World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Environmental Sciences 48 5484 5257 368 360 132 9965

Martin Wiesmeier publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Martin Wiesmeier between 2008 and 2026, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Martin Wiesmeier published across 19 years, from 2008 to 2026, averaging 8.7 papers a year. Output peaked at 19 publications in 2021. 17 of the 165 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2008 to 2026. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 19. Peak 19 publications in 2021. 2008: 1 publication 2009: 3 publications 2010: 2 publications 2011: 2 publications 2012: 8 publications 2013: 5 publications 2014: 5 publications 2015: 6 publications 2016: 6 publications 2017: 9 publications 2018: 14 publications 2019: 13 publications 2020: 15 publications 2021: 19 publications 2022: 16 publications 2023: 14 publications 2024: 10 publications 2025: 14 publications 2026: 3 publications
2008 2026

165 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Martin Wiesmeier: publications per year, 2008 to 2026
Year Publications
2008 1
2009 3
2010 2
2011 2
2012 8
2013 5
2014 5
2015 6
2016 6
2017 9
2018 14
2019 13
2020 15
2021 19
2022 16
2023 14
2024 10
2025 14
2026 3
Total 165
Download as CSV

Martin Wiesmeier publication distribution in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Environmental Sciences in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Martin Wiesmeier sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 66 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 41–50 to 690+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 617. Most scientists, 617, have 121–130 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 690 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 131–140 publications, is where this scientist sits. 41–50 publications: 21 scientists 51–60 publications: 62 scientists 61–70 publications: 133 scientists 71–80 publications: 257 scientists 81–90 publications: 361 scientists 91–100 publications: 440 scientists 101–110 publications: 492 scientists 111–120 publications: 541 scientists 121–130 publications: 617 scientists 131–140 publications: 544 scientists 141–150 publications: 541 scientists 151–160 publications: 539 scientists 161–170 publications: 444 scientists 171–180 publications: 444 scientists 181–190 publications: 400 scientists 191–200 publications: 377 scientists 201–210 publications: 318 scientists 211–220 publications: 282 scientists 221–230 publications: 263 scientists 231–240 publications: 220 scientists 241–250 publications: 217 scientists 251–260 publications: 180 scientists 261–270 publications: 181 scientists 271–280 publications: 155 scientists 281–290 publications: 130 scientists 291–300 publications: 127 scientists 301–310 publications: 130 scientists 311–320 publications: 85 scientists 321–330 publications: 106 scientists 331–340 publications: 80 scientists 341–350 publications: 83 scientists 351–360 publications: 75 scientists 361–370 publications: 69 scientists 371–380 publications: 52 scientists 381–390 publications: 54 scientists 391–400 publications: 56 scientists 401–410 publications: 44 scientists 411–420 publications: 40 scientists 421–430 publications: 36 scientists 431–440 publications: 25 scientists 441–450 publications: 25 scientists 451–460 publications: 32 scientists 461–470 publications: 29 scientists 471–480 publications: 21 scientists 481–490 publications: 26 scientists 491–500 publications: 26 scientists 501–510 publications: 17 scientists 511–520 publications: 19 scientists 521–530 publications: 15 scientists 531–540 publications: 22 scientists 541–550 publications: 12 scientists 551–560 publications: 15 scientists 561–570 publications: 11 scientists 571–580 publications: 19 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 9 scientists 601–610 publications: 7 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 5 scientists 631–640 publications: 5 scientists 641–650 publications: 6 scientists 651–660 publications: 3 scientists 661–670 publications: 3 scientists 671–680 publications: 4 scientists 681–689 publications: 4 scientists 690+ publications: 100 scientists
41–50 publications 690+

This scientist: 132 publications — 31st percentile

31% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 690 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Environmental Sciences scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,676 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
41–50 21
51–60 62
61–70 133
71–80 257
81–90 361
91–100 440
101–110 492
111–120 541
121–130 617
131–140 544 132
141–150 541
151–160 539
161–170 444
171–180 444
181–190 400
191–200 377
201–210 318
211–220 282
221–230 263
231–240 220
241–250 217
251–260 180
261–270 181
271–280 155
281–290 130
291–300 127
301–310 130
311–320 85
321–330 106
331–340 80
341–350 83
351–360 75
361–370 69
371–380 52
381–390 54
391–400 56
401–410 44
411–420 40
421–430 36
431–440 25
441–450 25
451–460 32
461–470 29
471–480 21
481–490 26
491–500 26
501–510 17
511–520 19
521–530 15
531–540 22
541–550 12
551–560 15
561–570 11
571–580 19
581–590 9
591–600 9
601–610 7
611–620 11
621–630 5
631–640 5
641–650 6
651–660 3
661–670 3
671–680 4
681–689 4
690+ 100
Download as CSV

Martin Wiesmeier D-index placement in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Environmental Sciences scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Martin Wiesmeier sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300
Bar chart with 97 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 126+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 348. Most scientists, 348, have 45 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 126 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 48 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 12 scientists 31 D-Index: 26 scientists 32 D-Index: 51 scientists 33 D-Index: 88 scientists 34 D-Index: 123 scientists 35 D-Index: 163 scientists 36 D-Index: 206 scientists 37 D-Index: 267 scientists 38 D-Index: 265 scientists 39 D-Index: 275 scientists 40 D-Index: 321 scientists 41 D-Index: 343 scientists 42 D-Index: 305 scientists 43 D-Index: 336 scientists 44 D-Index: 330 scientists 45 D-Index: 348 scientists 46 D-Index: 291 scientists 47 D-Index: 275 scientists 48 D-Index: 272 scientists 49 D-Index: 273 scientists 50 D-Index: 263 scientists 51 D-Index: 232 scientists 52 D-Index: 266 scientists 53 D-Index: 217 scientists 54 D-Index: 198 scientists 55 D-Index: 177 scientists 56 D-Index: 202 scientists 57 D-Index: 204 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 177 scientists 60 D-Index: 166 scientists 61 D-Index: 152 scientists 62 D-Index: 143 scientists 63 D-Index: 150 scientists 64 D-Index: 124 scientists 65 D-Index: 119 scientists 66 D-Index: 120 scientists 67 D-Index: 118 scientists 68 D-Index: 82 scientists 69 D-Index: 98 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 105 scientists 72 D-Index: 74 scientists 73 D-Index: 84 scientists 74 D-Index: 70 scientists 75 D-Index: 67 scientists 76 D-Index: 78 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 59 scientists 79 D-Index: 52 scientists 80 D-Index: 47 scientists 81 D-Index: 38 scientists 82 D-Index: 48 scientists 83 D-Index: 42 scientists 84 D-Index: 42 scientists 85 D-Index: 43 scientists 86 D-Index: 29 scientists 87 D-Index: 37 scientists 88 D-Index: 29 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 34 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 22 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 19 scientists 95 D-Index: 24 scientists 96 D-Index: 21 scientists 97 D-Index: 20 scientists 98 D-Index: 24 scientists 99 D-Index: 17 scientists 100 D-Index: 17 scientists 101 D-Index: 21 scientists 102 D-Index: 25 scientists 103 D-Index: 18 scientists 104 D-Index: 26 scientists 105 D-Index: 20 scientists 106 D-Index: 15 scientists 107 D-Index: 10 scientists 108 D-Index: 13 scientists 109 D-Index: 15 scientists 110 D-Index: 12 scientists 111 D-Index: 8 scientists 112 D-Index: 7 scientists 113 D-Index: 9 scientists 114 D-Index: 6 scientists 115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116 D-Index: 7 scientists 117 D-Index: 8 scientists 118 D-Index: 3 scientists 119 D-Index: 5 scientists 120 D-Index: 7 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 4 scientists 123 D-Index: 8 scientists 124 D-Index: 7 scientists 125 D-Index: 9 scientists 126+ D-Index: 92 scientists
30 D-Index 126+

This scientist: 48 D-Index — 44th percentile

44% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 126 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Environmental Sciences scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,676 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 12
31 26
32 51
33 88
34 123
35 163
36 206
37 267
38 265
39 275
40 321
41 343
42 305
43 336
44 330
45 348
46 291
47 275
48 272 48
49 273
50 263
51 232
52 266
53 217
54 198
55 177
56 202
57 204
58 166
59 177
60 166
61 152
62 143
63 150
64 124
65 119
66 120
67 118
68 82
69 98
70 94
71 105
72 74
73 84
74 70
75 67
76 78
77 60
78 59
79 52
80 47
81 38
82 48
83 42
84 42
85 43
86 29
87 37
88 29
89 30
90 34
91 20
92 22
93 17
94 19
95 24
96 21
97 20
98 24
99 17
100 17
101 21
102 25
103 18
104 26
105 20
106 15
107 10
108 13
109 15
110 12
111 8
112 7
113 9
114 6
115 12
116 7
117 8
118 3
119 5
120 7
121 2
122 4
123 8
124 7
125 9
126+ 92
Download as CSV

Overview

Martin Wiesmeier is affiliated with the Technical University of Munich in Germany. Their research primarily focuses on the fields of Agricultural and Biological Sciences as well as Environmental Science, with significant contributions to subfields including Soil Science, Ecology, Environmental Engineering, Environmental Chemistry, and Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics.

The scientist's work addresses several main topics, notably Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics, Peatlands and Wetlands Ecology, Soil Geostatistics and Mapping, Soil and Water Nutrient Dynamics, Soil erosion and sediment transport, Agroforestry and silvopastoral systems, and Agriculture, Soil, Plant Science.

Martin Wiesmeier has published extensively in various scientific venues. Frequent publication outlets include Geoderma, Agriculture Ecosystems & Environment, CATENA, SSRN Electronic Journal, and Remote Sensing.

Recent papers authored or co-authored by Martin Wiesmeier include:

  • Unlocking complex soil systems as carbon sinks: multi-pool management as the key (2023) in Nature Communications
  • Carbon farming: Are soil carbon certificates a suitable tool for climate change mitigation? (2023) in Journal of Environmental Management
  • Soil organic carbon sequestration in temperate agroforestry systems - A meta-analysis (2021) in Agriculture Ecosystems & Environment
  • Reduced tillage in organic farming affects soil organic carbon stocks in temperate Europe (2021) in Soil and Tillage Research
  • The potential of cover crops to increase soil organic carbon storage in German croplands (2022) in Plant and Soil

They have collaborated frequently with several co-authors, including Ingrid Kögel-Knabner, Noelia García-Franco, Michael Dannenmann, Jordi Sardans, and Josep Peñuelas.

Best Publications

  • Soil organic carbon storage as a key function of soils - A review of drivers and indicators at various scales

    Martin Wiesmeier;Livia Urbanski;Eleanor Hobley;Birgit Lang

  • Soil structure as an indicator of soil functions: A review

    E. Rabot;M. Wiesmeier;S. Schlüter;H.-J. Vogel

  • Isolating organic carbon fractions with varying turnover rates in temperate agricultural soils : a comprehensive method comparison

    Christopher Poeplau;Axel Don;Johan Six;Michael Kaiser;Michael Kaiser

  • Digital mapping of soil organic matter stocks using Random Forest modeling in a semi-arid steppe ecosystem

    Martin Wiesmeier;Frauke Barthold;Benjamin Blank;Ingrid Kögel-Knabner

  • Soil organic carbon stocks in southeast Germany (Bavaria) as affected by land use, soil type and sampling depth

    Martin Wiesmeier;Peter Spörlein;Uwe Geuß;Edzard Hangen

  • Unlocking complex soil systems as carbon sinks: multi-pool management as the key

    Unknown

  • Carbon sequestration potential of soils in southeast Germany derived from stable soil organic carbon saturation.

    Martin Wiesmeier;Rico Hübner;Peter Spörlein;Uwe Geuß

  • Amount, distribution and driving factors of soil organic carbon and nitrogen in cropland and grassland soils of southeast Germany (Bavaria)

    Martin Wiesmeier;Rico Hübner;Frauke Barthold;Peter Spörlein

  • Carbon farming: Are soil carbon certificates a suitable tool for climate change mitigation?

    Unknown

  • Projected loss of soil organic carbon in temperate agricultural soils in the 21 st century: effects of climate change and carbon input trends

    Martin Wiesmeier;Christopher Poeplau;Carlos A. Sierra;Harald Maier

  • A systemic approach for modeling soil functions

    Hans-Jörg Vogel;Hans-Jörg Vogel;Stephan Bartke;Katrin Daedlow;Katharina Helming

  • Storage and drivers of organic carbon in forest soils of southeast Germany (Bavaria) - Implications for carbon sequestration

    Martin Wiesmeier;Jörg Prietzel;Frauke Barthold;Peter Spörlein

  • Aggregate stability and physical protection of soil organic carbon in semi-arid steppe soils

    M. Wiesmeier;M. Steffens;C. W. Mueller;A. Kölbl

  • Soil organic carbon sequestration in temperate agroforestry systems: A meta-analysis

    Stefanie Mayer;Martin Wiesmeier;Eva Sakamoto;Rico Hübner

  • Carbon storage capacity of semi‐arid grassland soils and sequestration potentials in northern China

    Martin Wiesmeier;Sam Munro;Frauke Barthold;Markus Steffens

  • Land use effects on organic carbon storage in soils of Bavaria: The importance of soil types

    Martin Wiesmeier;Margit von Lützow;Peter Spörlein;Uwe Geuß

  • The potential of cover crops to increase soil organic carbon storage in German croplands

    Unknown

  • Grazing exclusion—An effective approach for naturally restoring degraded grasslands in Northern China

    Li Wang;Yantai Gan;Martin Wiesmeier;Guiqin Zhao

  • Quantitative Evaluation of Soil Functions: Potential and State

    Hans-Jörg Vogel;Einar Eberhardt;Uwe Franko;Birgit Lang

  • Large soil organic carbon increase due to improved agronomic management in the North China Plain from 1980s to 2010s

    Daorui Han;Martin Wiesmeier;Richard T. Conant;Anna Kühnel

  • Estimation of total organic carbon storage and its driving factors in soils of Bavaria (southeast Germany)

    Martin Wiesmeier;Frauke Barthold;Peter Spörlein;Uwe Geuß

  • Degradation and small-scale spatial homogenization of topsoils in intensively-grazed steppes of Northern China

    Martin Wiesmeier;Markus Steffens;Angelika Kölbl;Ingrid Kögel-Knabner

  • Land use and climate control the spatial distribution of soil types in the grasslands of Inner Mongolia

    F.K. Barthold;M. Wiesmeier;L. Breuer;H.-G. Frede

Frequent Co-Authors

Ingrid Kögel-Knabner
Ingrid Kögel-Knabner Technical University of Munich
Hans-Jörg Vogel
Hans-Jörg Vogel Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research
Michael Dannenmann
Michael Dannenmann Karlsruhe Institute of Technology
Ralf Kiese
Ralf Kiese Karlsruhe Institute of Technology
Katharina Helming
Katharina Helming Leibniz Centre for Agricultural Landscape Research
Bas van Wesemael
Bas van Wesemael Université Catholique de Louvain
Jordi Sardans
Jordi Sardans Spanish National Research Council
Carsten W. Mueller
Carsten W. Mueller University of Copenhagen
Josep Peñuelas
Josep Peñuelas Centre for Ecological Research and Forestry Applications (CREAF), CSIC
María Martínez-Mena
María Martínez-Mena Spanish National Research Council

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Environmental Sciences opens doors to a variety of multidisciplinary career paths that often intersect with social sciences and policy-making. For those interested in the social aspects of environmental issues, pursuing a bachelors degree in sociology online can provide valuable insights into human behavior and societal impacts on the environment.

Advanced degrees are another avenue to deepen expertise and leadership potential. Many professionals are turning to online doctoral programs without dissertation, which offer more flexibility and faster completion times for busy practitioners.

Those holding an Education Specialist (EdS) degree might consider transitioning to an eds to edd program to enhance their qualifications and impact in environmental education and policy roles. Additionally, for individuals focused on social work within environmental contexts, exploring the cheapest online dsw programs can be a strategic and affordable step.

Exploring these related online degrees can help students and professionals tailor their education to emerging environmental challenges and career goals.

Best Scientists Citing Martin Wiesmeier

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles