World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Environmental Sciences

D-Index
49
Citations
7237
World Ranking
5355
National Ranking
1959

Mary Lynn Baeck publication distribution in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Environmental Sciences in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Mary Lynn Baeck sits on this spectrum.

41–50 publications: 21 scientists 51–60 publications: 62 scientists 61–70 publications: 133 scientists 71–80 publications: 257 scientists 81–90 publications: 361 scientists 91–100 publications: 440 scientists 101–110 publications: 492 scientists 111–120 publications: 541 scientists 121–130 publications: 617 scientists 131–140 publications: 544 scientists 141–150 publications: 541 scientists 151–160 publications: 539 scientists 161–170 publications: 444 scientists 171–180 publications: 444 scientists 181–190 publications: 400 scientists 191–200 publications: 377 scientists 201–210 publications: 318 scientists 211–220 publications: 283 scientists 221–230 publications: 263 scientists 231–240 publications: 220 scientists 241–250 publications: 217 scientists 251–260 publications: 180 scientists 261–270 publications: 181 scientists 271–280 publications: 155 scientists 281–290 publications: 130 scientists 291–300 publications: 127 scientists 301–310 publications: 130 scientists 311–320 publications: 85 scientists 321–330 publications: 106 scientists 331–340 publications: 80 scientists 341–350 publications: 83 scientists 351–360 publications: 75 scientists 361–370 publications: 69 scientists 371–380 publications: 52 scientists 381–390 publications: 54 scientists 391–400 publications: 56 scientists 401–410 publications: 44 scientists 411–420 publications: 40 scientists 421–430 publications: 36 scientists 431–440 publications: 25 scientists 441–450 publications: 25 scientists 451–460 publications: 32 scientists 461–470 publications: 29 scientists 471–480 publications: 21 scientists 481–490 publications: 26 scientists 491–500 publications: 25 scientists 501–510 publications: 17 scientists 511–520 publications: 18 scientists 521–530 publications: 15 scientists 531–540 publications: 22 scientists 541–550 publications: 12 scientists 551–560 publications: 15 scientists 561–570 publications: 11 scientists 571–580 publications: 19 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 9 scientists 601–610 publications: 7 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 5 scientists 631–640 publications: 5 scientists 641–650 publications: 6 scientists 651–660 publications: 3 scientists 661–670 publications: 3 scientists 671–680 publications: 4 scientists 681–686 publications: 3 scientists 687+ publications: 100 scientists
41 publications 687+

This scientist: 112 publications — 19th percentile

19% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 687 publications or more.

Mary Lynn Baeck D-index placement in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Environmental Sciences scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Mary Lynn Baeck sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 12 scientists 31 D-Index: 26 scientists 32 D-Index: 51 scientists 33 D-Index: 88 scientists 34 D-Index: 123 scientists 35 D-Index: 163 scientists 36 D-Index: 206 scientists 37 D-Index: 267 scientists 38 D-Index: 265 scientists 39 D-Index: 275 scientists 40 D-Index: 321 scientists 41 D-Index: 343 scientists 42 D-Index: 305 scientists 43 D-Index: 336 scientists 44 D-Index: 330 scientists 45 D-Index: 348 scientists 46 D-Index: 291 scientists 47 D-Index: 275 scientists 48 D-Index: 272 scientists 49 D-Index: 273 scientists 50 D-Index: 263 scientists 51 D-Index: 232 scientists 52 D-Index: 266 scientists 53 D-Index: 217 scientists 54 D-Index: 199 scientists 55 D-Index: 177 scientists 56 D-Index: 202 scientists 57 D-Index: 204 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 177 scientists 60 D-Index: 166 scientists 61 D-Index: 152 scientists 62 D-Index: 143 scientists 63 D-Index: 150 scientists 64 D-Index: 124 scientists 65 D-Index: 119 scientists 66 D-Index: 120 scientists 67 D-Index: 118 scientists 68 D-Index: 82 scientists 69 D-Index: 98 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 105 scientists 72 D-Index: 74 scientists 73 D-Index: 84 scientists 74 D-Index: 70 scientists 75 D-Index: 67 scientists 76 D-Index: 78 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 59 scientists 79 D-Index: 52 scientists 80 D-Index: 47 scientists 81 D-Index: 38 scientists 82 D-Index: 48 scientists 83 D-Index: 42 scientists 84 D-Index: 42 scientists 85 D-Index: 43 scientists 86 D-Index: 29 scientists 87 D-Index: 37 scientists 88 D-Index: 29 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 34 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 22 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 19 scientists 95 D-Index: 24 scientists 96 D-Index: 21 scientists 97 D-Index: 20 scientists 98 D-Index: 24 scientists 99 D-Index: 17 scientists 100 D-Index: 17 scientists 101 D-Index: 21 scientists 102 D-Index: 25 scientists 103 D-Index: 18 scientists 104 D-Index: 26 scientists 105 D-Index: 19 scientists 106 D-Index: 15 scientists 107 D-Index: 10 scientists 108 D-Index: 13 scientists 109 D-Index: 15 scientists 110 D-Index: 12 scientists 111 D-Index: 8 scientists 112 D-Index: 7 scientists 113 D-Index: 9 scientists 114 D-Index: 6 scientists 115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116 D-Index: 7 scientists 117 D-Index: 8 scientists 118 D-Index: 3 scientists 119 D-Index: 5 scientists 120 D-Index: 7 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 4 scientists 123 D-Index: 8 scientists 124 D-Index: 7 scientists 125+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 125+

This scientist: 49 D-Index — 47th percentile

47% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 125 D-Index or more.

Overview

Mary Lynn Baeck is affiliated with Princeton University in the United States. Their research spans environmental science and earth and planetary sciences, with a particular focus on atmospheric and global planetary change. The scientist's work encompasses applied aspects of environmental engineering, water science and technology, as well as policy and management monitoring.

The main topics covered by their research include meteorological phenomena and simulations, precipitation measurement and analysis, flood risk assessment and management, hydrology and drought analysis, and climate variability and models. Their studies also address hydrology and watershed management as well as tropical and extratropical cyclones research.

Frequent coauthors of Mary Lynn Baeck include James A. Smith, Andrew J. Miller, Zhengzheng Zhou, Daniel B. Wright, and Brianne Smith, reflecting ongoing collaborative work within their research network.

The scientist has published extensively in several key journals, including Water Resources Research, Hydrology and Earth System Sciences, Hydrological Processes, Hydrological Sciences Journal, and the Journal of Hydrometeorology.

  • The impact of the spatiotemporal structure of rainfall on flood frequency over a small urban watershed: an approach coupling stochastic storm transposition and hydrologic modeling (2021, Hydrology and Earth System Sciences)
  • Strange Storms: Rainfall Extremes From the Remnants of Hurricane Ida (2021) in the Northeastern US (2023, Water Resources Research)
  • Assessing urban rainfall-runoff response to stormwater management extent (2021, Hydrological Processes)
  • Rainfall Frequency Analysis Based on Long-Term High-Resolution Radar Rainfall Fields: Spatial Heterogeneities and Temporal Nonstationarities (2024, Water Resources Research)
  • Range Dependence of Polarimetric Radar Estimates for Extreme Flood-Producing Rainfall in Urban Watersheds (2022, Journal of Hydrometeorology)

Best Publications

  • An Intercomparison Study of NEXRAD Precipitation Estimates

    James A. Smith;Dong Jun Seo;Mary Lynn Baeck;Michael D. Hudlow

  • Hydrologic analysis of the Fort Collins, Colorado, flash flood of 1997

    F. L. Ogden;H. O. Sharif;S. U.S. Senarath;James A. Smith

  • On the frequency of heavy rainfall for the Midwest of the United States

    Gabriele Villarini;James A. Smith;Mary Lynn Baeck;Renato Vitolo

  • Catastrophic rainfall from an upslope thunderstorm in the central Appalachians: The Rapidan Storm of June 27, 1995

    James A. Smith;Mary Lynn Baeck;Matthias Steiner;Andrew J. Miller

  • The Regional Hydrology of Extreme Floods in an Urbanizing Drainage Basin

    James A. Smith;Mary Lynn Baeck;Julia E. Morrison;Paula Sturdevant-Rees

  • Rainfall Estimation by the WSR-88D for Heavy Rainfall Events

    Mary Lynn Baeck;James A. Smith

  • Mixture Distributions and the Hydroclimatology of Extreme Rainfall and Flooding in the Eastern United States

    James A. Smith;Gabriele Villarini;Mary Lynn Baeck

  • Examining Flood Frequency Distributions in the Midwest U.S.1

    Gabriele Villarini;James A. Smith;Mary Lynn Baeck;Witold F. Krajewski

  • An evaluation of NEXRAD precipitation estimates in complex terrain

    C. Bryan Young;Brian R. Nelson;A. Allen Bradley;James A. Smith

  • Field studies of the storm event hydrologic response in an urbanizing watershed

    James A. Smith;Mary Lynn Baeck;Katherine L. Meierdiercks;Peter A. Nelson;Peter A. Nelson

  • Analyses of urban drainage network structure and its impact on hydrologic response.

    Katherine L. Meierdiercks;James A. Smith;Mary Lynn Baeck;Andrew J. Miller

  • Characterization of rainfall distribution and flooding associated with U.S. landfalling tropical cyclones: Analyses of Hurricanes Frances, Ivan, and Jeanne (2004)

    Gabriele Villarini;James A. Smith;Mary Lynn Baeck;Timothy Marchok

  • Extreme Rainfall and Flooding from Supercell Thunderstorms

    James A. Smith;Mary Lynn Baeck;Yu Zhang;Charles A. Doswell

  • Radar rainfall estimation for flash flood forecasting in small urban watersheds

    James A. Smith;Mary Lynn Baeck;Katherine L. Meierdiercks;Andrew J. Miller

  • Estimating the frequency of extreme rainfall using weather radar and stochastic storm transposition

    Daniel B. Wright;James A. Smith;Gabriele Villarini;Mary Lynn Baeck

  • Flood frequency analysis using radar rainfall fields and stochastic storm transposition

    Daniel B. Wright;Daniel B. Wright;James A. Smith;Mary Lynn Baeck

  • Catastrophic Rainfall and Flooding in Texas

    James A. Smith;Mary Lynn Baeck;Julia E. Morrison;Paula Sturdevant-Rees

  • Modeling Extreme Rainfall, Winds, and Surge from Hurricane Isabel (2003)

    Ning Lin;James A. Smith;Gabriele Villarini;Timothy P. Marchok

  • Strange Floods: The Upper Tail of Flood Peaks in the United States

    James A. Smith;Alexander A. Cox;Mary Lynn Baeck;Long Yang

  • Analyses of a long-term, high-resolution radar rainfall data set for the Baltimore metropolitan region

    James A. Smith;Mary Lynn Baeck;Gabriele Villarini;Claire Welty

  • Towards better utilization of NEXRAD data in hydrology: an overview of Hydro-NEXRAD

    Witold F. Krajewski;Anton Kruger;James A. Smith;Ramon Lawrence

Frequent Co-Authors

Gabriele Villarini
Gabriele Villarini Princeton University
Witold F. Krajewski
Witold F. Krajewski University of Iowa
Elie Bou-Zeid
Elie Bou-Zeid Princeton University
Paul D Bates
Paul D Bates University of Bristol
Fuqiang Tian
Fuqiang Tian Tsinghua University
Efrat Morin
Efrat Morin Hebrew University of Jerusalem
David C. Goodrich
David C. Goodrich US Department of Agriculture
Fred L. Ogden
Fred L. Ogden National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
Peter R. Jaffé
Peter R. Jaffé Princeton University
Claire F. Gmachl
Claire F. Gmachl Princeton University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a degree in Environmental Sciences opens doors to various career paths, each requiring distinct educational backgrounds. For those considering further specialization, exploring a dsw program can be valuable, especially if you're interested in community-based environmental projects or social aspects of sustainability.

Students looking for flexibility and affordability might consider a low cost online general studies degree. This option allows a broad academic foundation while tailoring electives toward environmental topics, making it ideal for those balancing multiple commitments.

For quick entry into the workforce, some may seek an easy bachelor's degree that aligns with their interests in sustainability, environmental policy, or conservation. However, it's important to ensure the program maintains credibility and relevance.

For technically focused careers, such as becoming a geologist, enrolling in a geologist degree online offers specialized training that can complement environmental science knowledge and enhance job prospects in natural resource management or environmental consulting.

Best Scientists Citing Mary Lynn Baeck

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles