World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Ecology and Evolution

D-Index
41
Citations
16304
World Ranking
5683
National Ranking
1936

Meg A. Krawchuk publication distribution in Ecology and Evolution in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Ecology and Evolution in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Meg A. Krawchuk sits on this spectrum.

37–41 publications: 2 scientists 42–46 publications: 9 scientists 47–51 publications: 10 scientists 52–56 publications: 31 scientists 57–61 publications: 56 scientists 62–66 publications: 91 scientists 67–71 publications: 92 scientists 72–76 publications: 127 scientists 77–81 publications: 173 scientists 82–86 publications: 236 scientists 87–91 publications: 227 scientists 92–96 publications: 240 scientists 97–101 publications: 333 scientists 102–106 publications: 280 scientists 107–111 publications: 300 scientists 112–116 publications: 285 scientists 117–121 publications: 305 scientists 122–126 publications: 287 scientists 127–131 publications: 278 scientists 132–136 publications: 289 scientists 137–141 publications: 273 scientists 142–146 publications: 262 scientists 147–151 publications: 246 scientists 152–156 publications: 235 scientists 157–161 publications: 205 scientists 162–166 publications: 199 scientists 167–171 publications: 174 scientists 172–176 publications: 164 scientists 177–181 publications: 173 scientists 182–186 publications: 189 scientists 187–191 publications: 170 scientists 192–196 publications: 139 scientists 197–201 publications: 128 scientists 202–206 publications: 117 scientists 207–211 publications: 115 scientists 212–216 publications: 107 scientists 217–221 publications: 124 scientists 222–226 publications: 81 scientists 227–231 publications: 82 scientists 232–236 publications: 85 scientists 237–241 publications: 75 scientists 242–246 publications: 66 scientists 247–251 publications: 81 scientists 252–256 publications: 69 scientists 257–261 publications: 70 scientists 262–266 publications: 55 scientists 267–271 publications: 64 scientists 272–276 publications: 49 scientists 277–281 publications: 48 scientists 282–286 publications: 44 scientists 287–291 publications: 45 scientists 292–296 publications: 36 scientists 297–301 publications: 39 scientists 302–306 publications: 38 scientists 307–311 publications: 30 scientists 312–316 publications: 34 scientists 317–321 publications: 25 scientists 322–326 publications: 22 scientists 327–331 publications: 28 scientists 332–336 publications: 30 scientists 337–341 publications: 22 scientists 342–346 publications: 30 scientists 347–351 publications: 26 scientists 352–356 publications: 22 scientists 357–361 publications: 29 scientists 362–366 publications: 21 scientists 367–371 publications: 12 scientists 372–376 publications: 18 scientists 377–381 publications: 17 scientists 382–386 publications: 13 scientists 387–391 publications: 21 scientists 392–396 publications: 13 scientists 397–401 publications: 10 scientists 402–406 publications: 15 scientists 407–411 publications: 8 scientists 412–416 publications: 9 scientists 417–421 publications: 8 scientists 422–426 publications: 4 scientists 427–431 publications: 10 scientists 432–436 publications: 10 scientists 437–441 publications: 5 scientists 442–446 publications: 4 scientists 447–451 publications: 10 scientists 452–456 publications: 2 scientists 457–461 publications: 4 scientists 462–466 publications: 7 scientists 467–471 publications: 7 scientists 472–476 publications: 6 scientists 477–481 publications: 6 scientists 482–486 publications: 3 scientists 487–491 publications: 3 scientists 492–496 publications: 4 scientists 497–501 publications: 4 scientists 502–506 publications: 8 scientists 507–511 publications: 5 scientists 512–516 publications: 4 scientists 517–521 publications: 5 scientists 522–526 publications: 4 scientists 527–530 publications: 5 scientists 531+ publications: 100 scientists
37 publications 531+

This scientist: 92 publications — 13th percentile

13% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 531 publications or more.

Meg A. Krawchuk D-index placement in Ecology and Evolution in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Ecology and Evolution scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Meg A. Krawchuk sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 95 scientists 31 D-Index: 123 scientists 32 D-Index: 191 scientists 33 D-Index: 245 scientists 34 D-Index: 252 scientists 35 D-Index: 244 scientists 36 D-Index: 249 scientists 37 D-Index: 244 scientists 38 D-Index: 254 scientists 39 D-Index: 254 scientists 40 D-Index: 280 scientists 41 D-Index: 274 scientists 42 D-Index: 266 scientists 43 D-Index: 233 scientists 44 D-Index: 248 scientists 45 D-Index: 208 scientists 46 D-Index: 201 scientists 47 D-Index: 213 scientists 48 D-Index: 207 scientists 49 D-Index: 172 scientists 50 D-Index: 209 scientists 51 D-Index: 199 scientists 52 D-Index: 153 scientists 53 D-Index: 169 scientists 54 D-Index: 163 scientists 55 D-Index: 148 scientists 56 D-Index: 120 scientists 57 D-Index: 146 scientists 58 D-Index: 137 scientists 59 D-Index: 140 scientists 60 D-Index: 104 scientists 61 D-Index: 119 scientists 62 D-Index: 118 scientists 63 D-Index: 99 scientists 64 D-Index: 77 scientists 65 D-Index: 100 scientists 66 D-Index: 86 scientists 67 D-Index: 83 scientists 68 D-Index: 75 scientists 69 D-Index: 94 scientists 70 D-Index: 57 scientists 71 D-Index: 68 scientists 72 D-Index: 59 scientists 73 D-Index: 63 scientists 74 D-Index: 66 scientists 75 D-Index: 60 scientists 76 D-Index: 42 scientists 77 D-Index: 49 scientists 78 D-Index: 39 scientists 79 D-Index: 37 scientists 80 D-Index: 43 scientists 81 D-Index: 41 scientists 82 D-Index: 45 scientists 83 D-Index: 34 scientists 84 D-Index: 40 scientists 85 D-Index: 35 scientists 86 D-Index: 55 scientists 87 D-Index: 24 scientists 88 D-Index: 24 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 23 scientists 91 D-Index: 25 scientists 92 D-Index: 27 scientists 93 D-Index: 27 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 23 scientists 96 D-Index: 12 scientists 97 D-Index: 14 scientists 98 D-Index: 19 scientists 99 D-Index: 16 scientists 100 D-Index: 14 scientists 101 D-Index: 5 scientists 102 D-Index: 21 scientists 103 D-Index: 16 scientists 104 D-Index: 10 scientists 105 D-Index: 7 scientists 106 D-Index: 7 scientists 107 D-Index: 7 scientists 108 D-Index: 6 scientists 109 D-Index: 9 scientists 110 D-Index: 11 scientists 111 D-Index: 12 scientists 112 D-Index: 9 scientists 113 D-Index: 7 scientists 114 D-Index: 3 scientists 115 D-Index: 8 scientists 116 D-Index: 5 scientists 117 D-Index: 11 scientists 118 D-Index: 4 scientists 119 D-Index: 2 scientists 120 D-Index: 5 scientists 121+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 121+

This scientist: 41 D-Index — 32nd percentile

32% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 121 D-Index or more.

Overview

Meg A. Krawchuk is affiliated with Oregon State University in the United States. Their research primarily focuses on environmental science, with a particular emphasis on global and planetary change, ecology, and nature and landscape conservation. The subfields they contribute to include ecology, evolution, behavior and systematics, as well as atmospheric science.

The main topics researched by Meg A. Krawchuk involve fire effects on ecosystems, ecology and vegetation dynamics studies, and rangeland and wildlife management. Additional areas of work include plant and animal studies, forest insect ecology and management, species distribution in relation to climate change, and plant water relations alongside carbon dynamics.

Their recent publications include the following:

  • Evidence for widespread changes in the structure, composition, and fire regimes of western North American forests (2021, Ecological Applications)
  • Climate-change refugia: biodiversity in the slow lane (2020, Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment)
  • Disturbance refugia within mosaics of forest fire, drought, and insect outbreaks (2020, Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment)
  • Reduced fire severity offers near-term buffer to climate-driven declines in conifer resilience across the western United States (2023, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences)
  • Wildfire, Smoke Exposure, Human Health, and Environmental Justice Need to be Integrated into Forest Restoration and Management (2022, Current Environmental Health Reports)

The frequent coauthors who collaborate with Meg A. Krawchuk are:

  • Garrett W. Meigs
  • Claire M. Tortorelli
  • Mark E. Swanson
  • James D. Johnston
  • Becky K. Kerns

The primary venues where their work is published include:

  • Forest Ecology and Management
  • CATALOG OREGON STATE ARTHROPOD COLLECTION
  • Forest Service Research Data Archive
  • Ecological Applications
  • Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment

Best Publications

  • Fire in the Earth System

    David M. J. S. Bowman;Jennifer K. Balch;Jennifer K. Balch;Jennifer K. Balch;Paulo Artaxo;William J. Bond

  • Implications of changing climate for global wildland fire

    Mike D. Flannigan;Meg A. Krawchuk;William J. de Groot;B. Mike Wotton

  • The human dimension of fire regimes on Earth

    David M. J. S. Bowman;Jennifer Balch;Paulo Artaxo;William J. Bond

  • Global pyrogeography: the current and future distribution of wildfire.

    Meg A. Krawchuk;Max A. Moritz;Marc-André Parisien;Marc-André Parisien;Jeff Van Dorn

  • Climate change and disruptions to global fire activity

    Max A. Moritz;Marc-André Parisien;Enric Batllori;Meg A. Krawchuk

  • Application of random effects to the study of resource selection by animals

    Cameron S. Gillies;Mark Hebblewhite;Scott E. Nielsen;Meg A. Krawchuk

  • Adapt to more wildfire in western North American forests as climate changes

    Tania Schoennagel;Jennifer K. Balch;Hannah Brenkert-Smith;Philip E. Dennison

  • Constraints on global fire activity vary across a resource gradient.

    Meg A. Krawchuk;Max A. Moritz

  • Why have global shark and ray landings declined: improved management or overfishing?

    Lindsay N K Davidson;Meg A Krawchuk;Nicholas K Dulvy

  • Evidence for widespread changes in the structure, composition, and fire regimes of western North American forests.

    R. K. Hagmann;P. F. Hessburg;P. F. Hessburg;S. J. Prichard;N. A. Povak

  • Climate‐change refugia: biodiversity in the slow lane

    Toni Lyn Morelli;Cameron W Barrows;Aaron R Ramirez;Jennifer M Cartwright

  • Rethinking resilience to wildfire

    David B. McWethy;Tania Schoennagel;Philip E. Higuera;Meg Krawchuk

  • BIOTIC AND ABIOTIC REGULATION OF LIGHTNING FIRE INITIATION IN THE MIXEDWOOD BOREAL FOREST

    M. A. Krawchuk;S. G. Cumming;M. D. Flannigan;R. W. Wein

  • Climate change-induced shifts in fire for Mediterranean ecosystems

    Enric Batllori;Marc-André Parisien;Meg A. Krawchuk;Max A. Moritz

  • Fire Refugia: What Are They, and Why Do They Matter for Global Change?

    Arjan J H Meddens;Crystal A Kolden;James A Lutz;Alistair M S Smith

  • Global protected areas and IUCN designations: Do the categories match the conditions?

    Shawn J. Leroux;Meg A. Krawchuk;Fiona Schmiegelow;Steven G. Cumming

  • Predicted changes in fire weather suggest increases in lightning fire initiation and future area burned in the mixedwood boreal forest

    Meg A. Krawchuk;Steve G. Cumming;Mike D. Flannigan

  • Spatial variation in extreme winds predicts large wildfire locations in chaparral ecosystems

    Max A. Moritz;Tadashi J. Moody;Meg A. Krawchuk;Mimi Hughes;Mimi Hughes

  • Topographic and fire weather controls of fire refugia in forested ecosystems of northwestern North America

    Meg A. Krawchuk;Sandra L. Haire;Jonathan D. Coop;Marc-Andre Parisien

  • Forest fire management, climate change and the risk of catastrophic carbon losses

    David M. J. S Bowman;Brett P Murphy;Brett P Murphy;Mathias M Boer;Ross A Bradstock

Frequent Co-Authors

Max A. Moritz
Max A. Moritz University of California, Santa Barbara
Marc-André Parisien
Marc-André Parisien Natural Resources Canada
Carol Miller
Carol Miller US Forest Service
Jennifer K. Balch
Jennifer K. Balch University of Colorado Boulder
Mike D. Flannigan
Mike D. Flannigan University of Alberta
Mark A. Cochrane
Mark A. Cochrane University of Maryland Center For Environmental Sciences
David M. J. S. Bowman
David M. J. S. Bowman University of Tasmania
Jon E. Keeley
Jon E. Keeley United States Geological Survey
Steven G. Cumming
Steven G. Cumming Université Laval
Thomas W. Swetnam
Thomas W. Swetnam University of Arizona

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing studies in Ecology and Evolution can open doors to diverse career paths, many of which are increasingly accessible through online education. Innovative programs, such as direct entry msn programs online, demonstrate the flexibility found in web-based learning—even for fields that traditionally require in-person training.

Selecting the right institution is vital, particularly when considering accreditation and program quality. For example, understanding the details of capella university nursing accreditation helps students make informed decisions about where to enroll. This is equally true for bridge programs, as highlighted by popular rn to msn bridge programs, which showcase seamless educational progression for advancing one's career.

For those aspiring to credible and reputable qualifications, enrolling in non profit online colleges ensures a focus on academic excellence and student outcomes. Whichever path you choose, online degrees are providing more accessible, flexible routes to professional success in ecology, evolution, and many other fields.

Best Scientists Citing Meg A. Krawchuk

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles