World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Environmental Sciences 34 9423 9022 3378 3128 94 5338

Michela Biasutti publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Michela Biasutti between 2003 and 2026, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Michela Biasutti published across 24 years, from 2003 to 2026, averaging 5.2 papers a year. Output peaked at 11 publications in 2024. 13 of the 124 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
2 4 6 8 10
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2003 to 2026. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 11. Peak 11 publications in 2024. 2003: 2 publications 2004: 1 publication 2005: 1 publication 2006: 3 publications 2007: 0 publications 2008: 3 publications 2009: 5 publications 2010: 4 publications 2011: 3 publications 2012: 4 publications 2013: 7 publications 2014: 4 publications 2015: 8 publications 2016: 6 publications 2017: 7 publications 2018: 7 publications 2019: 3 publications 2020: 7 publications 2021: 7 publications 2022: 9 publications 2023: 9 publications 2024: 11 publications 2025: 11 publications 2026: 2 publications
2003 2026

124 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Michela Biasutti: publications per year, 2003 to 2026
Year Publications
2003 2
2004 1
2005 1
2006 3
2007 0
2008 3
2009 5
2010 4
2011 3
2012 4
2013 7
2014 4
2015 8
2016 6
2017 7
2018 7
2019 3
2020 7
2021 7
2022 9
2023 9
2024 11
2025 11
2026 2
Total 124
Download as CSV

Michela Biasutti publication distribution in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Environmental Sciences in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Michela Biasutti sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 66 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 41–50 to 690+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 617. Most scientists, 617, have 121–130 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 690 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 91–100 publications, is where this scientist sits. 41–50 publications: 21 scientists 51–60 publications: 62 scientists 61–70 publications: 133 scientists 71–80 publications: 257 scientists 81–90 publications: 361 scientists 91–100 publications: 440 scientists 101–110 publications: 492 scientists 111–120 publications: 541 scientists 121–130 publications: 617 scientists 131–140 publications: 544 scientists 141–150 publications: 541 scientists 151–160 publications: 539 scientists 161–170 publications: 444 scientists 171–180 publications: 444 scientists 181–190 publications: 400 scientists 191–200 publications: 377 scientists 201–210 publications: 318 scientists 211–220 publications: 282 scientists 221–230 publications: 263 scientists 231–240 publications: 220 scientists 241–250 publications: 217 scientists 251–260 publications: 180 scientists 261–270 publications: 181 scientists 271–280 publications: 155 scientists 281–290 publications: 130 scientists 291–300 publications: 127 scientists 301–310 publications: 130 scientists 311–320 publications: 85 scientists 321–330 publications: 106 scientists 331–340 publications: 80 scientists 341–350 publications: 83 scientists 351–360 publications: 75 scientists 361–370 publications: 69 scientists 371–380 publications: 52 scientists 381–390 publications: 54 scientists 391–400 publications: 56 scientists 401–410 publications: 44 scientists 411–420 publications: 40 scientists 421–430 publications: 36 scientists 431–440 publications: 25 scientists 441–450 publications: 25 scientists 451–460 publications: 32 scientists 461–470 publications: 29 scientists 471–480 publications: 21 scientists 481–490 publications: 26 scientists 491–500 publications: 26 scientists 501–510 publications: 17 scientists 511–520 publications: 19 scientists 521–530 publications: 15 scientists 531–540 publications: 22 scientists 541–550 publications: 12 scientists 551–560 publications: 15 scientists 561–570 publications: 11 scientists 571–580 publications: 19 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 9 scientists 601–610 publications: 7 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 5 scientists 631–640 publications: 5 scientists 641–650 publications: 6 scientists 651–660 publications: 3 scientists 661–670 publications: 3 scientists 671–680 publications: 4 scientists 681–689 publications: 4 scientists 690+ publications: 100 scientists
41–50 publications 690+

This scientist: 94 publications — 10th percentile

10% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 690 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Environmental Sciences scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,676 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
41–50 21
51–60 62
61–70 133
71–80 257
81–90 361
91–100 440 94
101–110 492
111–120 541
121–130 617
131–140 544
141–150 541
151–160 539
161–170 444
171–180 444
181–190 400
191–200 377
201–210 318
211–220 282
221–230 263
231–240 220
241–250 217
251–260 180
261–270 181
271–280 155
281–290 130
291–300 127
301–310 130
311–320 85
321–330 106
331–340 80
341–350 83
351–360 75
361–370 69
371–380 52
381–390 54
391–400 56
401–410 44
411–420 40
421–430 36
431–440 25
441–450 25
451–460 32
461–470 29
471–480 21
481–490 26
491–500 26
501–510 17
511–520 19
521–530 15
531–540 22
541–550 12
551–560 15
561–570 11
571–580 19
581–590 9
591–600 9
601–610 7
611–620 11
621–630 5
631–640 5
641–650 6
651–660 3
661–670 3
671–680 4
681–689 4
690+ 100
Download as CSV

Michela Biasutti D-index placement in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Environmental Sciences scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Michela Biasutti sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300
Bar chart with 97 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 126+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 348. Most scientists, 348, have 45 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 126 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 34 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 12 scientists 31 D-Index: 26 scientists 32 D-Index: 51 scientists 33 D-Index: 88 scientists 34 D-Index: 123 scientists 35 D-Index: 163 scientists 36 D-Index: 206 scientists 37 D-Index: 267 scientists 38 D-Index: 265 scientists 39 D-Index: 275 scientists 40 D-Index: 321 scientists 41 D-Index: 343 scientists 42 D-Index: 305 scientists 43 D-Index: 336 scientists 44 D-Index: 330 scientists 45 D-Index: 348 scientists 46 D-Index: 291 scientists 47 D-Index: 275 scientists 48 D-Index: 272 scientists 49 D-Index: 273 scientists 50 D-Index: 263 scientists 51 D-Index: 232 scientists 52 D-Index: 266 scientists 53 D-Index: 217 scientists 54 D-Index: 198 scientists 55 D-Index: 177 scientists 56 D-Index: 202 scientists 57 D-Index: 204 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 177 scientists 60 D-Index: 166 scientists 61 D-Index: 152 scientists 62 D-Index: 143 scientists 63 D-Index: 150 scientists 64 D-Index: 124 scientists 65 D-Index: 119 scientists 66 D-Index: 120 scientists 67 D-Index: 118 scientists 68 D-Index: 82 scientists 69 D-Index: 98 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 105 scientists 72 D-Index: 74 scientists 73 D-Index: 84 scientists 74 D-Index: 70 scientists 75 D-Index: 67 scientists 76 D-Index: 78 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 59 scientists 79 D-Index: 52 scientists 80 D-Index: 47 scientists 81 D-Index: 38 scientists 82 D-Index: 48 scientists 83 D-Index: 42 scientists 84 D-Index: 42 scientists 85 D-Index: 43 scientists 86 D-Index: 29 scientists 87 D-Index: 37 scientists 88 D-Index: 29 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 34 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 22 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 19 scientists 95 D-Index: 24 scientists 96 D-Index: 21 scientists 97 D-Index: 20 scientists 98 D-Index: 24 scientists 99 D-Index: 17 scientists 100 D-Index: 17 scientists 101 D-Index: 21 scientists 102 D-Index: 25 scientists 103 D-Index: 18 scientists 104 D-Index: 26 scientists 105 D-Index: 20 scientists 106 D-Index: 15 scientists 107 D-Index: 10 scientists 108 D-Index: 13 scientists 109 D-Index: 15 scientists 110 D-Index: 12 scientists 111 D-Index: 8 scientists 112 D-Index: 7 scientists 113 D-Index: 9 scientists 114 D-Index: 6 scientists 115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116 D-Index: 7 scientists 117 D-Index: 8 scientists 118 D-Index: 3 scientists 119 D-Index: 5 scientists 120 D-Index: 7 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 4 scientists 123 D-Index: 8 scientists 124 D-Index: 7 scientists 125 D-Index: 9 scientists 126+ D-Index: 92 scientists
30 D-Index 126+

This scientist: 34 D-Index — 3rd percentile

3% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 126 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Environmental Sciences scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,676 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 12
31 26
32 51
33 88
34 123 34
35 163
36 206
37 267
38 265
39 275
40 321
41 343
42 305
43 336
44 330
45 348
46 291
47 275
48 272
49 273
50 263
51 232
52 266
53 217
54 198
55 177
56 202
57 204
58 166
59 177
60 166
61 152
62 143
63 150
64 124
65 119
66 120
67 118
68 82
69 98
70 94
71 105
72 74
73 84
74 70
75 67
76 78
77 60
78 59
79 52
80 47
81 38
82 48
83 42
84 42
85 43
86 29
87 37
88 29
89 30
90 34
91 20
92 22
93 17
94 19
95 24
96 21
97 20
98 24
99 17
100 17
101 21
102 25
103 18
104 26
105 20
106 15
107 10
108 13
109 15
110 12
111 8
112 7
113 9
114 6
115 12
116 7
117 8
118 3
119 5
120 7
121 2
122 4
123 8
124 7
125 9
126+ 92
Download as CSV

Overview

Michela Biasutti is affiliated with Columbia University in the United States and has a research focus grounded in Earth and Planetary Sciences and Environmental Science. Their scientific contributions span several subfields including Atmospheric Science, Global and Planetary Change, Oceanography, Water Science and Technology, and Environmental Engineering.

The main topics of their work include Climate Variability and Models, Meteorological Phenomena and Simulations, Tropical and Extratropical Cyclones Research, Hydrology and Drought Analysis, Oceanographic and Atmospheric Processes, Plant Water Relations and Carbon Dynamics, and Geology and Paleoclimatology Research.

Among their recent publications are:

  • Monsoons Climate Change Assessment, 2020, Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society
  • Wetting and drying trends under climate change, 2023, Nature Water
  • Fingerprints of external forcings on Sahel rainfall: aerosols, greenhouse gases, and model-observation discrepancies, 2020, Environmental Research Letters
  • Polar Amplification as an Inherent Response of a Circulating Atmosphere: Results From the TRACMIP Aquaplanets, 2020, Geophysical Research Letters
  • The effects of anthropogenic and volcanic aerosols and greenhouse gases on twentieth century Sahel precipitation, 2020, Scientific Reports

The scientist frequently collaborates with others in the field. Notable coauthors include Spencer A. Hill, Adam H. Sobel, Yochanan Kushnir, Aiko Voigt, and Michael P. Byrne.

Their work is often published in certain key scientific venues which include Geophysical Research Letters, Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences, Journal of Climate, Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society, and Environmental Research Letters.

Best Publications

  • A global perspective on African climate

    Alessandra Giannini;Michela Biasutti;Isaac M. Held;Adam H. Sobel

  • Sensitivity of the Atlantic Intertropical Convergence Zone to Last Glacial Maximum boundary conditions

    John C. H. Chiang;Michela Biasutti;David S. Battisti

  • Forced Sahel rainfall trends in the CMIP5 archive

    M. Biasutti

  • Robust Sahel drying in response to late 20th century forcings

    Michela Biasutti;Alessandra Giannini

  • Rainfall trends in the African Sahel: Characteristics, processes, and causes

    Michela Biasutti

  • A climate model-based review of drought in the Sahel: Desertification, the re-greening and climate change

    Alessandra Giannini;Michela Biasutti;Michel M. Verstraete

  • Monsoons Climate Change Assessment

    Bin Wang;Michela Biasutti;Michael P. Byrne;Christopher Castro

  • SST Forcings and Sahel Rainfall Variability in Simulations of the Twentieth and Twenty-First Centuries

    Michela Biasutti;Isaac M. Held;A. H. Sobel;A. Giannini

  • Delayed Sahel rainfall and global seasonal cycle in a warmer climate

    Michela Biasutti;Adam H. Sobel

  • Variability and predictability of West African droughts: a review on the role of sea surface temperature anomalies.

    Belen Rodríguez-Fonseca;Elsa Mohino;Carlos R. Mechoso;Cyril Caminade

  • Very high resolution rainfall patterns measured by TRMM precipitation radar: seasonal and diurnal cycles

    Michela Biasutti;Sandra E. Yuter;Casey D. Burleyson;Adam H. Sobel

  • CMIP5 Projected Changes in the Annual Cycle of Precipitation in Monsoon Regions

    Anji Seth;Sara A. Rauscher;Michela Biasutti;Alessandra Giannini

  • Projected Changes in the Seasonal Cycle of Surface Temperature

    John Gaffney Dwyer;Michela Biasutti;Adam H. Sobel

  • Global energetics and local physics as drivers of past, present and future monsoons

    Michela Biasutti;Aiko Voigt;Aiko Voigt;William R. Boos;Pascale Braconnot

  • Robust features of future climate change impacts on sorghum yields in West Africa

    Benjamin Sultan;Kaiyu Guan;Mamoutou Kouressy;Michela Biasutti

  • Projected changes in the physical climate of the Gulf Coast and Caribbean

    Michela Biasutti;Adam H. Sobel;Adam H. Sobel;Suzana J. Camargo;Timothy T. Creyts

  • AGCM Precipitation Biases in the Tropical Atlantic

    M. Biasutti;A. H. Sobel;Y. Kushnir

  • The Role of the Sahara Low in Summertime Sahel Rainfall Variability and Change in the CMIP3 Models

    Michela Biasutti;Adam H. Sobel;Suzana J. Camargo

  • Assessing climate adaptation options and uncertainties for cereal systems in West Africa

    Kaiyu Guan;Kaiyu Guan;Benjamin Sultan;Michela Biasutti;Christian Baron

  • The Annual Cycle over the Tropical Atlantic, South America, and Africa*

    M. Biasutti;D. S. Battisti;E. S. Sarachik

Frequent Co-Authors

Adam H. Sobel
Adam H. Sobel Lamont-Doherty Earth Observatory
Aiko Voigt
Aiko Voigt Karlsruhe Institute of Technology
Alessandra Giannini
Alessandra Giannini Columbia University
Kaiyu Guan
Kaiyu Guan University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
David B. Lobell
David B. Lobell Stanford University
Yochanan Kushnir
Yochanan Kushnir Lamont-Doherty Earth Observatory
David S. Battisti
David S. Battisti University of Washington
Benjamin Sultan
Benjamin Sultan Institut de Recherche pour le Développement
Sandra E. Yuter
Sandra E. Yuter North Carolina State University
Richard Seager
Richard Seager Lamont-Doherty Earth Observatory

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Environmental Sciences in the USA opens doors to diverse career opportunities that often intersect with fields like public administration, sociology, and education. For those aiming to blend environmental knowledge with leadership roles, exploring mpa one year programs offers accelerated pathways to governance and policy-making careers. These programs emphasize public sector management, pivotal for environmental policy development and implementation.

Understanding social dynamics is crucial in addressing environmental challenges. Pursuing an online sociology bachelor programs can provide valuable insights into community behaviors and cultural impacts, enhancing the effectiveness of environmental initiatives.

For those seeking advanced education without the extended commitment of traditional research, online doctoral programs without dissertation offer a flexible route to doctoral credentials. These programs are ideal for professionals who want to elevate their expertise and leadership in environmental education or policy without extensive research components.

Additionally, professionals can consider progressing through eds to edd program pathways, which facilitate seamless advancement from a master's to a doctoral degree in education. This pathway is especially beneficial for educators aiming to specialize in environmental education and advocacy.

Best Scientists Citing Michela Biasutti

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles