World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Ecology and Evolution

D-Index
79
Citations
27191
World Ranking
864
National Ranking
125

Paul H. Williams publication distribution in Ecology and Evolution in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Ecology and Evolution in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Paul H. Williams sits on this spectrum.

37–41 publications: 2 scientists 42–46 publications: 9 scientists 47–51 publications: 10 scientists 52–56 publications: 31 scientists 57–61 publications: 56 scientists 62–66 publications: 91 scientists 67–71 publications: 92 scientists 72–76 publications: 127 scientists 77–81 publications: 173 scientists 82–86 publications: 236 scientists 87–91 publications: 227 scientists 92–96 publications: 240 scientists 97–101 publications: 333 scientists 102–106 publications: 280 scientists 107–111 publications: 300 scientists 112–116 publications: 285 scientists 117–121 publications: 305 scientists 122–126 publications: 287 scientists 127–131 publications: 278 scientists 132–136 publications: 289 scientists 137–141 publications: 273 scientists 142–146 publications: 262 scientists 147–151 publications: 246 scientists 152–156 publications: 235 scientists 157–161 publications: 205 scientists 162–166 publications: 199 scientists 167–171 publications: 174 scientists 172–176 publications: 164 scientists 177–181 publications: 173 scientists 182–186 publications: 189 scientists 187–191 publications: 170 scientists 192–196 publications: 139 scientists 197–201 publications: 128 scientists 202–206 publications: 117 scientists 207–211 publications: 115 scientists 212–216 publications: 107 scientists 217–221 publications: 124 scientists 222–226 publications: 81 scientists 227–231 publications: 82 scientists 232–236 publications: 85 scientists 237–241 publications: 75 scientists 242–246 publications: 66 scientists 247–251 publications: 81 scientists 252–256 publications: 69 scientists 257–261 publications: 70 scientists 262–266 publications: 55 scientists 267–271 publications: 64 scientists 272–276 publications: 49 scientists 277–281 publications: 48 scientists 282–286 publications: 44 scientists 287–291 publications: 45 scientists 292–296 publications: 36 scientists 297–301 publications: 39 scientists 302–306 publications: 38 scientists 307–311 publications: 30 scientists 312–316 publications: 34 scientists 317–321 publications: 25 scientists 322–326 publications: 22 scientists 327–331 publications: 28 scientists 332–336 publications: 30 scientists 337–341 publications: 22 scientists 342–346 publications: 30 scientists 347–351 publications: 26 scientists 352–356 publications: 22 scientists 357–361 publications: 29 scientists 362–366 publications: 21 scientists 367–371 publications: 12 scientists 372–376 publications: 18 scientists 377–381 publications: 17 scientists 382–386 publications: 13 scientists 387–391 publications: 21 scientists 392–396 publications: 13 scientists 397–401 publications: 10 scientists 402–406 publications: 15 scientists 407–411 publications: 8 scientists 412–416 publications: 9 scientists 417–421 publications: 8 scientists 422–426 publications: 4 scientists 427–431 publications: 10 scientists 432–436 publications: 10 scientists 437–441 publications: 5 scientists 442–446 publications: 4 scientists 447–451 publications: 10 scientists 452–456 publications: 2 scientists 457–461 publications: 4 scientists 462–466 publications: 7 scientists 467–471 publications: 7 scientists 472–476 publications: 6 scientists 477–481 publications: 6 scientists 482–486 publications: 3 scientists 487–491 publications: 3 scientists 492–496 publications: 4 scientists 497–501 publications: 4 scientists 502–506 publications: 8 scientists 507–511 publications: 5 scientists 512–516 publications: 4 scientists 517–521 publications: 5 scientists 522–526 publications: 4 scientists 527–530 publications: 5 scientists 531+ publications: 100 scientists
37 publications 531+

This scientist: 189 publications — 70th percentile

70% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 531 publications or more.

Paul H. Williams D-index placement in Ecology and Evolution in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Ecology and Evolution scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Paul H. Williams sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 95 scientists 31 D-Index: 123 scientists 32 D-Index: 191 scientists 33 D-Index: 245 scientists 34 D-Index: 252 scientists 35 D-Index: 244 scientists 36 D-Index: 249 scientists 37 D-Index: 244 scientists 38 D-Index: 254 scientists 39 D-Index: 254 scientists 40 D-Index: 280 scientists 41 D-Index: 274 scientists 42 D-Index: 266 scientists 43 D-Index: 233 scientists 44 D-Index: 248 scientists 45 D-Index: 208 scientists 46 D-Index: 201 scientists 47 D-Index: 213 scientists 48 D-Index: 207 scientists 49 D-Index: 172 scientists 50 D-Index: 209 scientists 51 D-Index: 199 scientists 52 D-Index: 153 scientists 53 D-Index: 169 scientists 54 D-Index: 163 scientists 55 D-Index: 148 scientists 56 D-Index: 120 scientists 57 D-Index: 146 scientists 58 D-Index: 137 scientists 59 D-Index: 140 scientists 60 D-Index: 104 scientists 61 D-Index: 119 scientists 62 D-Index: 118 scientists 63 D-Index: 99 scientists 64 D-Index: 77 scientists 65 D-Index: 100 scientists 66 D-Index: 86 scientists 67 D-Index: 83 scientists 68 D-Index: 75 scientists 69 D-Index: 94 scientists 70 D-Index: 57 scientists 71 D-Index: 68 scientists 72 D-Index: 59 scientists 73 D-Index: 63 scientists 74 D-Index: 66 scientists 75 D-Index: 60 scientists 76 D-Index: 42 scientists 77 D-Index: 49 scientists 78 D-Index: 39 scientists 79 D-Index: 37 scientists 80 D-Index: 43 scientists 81 D-Index: 41 scientists 82 D-Index: 45 scientists 83 D-Index: 34 scientists 84 D-Index: 40 scientists 85 D-Index: 35 scientists 86 D-Index: 55 scientists 87 D-Index: 24 scientists 88 D-Index: 24 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 23 scientists 91 D-Index: 25 scientists 92 D-Index: 27 scientists 93 D-Index: 27 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 23 scientists 96 D-Index: 12 scientists 97 D-Index: 14 scientists 98 D-Index: 19 scientists 99 D-Index: 16 scientists 100 D-Index: 14 scientists 101 D-Index: 5 scientists 102 D-Index: 21 scientists 103 D-Index: 16 scientists 104 D-Index: 10 scientists 105 D-Index: 7 scientists 106 D-Index: 7 scientists 107 D-Index: 7 scientists 108 D-Index: 6 scientists 109 D-Index: 9 scientists 110 D-Index: 11 scientists 111 D-Index: 12 scientists 112 D-Index: 9 scientists 113 D-Index: 7 scientists 114 D-Index: 3 scientists 115 D-Index: 8 scientists 116 D-Index: 5 scientists 117 D-Index: 11 scientists 118 D-Index: 4 scientists 119 D-Index: 2 scientists 120 D-Index: 5 scientists 121+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 121+

This scientist: 79 D-Index — 90th percentile

90% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 121 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 1977 - Fellow of John Simon Guggenheim Memorial Foundation

Overview

Paul H. Williams is affiliated with the Natural History Museum in the United Kingdom. Their academic career is marked by an award received in 1977 as a Fellow of the John Simon Guggenheim Memorial Foundation, acknowledging their contributions in their field.

The absence of listed research papers, co-authors, publication venues, books, and specific topics or subfields suggests that their public academic profile or bibliographic records may be limited or focused in areas not fully documented in the provided data.

As a researcher connected to the Natural History Museum, their work likely intersects with the study of natural history, encompassing a broad range of biological and ecological disciplines, although specific details are not specified here.

The Guggenheim Fellowship award, granted in 1977, is typically conferred upon individuals demonstrating exceptional capacity for productive scholarship or creative ability in the arts, indicating a recognition of their potential or achievements at that time.

Best Publications

  • What to protect?—Systematics and the agony of choice

    R.I. Vane-Wright;C.J. Humphries;P.H. Williams

  • Beyond opportunism: Key principles for systematic reserve selection

    R L. Pressey;C. J. Humphries;Christopher R. Margules;R. I. Vane-Wright

  • Would climate change drive species out of reserves? An assessment of existing reserve‐selection methods

    Miguel B. Araújo;Miguel B. Araújo;Miguel B. Araújo;Mar Cabeza;Wilfried Thuiller;Lee Hannah

  • Protected area needs in a changing climate

    Lee Hannah;Guy Midgley;Sandy Andelman;Miguel Araújo

  • Conservation Conflicts Across Africa

    Andrew Balmford;Joslin Moore;Joslin Moore;Thomas M Brooks;Thomas M Brooks;Thomas M Brooks;Neil Burgess

  • A Comparison of Richness Hotspots, Rarity Hotspots, and Complementary Areas for Conserving Diversity of British Birds

    Paul Williams;David Gibbons;Chris Margules;Anthony Rebelo

  • Host Specific Social Parasites ( Psithyrus ) Indicate Chemical Recognition System in Bumblebees

    Stephen J. Martin;Jonathan M. Carruthers;Paul H. Williams;Falko P. Drijfhout

  • Bumblebee vulnerability and conservation world-wide

    Paul H. Williams;Juliet L. Osborne

  • Biodiversity Conservation Planning Tools: Present Status and Challenges for the Future

    Sahotra Sarkar;Robert L. Pressey;Daniel P. Faith;Christopher R. Margules

  • Avoiding Pitfalls of Using Species-Distribution Models in Conservation Planning

    Bette A. Loiselle;Christine A. Howell;Catherine H. Graham;Jaqueline M. Goerck

  • A comparison of reserve selection algorithms using data on terrestrial vertebrates in Oregon

    Blair Csuti;Stephen Polasky;Paul H. Williams;Robert L. Pressey

  • Selecting areas for species persistence using occurrence data

    Miguel B Araújo;Miguel B Araújo;Paul H Williams

  • Measuring more of biodiversity: Can higher-taxon richness predict wholesale species richness?

    Paul H. Williams;Kevin J. Gaston

  • Representing biodiversity: data and procedures for identifying priority areas for conservation.

    C. R. Margules;R. L. Pressey;R. L. Pressey;P. H. Williams;P. H. Williams

  • A comprehensive phylogeny of the bumble bees (Bombus)

    S. A. Cameron;H. M. Hines;P. H. Williams

  • Planning for Climate Change: Identifying Minimum-Dispersal Corridors for the Cape Proteaceae

    Paul Williams;Lee Hannah;Sandy Andelman;Guy Midgley

  • Bumble Bees of North America

    Paul H. Williams;Robbin W. Thorp;Leif L. Richardson;Sheila R. Colla

  • Downscaling European species atlas distributions to a finer resolution: implications for conservation planning

    Miguel B. Araújo;Miguel B. Araújo;Miguel B. Araújo;Wilfried Thuiller;Wilfried Thuiller;Paul H. Williams;Isabelle Reginster

  • Bumble Bees of North America: An Identification Guide

    Paul H. Williams;Robbin W. Thorp;Leif L. Richardson;Sheila R. Colla

  • A simplified subgeneric classification of the bumblebees (genus Bombus)

    Paul H. Williams;Sydney A. Cameron;Heather M. Hines;Bjorn Cederberg

  • Mapping the World's Species-The Higher Taxon Approach

    Kevin J. Gaston;Paul H. Williams

Frequent Co-Authors

Miguel B. Araújo
Miguel B. Araújo University of Évora
Carsten Rahbek
Carsten Rahbek University of Copenhagen
Andrew Balmford
Andrew Balmford University of Cambridge
Kevin J. Gaston
Kevin J. Gaston University of Exeter
Thomas M. Brooks
Thomas M. Brooks International Union for Conservation of Nature
Robert L. Pressey
Robert L. Pressey James Cook University
Pierre Rasmont
Pierre Rasmont University of Mons
Shonil A. Bhagwat
Shonil A. Bhagwat The Open University
Sydney A. Cameron
Sydney A. Cameron University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
Joslin L. Moore
Joslin L. Moore Monash University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

If you’re interested in studying Ecology and Evolution but want to explore additional or complementary career paths, many online degree options in healthcare and life sciences can help you advance quickly. For those considering nursing, it’s important to know how long to become nurse practitioner—as accelerated routes are available for motivated students.

Online programs like the 6-month rn to bsn program and various bridge programs offer flexible, fast-track options. For example, students with an associate degree in nursing can choose from specialized asn to np programs to seamlessly transition into advanced practice roles.

Even those without a nursing background can pursue high-level positions through direct entry msn programs, designed especially for non-nurses looking to enter the field. These alternatives provide excellent flexibility and diverse pathways for career changers or those wishing to combine ecological sciences with healthcare expertise.

Best Scientists Citing Paul H. Williams

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles