isolation, separation, and loss during the COVID-19 pandemic for couples' relationships, 2021, Current Opinion in Psychology

Frequent collaborators with Paula R. Pietromonaco include:

  • Nickola C. Overall
  • Sally I. Powers
  • Eran Bar-Kalifa
  • Jeffry A. Simpson
  • Fiona Ge

Their work has been published multiple times in select academic venues, notably:

  • Journal of Social and Personal Relationships
  • Social Psychological and Personality Science
  • American Psychologist
  • Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
  • Current Opinion in Psychology

Paula R. Pietromonaco was awarded Fellow of the American Psychological Association (APA) in 2013.

Best Publications

  • Adult Romantic Attachment: Theoretical Developments, Emerging Controversies, and Unanswered Questions

    R. Chris Fraley;Phillip R. Shaver

  • Intimacy as an Interpersonal Process" The Importance of Self-Disclosure, Partner Disclosure, and Perceived Partner Responsiveness in Interpersonal Exchanges

    Jean-Philippe Laurenceau;Lisa Feldman Barrett;Paula R. Pietromonaco

  • Automatic information processing and social perception: The influence of trait information presented outside of conscious awareness on impression formation.

    John A. Bargh;Paula Pietromonaco

  • The Internal Working Models Concept: What do we Really know about the Self in Relation to Others?:

    Paula R. Pietromonaco;Lisa Feldman Barrett

  • Depression, working models of others, and relationship functioning.

    Katherine B. Carnelley;Paula R. Pietromonaco;Kenneth Jaffe

  • Are Women the More Emotional Sex? Evidence From Emotional Experiences in Social Context

    Lisa Feldman Barrett;Lucy Robin;Paula R. Pietromonaco;Kristen M. Eyssell

  • Working models of attachment and daily social interactions.

    Paula R. Pietromonaco;Lisa Feldman Barrett

  • Applying relationship science to evaluate how the COVID-19 pandemic may impact couples' relationships.

    Paula R. Pietromonaco;Nickola C. Overall

  • Close Relationship Processes and Health: Implications of Attachment Theory for Health and Disease

    Paula R. Pietromonaco;Bert Uchino;Christine Dunkel Schetter

  • Interpersonal mechanisms linking close relationships to health.

    Paula R. Pietromonaco;Nancy L. Collins

  • Attachment, caregiving, and relationship functioning in couples: effects of self and partner

    Katherine B. Carnelley;Paula R. Pietromonaco;Kenneth Jaffe

  • Depression, working models of others, and relationship functioning.

    Unknown

  • Psychological Consequences of Multiple Social Roles

    Paula R. Pietromonaco;Jean Manis;Katherine Frohardt-Lane

  • Machine learning uncovers the most robust self-report predictors of relationship quality across 43 longitudinal couples studies

    Samantha Joel;Paul W. Eastwick;Colleen J. Allison;Ximena B. Arriaga

  • Ethos of Independence across Regions in the United States: The Production-Adoption Model of Cultural Change.

    Shinobu Kitayama;Lucian Gideon Conway;Paula R. Pietromonaco;Hyekyung Park

  • Dating couples' attachment styles and patterns of cortisol reactivity and recovery in response to a relationship conflict.

    Unknown

  • Intimacy as an Interpersonal Process: Current Status and Future Directions.

    Jean Philippe Laurenceau;Luis M. Rivera;Amy R. Schaffer;Paula R. Pietromonaco

  • The nature of negative thoughts in depression.

    Paula R. Pietromonaco;Hazel Markus

  • Gender and working models of attachment: Consequences for perceptions of self and romantic relationships

    Paula R. Pietromonaco;Katherine B. Carnelley

  • Spouses’ attachment pairings predict neuroendocrine, behavioral, and psychological responses to marital conflict.

    Lindsey A. Beck;Paula R. Pietromonaco;Casey J. DeBuse;Sally I. Powers

  • Accuracy of the Five-Factor Model in Predicting Perceptions of Daily Social Interactions:

    Lisa Feldman Barrett;Paula R. Pietromonaco

  • Decision Style in Depression: The Contribution of Perceived Risks Versus Benefits

    Paula R. Pietromonaco;Karen S. Rook

Frequent Co-Authors

Lisa Feldman Barrett
Lisa Feldman Barrett Northeastern University
Nickola C. Overall
Nickola C. Overall University of Auckland
Jean-Philippe Laurenceau
Jean-Philippe Laurenceau University of Delaware
Karen S. Rook
Karen S. Rook University of California, Irvine
Bert N. Uchino
Bert N. Uchino University of Utah
Hazel Rose Markus
Hazel Rose Markus Stanford University
Eshkol Rafaeli
Eshkol Rafaeli Bar-Ilan University
Megan A. Lewis
Megan A. Lewis RTI International
Gurit E. Birnbaum
Gurit E. Birnbaum Reichman University
Amy Muise
Amy Muise York University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring an online degree in psychology opens the door to varied career paths, including mental health counseling. Each state has unique licensing requirements, so it’s vital to research your area’s criteria. For example, those hoping to become a mental health counselor in Philadelphia must complete a relevant graduate program and supervised clinical hours.

Certification and licensing steps can differ widely even within the same state. If you’re looking into Phoenix mental health counselor certification requirements or learning about mental health counselor requirements in Pittsburgh, you’ll notice important differences in the courses and examinations required.

Many online degrees provide the foundational knowledge needed for these roles, but you’ll still need to meet practicum and licensing regulations. For those interested in working in Texas, look into what’s required to become a mental health counselor in Plano. Researching local requirements ensures your educational and professional path aligns with your career goals.

Best Scientists Citing Paula R. Pietromonaco

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles