World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Oliver P. Love

Oliver P. Love

D-Index & Metrics

Environmental Sciences

D-Index
41
Citations
6326
World Ranking
7730
National Ranking
349

Oliver P. Love publication distribution in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Environmental Sciences in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Oliver P. Love sits on this spectrum.

41–50 publications: 21 scientists 51–60 publications: 62 scientists 61–70 publications: 133 scientists 71–80 publications: 257 scientists 81–90 publications: 361 scientists 91–100 publications: 440 scientists 101–110 publications: 492 scientists 111–120 publications: 541 scientists 121–130 publications: 617 scientists 131–140 publications: 544 scientists 141–150 publications: 541 scientists 151–160 publications: 539 scientists 161–170 publications: 444 scientists 171–180 publications: 444 scientists 181–190 publications: 400 scientists 191–200 publications: 377 scientists 201–210 publications: 318 scientists 211–220 publications: 283 scientists 221–230 publications: 263 scientists 231–240 publications: 220 scientists 241–250 publications: 217 scientists 251–260 publications: 180 scientists 261–270 publications: 181 scientists 271–280 publications: 155 scientists 281–290 publications: 130 scientists 291–300 publications: 127 scientists 301–310 publications: 130 scientists 311–320 publications: 85 scientists 321–330 publications: 106 scientists 331–340 publications: 80 scientists 341–350 publications: 83 scientists 351–360 publications: 75 scientists 361–370 publications: 69 scientists 371–380 publications: 52 scientists 381–390 publications: 54 scientists 391–400 publications: 56 scientists 401–410 publications: 44 scientists 411–420 publications: 40 scientists 421–430 publications: 36 scientists 431–440 publications: 25 scientists 441–450 publications: 25 scientists 451–460 publications: 32 scientists 461–470 publications: 29 scientists 471–480 publications: 21 scientists 481–490 publications: 26 scientists 491–500 publications: 25 scientists 501–510 publications: 17 scientists 511–520 publications: 18 scientists 521–530 publications: 15 scientists 531–540 publications: 22 scientists 541–550 publications: 12 scientists 551–560 publications: 15 scientists 561–570 publications: 11 scientists 571–580 publications: 19 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 9 scientists 601–610 publications: 7 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 5 scientists 631–640 publications: 5 scientists 641–650 publications: 6 scientists 651–660 publications: 3 scientists 661–670 publications: 3 scientists 671–680 publications: 4 scientists 681–686 publications: 3 scientists 687+ publications: 100 scientists
41 publications 687+

This scientist: 135 publications — 33rd percentile

33% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 687 publications or more.

Oliver P. Love D-index placement in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Environmental Sciences scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Oliver P. Love sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 12 scientists 31 D-Index: 26 scientists 32 D-Index: 51 scientists 33 D-Index: 88 scientists 34 D-Index: 123 scientists 35 D-Index: 163 scientists 36 D-Index: 206 scientists 37 D-Index: 267 scientists 38 D-Index: 265 scientists 39 D-Index: 275 scientists 40 D-Index: 321 scientists 41 D-Index: 343 scientists 42 D-Index: 305 scientists 43 D-Index: 336 scientists 44 D-Index: 330 scientists 45 D-Index: 348 scientists 46 D-Index: 291 scientists 47 D-Index: 275 scientists 48 D-Index: 272 scientists 49 D-Index: 273 scientists 50 D-Index: 263 scientists 51 D-Index: 232 scientists 52 D-Index: 266 scientists 53 D-Index: 217 scientists 54 D-Index: 199 scientists 55 D-Index: 177 scientists 56 D-Index: 202 scientists 57 D-Index: 204 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 177 scientists 60 D-Index: 166 scientists 61 D-Index: 152 scientists 62 D-Index: 143 scientists 63 D-Index: 150 scientists 64 D-Index: 124 scientists 65 D-Index: 119 scientists 66 D-Index: 120 scientists 67 D-Index: 118 scientists 68 D-Index: 82 scientists 69 D-Index: 98 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 105 scientists 72 D-Index: 74 scientists 73 D-Index: 84 scientists 74 D-Index: 70 scientists 75 D-Index: 67 scientists 76 D-Index: 78 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 59 scientists 79 D-Index: 52 scientists 80 D-Index: 47 scientists 81 D-Index: 38 scientists 82 D-Index: 48 scientists 83 D-Index: 42 scientists 84 D-Index: 42 scientists 85 D-Index: 43 scientists 86 D-Index: 29 scientists 87 D-Index: 37 scientists 88 D-Index: 29 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 34 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 22 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 19 scientists 95 D-Index: 24 scientists 96 D-Index: 21 scientists 97 D-Index: 20 scientists 98 D-Index: 24 scientists 99 D-Index: 17 scientists 100 D-Index: 17 scientists 101 D-Index: 21 scientists 102 D-Index: 25 scientists 103 D-Index: 18 scientists 104 D-Index: 26 scientists 105 D-Index: 19 scientists 106 D-Index: 15 scientists 107 D-Index: 10 scientists 108 D-Index: 13 scientists 109 D-Index: 15 scientists 110 D-Index: 12 scientists 111 D-Index: 8 scientists 112 D-Index: 7 scientists 113 D-Index: 9 scientists 114 D-Index: 6 scientists 115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116 D-Index: 7 scientists 117 D-Index: 8 scientists 118 D-Index: 3 scientists 119 D-Index: 5 scientists 120 D-Index: 7 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 4 scientists 123 D-Index: 8 scientists 124 D-Index: 7 scientists 125+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 125+

This scientist: 41 D-Index — 22nd percentile

22% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 125 D-Index or more.

Overview

Oliver P. Love is affiliated with the University of Windsor in Canada and specializes primarily in Environmental Science, with a significant focus on Ecology. Their research spans several subfields including Ecology, Ecological Modeling, Atmospheric Science, Global and Planetary Change, and Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics.

Their academic contributions are concentrated on topics such as Avian ecology and behavior, Marine animal studies overview, Physiological and biochemical adaptations, Species Distribution and Climate Change, Arctic and Antarctic ice dynamics, Animal Behavior and Reproduction, and Wildlife Ecology and Conservation.

Oliver P. Love has authored and co-authored papers published in various scientific journals, with some frequent publication venues including Ecology and Evolution, Conservation Physiology, Scientific Reports, Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution, and The Science of The Total Environment.

Recent papers attributed to Oliver P. Love include the following:

  • Ecological insights from three decades of animal movement tracking across a changing Arctic, 2020, Science
  • The Circadian Clock Gene, Bmal1, Regulates Intestinal Stem Cell Signaling and Represses Tumor Initiation, 2021, Cellular and Molecular Gastroenterology and Hepatology
  • One hundred research questions in conservation physiology for generating actionable evidence to inform conservation policy and practice, 2021, Conservation Physiology
  • Reframing conservation physiology to be more inclusive, integrative, relevant and forward-looking: reflections and a horizon scan, 2020, Conservation Physiology
  • Foraging range scales with colony size in high-latitude seabirds, 2022, Current Biology

Oliver P. Love frequently collaborates with a network of researchers. Notable co-authors include:

  • H. Grant Gilchrist
  • François Vézina
  • Kyle H. Elliott
  • Ryan S. O'Connor
  • Audrey Le Pogam

Best Publications

  • Stress hormones: a link between maternal condition and sex-biased reproductive investment.

    Oliver P. Love;Eunice H. Chin;Katherine E. Wynne‐Edwards;Tony D. Williams

  • Determining the adaptive potential of maternal stress.

    M. J. Sheriff;Oliver P. Love

  • The Adaptive Value of Stress‐Induced Phenotypes: Effects of Maternally Derived Corticosterone on Sex‐Biased Investment, Cost of Reproduction, and Maternal Fitness

    Oliver P. Love;Tony D. Williams

  • Mediation of a corticosterone-induced reproductive conflict

    Oliver P Love;Creagh W Breuner;François Vézina;Tony D Williams

  • Maternal adversity and ecological stressors in natural populations: the role of stress axis programming in individuals, with implications for populations and communities

    Oliver P. Love;Patrick O. McGowan;Michael J. Sheriff

  • Ten years tracking the migrations of small landbirds: Lessons learned in the golden age of bio-logging

    Emily A. McKinnon;Oliver P. Love

  • Plasticity in the adrenocortical response of a free-living vertebrate: the role of pre- and post-natal developmental stress.

    Oliver P. Love;Tony D. Williams

  • Individual optimization of reproduction in a long‐lived migratory bird: a test of the condition‐dependent model of laying date and clutch size

    Sébastien Descamps;Sébastien Descamps;Joël Bêty;Oliver P. Love;H. Grant Gilchrist

  • The conservation physiology toolbox: status and opportunities.

    Christine L Madliger;Christine L Madliger;Oliver P Love;Kevin R Hultine;Steven J Cooke

  • The need for a predictive, context-dependent approach to the application of stress hormones in conservation.

    Christine L. Madliger;Oliver P. Love

  • Ecological insights from three decades of animal movement tracking across a changing Arctic

    Sarah C. Davidson;Sarah C. Davidson;Sarah C. Davidson;Gil Bohrer;Eliezer Gurarie;Eliezer Gurarie;Scott LaPoint;Scott LaPoint

  • Juveniles exposed to embryonic corticosterone have enhanced flight performance

    Eunice H Chin;Oliver P Love;Jan J Verspoor;Tony D Williams

  • Determinants of within- and among-clutch variation in yolk corticosterone in the European starling.

    O.P. Love;K.E. Wynne-Edwards;L. Bond;T.D. Williams

  • Pre-laying climatic cues can time reproduction to optimally match offspring hatching and ice conditions in an Arctic marine bird.

    Oliver P. Love;Oliver P. Love;H. Grant Gilchrist;Sébastien Descamps;Sébastien Descamps;Sébastien Descamps;Christina A. D. Semeniuk

  • Glucocorticoid manipulations in free-living animals: considerations of dose delivery, life-history context and reproductive state

    Glenn T. Crossin;Oliver P. Love;Steven J. Cooke;Tony D. Williams

  • Integrating Ecological and Evolutionary Context in the Study of Maternal Stress.

    Michael J. Sheriff;Alison Marie Bell;Rudy Boonstra;Ben Dantzer

  • Feather corticosterone reveals effect of moulting conditions in the autumn on subsequent reproductive output and survival in an Arctic migratory bird

    N. Jane Harms;Pierre Legagneux;H. Grant Gilchrist;Joël Bêty

  • Success stories and emerging themes in conservation physiology

    Christine L. Madliger;Steven J. Cooke;Erica J. Crespi;Jennifer L. Funk

  • What causes the decrease in haematocrit during egg production

    T. D. Williams;W. O. Challenger;J. K. Christians;M. Evanson

  • Corticosterone levels during post-natal development in captive American kestrels (Falco sparverius).

    Oliver P. Love;David M. Bird;Laird J. Shutt

  • Revisiting the condition‐dependence of melanin‐based plumage

    Sarah Guindre‐Parker;Oliver P. Love

  • Sex‐Specific Variability in the Immune System across Life‐History Stages

    Oliver P. Love;Katrina G. Salvante;James Dale;Tony D. Williams

  • Evidence for baseline glucocorticoids as mediators of reproductive investment in a wild bird.

    Oliver P. Love;Christine L. Madliger;Sophie Bourgeon;Christina A.D. Semeniuk

  • Brood size and environmental conditions sex-specifically affect nestling immune response in the European starling Sturnus vulgaris

    Eunice H. Chin;Oliver P. Love;Alison M. Clark;Tony D. Williams

  • Implications of mercury and lead concentrations on breeding physiology and phenology in an Arctic bird

    J.F. Provencher;M.R. Forbes;H.L. Hennin;O.P. Love

  • Effectiveness of baseline corticosterone as a monitoring tool for fitness: a meta-analysis in seabirds.

    Graham H. Sorenson;Cody J. Dey;Christine L. Madliger;Oliver P. Love

  • One hundred research questions in conservation physiology for generating actionable evidence to inform conservation policy and practice.

    Steven J Cooke;Jordanna N Bergman;Christine L Madliger;Rebecca L Cramp

Frequent Co-Authors

Tony D. Williams
Tony D. Williams Simon Fraser University
H. Grant Gilchrist
H. Grant Gilchrist Carleton University
Joël Bêty
Joël Bêty Université du Québec à Rimouski
Sébastien Descamps
Sébastien Descamps Norwegian Polar Institute
Steven J. Cooke
Steven J. Cooke Carleton University
Daniel D. Heath
Daniel D. Heath University of Windsor
Trevor E. Pitcher
Trevor E. Pitcher University of Windsor
Kevin R. Hultine
Kevin R. Hultine Desert Botanical Garden
Craig E. Franklin
Craig E. Franklin University of Queensland
Mark R. Forbes
Mark R. Forbes Carleton University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For those interested in broadening their expertise in Environmental Sciences, exploring related online degrees can offer diverse career pathways. Programs such as online doctoral programs without dissertation provide a flexible option for professionals looking to advance their education without the traditional research-heavy requirements.

Similarly, educators aiming to enhance their credentials might consider the best online eds to edd programs, which streamline the path from a Master's in Education to a Doctorate, often with a focus on leadership and policy development.

Social work professionals engaged with environmental justice will find value in fully funded dsw programs online, balancing affordability with depth of study to impact communities effectively.

For students seeking a more generalized approach, a low cost online general studies degree can provide foundational skills adaptable to various sectors within environmental sciences and beyond.

Best Scientists Citing Oliver P. Love

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles