World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
55
Citations
35362
World Ranking
4174
National Ranking
1970

Paul Resnick publications per year

1987: 1 publications 1988: 0 publications 1989: 2 publications 1990: 0 publications 1991: 0 publications 1992: 3 publications 1993: 2 publications 1994: 4 publications 1995: 1 publications 1996: 1 publications 1997: 8 publications 1998: 1 publications 1999: 3 publications 2000: 5 publications 2001: 2 publications 2002: 5 publications 2003: 2 publications 2004: 4 publications 2005: 5 publications 2006: 2 publications 2007: 6 publications 2008: 6 publications 2009: 8 publications 2010: 13 publications 2011: 9 publications 2012: 2 publications 2013: 8 publications 2014: 4 publications 2015: 5 publications 2016: 3 publications 2017: 4 publications 2018: 3 publications 2019: 4 publications 2020: 4 publications 2021: 8 publications 2022: 3 publications 2023: 5 publications 2024: 9 publications 2025: 2 publications
1987 2025

157 publications in total across all disciplines

Paul Resnick publication distribution in Computer Science in 2027

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2027. The highlighted bar marks where Paul Resnick sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 133 publications — 20th percentile

20% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Paul Resnick D-index placement in Computer Science in 2027

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2027. The highlighted bar marks where Paul Resnick sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 55 D-Index — 71st percentile

71% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2020 - ACM Fellow For contributions to recommender systems, economics and computation, and online communities
  • 2010 - ACM Software System Award For the GroupLens Collaborative Filtering Recommender Systems, which showed how to automate the process by which a distributed set of users could receive personalized recommendations by sharing ratings, leading to both commercial products and extensive research.

Overview

Paul Resnick is affiliated with the University of Michigan-Ann Arbor in the United States. Their research spans interdisciplinary areas including social sciences and computer science, with numerous publications focusing on the intersection of communication, artificial intelligence, sociology, and political science.

The scientist's main fields of study include:

  • Social Sciences
  • Computer Science

Within these fields, specific subfields addressed in their work comprise:

  • Communication
  • Artificial Intelligence
  • Sociology and Political Science
  • Statistical and Nonlinear Physics
  • Education

Research topics covered by Paul Resnick feature:

  • Social Media and Politics
  • Hate Speech and Cyberbullying Detection
  • Misinformation and Its Impacts
  • Opinion Dynamics and Social Influence
  • Adversarial Robustness in Machine Learning
  • Public Relations and Crisis Communication
  • Metamaterials and Metasurfaces Applications

Paul Resnick has contributed extensively to scholarly work, with significant publications appearing in key venues such as:

  • arXiv (Cornell University)
  • Proceedings of the International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media
  • Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction
  • Collective Intelligence
  • Science Advances

Frequent co-authors collaborating with Resnick are:

  • Ashwin Rajadesingan
  • Ceren Budak
  • Siqi Wu
  • Qiaozhu Mei
  • Libby Hemphill

Some recent notable papers include:

  • "Encouraging Reading of Diverse Political Viewpoints with a Browser Widget" (2021), Proceedings of the International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media
  • "Classifying the Political Leaning of News Articles and Users from User Votes" (2021), Proceedings of the International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media
  • "Quick, Community-Specific Learning: How Distinctive Toxicity Norms Are Maintained in Political Subreddits" (2020), Proceedings of the International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media
  • "Feature-Based Explanations Don't Help People Detect Misclassifications of Online Toxicity" (2020), Proceedings of the International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media
  • "The Prevalence of Political Discourse in Non-Political Blogs" (2021), Proceedings of the International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media

Their awards include:

  • ACM Fellow (2020) for contributions to recommender systems, economics and computation, and online communities
  • ACM Software System Award (2010) for the GroupLens Collaborative Filtering Recommender Systems, which demonstrated how distributed user data can lead to automated personalized recommendations, influencing both commercial products and research

Best Publications

  • GroupLens: An Open Architecture for Collaborative Filtering of Netnews

    Paul Resnick;Neophytos Iacovou;Mitesh Suchak;Peter Bergstrom

  • Recommender systems

    Paul Resnick;Hal R. Varian

  • Reputation systems

    Paul Resnick;Ko Kuwabara;Richard Zeckhauser;Eric Friedman

  • Trust among strangers in internet transactions: Empirical analysis of eBay' s reputation system

    Paul Resnick;Richard Zeckhauser

  • The value of reputation on eBay: A controlled experiment

    Paul Resnick;Richard Zeckhauser;John Swanson;Kate Lockwood

  • Building Successful Online Communities: Evidence-Based Social Design

    Robert E. Kraut;Paul Resnick;Sara Kiesler;Yuqing Ren

  • The Social Cost of Cheap Pseudonyms

    Eric J. Friedman;Paul Resnick

  • Beyond Bowling Together: SocioTechnical Capital

    Paul Resnick

  • Eliciting Informative Feedback: The Peer-Prediction Method

    Nolan Miller;Paul Resnick;Richard Zeckhauser

  • Enquiring Minds: Early Detection of Rumors in Social Media from Enquiry Posts

    Zhe Zhao;Paul Resnick;Qiaozhu Mei

  • Referee: trust management for Web applications

    Yang-Hua Chu;Joan Feigenbaum;Brian LaMacchia;Paul Resnick

  • It's not that i don't have problems, i'm just not putting them on facebook: challenges and opportunities in using online social networks for health

    Mark W. Newman;Debra Lauterbach;Sean A. Munson;Paul Resnick

  • Using social psychology to motivate contributions to online communities

    Gerard Beenen;Kimberly Ling;Xiaoqing Wang;Klarissa Chang

  • Slash(dot) and burn: distributed moderation in a large online conversation space

    Cliff Lampe;Paul Resnick

  • Adolescents Searching for Health Information on the Internet: An Observational Study

    Derek L Hansen;Holly A Derry;Paul J Resnick;Caroline R Richardson

  • Social navigation: techniques for building more usable systems

    A. Dieberger;P. Dourish;K. Höök;P. Resnick

  • PICS: Internet access controls without censorship

    Paul Resnick;James Miller

  • Presenting diverse political opinions: how and how much

    Sean A. Munson;Paul Resnick

  • Reputation Systems: Facilitating Trust in Internet Interactions

    Paul Resnick

  • Motivating participation by displaying the value of contribution

    Al M. Rashid;Kimberly Ling;Regina D. Tassone;Paul Resnick

  • Recommender systems — beyond matrix completion

    Dietmar Jannach;Paul Resnick;Alexander Tuzhilin;Markus Zanker

Frequent Co-Authors

Sean A. Munson
Sean A. Munson University of Washington
Richard J. Zeckhauser
Richard J. Zeckhauser Harvard University
Qiaozhu Mei
Qiaozhu Mei University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Robert E. Kraut
Robert E. Kraut Carnegie Mellon University
Cliff Lampe
Cliff Lampe University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Derek L. Hansen
Derek L. Hansen Brigham Young University
John Riedl
John Riedl University of Minnesota
Sara Kiesler
Sara Kiesler Carnegie Mellon University
Eytan Adar
Eytan Adar University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Joan Feigenbaum
Joan Feigenbaum Yale University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring online education options can open new doors in computer science and related fields. For those seeking a fast entry into the tech world, consider an easiest associate degree to get online. These programs allow students to quickly build foundational IT skills and qualify for entry-level positions.

If you’re interested in teaching, research, or leadership roles, pursuing an ed d in education can help you specialize in educational technology or computer science education. These advanced degrees are also available online, making them accessible for working professionals.

Choosing the right school is crucial. Look for programs offered by the best online schools to ensure your degree is respected by employers and meets industry standards.

For creative tech enthusiasts, there are various specialized programs such as game design schools online. These courses help students build skills in programming, animation, and interactive media, offering exciting pathways into the booming gaming industry.

Best Scientists Citing Paul Resnick

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles