World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Environmental Sciences

D-Index
48
Citations
9965
World Ranking
5482
National Ranking
368

Martin Wiesmeier publication distribution in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Environmental Sciences in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Martin Wiesmeier sits on this spectrum.

41–50 publications: 21 scientists 51–60 publications: 62 scientists 61–70 publications: 133 scientists 71–80 publications: 257 scientists 81–90 publications: 361 scientists 91–100 publications: 440 scientists 101–110 publications: 492 scientists 111–120 publications: 541 scientists 121–130 publications: 617 scientists 131–140 publications: 544 scientists 141–150 publications: 541 scientists 151–160 publications: 539 scientists 161–170 publications: 444 scientists 171–180 publications: 444 scientists 181–190 publications: 400 scientists 191–200 publications: 377 scientists 201–210 publications: 318 scientists 211–220 publications: 283 scientists 221–230 publications: 263 scientists 231–240 publications: 220 scientists 241–250 publications: 217 scientists 251–260 publications: 180 scientists 261–270 publications: 181 scientists 271–280 publications: 155 scientists 281–290 publications: 130 scientists 291–300 publications: 127 scientists 301–310 publications: 130 scientists 311–320 publications: 85 scientists 321–330 publications: 106 scientists 331–340 publications: 80 scientists 341–350 publications: 83 scientists 351–360 publications: 75 scientists 361–370 publications: 69 scientists 371–380 publications: 52 scientists 381–390 publications: 54 scientists 391–400 publications: 56 scientists 401–410 publications: 44 scientists 411–420 publications: 40 scientists 421–430 publications: 36 scientists 431–440 publications: 25 scientists 441–450 publications: 25 scientists 451–460 publications: 32 scientists 461–470 publications: 29 scientists 471–480 publications: 21 scientists 481–490 publications: 26 scientists 491–500 publications: 25 scientists 501–510 publications: 17 scientists 511–520 publications: 18 scientists 521–530 publications: 15 scientists 531–540 publications: 22 scientists 541–550 publications: 12 scientists 551–560 publications: 15 scientists 561–570 publications: 11 scientists 571–580 publications: 19 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 9 scientists 601–610 publications: 7 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 5 scientists 631–640 publications: 5 scientists 641–650 publications: 6 scientists 651–660 publications: 3 scientists 661–670 publications: 3 scientists 671–680 publications: 4 scientists 681–686 publications: 3 scientists 687+ publications: 100 scientists
41 publications 687+

This scientist: 132 publications — 31st percentile

31% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 687 publications or more.

Martin Wiesmeier D-index placement in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Environmental Sciences scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Martin Wiesmeier sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 12 scientists 31 D-Index: 26 scientists 32 D-Index: 51 scientists 33 D-Index: 88 scientists 34 D-Index: 123 scientists 35 D-Index: 163 scientists 36 D-Index: 206 scientists 37 D-Index: 267 scientists 38 D-Index: 265 scientists 39 D-Index: 275 scientists 40 D-Index: 321 scientists 41 D-Index: 343 scientists 42 D-Index: 305 scientists 43 D-Index: 336 scientists 44 D-Index: 330 scientists 45 D-Index: 348 scientists 46 D-Index: 291 scientists 47 D-Index: 275 scientists 48 D-Index: 272 scientists 49 D-Index: 273 scientists 50 D-Index: 263 scientists 51 D-Index: 232 scientists 52 D-Index: 266 scientists 53 D-Index: 217 scientists 54 D-Index: 199 scientists 55 D-Index: 177 scientists 56 D-Index: 202 scientists 57 D-Index: 204 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 177 scientists 60 D-Index: 166 scientists 61 D-Index: 152 scientists 62 D-Index: 143 scientists 63 D-Index: 150 scientists 64 D-Index: 124 scientists 65 D-Index: 119 scientists 66 D-Index: 120 scientists 67 D-Index: 118 scientists 68 D-Index: 82 scientists 69 D-Index: 98 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 105 scientists 72 D-Index: 74 scientists 73 D-Index: 84 scientists 74 D-Index: 70 scientists 75 D-Index: 67 scientists 76 D-Index: 78 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 59 scientists 79 D-Index: 52 scientists 80 D-Index: 47 scientists 81 D-Index: 38 scientists 82 D-Index: 48 scientists 83 D-Index: 42 scientists 84 D-Index: 42 scientists 85 D-Index: 43 scientists 86 D-Index: 29 scientists 87 D-Index: 37 scientists 88 D-Index: 29 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 34 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 22 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 19 scientists 95 D-Index: 24 scientists 96 D-Index: 21 scientists 97 D-Index: 20 scientists 98 D-Index: 24 scientists 99 D-Index: 17 scientists 100 D-Index: 17 scientists 101 D-Index: 21 scientists 102 D-Index: 25 scientists 103 D-Index: 18 scientists 104 D-Index: 26 scientists 105 D-Index: 19 scientists 106 D-Index: 15 scientists 107 D-Index: 10 scientists 108 D-Index: 13 scientists 109 D-Index: 15 scientists 110 D-Index: 12 scientists 111 D-Index: 8 scientists 112 D-Index: 7 scientists 113 D-Index: 9 scientists 114 D-Index: 6 scientists 115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116 D-Index: 7 scientists 117 D-Index: 8 scientists 118 D-Index: 3 scientists 119 D-Index: 5 scientists 120 D-Index: 7 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 4 scientists 123 D-Index: 8 scientists 124 D-Index: 7 scientists 125+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 125+

This scientist: 48 D-Index — 44th percentile

44% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 125 D-Index or more.

Overview

Martin Wiesmeier is affiliated with the Technical University of Munich in Germany. Their research primarily focuses on the fields of Agricultural and Biological Sciences as well as Environmental Science, with significant contributions to subfields including Soil Science, Ecology, Environmental Engineering, Environmental Chemistry, and Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics.

The scientist's work addresses several main topics, notably Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics, Peatlands and Wetlands Ecology, Soil Geostatistics and Mapping, Soil and Water Nutrient Dynamics, Soil erosion and sediment transport, Agroforestry and silvopastoral systems, and Agriculture, Soil, Plant Science.

Martin Wiesmeier has published extensively in various scientific venues. Frequent publication outlets include Geoderma, Agriculture Ecosystems & Environment, CATENA, SSRN Electronic Journal, and Remote Sensing.

Recent papers authored or co-authored by Martin Wiesmeier include:

  • Unlocking complex soil systems as carbon sinks: multi-pool management as the key (2023) in Nature Communications
  • Carbon farming: Are soil carbon certificates a suitable tool for climate change mitigation? (2023) in Journal of Environmental Management
  • Soil organic carbon sequestration in temperate agroforestry systems - A meta-analysis (2021) in Agriculture Ecosystems & Environment
  • Reduced tillage in organic farming affects soil organic carbon stocks in temperate Europe (2021) in Soil and Tillage Research
  • The potential of cover crops to increase soil organic carbon storage in German croplands (2022) in Plant and Soil

They have collaborated frequently with several co-authors, including Ingrid Kögel-Knabner, Noelia García-Franco, Michael Dannenmann, Jordi Sardans, and Josep Peñuelas.

Best Publications

  • Soil organic carbon storage as a key function of soils - A review of drivers and indicators at various scales

    Martin Wiesmeier;Livia Urbanski;Eleanor Hobley;Birgit Lang

  • Soil structure as an indicator of soil functions: A review

    E. Rabot;M. Wiesmeier;S. Schlüter;H.-J. Vogel

  • Isolating organic carbon fractions with varying turnover rates in temperate agricultural soils : a comprehensive method comparison

    Christopher Poeplau;Axel Don;Johan Six;Michael Kaiser;Michael Kaiser

  • Digital mapping of soil organic matter stocks using Random Forest modeling in a semi-arid steppe ecosystem

    Martin Wiesmeier;Frauke Barthold;Benjamin Blank;Ingrid Kögel-Knabner

  • Soil organic carbon stocks in southeast Germany (Bavaria) as affected by land use, soil type and sampling depth

    Martin Wiesmeier;Peter Spörlein;Uwe Geuß;Edzard Hangen

  • Unlocking complex soil systems as carbon sinks: multi-pool management as the key

    Unknown

  • Carbon sequestration potential of soils in southeast Germany derived from stable soil organic carbon saturation.

    Martin Wiesmeier;Rico Hübner;Peter Spörlein;Uwe Geuß

  • Amount, distribution and driving factors of soil organic carbon and nitrogen in cropland and grassland soils of southeast Germany (Bavaria)

    Martin Wiesmeier;Rico Hübner;Frauke Barthold;Peter Spörlein

  • Carbon farming: Are soil carbon certificates a suitable tool for climate change mitigation?

    Unknown

  • Projected loss of soil organic carbon in temperate agricultural soils in the 21 st century: effects of climate change and carbon input trends

    Martin Wiesmeier;Christopher Poeplau;Carlos A. Sierra;Harald Maier

  • A systemic approach for modeling soil functions

    Hans-Jörg Vogel;Hans-Jörg Vogel;Stephan Bartke;Katrin Daedlow;Katharina Helming

  • Storage and drivers of organic carbon in forest soils of southeast Germany (Bavaria) - Implications for carbon sequestration

    Martin Wiesmeier;Jörg Prietzel;Frauke Barthold;Peter Spörlein

  • Aggregate stability and physical protection of soil organic carbon in semi-arid steppe soils

    M. Wiesmeier;M. Steffens;C. W. Mueller;A. Kölbl

  • Soil organic carbon sequestration in temperate agroforestry systems: A meta-analysis

    Stefanie Mayer;Martin Wiesmeier;Eva Sakamoto;Rico Hübner

  • Carbon storage capacity of semi‐arid grassland soils and sequestration potentials in northern China

    Martin Wiesmeier;Sam Munro;Frauke Barthold;Markus Steffens

  • Land use effects on organic carbon storage in soils of Bavaria: The importance of soil types

    Martin Wiesmeier;Margit von Lützow;Peter Spörlein;Uwe Geuß

  • The potential of cover crops to increase soil organic carbon storage in German croplands

    Unknown

  • Grazing exclusion—An effective approach for naturally restoring degraded grasslands in Northern China

    Li Wang;Yantai Gan;Martin Wiesmeier;Guiqin Zhao

  • Quantitative Evaluation of Soil Functions: Potential and State

    Hans-Jörg Vogel;Einar Eberhardt;Uwe Franko;Birgit Lang

  • Large soil organic carbon increase due to improved agronomic management in the North China Plain from 1980s to 2010s

    Daorui Han;Martin Wiesmeier;Richard T. Conant;Anna Kühnel

  • Estimation of total organic carbon storage and its driving factors in soils of Bavaria (southeast Germany)

    Martin Wiesmeier;Frauke Barthold;Peter Spörlein;Uwe Geuß

  • Degradation and small-scale spatial homogenization of topsoils in intensively-grazed steppes of Northern China

    Martin Wiesmeier;Markus Steffens;Angelika Kölbl;Ingrid Kögel-Knabner

  • Land use and climate control the spatial distribution of soil types in the grasslands of Inner Mongolia

    F.K. Barthold;M. Wiesmeier;L. Breuer;H.-G. Frede

Frequent Co-Authors

Ingrid Kögel-Knabner
Ingrid Kögel-Knabner Technical University of Munich
Hans-Jörg Vogel
Hans-Jörg Vogel Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research
Michael Dannenmann
Michael Dannenmann Karlsruhe Institute of Technology
Ralf Kiese
Ralf Kiese Karlsruhe Institute of Technology
Katharina Helming
Katharina Helming Leibniz Centre for Agricultural Landscape Research
Bas van Wesemael
Bas van Wesemael Université Catholique de Louvain
Jordi Sardans
Jordi Sardans Spanish National Research Council
Carsten W. Mueller
Carsten W. Mueller University of Copenhagen
Josep Peñuelas
Josep Peñuelas Centre for Ecological Research and Forestry Applications (CREAF), CSIC
María Martínez-Mena
María Martínez-Mena Spanish National Research Council

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Environmental Sciences opens doors to a variety of multidisciplinary career paths that often intersect with social sciences and policy-making. For those interested in the social aspects of environmental issues, pursuing a bachelors degree in sociology online can provide valuable insights into human behavior and societal impacts on the environment.

Advanced degrees are another avenue to deepen expertise and leadership potential. Many professionals are turning to online doctoral programs without dissertation, which offer more flexibility and faster completion times for busy practitioners.

Those holding an Education Specialist (EdS) degree might consider transitioning to an eds to edd program to enhance their qualifications and impact in environmental education and policy roles. Additionally, for individuals focused on social work within environmental contexts, exploring the cheapest online dsw programs can be a strategic and affordable step.

Exploring these related online degrees can help students and professionals tailor their education to emerging environmental challenges and career goals.

Best Scientists Citing Martin Wiesmeier

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles