World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 36 9573 8954 210 206 149 4893

Monica Mazza publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Monica Mazza between 2000 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Monica Mazza published across 26 years, from 2000 to 2025, averaging 6.7 papers a year. Output peaked at 23 publications in 2016. 18 of the 173 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2000 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 23. Peak 23 publications in 2016. 2000: 1 publication 2001: 1 publication 2002: 5 publications 2003: 4 publications 2004: 3 publications 2005: 1 publication 2006: 1 publication 2007: 8 publications 2008: 6 publications 2009: 4 publications 2010: 3 publications 2011: 4 publications 2012: 7 publications 2013: 14 publications 2014: 14 publications 2015: 11 publications 2016: 23 publications 2017: 6 publications 2018: 2 publications 2019: 4 publications 2020: 11 publications 2021: 9 publications 2022: 5 publications 2023: 8 publications 2024: 11 publications 2025: 7 publications
2000 2025

173 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Monica Mazza: publications per year, 2000 to 2025
Year Publications
2000 1
2001 1
2002 5
2003 4
2004 3
2005 1
2006 1
2007 8
2008 6
2009 4
2010 3
2011 4
2012 7
2013 14
2014 14
2015 11
2016 23
2017 6
2018 2
2019 4
2020 11
2021 9
2022 5
2023 8
2024 11
2025 7
Total 173
Download as CSV

Monica Mazza publications per year - data summary

  • Monica Mazza, a Psychology scholar from University of L'Aquila, has 173 publications recorded across 26 years, from 2000 to 2025.
  • The oldest publication on record dates to 2000 and the most recent to 2025.
  • The most productive year is 2016, with 23 publications.
  • The least productive years with any output are 2000, 2001, 2005 and 2006, with 1 publication each.
  • The rate of publication averages 6.7 papers per year over the whole span, or 6.7 per year counting only the 26 years with at least one publication.
  • The last 5 years on the chart (2021-2025) hold 40 publications, 23% of the career total.
  • Split into equal eras - 2000-2008: 30 publications (3.3 per year); 2009-2017: 86 publications (9.6 per year); 2018-2025: 57 publications (7.1 per year).
  • Comparing the opening and closing eras, the overall trend of publication is rising.

Monica Mazza publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Monica Mazza sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 141–150 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 149 publications — 49th percentile

49% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597 149
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Monica Mazza publication distribution in Psychology in 2026 - data summary

  • The chart plots the publication count of all 11,416 Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026, grouped into 69 ranges running from 31–40 to 705+ publications.
  • Monica Mazza, a Psychology scholar from University of L'Aquila, records 149 publications - the 49th percentile of the discipline.
  • 49% of ranked Psychology scientists score the same or lower than Monica Mazza, and about 51% score higher.
  • The median of the discipline falls in the 151–160 publications range, and Monica Mazza ranks below the median.
  • The most crowded range is 101–110 publications, holding 736 scientists (6% of the field).
  • 72% of the field sits in the lowest quarter of the value range (up to 201–210 publications), so the distribution is heavily right-skewed and high scores are rare.
  • The final bar has no upper bound: it groups every scientist with 705 publications or more, 100 scientists in all (<1% of the field).

Monica Mazza D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Monica Mazza sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 36–37 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 36 D-Index — 19th percentile

19% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659 36
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Monica Mazza D-index placement in Psychology in 2026 - data summary

  • The chart plots the discipline H-index (D-index) of all 11,416 Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026, grouped into 58 ranges running from 30–31 to 144+ D-Index.
  • Monica Mazza, a Psychology scholar from University of L'Aquila, records 36 D-Index - the 19th percentile of the discipline.
  • 19% of ranked Psychology scientists score the same or lower than Monica Mazza, and about 81% score higher.
  • The median of the discipline falls in the 48–49 D-Index range, and Monica Mazza ranks below the median.
  • The most crowded range is 32–33 D-Index, holding 702 scientists (6% of the field).
  • 68% of the field sits in the lowest quarter of the value range (up to 58–59 D-Index), so the distribution is heavily right-skewed and high scores are rare.
  • The final bar has no upper bound: it groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more, 98 scientists in all (<1% of the field).

Overview

Monica Mazza is affiliated with the University of L'Aquila in Italy and has contributed to research primarily within the fields of Neuroscience, Psychology, and Medicine. Their work spans various subfields including Cognitive Neuroscience, Clinical Psychology, Psychiatry and Mental Health, Developmental and Educational Psychology, and Education.

The primary focus of their research centers on Autism Spectrum Disorder, which is reflected in the significant number of publications in this area, alongside related topics such as Child Development and Digital Technology, Behavioral and Psychological Studies, Child Nutrition and Feeding Issues, Family and Disability Support Research, Obsessive-Compulsive Spectrum Disorders, and Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder.

Among their recent publications are:

  • "Food Selectivity in Children with Autism: Guidelines for Assessment and Clinical Interventions" (2023), published in the International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
  • "Moral Decision-Making, Stress, and Social Cognition in Frontline Workers vs. Population Groups During the COVID-19 Pandemic: An Explorative Study" (2020), published in Frontiers in Psychology
  • "Autism spectrum disorder and personality disorders: Comorbidity and differential diagnosis" (2021), published in the World Journal of Psychiatry
  • "Register-based cumulative prevalence of Autism Spectrum Disorders during childhood and adolescence in Central Italy" (2022), published in Epidemiology Biostatistics and Public Health
  • "Comparing virtual vs real faces expressing emotions in children with autism: An eye-tracking study" (2021), published in Education and Information Technologies

The researcher frequently collaborates with a set of co-authors who include Marco Valenti, Margherita Attanasio, Roberto Vagnetti, Maria Chiara Pino, and Ilenia Le Donne.

Monica Mazza's research has appeared recurrently in notable publication venues such as Frontiers in Psychology, Epidemiology Biostatistics and Public Health, the Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, Children, and Behavioral Sciences.

Best Publications

  • Selective impairments of theory of mind in people with schizophrenia

    M. Mazza;A. De Risio;L. Surian;R. Roncone

  • Is theory of mind in schizophrenia more strongly associated with clinical and social functioning than with neurocognitive deficits

    Rita Roncone;Ian R.H. Falloon;Monica Mazza;Alessandro De Risio

  • Affective and cognitive empathy in adolescents with autism spectrum disorder.

    Monica Mazza;Maria C. Pino;Melania Mariano;Daniela Tempesta

  • Could schizophrenic subjects improve their social cognition abilities only with observation and imitation of social situations

    Monica Mazza;Giuliana Lucci;Francesca Pacitti;Maria Chiara Pino

  • The Use of "Literary Fiction" to Promote Mentalizing Ability.

    Maria Chiara Pino;Monica Mazza

  • An update of safety of clinically used atypical antipsychotics

    Orsolini L;Tomasetti C;Valchera A;Vecchiotti R

  • Psychopathology, emotional aspects and psychological counselling in infertility: a review.

    De Berardis D;Mazza M;Marini S;Del Nibletto L

  • The Role of Theory of Mind on Social Information Processing in Children With Autism Spectrum Disorders: A Mediation Analysis

    Monica Mazza;Melania Mariano;Sara Peretti;Francesco Masedu

  • Targeting the Noradrenergic System in Posttraumatic Stress Disorder: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Prazosin Trials

    Domenico De Berardis;Stefano Marini;Nicola Serroni;Felice Iasevoli

  • Pragmatic Language and Theory of Mind Deficits in People with Schizophrenia and Their Relatives

    M. Mazza;V. Di Michele;R. Pollice;M. Casacchia

  • Neuropsychological functioning in young subjects with generalized anxiety disorder with and without pharmacotherapy.

    D. Tempesta;M. Mazza;N. Serroni;F.S. Moschetta

  • Rehabilitation of theory of mind deficit in schizophrenia: a pilot study of metacognitive strategies in group treatment

    Rita Roncone;Monica Mazza;Irini Frangou;Alessandro De Risio

  • Agomelatine beyond Borders: Current Evidences of Its Efficacy in Disorders Other than Major Depression

    Domenico De Berardis;Michele Fornaro;Nicola Serroni;Daniela Campanella

  • Social cognition disorders in military police officers affected by posttraumatic stress disorder after the attack of An-Nasiriyah in Iraq 2006.

    Monica Mazza;Laura Giusti;Anna Albanese;Melania Mariano

  • Deficit of social cognition in subjects with surgically treated frontal lobe lesions and in subjects affected by schizophrenia

    Monica Mazza;Catello Costagliola;Vittorio Di Michele;Vincenzo Magliani

  • Diet: the keystone of autism spectrum disorder?

    S Peretti;M Mariano;C Mazzocchetti;M Mazza

  • Neural activity related to cognitive and emotional empathy in post-traumatic stress disorder.

    Monica Mazza;Daniela Tempesta;Maria Chiara Pino;Anna Nigri

  • Alexithymia, Suicide Ideation, C-Reactive Protein, and Serum Lipid Levels Among Outpatients with Generalized Anxiety Disorder

    Domenico De Berardis;Nicola Serroni;Daniela Campanella;Stefano Marini

  • Affective temperaments are associated with specific clusters of symptoms and psychopathology: A cross-sectional study on bipolar disorder inpatients in acute manic, mixed, or depressive relapse

    Felice Iasevoli;Alessandro Valchera;Emanuela Di Giovambattista;Massimo Marconi

  • The Relationships between Cholesterol and Suicide: An Update

    Domenico De Berardis;Stefano Marini;Monica Piersanti;Marilde Cavuto

Frequent Co-Authors

Massimo Casacchia
Massimo Casacchia University of L'Aquila
Giovanni Martinotti
Giovanni Martinotti University of Chieti-Pescara
Felice Iasevoli
Felice Iasevoli University of Naples Federico II
Giampaolo Perna
Giampaolo Perna Humanitas University
Michele Ferrara
Michele Ferrara University of L'Aquila
Giuseppe Iaria
Giuseppe Iaria University of Calgary
Marco Di Nicola
Marco Di Nicola Catholic University of the Sacred Heart
Francesca Cirulli
Francesca Cirulli Istituto Superiore di Sanità
Igor Branchi
Igor Branchi Istituto Superiore di Sanità
Alessandro Rossi
Alessandro Rossi University of L'Aquila

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a degree in psychology opens doors to a variety of online programs and career paths, especially in social work. Many students with psychology backgrounds transition into social work roles by obtaining additional credentials. The process and requirements often depend on the state in which you plan to work.

For instance, those interested in practicing social work in Oklahoma should review the Oklahoma social work license requirements to understand necessary qualifications and steps. Similarly, if you want to practice in Oregon, you’ll need to follow specific guidelines on how to become a social worker in Oregon. Each state may have unique coursework, fieldwork, and examination requirements.

Students considering Pennsylvania should explore information on how to become a social worker in Pennsylvania. Meanwhile, those targeting Rhode Island should look into Rhode Island social work license requirements for details on boosting their career prospects.

Selecting the right online degree and understanding state-specific pathways can help you meet your career goals in psychology and related professions like social work.

Best Scientists Citing Monica Mazza

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles