World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Ecology and Evolution

D-Index
33
Citations
4858
World Ranking
7822
National Ranking
615

Nancy A. Schellhorn publication distribution in Ecology and Evolution in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Ecology and Evolution in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Nancy A. Schellhorn sits on this spectrum.

37–41 publications: 2 scientists 42–46 publications: 9 scientists 47–51 publications: 10 scientists 52–56 publications: 31 scientists 57–61 publications: 56 scientists 62–66 publications: 91 scientists 67–71 publications: 92 scientists 72–76 publications: 127 scientists 77–81 publications: 173 scientists 82–86 publications: 236 scientists 87–91 publications: 227 scientists 92–96 publications: 240 scientists 97–101 publications: 333 scientists 102–106 publications: 280 scientists 107–111 publications: 300 scientists 112–116 publications: 285 scientists 117–121 publications: 305 scientists 122–126 publications: 287 scientists 127–131 publications: 278 scientists 132–136 publications: 289 scientists 137–141 publications: 273 scientists 142–146 publications: 262 scientists 147–151 publications: 246 scientists 152–156 publications: 235 scientists 157–161 publications: 205 scientists 162–166 publications: 199 scientists 167–171 publications: 174 scientists 172–176 publications: 164 scientists 177–181 publications: 173 scientists 182–186 publications: 189 scientists 187–191 publications: 170 scientists 192–196 publications: 139 scientists 197–201 publications: 128 scientists 202–206 publications: 117 scientists 207–211 publications: 115 scientists 212–216 publications: 107 scientists 217–221 publications: 124 scientists 222–226 publications: 81 scientists 227–231 publications: 82 scientists 232–236 publications: 85 scientists 237–241 publications: 75 scientists 242–246 publications: 66 scientists 247–251 publications: 81 scientists 252–256 publications: 69 scientists 257–261 publications: 70 scientists 262–266 publications: 55 scientists 267–271 publications: 64 scientists 272–276 publications: 49 scientists 277–281 publications: 48 scientists 282–286 publications: 44 scientists 287–291 publications: 45 scientists 292–296 publications: 36 scientists 297–301 publications: 39 scientists 302–306 publications: 38 scientists 307–311 publications: 30 scientists 312–316 publications: 34 scientists 317–321 publications: 25 scientists 322–326 publications: 22 scientists 327–331 publications: 28 scientists 332–336 publications: 30 scientists 337–341 publications: 22 scientists 342–346 publications: 30 scientists 347–351 publications: 26 scientists 352–356 publications: 22 scientists 357–361 publications: 29 scientists 362–366 publications: 21 scientists 367–371 publications: 12 scientists 372–376 publications: 18 scientists 377–381 publications: 17 scientists 382–386 publications: 13 scientists 387–391 publications: 21 scientists 392–396 publications: 13 scientists 397–401 publications: 10 scientists 402–406 publications: 15 scientists 407–411 publications: 8 scientists 412–416 publications: 9 scientists 417–421 publications: 8 scientists 422–426 publications: 4 scientists 427–431 publications: 10 scientists 432–436 publications: 10 scientists 437–441 publications: 5 scientists 442–446 publications: 4 scientists 447–451 publications: 10 scientists 452–456 publications: 2 scientists 457–461 publications: 4 scientists 462–466 publications: 7 scientists 467–471 publications: 7 scientists 472–476 publications: 6 scientists 477–481 publications: 6 scientists 482–486 publications: 3 scientists 487–491 publications: 3 scientists 492–496 publications: 4 scientists 497–501 publications: 4 scientists 502–506 publications: 8 scientists 507–511 publications: 5 scientists 512–516 publications: 4 scientists 517–521 publications: 5 scientists 522–526 publications: 4 scientists 527–530 publications: 5 scientists 531+ publications: 100 scientists
37 publications 531+

This scientist: 98 publications — 17th percentile

17% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 531 publications or more.

Nancy A. Schellhorn D-index placement in Ecology and Evolution in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Ecology and Evolution scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Nancy A. Schellhorn sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 95 scientists 31 D-Index: 123 scientists 32 D-Index: 191 scientists 33 D-Index: 245 scientists 34 D-Index: 252 scientists 35 D-Index: 244 scientists 36 D-Index: 249 scientists 37 D-Index: 244 scientists 38 D-Index: 254 scientists 39 D-Index: 254 scientists 40 D-Index: 280 scientists 41 D-Index: 274 scientists 42 D-Index: 266 scientists 43 D-Index: 233 scientists 44 D-Index: 248 scientists 45 D-Index: 208 scientists 46 D-Index: 201 scientists 47 D-Index: 213 scientists 48 D-Index: 207 scientists 49 D-Index: 172 scientists 50 D-Index: 209 scientists 51 D-Index: 199 scientists 52 D-Index: 153 scientists 53 D-Index: 169 scientists 54 D-Index: 163 scientists 55 D-Index: 148 scientists 56 D-Index: 120 scientists 57 D-Index: 146 scientists 58 D-Index: 137 scientists 59 D-Index: 140 scientists 60 D-Index: 104 scientists 61 D-Index: 119 scientists 62 D-Index: 118 scientists 63 D-Index: 99 scientists 64 D-Index: 77 scientists 65 D-Index: 100 scientists 66 D-Index: 86 scientists 67 D-Index: 83 scientists 68 D-Index: 75 scientists 69 D-Index: 94 scientists 70 D-Index: 57 scientists 71 D-Index: 68 scientists 72 D-Index: 59 scientists 73 D-Index: 63 scientists 74 D-Index: 66 scientists 75 D-Index: 60 scientists 76 D-Index: 42 scientists 77 D-Index: 49 scientists 78 D-Index: 39 scientists 79 D-Index: 37 scientists 80 D-Index: 43 scientists 81 D-Index: 41 scientists 82 D-Index: 45 scientists 83 D-Index: 34 scientists 84 D-Index: 40 scientists 85 D-Index: 35 scientists 86 D-Index: 55 scientists 87 D-Index: 24 scientists 88 D-Index: 24 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 23 scientists 91 D-Index: 25 scientists 92 D-Index: 27 scientists 93 D-Index: 27 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 23 scientists 96 D-Index: 12 scientists 97 D-Index: 14 scientists 98 D-Index: 19 scientists 99 D-Index: 16 scientists 100 D-Index: 14 scientists 101 D-Index: 5 scientists 102 D-Index: 21 scientists 103 D-Index: 16 scientists 104 D-Index: 10 scientists 105 D-Index: 7 scientists 106 D-Index: 7 scientists 107 D-Index: 7 scientists 108 D-Index: 6 scientists 109 D-Index: 9 scientists 110 D-Index: 11 scientists 111 D-Index: 12 scientists 112 D-Index: 9 scientists 113 D-Index: 7 scientists 114 D-Index: 3 scientists 115 D-Index: 8 scientists 116 D-Index: 5 scientists 117 D-Index: 11 scientists 118 D-Index: 4 scientists 119 D-Index: 2 scientists 120 D-Index: 5 scientists 121+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 121+

This scientist: 33 D-Index — 8th percentile

8% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 121 D-Index or more.

Overview

Nancy A. Schellhorn is affiliated with the Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation in Australia. Their research primarily focuses on Agricultural and Biological Sciences, with significant contributions to subfields including Insect Science, Plant Science, Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Global and Planetary Change, and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health.

The scientist's work covers various main topics within these fields, notably:

  • Insect-Plant Interactions and Control
  • Plant and animal studies
  • Insect symbiosis and bacterial influences
  • Nematode management and characterization studies
  • Plant Parasitism and Resistance
  • Insect and Pesticide Research
  • Insect Pest Control Strategies

Recent publications by Nancy A. Schellhorn include:

  • Better outcomes for pest pressure, insecticide use, and yield in less intensive agricultural landscapes, 2021, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
  • Landscape factors and how they influence whitefly pests in cassava fields across East Africa, 2020, Landscape Ecology
  • Fresh, frozen or fake: A comparison of predation rates measured by various types of sentinel prey, 2020, Journal of Applied Entomology
  • Simulating an invasion: unsealed water storage (rainwater tanks) and urban block design facilitate the spread of the dengue fever mosquito, Aedes aegypti, in Brisbane, Australia, 2021, Biological Invasions
  • Evaluation of cultural control and resistance-breeding strategies for suppression of whitefly infestation of cassava at the landscape scale: a simulation modeling approach, 2020, Pest Management Science

Frequent collaborators include:

  • Myron P. Zalucki
  • Hazel Parry
  • Vesna Gagić
  • Andrew Hulthen
  • Rebecca K. Nagy

The scientist has published across various venues with consistent presence in:

  • Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
  • Journal of Applied Entomology
  • Biological Invasions
  • Landscape Ecology
  • Pest Management Science

Best Publications

  • Crop pests and predators exhibit inconsistent responses to surrounding landscape composition

    Daniel S. Karp;Rebecca E Chaplin-Kramer;Timothy D. Meehan;Emily A. Martin

  • When natural habitat fails to enhance biological pest control – Five hypotheses ☆

    Teja Tscharntke;Daniel S. Karp;Rebecca Chaplin-Kramer;Péter Batáry

  • The database of the PREDICTS (Projecting Responses of Ecological Diversity In Changing Terrestrial Systems) project

    Lawrence N. Hudson;Tim Newbold;Tim Newbold;Sara Contu;Samantha L.L. Hill;Samantha L.L. Hill

  • Movement of entomophagous arthropods in agricultural landscapes: links to pest suppression.

    N.A. Schellhorn;F.J.J.A. Bianchi;C.L. Hsu

  • Time will tell: resource continuity bolsters ecosystem services

    Nancy A Schellhorn;Vesna Gagic;Vesna Gagic;Riccardo Bommarco

  • Forest Biodiversity and the Delivery of Ecosystem Goods and Services: Translating Science into Policy

    Ian D. Thompson;Kimiko Okabe;Jason M. Tylianakis;Pushpam Kumar

  • A perspective on management of Helicoverpa armigera: transgenic Bt cotton, IPM, and landscapes.

    Sharon Downes;Darren Kriticos;Hazel Parry;Cate Paull

  • Predicting bee community responses to land-use changes : Effects of geographic and taxonomic biases

    Adriana De Palma;Adriana De Palma;Stefan Abrahamczyk;Marcelo A. Aizen;Matthias Albrecht

  • The impact of weed diversity on insect population dynamics and crop yield in collards, Brassica oleraceae (Brassicaceae)

    Nancy A. Schellhorn;Victoria L. Sork

  • Cannibalism and interspecific predation: Role of oviposition behavior

    N. A. Schellhorn;David Andow

  • Managing ecosystem services and biodiversity conservation in agricultural landscapes: are the solutions the same?

    Sarina Macfadyen;Saul A. Cunningham;Alejandro C. Costamagna;Nancy A. Schellhorn

  • Response of coccinellids to their aphid prey at different spatial scales

    Nancy A. Schellhorn;Nancy A. Schellhorn;David A. Andow

  • Mortality of coccinellid (Coleoptera: Coccinellidae) larvae and pupae when prey become scarce

    Nancy A. Schellhorn;David A. Andow

  • Connecting scales: Achieving in-field pest control from areawide and landscape ecology studies

    Nancy A. Schellhorn;Hazel R. Parry;Sarina Macfadyen;Yongmo Wang

  • Managing ecosystem services in broadacre landscapes: what are the appropriate spatial scales?

    Nancy A. Schellhorn;Sarina Macfadyen;Felix J. J. A. Bianchi;David G. Williams

  • Spatial variability in ecosystem services: simple rules for predator-mediated pest suppression.

    F. J. J. A. Bianchi;F. J. J. A. Bianchi;N. A. Schellhorn;Y. M. Buckley;Y. M. Buckley;H. P. Possingham

  • Early-season movement dynamics of phytophagous pest and natural enemies across a native vegetation-crop ecotone

    S. Macfadyen;J. Hopkinson;H. Parry;M.J. Neave

  • Habitat functionality for the ecosystem service of pest control: reproduction and feeding sites of pests and natural enemies

    Felix J. J. A. Bianchi;Nancy A. Schellhorn;Saul A. Cunningham

  • Interactions between conventional and organic farming for biocontrol services across the landscape

    F. J. J. A Bianchi;A. R. Ives;N. A. Schellhorn

  • COMPETITION BETWEEN NATIVE AND INTRODUCED PARASITOIDS OF APHIDS: NONTARGET EFFECTS AND BIOLOGICAL CONTROL

    Nancy A. Schellhorn;Timothy R. Kuhman;Anders C. Olson;Anthony R. Ives

  • Parasitoid and moth movement from refuge to crop

    N.A. Schellhorn;J. Bellati;C.A. Paull;L. Maratos

Frequent Co-Authors

Felix J.J.A. Bianchi
Felix J.J.A. Bianchi Wageningen University & Research
Myron P. Zalucki
Myron P. Zalucki University of Queensland
Saul A. Cunningham
Saul A. Cunningham Australian National University
Tim Diekötter
Tim Diekötter Kiel University
Teja Tscharntke
Teja Tscharntke University of Göttingen
Jason M. Tylianakis
Jason M. Tylianakis University of Canterbury
Katja Poveda
Katja Poveda Cornell University
Andy Purvis
Andy Purvis Natural History Museum
Patrick Lavelle
Patrick Lavelle Sorbonne University
Ingo Grass
Ingo Grass University of Hohenheim

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring careers in Ecology and Evolution often means a multidisciplinary approach, and many students consider related fields in healthcare for broader job opportunities. Online degrees can offer the convenience and flexibility needed to pivot or advance in your career. For those already in nursing, rn to np programs allow registered nurses to move into higher-level practitioner roles, combining clinical skills with research and leadership.

If you’re changing careers and do not hold a nursing background, online direct entry msn programs for non-nurses are tailored for those who hold a degree in another field, streamlining the path to advanced nursing credentials.

Choosing the right institution is crucial. When evaluating options, many prospective students compare capella university vs wgu rn to bsn to find programs that best match their learning styles and career goals.

Affordability also matters. For budget-conscious students, online bsn to msn programs make advancing your education accessible without unnecessary financial strain.

These diverse pathways equip students with the knowledge and credentials needed for a range of impactful careers in health, science, and beyond.

Best Scientists Citing Nancy A. Schellhorn

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles