World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
80
Citations
40850
World Ranking
16885
National Ranking
8468

Michael Miller publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Michael Miller sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 611 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 322 publications — 21st percentile

21% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Michael Miller D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Michael Miller sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 400 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 80 D-Index — 16th percentile

16% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

Michael Miller is affiliated with the Corporal Michael J. Crescenz VA Medical Center in the United States. Their research spans primarily across the field of Medicine, with a strong focus on subfields including Surgery, Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, Nutrition and Dietetics, Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism, and Physiology.

Their work addresses a variety of topics related to cardiovascular health and metabolic processes. Main topics covered in their publications include Lipoproteins and Cardiovascular Health, Fatty Acid Research and Health, Diabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and Lipoproteins, Diet and Metabolism Studies, Eicosanoids and Hypertension Pharmacology, Cardiovascular Disease and Adiposity, and Lipid Metabolism and Disorders.

Michael Miller has contributed to numerous papers, with some recent publications as follows:

  • Effect of omega-3 fatty acids on cardiovascular outcomes: A systematic review and meta-analysis, 2021, EClinicalMedicine
  • 2021 ACC Expert Consensus Decision Pathway on the Management of ASCVD Risk Reduction in Patients With Persistent Hypertriglyceridemia, 2021, Journal of the American College of Cardiology
  • Comparison of Proteomic Assessment Methods in Multiple Cohort Studies, 2020, PROTEOMICS
  • Barriers, Opportunities, and Challenges in Addressing Disparities in Diet-Related Cardiovascular Disease in the United States, 2020, Journal of the American Heart Association
  • Effects of Randomized Treatment With Icosapent Ethyl and a Mineral Oil Comparator on Interleukin-1β, Interleukin-6, C-Reactive Protein, Oxidized Low-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol, Homocysteine, Lipoprotein(a), and Lipoprotein-Associated Phospholipase A2: A REDUCE-IT Biomarker Substudy, 2022, Circulation

The scientist collaborates frequently with a number of coauthors, including:

  • Deepak L. Bhatt
  • Christie M. Ballantyne
  • Eliot A. Brinton
  • Philippe Gabríel Steg
  • Terry A. Jacobson

Michael Miller's work is published in several key journals, with multiple publications especially in:

  • Journal of the American College of Cardiology (14 publications)
  • Circulation (12 publications)
  • Paediatrics & Child Health (11 publications)
  • European Heart Journal (8 publications)
  • Journal of the American Heart Association (5 publications)

Best Publications

  • Effects of intensive glucose lowering in type 2 diabetes

    Hertzel C Gerstein;Michael E Miller;Robert P Byington

  • Cardiovascular Risk Reduction with Icosapent Ethyl for Hypertriglyceridemia

    Deepak L. Bhatt;P. Gabriel Steg;Michael Miller;Eliot A. Brinton

  • Triglycerides and Cardiovascular Disease A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association

    Michael Miller;Neil J. Stone;Christie Ballantyne;Vera Bittner

  • Effect of Amlodipine on the Progression of Atherosclerosis and the Occurrence of Clinical Events

    Bertram Pitt;Robert P. Byington;Curt D. Furberg;Donald B. Hunninghake

  • Extended-Release Niacin or Ezetimibe and Carotid Intima–Media Thickness

    Allen J. Taylor;Todd C. Villines;Eric J. Stanek;Patrick J. Devine

  • Omega-3 fatty acids and coronary heart disease risk: clinical and mechanistic perspectives.

    William S. Harris;Michael Miller;Ann P. Tighe;Michael H. Davidson

  • A null mutation in human APOC3 confers a favorable plasma lipid profile and apparent cardioprotection

    Toni I. Pollin;Coleen M. Damcott;Haiqing Shen;Sandra H. Ott

  • Impact of triglyceride levels beyond low-density lipoprotein cholesterol after acute coronary syndrome in the PROVE IT-TIMI 22 trial.

    Michael Miller;Christopher P. Cannon;Sabina A. Murphy;Jie Qin

  • Cardiovascular efficacy and safety of bococizumab in high-risk patients

    Paul M. Ridker;James Revkin;Pierre Amarenco;Robert Brunell

  • Statin Safety and Associated Adverse Events: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association

    Connie B. Newman;David Preiss;Jonathan A. Tobert;Terry A. Jacobson

  • International, randomized, controlled trial of lamifiban (a platelet glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitor), heparin, or both in unstable angina

    E Topol;R Califf;F Van De Werf;R Diaz

  • Physical activity, functional limitations, and disability in older adults.

    Michael E. Miller;W. Jack Rejeski;Beth A. Reboussin;Thomas R. Ten Have

  • High-density lipoproteins: A consensus statement from the National Lipid Association

    Peter P. Toth;Peter P. Toth;Philip J. Barter;Robert S. Rosenson;William E. Boden

  • A Familial Deficiency of the Phagocytosis-Enhancing Activity of Serum Related to a Dysfunction of the Fifth Component of Complement (C5)

    Michael E. Miller;Ulf R. Nilsson

  • The ARBITER 6-HALTS Trial (Arterial Biology for the Investigation of the Treatment Effects of Reducing Cholesterol 6–HDL and LDL Treatment Strategies in Atherosclerosis): Final Results and the Impact of Medication Adherence, Dose, and Treatment Duration

    Todd C. Villines;Eric J. Stanek;Patrick J. Devine;Mark Turco

  • Normal Triglyceride Levels and Coronary Artery Disease Events: The Baltimore Coronary Observational Long-Term Study

    Michael Miller;Michael Miller;Alexander Seidler;Alexander Seidler;Azita Moalemi;Azita Moalemi;Thomas A Pearson

  • Requiring physicians to respond to computerized reminders improves their compliance with preventive care protocols

    Debra K. Litzelman;Robert S. Dittus;Michael E. Miller;William M. Tierney

  • Scapular fractures. Analysis of 113 cases.

    Jesse R. Ada;Michael E. Miller

  • Fasting triglycerides predict recurrent ischemic events in patients with acute coronary syndrome treated with statins.

    Gregory G. Schwartz;Markus Abt;Weihang Bao;David DeMicco

  • Genome Screening in Human Systemic Lupus Erythematosus: Results from a Second Minnesota Cohort and Combined Analyses of 187 Sib-Pair Families

    Patrick M. Gaffney;Ward A. Ortmann;Scott A. Selby;Katherine B. Shark

Frequent Co-Authors

Christie M. Ballantyne
Christie M. Ballantyne Baylor College of Medicine
Deepak L. Bhatt
Deepak L. Bhatt Mount Sinai Hospital
Terry A. Jacobson
Terry A. Jacobson Emory University
W. Jack Rejeski
W. Jack Rejeski Wake Forest University
Stephen B. Kritchevsky
Stephen B. Kritchevsky Wake Forest University
Jean-Claude Tardif
Jean-Claude Tardif Montreal Heart Institute
Braxton D. Mitchell
Braxton D. Mitchell University of Maryland, Baltimore
Abby C. King
Abby C. King Stanford University
Alan R. Shuldiner
Alan R. Shuldiner University of Maryland, Baltimore
Mark A. Espeland
Mark A. Espeland Wake Forest University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing Medicine in the USA opens doors to many rewarding healthcare careers. If you’re exploring flexible or alternative pathways, online degrees in nursing offer an accessible way to advance your qualifications and skills—often while continuing to work or manage other responsibilities.

For those mindful of cost, cheap online nursing programs provide quality education at lower tuition rates. These programs are ideal for students seeking value without sacrificing accreditation or outcomes.

Nurses looking to expand their credentials may consider rn to bsn online programs, which allow registered nurses to earn a bachelor’s degree remotely and efficiently. Advanced practice or leadership roles may require even higher education—online nursing phd programs are available for those interested in research or teaching.

Even individuals without a nursing background can enter the profession through msn direct entry programs online, which are designed for career changers seeking a fast track to a master’s-level nursing qualification. Each route provides flexibility, making online study a popular choice for today’s aspiring healthcare professionals.

Best Scientists Citing Michael Miller

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles