World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
35
Citations
4793
World Ranking
11757
National Ranking
219

Nicola Zannone publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Nicola Zannone sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 224 publications — 55th percentile

55% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Nicola Zannone D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Nicola Zannone sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 35 D-Index — 20th percentile

20% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Overview

Nicola Zannone is affiliated with Eindhoven University of Technology in the Netherlands and has contributed widely to the fields of computer science and social sciences, with a focus on artificial intelligence, information systems, computer networks and communications, sociology, political science, and signal processing.

The main topics in their research include advanced malware detection techniques, spam and phishing detection, privacy-preserving technologies in data, privacy, security, and data protection, network security and intrusion detection, cryptography and data security, and internet traffic analysis and secure e-voting.

The scientist's recent papers include the following:

  • "A survey on multi-factor authentication for online banking in the wild," 2020, Computers & Security
  • "A decision-support framework for data anonymization with application to machine learning processes," 2022, Information Sciences
  • "The applicability of a hybrid framework for automated phishing detection," 2024, Computers & Security
  • "Cognition in Social Engineering Empirical Research: A Systematic Literature Review," 2023, ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction
  • "Extending access control in AWS IoT through event-driven functions: an experimental evaluation using a smart lock system," 2021, International Journal of Information Security

The frequent co-authors with whom Nicola Zannone has published multiple works are:

  • Luca Allodi
  • Pavlo Burda
  • Laura Genga
  • Claudia Diamantini
  • Domenico Potena

The notable publication venues where Nicola Zannone's work regularly appears include:

  • Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
  • Computers & Security
  • Information Sciences
  • ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction
  • International Journal of Information Security

Nicola Zannone has also contributed to book publications, including a work published by Frontiers Media titled "2022 Computer Science - Editor's Pick" in 2023.

Best Publications

  • Modeling security requirements through ownership, permission and delegation

    P. Giorgini;F. Massacci;J. Mylopoulos;N. Zannone

  • Engineering Secure Software and Systems

    Úlfar Erlingsson;Roelf J. Wieringa;Nicola Zannone

  • Towards the development of privacy-aware systems

    Paolo Guarda;Nicola Zannone

  • Access control in Internet-of-Things: a survey

    Sowmya Ravidas;Alexios Lekidis;Federica Paci;Nicola Zannone

  • A vulnerability-centric requirements engineering framework: analyzing security attacks, countermeasures, and requirements based on vulnerabilities

    Golnaz Elahi;Eric Yu;Nicola Zannone

  • Requirements Engineering Meets Trust Management

    Paolo Giorgini;Fabio Massacci;John Mylopoulos;John Mylopoulos;Nicola Zannone

  • Using a security requirements engineering methodology in practice: The compliance with the Italian data protection legislation

    Fabio Massacci;Marco Prest;Nicola Zannone

  • Security and privacy for innovative automotive applications : a survey

    Van Huynh Le;Jerry den Hartog;Nicola Zannone

  • Requirements engineering for trust management: model, methodology, and reasoning

    Paolo Giorgini;Fabio Massacci;John Mylopoulos;Nicola Zannone

  • Requirements Engineering meets trust management: Model, methodology, and reasoning

    Paolo Giorgini;Fabio Massacci;John Mylopoulos;Nicola Zannone

  • Security and trust requirements engineering

    Paolo Giorgini;Fabio Massacci;Nicola Zannone

  • A reference model for reputation systems

    S Sokratis Vavilis;M Milan Petkovic;M Milan Petkovic;N Nicola Zannone

  • Survey on Access Control for Community-Centered Collaborative Systems

    Federica Paci;Anna Squicciarini;Nicola Zannone

  • Modelling security and trust with Secure Tropos

    P Giorgini;H Mouratidis;N Nicola Zannone

  • From Trust to Dependability through Risk Analysis

    Y. Asnar;P. Giorgini;F. Massacci;N. Zannone

  • A Modeling Ontology for Integrating Vulnerabilities into Security Requirements Conceptual Foundations

    Golnaz Elahi;Eric Yu;Nicola Zannone

  • Formal analysis of BPMN via a translation into COWS

    Davide Prandi;Paola Quaglia;Nicola Zannone

  • How to integrate legal requirements into a requirements engineering methodology for the development of security and privacy patterns

    Luca Compagna;Paul El Khoury;Alžbeta Krausová;Fabio Massacci

  • Analysis of XACML Policies with SMT

    Fatih Turkmen;Jerry Hartog;Silvio Ranise;Nicola Zannone

  • A survey on multi-factor authentication for online banking in the wild

    Federico Sinigaglia;Federico Sinigaglia;Roberto Carbone;Gabriele Costa;Nicola Zannone

  • Security requirements engineering: The si*modeling language and the Secure Tropos methodology

    Fabio Massacci;John Mylopoulos;Nicola Zannone

Frequent Co-Authors

Fabio Massacci
Fabio Massacci Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam
John Mylopoulos
John Mylopoulos University of Ottawa
Paolo Giorgini
Paolo Giorgini University of Trento
Roel Wieringa
Roel Wieringa University of Twente
Anna Cinzia Squicciarini
Anna Cinzia Squicciarini Pennsylvania State University
Paola Mello
Paola Mello University of Bologna
Marco Montali
Marco Montali Free University of Bozen-Bolzano
Paolo Torroni
Paolo Torroni University of Bologna
Eric Yu
Eric Yu University of Toronto
George Danezis
George Danezis University College London

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring online degrees can open doors to flexible and affordable options for students interested in Computer Science and related fields. Programs such as 2 year online degrees offer a fast-track to earning a qualification, helping you enter the workforce or prepare for continued study in a short time frame.

For many, finding cheap online degrees fast is a top priority, especially when managing costs without sacrificing the quality of education. These programs provide accessible pathways for students from diverse financial backgrounds.

Worried about previous academic performance? There are online colleges that accept low gpa, making higher education more inclusive and giving more students a second chance to pursue their passion in technology.

Beyond Computer Science, online learning also supports alternative career pathways. For example, if you’re interested in environmental technology or sustainability, learn more about what can you do with an environmental studies degree to discover diverse and impactful roles in this growing sector.

Best Scientists Citing Nicola Zannone

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles