World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Neuroscience

D-Index
76
Citations
37851
World Ranking
1883
National Ranking
63

Nadine Attal publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Nadine Attal sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientists 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 887+

This scientist: 246 publications — 74th percentile

74% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

Nadine Attal D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Nadine Attal sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 76 D-Index — 80th percentile

80% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

Overview

Nadine Attal is affiliated with Grenoble Alpes University in France and works primarily in the field of Medicine. Their research focuses on subfields such as Physiology, Neurology, Pharmacology, Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, and Cognitive Neuroscience.

The researcher has contributed extensively to topics including Pain Mechanisms and Treatments, Botulinum Toxin and Related Neurological Disorders, Musculoskeletal Pain and Rehabilitation, Pain Management and Placebo Effect, Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Studies, Pain Management and Opioid Use, and Pain Management and Treatment.

Among recent papers authored or co-authored by Nadine Attal are the following:

  • Pharmacological and non-pharmacological treatments for neuropathic pain: Systematic review and French recommendations (2020), Revue Neurologique
  • Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation for neuropathic pain: a randomized multicentre sham-controlled trial (2021), Brain
  • Potential for increased prevalence of neuropathic pain after the COVID-19 pandemic (2021), PAIN Reports
  • Advances and challenges in neuropathic pain: a narrative review and future directions (2023), British Journal of Anaesthesia
  • Joint European Academy of Neurology-European Pain Federation-Neuropathic Pain Special Interest Group of the International Association for the Study of Pain guidelines on neuropathic pain assessment (2023), European Journal of Neurology

Frequent co-authors collaborating with Nadine Attal include:

  • Didier Bouhassira
  • Serge Perrot
  • Ralf Baron
  • Nanna Brix Finnerup
  • Andrew S.C. Rice

Publications are frequently found in venues such as:

  • Pain
  • British Journal of Anaesthesia
  • Revue Neurologique
  • European Journal of Pain
  • PAIN Reports

Best Publications

  • Pharmacotherapy for neuropathic pain in adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

    Nanna B Finnerup;Nadine Attal;Simon Haroutounian;Ewan McNicol

  • Comparison of pain syndromes associated with nervous or somatic lesions and development of a new neuropathic pain diagnostic questionnaire (DN4)

    Didier Bouhassira;Nadine Attal;Haiel Alchaar;François Boureau

  • EFNS guidelines on the pharmacological treatment of neuropathic pain: 2010 revision

    N. Attal;G. Cruccu;R. Baron;M. Haanpää

  • Prevalence of chronic pain with neuropathic characteristics in the general population

    Didier Bouhassira;Michel Lantéri-Minet;Nadine Attal;Bernard Laurent

  • Neuropathic pain

    Unknown

  • Development and validation of the Neuropathic Pain Symptom Inventory

    Didier Bouhassira;Nadine Attal;Jacques Fermanian;Haiel Alchaar

  • EFNS guidelines on pharmacological treatment of neuropathic pain

    N. Attal;G. Cruccu;M. Haanpää;P. Hansson

  • NeuPSIG guidelines on neuropathic pain assessment

    Maija Haanpää;Nadine Attal;Miroslav Backonja;Ralf Baron

  • The IASP classification of chronic pain for ICD-11: chronic neuropathic pain.

    Joachim Scholz;Nanna B. Finnerup;Nadine Attal;Qasim Aziz

  • Using screening tools to identify neuropathic pain

    Michael I. Bennett;Nadine Attal;Miroslav M. Backonja;Ralf Baron

  • Further evidence for ‘pain-related’ behaviours in a model of unilateral peripheral mononeuropathy

    N. Attal;F. Jazat;V. Kayser;G. Guilbaud

  • EFNS guidelines on neuropathic pain assessment.

    G. Cruccu;P. Anand;N. Attal;L. Garcia‐Larrea

  • EFNS guidelines on neuropathic pain assessment: revised 2009.

    G. Cruccu;C. Sommer;P. Anand;N. Attal

  • Value of quantitative sensory testing in neurological and pain disorders: NeuPSIG consensus.

    Miroslav Misha Backonja;Nadine Attal;Ralf Baron;Didier Bouhassira

  • Peripheral neuropathic pain: a mechanism-related organizing principle based on sensory profiles.

    Ralf Baron;Christoph Maier;Nadine Attal;Andreas Binder

  • Botulinum toxin type A induces direct analgesic effects in chronic neuropathic pain.

    Danièle Ranoux;Nadine Attal;Françoise Morain;Didier Bouhassira

  • The specific disease burden of neuropathic pain: results of a French nationwide survey.

    Nadine Attal;Michel Lanteri-Minet;Bernard Laurent;Jacques Fermanian

  • Pharmacological and non-pharmacological treatments for neuropathic pain: Systematic review and French recommendations.

    X. Moisset;D. Bouhassira;J. Avez Couturier;H. Alchaar

  • Neuropathic pain: are there distinct subtypes depending on the aetiology or anatomical lesion?

    Nadine Attal;Christian Fermanian;Jacques Fermanian;Michel Lantéri-Minet

  • Topical clonazepam in stomatodynia: a randomised placebo-controlled study.

    Christelle Gremeau-Richard;Alain Woda;Marie Louise Navez;Nadine Attal

  • Intravenous lidocaine in central pain: A double-blind, placebo-controlled, psychophysical study

    N. Attal;V. Gaudé;L. Brasseur;M. Dupuy

  • Pharmacotherapy for Neuropathic Pain in Adults: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

    N.B. Finnerup;N. Attal;S. Haroutounian

Frequent Co-Authors

Didier Bouhassira
Didier Bouhassira Grenoble Alpes University
Troels S. Jensen
Troels S. Jensen Aarhus University
Per Hansson
Per Hansson Karolinska Institute
Ralf Baron
Ralf Baron Kiel University
Nanna B. Finnerup
Nanna B. Finnerup Aarhus University
Andrew S.C. Rice
Andrew S.C. Rice Imperial College London
Giorgio Cruccu
Giorgio Cruccu Sapienza University of Rome
Rolf-Detlef Treede
Rolf-Detlef Treede Heidelberg University
Thomas R. Tölle
Thomas R. Tölle Technical University of Munich
Märta Segerdahl
Märta Segerdahl Karolinska Institute

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Best Scientists Citing Nadine Attal

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles