World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Environmental Sciences

D-Index
45
Citations
6790
World Ranking
6482
National Ranking
2319

Otávio Cavalett publication distribution in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Environmental Sciences in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Otávio Cavalett sits on this spectrum.

41–50 publications: 21 scientists 51–60 publications: 62 scientists 61–70 publications: 133 scientists 71–80 publications: 257 scientists 81–90 publications: 361 scientists 91–100 publications: 440 scientists 101–110 publications: 492 scientists 111–120 publications: 541 scientists 121–130 publications: 617 scientists 131–140 publications: 544 scientists 141–150 publications: 541 scientists 151–160 publications: 539 scientists 161–170 publications: 444 scientists 171–180 publications: 444 scientists 181–190 publications: 400 scientists 191–200 publications: 377 scientists 201–210 publications: 318 scientists 211–220 publications: 283 scientists 221–230 publications: 263 scientists 231–240 publications: 220 scientists 241–250 publications: 217 scientists 251–260 publications: 180 scientists 261–270 publications: 181 scientists 271–280 publications: 155 scientists 281–290 publications: 130 scientists 291–300 publications: 127 scientists 301–310 publications: 130 scientists 311–320 publications: 85 scientists 321–330 publications: 106 scientists 331–340 publications: 80 scientists 341–350 publications: 83 scientists 351–360 publications: 75 scientists 361–370 publications: 69 scientists 371–380 publications: 52 scientists 381–390 publications: 54 scientists 391–400 publications: 56 scientists 401–410 publications: 44 scientists 411–420 publications: 40 scientists 421–430 publications: 36 scientists 431–440 publications: 25 scientists 441–450 publications: 25 scientists 451–460 publications: 32 scientists 461–470 publications: 29 scientists 471–480 publications: 21 scientists 481–490 publications: 26 scientists 491–500 publications: 25 scientists 501–510 publications: 17 scientists 511–520 publications: 18 scientists 521–530 publications: 15 scientists 531–540 publications: 22 scientists 541–550 publications: 12 scientists 551–560 publications: 15 scientists 561–570 publications: 11 scientists 571–580 publications: 19 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 9 scientists 601–610 publications: 7 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 5 scientists 631–640 publications: 5 scientists 641–650 publications: 6 scientists 651–660 publications: 3 scientists 661–670 publications: 3 scientists 671–680 publications: 4 scientists 681–686 publications: 3 scientists 687+ publications: 100 scientists
41 publications 687+

This scientist: 105 publications — 16th percentile

16% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 687 publications or more.

Otávio Cavalett D-index placement in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Environmental Sciences scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Otávio Cavalett sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 12 scientists 31 D-Index: 26 scientists 32 D-Index: 51 scientists 33 D-Index: 88 scientists 34 D-Index: 123 scientists 35 D-Index: 163 scientists 36 D-Index: 206 scientists 37 D-Index: 267 scientists 38 D-Index: 265 scientists 39 D-Index: 275 scientists 40 D-Index: 321 scientists 41 D-Index: 343 scientists 42 D-Index: 305 scientists 43 D-Index: 336 scientists 44 D-Index: 330 scientists 45 D-Index: 348 scientists 46 D-Index: 291 scientists 47 D-Index: 275 scientists 48 D-Index: 272 scientists 49 D-Index: 273 scientists 50 D-Index: 263 scientists 51 D-Index: 232 scientists 52 D-Index: 266 scientists 53 D-Index: 217 scientists 54 D-Index: 199 scientists 55 D-Index: 177 scientists 56 D-Index: 202 scientists 57 D-Index: 204 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 177 scientists 60 D-Index: 166 scientists 61 D-Index: 152 scientists 62 D-Index: 143 scientists 63 D-Index: 150 scientists 64 D-Index: 124 scientists 65 D-Index: 119 scientists 66 D-Index: 120 scientists 67 D-Index: 118 scientists 68 D-Index: 82 scientists 69 D-Index: 98 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 105 scientists 72 D-Index: 74 scientists 73 D-Index: 84 scientists 74 D-Index: 70 scientists 75 D-Index: 67 scientists 76 D-Index: 78 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 59 scientists 79 D-Index: 52 scientists 80 D-Index: 47 scientists 81 D-Index: 38 scientists 82 D-Index: 48 scientists 83 D-Index: 42 scientists 84 D-Index: 42 scientists 85 D-Index: 43 scientists 86 D-Index: 29 scientists 87 D-Index: 37 scientists 88 D-Index: 29 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 34 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 22 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 19 scientists 95 D-Index: 24 scientists 96 D-Index: 21 scientists 97 D-Index: 20 scientists 98 D-Index: 24 scientists 99 D-Index: 17 scientists 100 D-Index: 17 scientists 101 D-Index: 21 scientists 102 D-Index: 25 scientists 103 D-Index: 18 scientists 104 D-Index: 26 scientists 105 D-Index: 19 scientists 106 D-Index: 15 scientists 107 D-Index: 10 scientists 108 D-Index: 13 scientists 109 D-Index: 15 scientists 110 D-Index: 12 scientists 111 D-Index: 8 scientists 112 D-Index: 7 scientists 113 D-Index: 9 scientists 114 D-Index: 6 scientists 115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116 D-Index: 7 scientists 117 D-Index: 8 scientists 118 D-Index: 3 scientists 119 D-Index: 5 scientists 120 D-Index: 7 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 4 scientists 123 D-Index: 8 scientists 124 D-Index: 7 scientists 125+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 125+

This scientist: 45 D-Index — 36th percentile

36% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 125 D-Index or more.

Best Publications

  • Integrated versus stand-alone second generation ethanol production from sugarcane bagasse and trash.

    Marina O.S. Dias;Tassia L. Junqueira;Otávio Cavalett;Marcelo P. Cunha

  • Anaerobic digestion of vinasse from sugarcane biorefineries in Brazil from energy, environmental, and economic perspectives: Profit or expense?

    Bruna S. Moraes;Tassia L. Junqueira;Lucas G. Pavanello;Otávio Cavalett

  • Emergy assessment of integrated production systems of grains, pig and fish in small farms in the South Brazil

    Unknown

  • Sugarcane processing for ethanol and sugar in Brazil

    Marina Oliveira de Souza Dias;Rubens Maciel Filho;Paulo Eduardo Mantelatto;Otávio Cavalett

  • Comparative LCA of ethanol versus gasoline in Brazil using different LCIA methods

    Otávio Cavalett;Mateus Ferreira Chagas;Joaquim E. A. Seabra;Antonio Bonomi

  • Life Cycle Assessment of Poly(Lactic Acid) (PLA): Comparison Between Chemical Recycling, Mechanical Recycling and Composting

    Unknown

  • Environmental and economic assessment of sugarcane first generation biorefineries in Brazil

    Otávio Cavalett;Tassia L. Junqueira;Marina O. S. Dias;Charles D. F. Jesus

  • Integrated environmental assessment of biodiesel production from soybean in Brazil

    Unknown

  • Biorefineries for the production of first and second generation ethanol and electricity from sugarcane

    Marina O.S. Dias;Tassia L. Junqueira;Otávio Cavalett;Lucas G. Pavanello

  • Comparison of biofuel life-cycle GHG emissions assessment tools: The case studies of ethanol produced from sugarcane, corn, and wheat

    L.G. Pereira;O. Cavalett;A. Bonomi;Y. Zhang

  • Techno-economic analysis and climate change impacts of sugarcane biorefineries considering different time horizons

    Tassia L. Junqueira;Mateus F. Chagas;Vera L. R. Gouveia;Mylene C. A. F. Rezende

  • Emergy, nutrients balance, and economic assessment of soybean production and industrialization in Brazil

    Unknown

  • Enhancing life cycle impact assessment from climate science: Review of recent findings and recommendations for application to LCA

    Annie Levasseur;Otávio Cavalett;Jan S. Fuglestvedt;Thomas Gasser;Thomas Gasser

  • Techno-economic and Environmental Assessment of Renewable Jet Fuel Production in Integrated Brazilian Sugarcane Biorefineries

    Bruno Colling Klein;Mateus Ferreira Chagas;Tassia Lopes Junqueira;Mylene Cristina Alves Ferreira Rezende

  • Outlook for ethanol production costs in Brazil up to 2030, for different biomass crops and industrial technologies

    J.G.G. Jonker;F. van der Hilst;H.M. Junginger;O. Cavalett

  • Life cycle assessment of butanol production in sugarcane biorefineries in Brazil

    Lucas G. Pereira;Mateus F. Chagas;Marina O.S. Dias;Marina O.S. Dias;Otávio Cavalett

  • Trends in global warming and human health impacts related to Brazilian sugarcane ethanol production considering black carbon emissions

    Marcelo Galdos;Otávio Cavalett;Joaquim E.A. Seabra;Luiz Augusto Horta Nogueira

  • Asserting the climate benefits of the coal-to-gas shift across temporal and spatial scales

    Katsumasa Tanaka;Katsumasa Tanaka;Katsumasa Tanaka;Otávio Cavalett;William J. Collins;Francesco Cherubini

  • Brazilian Soybean Production: Emergy Analysis With an Expanded Scope:

    Unknown

  • Cogeneration in integrated first and second generation ethanol from sugarcane

    Marina O.S. Dias;Tassia L. Junqueira;Otávio Cavalett;Marcelo P. Cunha

Frequent Co-Authors

Antonio Bonomi
Antonio Bonomi State University of Campinas
Francesco Cherubini
Francesco Cherubini Norwegian University of Science and Technology
Rubens Maciel Filho
Rubens Maciel Filho State University of Campinas
João Luís Nunes Carvalho
João Luís Nunes Carvalho State University of Campinas
Anders Hammer Strømman
Anders Hammer Strømman Norwegian University of Science and Technology
William J. Collins
William J. Collins University of Reading
Jan S. Fuglestvedt
Jan S. Fuglestvedt Center for International Climate and Environmental Research
Marco Raugei
Marco Raugei Oxford Brookes University
Mark A. J. Huijbregts
Mark A. J. Huijbregts Radboud University
André Faaij
André Faaij Netherlands Organisation for Applied Scientific Research

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Environmental Sciences in the USA opens doors to diverse career pathways, many of which can be enhanced through specialized online degrees. For instance, Geographic Information Systems (GIS) play a critical role in environmental data analysis and decision-making. Exploring the best gis programs in the us can provide valuable skills in mapping and spatial data interpretation.

Leadership roles within environmental agencies often benefit from advanced knowledge in public administration. Professionals aiming to influence policy or manage projects may consider pursuing one of the best online masters in public administration. These programs prepare graduates to navigate bureaucratic structures and lead initiatives effectively.

Understanding social dynamics is equally important, as environmental issues frequently intersect with community behavior and societal trends. Degrees like an online bachelors in sociology complement environmental science by providing insights into cultural influences and public engagement strategies.

For experienced educators or professionals seeking leadership roles in environmental education, advanced degrees such as those found in edd no dissertation programs offer flexible pathways to doctoral credentials without the traditional dissertation hurdle.

Best Scientists Citing Otávio Cavalett

Recently Published Articles